Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Migraine | Research

Synaptic alterations in visual cortex reshape contrast-dependent gamma oscillations and inhibition-excitation ratio in a genetic mouse model of migraine

Authors: Nicolò Meneghetti, Chiara Cerri, Eleonora Vannini, Elena Tantillo, Angelita Tottene, Daniela Pietrobon, Matteo Caleo, Alberto Mazzoni

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2022

Abstract

Background

Migraine affects a significant fraction of the world population, yet its etiology is not completely understood. In vitro results highlighted thalamocortical and intra-cortical glutamatergic synaptic gain-of-function associated with a monogenic form of migraine (familial-hemiplegic-migraine-type-1: FHM1). However, how these alterations reverberate on cortical activity remains unclear. As altered responsivity to visual stimuli and abnormal processing of visual sensory information are common hallmarks of migraine, herein we investigated the effects of FHM1-driven synaptic alterations in the visual cortex of awake mice.

Methods

We recorded extracellular field potentials from the primary visual cortex (V1) of head-fixed awake FHM1 knock-in (n = 12) and wild type (n = 12) mice in response to square-wave gratings with different visual contrasts. Additionally, we reproduced in silico the obtained experimental results with a novel spiking neurons network model of mouse V1, by implementing in the model both the synaptic alterations characterizing the FHM1 genetic mouse model adopted.

Results

FHM1 mice displayed similar amplitude but slower temporal evolution of visual evoked potentials. Visual contrast stimuli induced a lower increase of multi-unit activity in FHM1 mice, while the amount of information content about contrast level remained, however, similar to WT.

Spectral analysis of the local field potentials revealed an increase in the β/low γ range of WT mice following the abrupt reversal of contrast gratings. Such frequency range transitioned to the high γ range in FHM1 mice. Despite this change in the encoding channel, these oscillations preserved the amount of information conveyed about visual contrast. The computational model showed how these network effects may arise from a combination of changes in thalamocortical and intra-cortical synaptic transmission, with the former inducing a lower cortical activity and the latter inducing the higher frequencies ɣ oscillations.

Conclusions

Contrast-driven ɣ modulation in V1 activity occurs at a much higher frequency in FHM1. This is likely to play a role in the altered processing of visual information. Computational studies suggest that this shift is specifically due to enhanced cortical excitatory transmission. Our network model can help to shed light on the relationship between cellular and network levels of migraine neural alterations.

Graphical Abstract

Available only for authorised users

Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Linde M, Steiner TJ (2022) The global prevalence of headache: an update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J Headache Pain 23(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S (2017) Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97(2):553–622. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2013) Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol 75(1):365–391. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183717

Battista J, Badcock DR, McKendrick AM (2011) Migraine increases Centre-surround suppression for drifting visual stimuli. PLoS One 6(4):e18211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018211CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nguyen BN, McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ (2016) Abnormal inhibition-excitation imbalance in migraine. Cephalalgia 36(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415576725CrossRefPubMed

Vecchia D, Pietrobon D (2012) Migraine: a disorder of brain excitatory–inhibitory balance? Trends Neurosci 35(8):507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.007CrossRefPubMed

Aurora S, Wilkinson F (2007) The brain is Hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia 27(12):1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01502.xCrossRefPubMed

Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J (2007) Is the cerebral cortex Hyperexcitable or Hyperresponsive in migraine? Cephalalgia 27(12):1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01500.xCrossRefPubMed

Cosentino G, Fierro B, Brighina F (2014) From different neurophysiological methods to conflicting pathophysiological views in migraine: a critical review of literature. Clin Neurophysiol 125(9):1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.005CrossRefPubMed

10.

Pietrobon D, Brennan KC (2019) Genetic mouse models of migraine. J Headache Pain 20(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1029-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Haan J, Kors EE, Vanmolkot KRJ, Maagdenberg AMJM, Frants RR, Ferrari MD (2005) Migraine genetics: an update. Curr Sci Inc 9(3):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-005-0065-9CrossRef

12.

van den Maagdenberg AMJM et al (2004) A Cacna1a Knockin migraine mouse model with increased susceptibility to cortical spreading depression. Neuron 41(5):701–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00085-6CrossRefPubMed

13.

Pietrobon D (2013) Calcium channels and migraine. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1828(7):1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.012CrossRef

14.

