Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 5/2020

Open Access 01-05-2020 | Migraine | Review

Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Narrative Review

Authors: Vincent Martin, Karen Hamrick Samaan, Sheena Aurora, Eric M. Pearlman, Chunmei Zhou, Xiaoping Li, Robert Pallay

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 5/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Migraine is a debilitating neurologic disease. People who experience migraine can have substantial disability, impaired functioning and a decreased quality of life (QoL). Expert recommendations suggest that people with frequent migraine attacks or severe impairment related to attacks may benefit from preventive treatment. Despite these recommendations and the existence of evidence-based guidelines for the use of preventive medication, many people who are candidates for preventive therapies do not receive them. Thus, there is still a substantial unmet need for preventive migraine treatment. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has a demonstrated role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Galcanezumab-gnlm (galcanezumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CGRP ligand and prevents binding to its receptor. It is administered as a once-monthly subcutaneous injection. The aim of this review is to present a comprehensive overview of the existing short- and long-term efficacy and safety data for galcanezumab in patients with migraine. Data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2 and REGAIN studies show that galcanezumab treatment for 3 or 6 months results in overall reduction in mean monthly migraine headache days in patients with episodic (EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2) and chronic (REGAIN) migraine. Greater proportions of patients with episodic migraine receiving galcanezumab versus placebo demonstrated a ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% response to therapy and reported a lower level of disability and an improvement in functioning and QoL. Similarly, when compared with placebo, greater proportions of patients with chronic migraine treated with galcanezumab demonstrated a ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% response and reported improved functioning. A 12-month open-label study demonstrated the continued efficacy of galcanezumab for up to 12 months. In all studies galcanezumab was well tolerated. In conclusion, data from pivotal studies show that galcanezumab may fulfill an unmet need in the treatment of patients with migraine who require preventive therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buse DC, Rupnow MF, et al. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(5):422–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Buse DC, Rupnow MF, et al. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(5):422–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Lampl C, Thomas H, et al. Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:9.PubMedPubMedCentral Lampl C, Thomas H, et al. Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:9.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1211–59.
4.
go back to reference Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, et al. Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now take notice? J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):17.PubMedPubMedCentral Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, et al. Migraine is first cause of disability in under 50s: will health politicians now take notice? J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):17.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1–211.
6.
go back to reference American Headache Society. The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59(1):1–18. American Headache Society. The American Headache Society position statement on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache. 2019;59(1):1–18.
7.
go back to reference Buse DC, Manack A, et al. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(4):428–32.PubMed Buse DC, Manack A, et al. Sociodemographic and comorbidity profiles of chronic migraine and episodic migraine sufferers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(4):428–32.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rizzoli P. Preventive pharmacotherapy in migraine. Headache. 2014;54(2):364–9.PubMed Rizzoli P. Preventive pharmacotherapy in migraine. Headache. 2014;54(2):364–9.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Bigal ME, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9.PubMed Lipton RB, Bigal ME, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Silberstein SD, Holland S, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1337–45.PubMedPubMedCentral Silberstein SD, Holland S, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: pharmacologic treatment for episodic migraine prevention in adults: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Headache Society. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1337–45.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Starling AJ, Vargas BB. A narrative review of evidence-based preventive options for chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015;19(10):49.PubMed Starling AJ, Vargas BB. A narrative review of evidence-based preventive options for chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2015;19(10):49.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Araujo AB, et al. Patterns of diagnosis, consultation, and treatment of migraine in the US: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):2–3. Lipton RB, Araujo AB, et al. Patterns of diagnosis, consultation, and treatment of migraine in the US: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):2–3.
13.
