Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Migraine | Research

Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial

Authors: Roberto De Icco, Gloria Vaghi, Marta Allena, Natascia Ghiotto, Elena Guaschino, Daniele Martinelli, Lara Ahmad, Michele Corrado, Federico Bighiani, Federica Tanganelli, Sara Bottiroli, Francescantonio Cammarota, Grazia Sances, Cristina Tassorelli

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Italy, monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway are subsidized for the preventive treatment of high frequency and chronic migraine (CM) in patients with a MIgraine Disability ASsessment (MIDAS) score ≥ 11. Eligibility to treatment continuation requires a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at three months (T3). In this study, we evaluate whether a ≥ 50% MIDAS score reduction at T3 is a reliable predictor of response to one-year erenumab treatment.

Methods

In this prospective, open-label, real-world study, 77 CM patients were treated with erenumab 70–140 mg s.c. every 28 days for one year (T13). We collected the following variables: monthly migraine days (MMDs), monthly headache days (MHDs), days of acute medication intake, MIDAS, HIT-6, anxiety, depression, quality of life and allodynia. Response to erenumab was evaluated as: i) average reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment period; and ii) percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs during the last 4 weeks after the 13th injection (RespondersT13).

Results

Erenumab induced a sustained reduction in MMDs, MHDs and intake of acute medications across the 12-month treatment period, with 64.9% of patients qualifying as RespondersT13. At T3, 55.8% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score (MIDASRes) and 55.4% of patients reported a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs (MMDRes). MIDASRes and MMDRes patients showed a more pronounced reduction in MMDs during the 1-year treatment as compared to NON-MIDASRes (MIDASRes: T0: 23.5 ± 4.9 vs. T13: 7.7 ± 6.2; NON- MIDASRes: T0: 21.6 ± 5.4 vs. T13: 11.3 ± 8.8, p = 0.045) and NON-MMDRes (MMDRes: T0: 23.0 ± 4.5 vs. T13: 6.6 ± 4.8; NON-MMDRes: T0: 22.3 ± 6.0 vs. T13: 12.7 ± 9.2, p < 0.001) groups. The percentage of RespondersT13 did not differ between MIDASRes (74.4%) and NON-MIDASRes (52.9%) patients (p = 0.058), while the percentage of RespondersT13 was higher in the MMDRes group (83.3%) when compared to NON-MMDRes (42.9%) (p = 0.001). MMDRes predicted the long-term outcome according to a multivariate analysis (Exp(B) = 7.128; p = 0.001), while MIDASRes did not. Treatment discontinuation based on MIDASRes would have early excluded 36.0% of RespondersT13. Discontinuation based on “either MIDASRes or MMDRes” would have excluded a lower percentage (16%) of RespondersT13.

Conclusion

MIDASRes only partly reflects the 12-month outcome of erenumab treatment in CM, as it excludes more than one third of responders. A criterion based on the alternative consideration of ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score or MMDs in the first three months of treatment represents a more precise and inclusive option.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered at www.​clinicaltrials.​gov (NCT05442008).

Graphical Abstract

CGRP: Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide. MIDAS: MIgraine Disability Assessment. MMDs: monthly migraine days. MIDASRes: Patients with a MIDAS score reduction of at least 50% at T3. MMDRes: Patients with a MMDs reduction of at least 50% at T3. ResponderT13: Patients with a MMDs reduction from baseline of at least 50% in the last 4 weeks of observation period (after 13 erenumab administrations). T0: First erenumab administration. T3, T6, T9, T12: Follow-up visits at three, six, nine, and twelve months after first erenumab administration. T13: Last visit of the protocol.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P (2019) Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: a new era in migraine therapy. Lancet 394:1765–1774CrossRef Charles A, Pozo-Rosich P (2019) Targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide: a new era in migraine therapy. Lancet 394:1765–1774CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bottiroli S, De Icco R, Vaghi G et al (2021) Psychological predictors of negative treatment outcome with Erenumab in chronic migraine : data from an open label long-term prospective study. J. Headache Pain 4:1–10 Bottiroli S, De Icco R, Vaghi G et al (2021) Psychological predictors of negative treatment outcome with Erenumab in chronic migraine : data from an open label long-term prospective study. J. Headache Pain 4:1–10
10.
go back to reference Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Cevoli S, et al (2021) Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study. Headache 61:1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14194 Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Cevoli S, et al (2021) Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study. Headache 61:1351–1363. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​head.​14194
12.
go back to reference Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB et al (2000) Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment ( MIDAS ) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 88:41–52CrossRef Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB et al (2000) Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment ( MIDAS ) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 88:41–52CrossRef
30.
38.
go back to reference Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, et al (2022) Rapid response to galcanezumab and predictive factors in chronic migraine patients: A 3-month observational, longitudinal, cohort, multicenter, Italian real-life study. Eur J Neurol 29:1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15197 Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, et al (2022) Rapid response to galcanezumab and predictive factors in chronic migraine patients: A 3-month observational, longitudinal, cohort, multicenter, Italian real-life study. Eur J Neurol 29:1198–1208. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​ene.​15197
Metadata
Title
Does MIDAS reduction at 3 months predict the outcome of erenumab treatment? A real-world, open-label trial
Authors
Roberto De Icco
Gloria Vaghi
Marta Allena
Natascia Ghiotto
Elena Guaschino
Daniele Martinelli
Lara Ahmad
Michele Corrado
Federico Bighiani
Federica Tanganelli
Sara Bottiroli
Francescantonio Cammarota
Grazia Sances
Cristina Tassorelli
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01480-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2022 Go to the issue