Tottene A et al (2002) Familial hemiplegic migraine mutations increase Ca2+ influx through single human CaV2.1 channels and decrease maximal CaV2.1 current density in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(20):13284–13289. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192242399CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Tottene A et al (2009) Enhanced excitatory transmission at cortical synapses as the basis for facilitated spreading depression in CaV2.1 Knockin migraine mice. Neuron 61(5):762–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.027CrossRefPubMed

16.

Tottene A, Favero M, Pietrobon D (2019) Enhanced Thalamocortical Synaptic Transmission and Dysregulation of the Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance at the Thalamocortical Feedforward Inhibitory Microcircuit in a Genetic Mouse Model of Migraine. J Neurosci 39(49):9841–9851. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1840-19.2019

17.

Vecchia D, Tottene A, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Pietrobon D (2014) Mechanism underlying unaltered cortical inhibitory synaptic transmission in contrast with enhanced excitatory transmission in CaV2.1 knockin migraine mice. Neurobiol Dis 69:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.05.035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Meneghetti N, Cerri C, Tantillo E, Vannini E, Caleo M, Mazzoni A (2021) Narrow and broad gamma bands process complementary visual information in mouse primary visual cortex. eNeuro ENEURO.0106–21.2021. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0106-21.2021

19.

Ko H, Hofer SB, Pichler B, Buchanan KA, Sjöström PJ, Mrsic-Flogel TD (2011) Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks. Nature 473(7345):87–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09880CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Tantillo E et al (2020) Differential roles of pyramidal and fast-spiking, GABAergic neurons in the control of glioma cell proliferation. Neurobiol Dis 141:104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104942CrossRefPubMed

21.

Bruyns-Haylett M et al (2017) The neurogenesis of P1 and N1: a concurrent EEG/LFP study. NeuroImage 146:575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.034CrossRefPubMed

22.

Freeman JA, Nicholson C (1975) Experimental optimization of current source-density technique for anuran cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 38(2):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.369CrossRefPubMed

23.

Haberly LB, Shepherd GM (1973) Current-density analysis of summed evoked potentials in opossum prepyriform cortex. J Neurophysiol 36(4):789–802. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1973.36.4.789CrossRefPubMed

24.

Pettersen KH, Devor A, Ulbert I, Dale AM, Einevoll GT (2006) Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conductivity discontinuities. J Neurosci Methods 154(1–2):116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.005CrossRefPubMed

25.

Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.xCrossRef

26.

Magri C, Whittingstall K, Singh V, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2009) A toolbox for the fast information analysis of multiple-site LFP, EEG and spike train recordings. BMC Neurosci 10(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Panzeri S, Treves A (1996) Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Netw Comput Neural Syst 7(1):87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954898X.1996.11978656CrossRef

28.

Cohen MX (2014) Analyzing neural time series data: theory and practice. The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRef

29.

Cavallari S, Panzeri S, Mazzoni A (2014) Comparison of the dynamics of neural interactions between current-based and conductance-based integrate-and-fire recurrent networks. Front Neural Circuits 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00012

30.

Mazzoni A, Panzeri S, Logothetis NK, Brunel N (2008) Encoding of naturalistic stimuli by local field potential spectra in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. PLoS Comput Biol 4(12):e1000239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Mazzoni A, Whittingstall K, Brunel N, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2010) Understanding the relationships between spike rate and delta/gamma frequency bands of LFPs and EEGs using a local cortical network model. NeuroImage 52(3):956–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.040CrossRefPubMed

32.

Mazzoni A, Brunel N, Cavallari S, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2011) Cortical dynamics during naturalistic sensory stimulations: experiments and models. J Physiol-Paris 105(1–3):2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.07.014CrossRefPubMed

33.

Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to theoretical neurobiology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623202CrossRef

34.

Braitenberg V, Schüz A (1991) Anatomy of the cortex, 18. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02728-8

35.

Holmgren C, Harkany T, Svennenfors B, Zilberter Y (2003) Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex. J Physiol 551(1):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044784CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Sjöström PJ, Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB (2001) Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron 32(6):1149–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00542-6CrossRefPubMed

37.

Brunel N, Wang X-J (2003) What determines the frequency of fast network oscillations with irregular neural discharges? I. synaptic dynamics and excitation-inhibition balance. J Neurophysiol 90(1):415–430. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01095.2002CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bartos M, Vida I, Frotscher M, Geiger JRP, Jonas P (2001) Rapid signaling at inhibitory synapses in a dentate gyrus interneuron network. J Neurosci 21(8):2687–2698. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02687.2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Bartos M et al (2002) Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(20):13222–13227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192233099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Gupta A (2000) Organizing principles for a diversity of GABAergic interneurons and synapses in the neocortex. Science 287(5451):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.273CrossRefPubMed

41.

Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Roth A, Sakmann B (1997) Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. J Physiol 500(2):409–440. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Angulo MC, Rossier J, Audinat E (1999) Postsynaptic glutamate receptors and integrative properties of fast-spiking interneurons in the rat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 82(3):1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1295CrossRefPubMed

43.

Kraushaar U, Jonas P (2000) Efficacy and stability of quantal GABA release at a hippocampal interneuron-principal neuron synapse. J Neurosci 20(15):5594–5607CrossRef

44.

Xiang Z, Huguenard JR, Prince DA (1998) GABA _A receptor-mediated currents in interneurons and pyramidal cells of rat visual cortex. J Physiol 506(3):715–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.715bv.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Zhou F-M, Hablitz JJ (1998) AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs in rat neocortical layer II/III interneurons have rapid kinetics. Brain Res 780(1):166–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01311-5CrossRefPubMed

46.

Saleem AB et al (2017) Subcortical source and modulation of the narrowband gamma oscillation in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 93(2):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Mazzoni A, Lindén H, Cuntz H, Lansner A, Panzeri S, Einevoll GT (2015) Computing the local field potential (LFP) from integrate-and-fire network models. PLoS Comput Biol 11(12):e1004584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C, Neltner L (1998) On numerical simulations of integrate-and-fire neural networks. Neural Comput 10(2):467–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017845CrossRefPubMed

49.

Shelley MJ, Tao L (2001) Efficient and accurate time-stepping schemes for integrate-and-fire neuronal networks. J Comput Neurosci 11(2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012885314187CrossRefPubMed

50.

Goodman D (2008) Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in Python. Front Neuroinform 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008

51.

Stimberg M, Brette R, Goodman DF (2019) Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator. eLife 8:e47314. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47314

52.

Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne Farmer J (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 58(1–4):77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-SCrossRef

53.

Ji X, Zingg B, Mesik L, Xiao Z, Zhang LI, Tao HW (2016) Thalamocortical innervation pattern in mouse auditory and visual cortex: laminar and cell-type specificity. Cereb Cortex 26(6):2612–2625. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv099CrossRefPubMed

54.

Di Russo F, Martínez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA (2002) Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential: cortical sources of VEP. Hum Brain Mapp 15(2):95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10010CrossRefPubMed

55.

Liao W, Gandal MJ, Ehrlichman RS, Siegel SJ, Carlson GC (2012) MeCP2+/− mouse model of RTT reproduces auditory phenotypes associated with Rett syndrome and replicate select EEG endophenotypes of autism spectrum disorder. Neurobiol Dis 46(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2011.12.048CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Ridder WH, Nusinowitz S (2006) The visual evoked potential in the mouse—origins and response characteristics. Vis Res 46(6–7):902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.006CrossRefPubMed

57.

Timme NM, C. Lapish (2018) A Tutorial for Information Theory in Neuroscience eNeuro 5:3. ENEURO.0052–18.2018. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0052-18.2018

58.

Adesnik H (2017) Synaptic mechanisms of feature coding in the visual cortex of awake mice. Neuron 95(5):1147–1159.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Brennan KC, Pietrobon D (2018) A systems neuroscience approach to migraine. Neuron 97(5):1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.029CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Younis S, Hougaard A, Noseda R, Ashina M (2019) Current understanding of thalamic structure and function in migraine. Cephalalgia 39(13):1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418791595CrossRefPubMed

61.

Gielen S, Krupa M, Zeitler M (2010) Gamma oscillations as a mechanism for selective information transmission. Biol Cybern 103(2):151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0390-xCrossRefPubMed

62.

Harris KD, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Dragoi G, Buzsáki G (2003) Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus. Nature 424(6948):552–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01834CrossRefPubMed

63.

Vick M, Womelsdorf T, Fries, Pascal (2013) Gamma-Band Synchronization and Information Transmission. in Principles of Neural Coding. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 449–462

64.

Pritchett DL, Siegle JH, Deister CA, Moore CI (2015) For things needing your attention: the role of neocortical gamma in sensory perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 31:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.004CrossRefPubMed

65.

Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, Palmer JE, Koehler PJ, Vredeveld J-W (2001) Visual cortex excitability in migraine with and without Aura. Headache 41(6):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006565.xCrossRefPubMed

66.

Puledda F, Ffytche D, O’Daly O, Goadsby PJ (2019) Imaging the visual network in the migraine Spectrum. Front Neurol 10:1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01325CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2014) Chaos and commotion in the wake of cortical spreading depression and spreading depolarizations. Nat Rev Neurosci 15(6):379–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3770CrossRefPubMed

68.

Parker PD et al (2021) Non-canonical glutamate signaling in a genetic model of migraine with aura. Neuron 109(4):611–628.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Crivellaro G et al (2021) Specific activation of GluN1-N2B NMDA receptors underlies facilitation of cortical spreading depression in a genetic mouse model of migraine with reduced astrocytic glutamate clearance. Neurobiol Dis 156:105419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105419CrossRefPubMed

70.

Henrie JA, Shapley R (2005) LFP power spectra in V1 cortex: the graded effect of stimulus contrast. J Neurophysiol 94(1):479–490. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00919.2004CrossRefPubMed

71.

Brunel N, Hakim V (1999) Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput 11(7):1621–1671. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016179CrossRefPubMed

72.

Perenboom MJL, Schenke M, Ferrari MD, Terwindt GM, den Maagdenberg AMJM, Tolner EA (2021) Responsivity to light in familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 mutant mice reveals frequency-dependent enhancement of visual network excitability. Eur J Neurosci 53(5):1672–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15041CrossRefPubMed

73.

Han C, Shapley R, Xing D (2021) Gamma rhythms in the visual cortex: functions and mechanisms. Cogn Neurodyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-021-09767-x

74.

Niell CM, Stryker MP (2010) Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65(4):472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Belitski A et al (2008) Low-frequency local field potentials and spikes in primary visual cortex convey independent visual information. J Neurosci 28(22):5696–5709. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

76.

Pietrobon D (2018) Ion channels in migraine disorders. Curr Opin Physiol 2:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2018.02.001CrossRef

77.

Tremblay R, Lee S, Rudy B (2016) GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 91(2):260–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

78.

Marchionni I, Pilati N, Forli A, Sessolo M, Tottene A, Pietrobon D (2022) Enhanced Feedback Inhibition Due to Increased Recruitment of Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons and Enhanced Cortical Recurrent Excitation in a Genetic Mouse Model of Migraine. J Neurosci JN-RM-0228-22. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0228-22.2022

79.

Billeh YN et al. (2020) Systematic Integration of Structural and Functional Data into Multi-scale Models of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex. Neuron S0896627320300672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.040

80.

Campagnola L et al. (2022) Local connectivity and synaptic dynamics in mouse and human neocortex. Science 375(6585):eabj5861. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5861

Title: Synaptic alterations in visual cortex reshape contrast-dependent gamma oscillations and inhibition-excitation ratio in a genetic mouse model of migraine
Authors: Nicolò Meneghetti
Chiara Cerri
Eleonora Vannini
Elena Tantillo
Angelita Tottene
Daniela Pietrobon
Matteo Caleo
Alberto Mazzoni
Publication date: 01-12-2022
Publisher: Springer Milan
Keyword: Migraine
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01495-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Synaptic alterations in visual cortex reshape contrast-dependent gamma oscillations and inhibition-excitation ratio in a genetic mouse model of migraine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Altered effective connectivity in migraine patients during emotional stimuli: a multi-frequency magnetoencephalography study

Early onset of efficacy with fremanezumab in patients with episodic and chronic migraine: subanalysis of two phase 2b/3 trials in Japanese and Korean patients

Gradually shifting clinical phenomics in migraine spectrum: a cross-sectional, multicenter study of 5438 patients

Visual stimulation and frequency of focal neurological symptoms engage distinctive neurocognitive resources in migraine with aura patients: a study of resting-state functional networks

Swiss QUality of life and healthcare impact Assessment in a Real-world Erenumab treated migraine population (SQUARE study): interim results

Correction: Applying a biopsychosocial model to migraine: rationale and clinical implications