go back to reference Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS-II). Headache. 2013;53(4):644–55.PubMed Blumenfeld AM, Bloudek LM, et al. Patterns of use and reasons for discontinuation of prophylactic medications for episodic migraine and chronic migraine: results from the second international burden of migraine study (IBMS-II). Headache. 2013;53(4):644–55.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Dodick DW, et al. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(6):478–88.PubMed Hepp Z, Dodick DW, et al. Adherence to oral migraine-preventive medications among patients with chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(6):478–88.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Loder EW, Rizzoli P. Tolerance and loss of beneficial effect during migraine prophylaxis: clinical considerations. Headache. 2011;51(8):1336–45.PubMed Loder EW, Rizzoli P. Tolerance and loss of beneficial effect during migraine prophylaxis: clinical considerations. Headache. 2011;51(8):1336–45.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Deen M, Correnti E, et al. Blocking CGRP in migraine patients—a review of pros and cons. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):96.PubMedPubMedCentral Deen M, Correnti E, et al. Blocking CGRP in migraine patients—a review of pros and cons. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):96.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Edvinsson L. The CGRP pathway in migraine as a viable target for therapies. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 1):33–47.PubMed Edvinsson L. The CGRP pathway in migraine as a viable target for therapies. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 1):33–47.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, et al. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies—successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–50.PubMed Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, et al. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies—successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(6):338–50.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Pellesi L, Guerzoni S, et al. Spotlight on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: the clinical evidence to date. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6(6):534–47.PubMedPubMedCentral Pellesi L, Guerzoni S, et al. Spotlight on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: the clinical evidence to date. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2017;6(6):534–47.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, et al. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22(1):54–61. Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, et al. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22(1):54–61.
21.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):885–92.PubMed Dodick DW, Goadsby PJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(9):885–92.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Oakes TMM, Skljarevski V, et al. Safety of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: a randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging phase 2b study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1015–25.PubMed Oakes TMM, Skljarevski V, et al. Safety of galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: a randomized placebo-controlled dose-ranging phase 2b study. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(6):1015–25.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Skljarevski V, Oakes TM, et al. Effect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(2):187–93.PubMed Skljarevski V, Oakes TM, et al. Effect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(2):187–93.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, et al. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211–21.PubMedPubMedCentral Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, et al. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211–21.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Skljarevski V, Matharu M, et al. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442–54.PubMed Skljarevski V, Matharu M, et al. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442–54.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, et al. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, et al. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Camporeale A, Kudrow D, et al. A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with migraine. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):188.PubMedPubMedCentral Camporeale A, Kudrow D, et al. A phase 3, long-term, open-label safety study of galcanezumab in patients with migraine. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):188.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Mansfield C, Gebben DJ, et al. Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments: a discrete-choice experiment. Headache. 2019;59(5):715–26.PubMed Mansfield C, Gebben DJ, et al. Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments: a discrete-choice experiment. Headache. 2019;59(5):715–26.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Peres MF, Silberstein S, et al. Patients’ preference for migraine preventive therapy. Headache. 2007;47(4):540–5.PubMed Peres MF, Silberstein S, et al. Patients’ preference for migraine preventive therapy. Headache. 2007;47(4):540–5.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(1):6–38.PubMed Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(1):6–38.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Peng KP, Wang SJ. Migraine diagnosis: screening items, instruments, and scales. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012;50(2):69–73.PubMed Peng KP, Wang SJ. Migraine diagnosis: screening items, instruments, and scales. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012;50(2):69–73.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Forderreuther S, Zhang Q, et al. Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):121.PubMedPubMedCentral Forderreuther S, Zhang Q, et al. Preventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. J Headache Pain. 2018;19(1):121.PubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Rosen N, Pearlman E, et al. 100% response rate to galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: a post hoc analysis of the results from phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 studies. Headache. 2018;58(9):1347–57.PubMedPubMedCentral Rosen N, Pearlman E, et al. 100% response rate to galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: a post hoc analysis of the results from phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 studies. Headache. 2018;58(9):1347–57.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Minen M, Shome A, et al. A migraine management training program for primary care providers: an overview of a survey and pilot study findings, lessons learned, and considerations for further research. Headache. 2016;56(4):725–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Minen M, Shome A, et al. A migraine management training program for primary care providers: an overview of a survey and pilot study findings, lessons learned, and considerations for further research. Headache. 2016;56(4):725–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Takaki H, Onozuka D, et al. Migraine-preventive prescription patterns by physician specialty in ambulatory care settings in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2018;9:62–7.PubMed Takaki H, Onozuka D, et al. Migraine-preventive prescription patterns by physician specialty in ambulatory care settings in the United States. Prev Med Rep. 2018;9:62–7.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Buse DC, Nicholson RA, et al. Migraine care across the healthcare landscape in the United States among those with ≥ 4 migraine headache days per month: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):16–17. Buse DC, Nicholson RA, et al. Migraine care across the healthcare landscape in the United States among those with ≥ 4 migraine headache days per month: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):16–17.
38.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Loder EW, et al. Assessing barriers to chronic migraine consultation, diagnosis, and treatment: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2016;56(5):821–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Dodick DW, Loder EW, et al. Assessing barriers to chronic migraine consultation, diagnosis, and treatment: results from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2016;56(5):821–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Serrano D, et al. Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of migraine: effects of sex, income, and headache features. Headache. 2013;53(1):81–92.PubMed Lipton RB, Serrano D, et al. Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of migraine: effects of sex, income, and headache features. Headache. 2013;53(1):81–92.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Reed ML, Araujo AB, et al. Symptom patterns, disability, and physician visits among a US sample of people with migraine: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):59–60. Reed ML, Araujo AB, et al. Symptom patterns, disability, and physician visits among a US sample of people with migraine: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):59–60.
41.
go back to reference Cevoli S, D’Amico D, et al. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of migraine in Italy: a survey of patients attending for the first time 10 headache centres. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(12):1285–93.PubMed Cevoli S, D’Amico D, et al. Underdiagnosis and undertreatment of migraine in Italy: a survey of patients attending for the first time 10 headache centres. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(12):1285–93.PubMed
42.
go back to reference Dekker F, Neven AK, et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine by GPs: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(597):e268–74.PubMedPubMedCentral Dekker F, Neven AK, et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine by GPs: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(597):e268–74.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Smelt AF, Eijsenga SJ, et al. Acceptance of preventive treatment in migraine patients: results of a survey. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;18(3):143–8.PubMed Smelt AF, Eijsenga SJ, et al. Acceptance of preventive treatment in migraine patients: results of a survey. Eur J Gen Pract. 2012;18(3):143–8.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Rozen TD. Migraine prevention: what patients want from medication and their physicians (a headache specialty clinic perspective). Headache. 2006;46(5):750–3.PubMed Rozen TD. Migraine prevention: what patients want from medication and their physicians (a headache specialty clinic perspective). Headache. 2006;46(5):750–3.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Kishimoto H, Maehara M. Compliance and persistence with daily, weekly, and monthly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in Japan: analysis of data from the CISA. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:231.PubMed Kishimoto H, Maehara M. Compliance and persistence with daily, weekly, and monthly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in Japan: analysis of data from the CISA. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:231.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Qiao Q, Ouwens MJ, et al. Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy administered by once-daily or once-weekly injection in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:201–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Qiao Q, Ouwens MJ, et al. Adherence to GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy administered by once-daily or once-weekly injection in patients with type 2 diabetes in Germany. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:201–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Rendas-Baum R, Bloudek LM, et al. The psychometric properties of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) in chronic migraine patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(5):1123–33.PubMed Rendas-Baum R, Bloudek LM, et al. The psychometric properties of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 (MSQ) in chronic migraine patients. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(5):1123–33.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Ashina S, Foster SA, et al. Opioid use among people with migraine: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):11. Ashina S, Foster SA, et al. Opioid use among people with migraine: results of the OVERCOME study. In: American Headache Society 61st Annual Scientific Meeting; 11–14 July; Philadelphia, PA USA 2019. Headache. 2019;59(S1):11.
50.
go back to reference Bordini CA, da Silva HM, et al. Effect of preventive treatment on health-related quality of life in episodic migraine. J Headache Pain. 2005;6(5):387–91.PubMedPubMedCentral Bordini CA, da Silva HM, et al. Effect of preventive treatment on health-related quality of life in episodic migraine. J Headache Pain. 2005;6(5):387–91.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab for the Preventive Treatment of Migraine: A Narrative Review
Authors
Vincent Martin
Karen Hamrick Samaan
Sheena Aurora
Eric M. Pearlman
Chunmei Zhou
Xiaoping Li
Robert Pallay
Publication date
01-05-2020
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01319-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

Advances in Therapy 5/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine