Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Migraine | Research

CGRP-monoclonal antibodies in Japan: insights from an online survey of physician members of the Japanese headache society

Authors: Tsubasa Takizawa, Keiko Ihara, Narumi Watanabe, Ryo Takemura, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Naoki Miyazaki, Mamoru Shibata, Keisuke Suzuki, Noboru Imai, Norihiro Suzuki, Koichi Hirata, Takao Takeshima, Jin Nakahara

Published in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have greatly changed migraine treatment options. In Japan, although CGRPmAb guidelines (≥ 4 monthly migraine days (MMDs) and ≥ 1 previous preventive failure) are well-acknowledged, the actual use of CGRPmAbs and the circumstances of the related headache care are unknown.

Methods

We conducted an online survey of Japanese Headache Society members, inquiring about the physicians' experience with CGRPmAbs and how they make decisions related to their use.

Results

Of the 397 respondents, 320 had prescribed CGRPmAbs. The threshold number of previous preventive failures for recommending a CGRPmAb was two for the majority of the respondents (n = 170, 54.5%), followed by one (n = 64, 20.5%). The MMD threshold was ≥ 4 for 71 respondents (22.8%), ≥ 6 for 68 (21.8%), ≥ 8 for 76 (24.4%), and ≥ 10 for 81 (26.0%). The respondents tended to assess treatment efficacy after 3 months (episodic migraine: n = 217, 69.6%, chronic migraine: n = 188, 60.3%). The cost of CGRPmAbs was described by many respondents in two questions: (i) any request for a CGRPmAb (27.7%), and (ii) the most frequently reported reason for responders to discontinue CGRPmAbs (24.4%).

Conclusions

Most of the respondents recommended CGRPmAbs to patients with ≥ 2 preventive failures, followed by ≥ 1. The MMD threshold ranged mostly from ≥ 4 to ≥ 10. The concern for costs was raised as a major limiting factor for prescribing CGRPmAbs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Lancet Neurol 2018;17(11):954-76. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 Lancet Neurol 2018;17(11):954-76.
2.
go back to reference Sakai F, Igarashi H (1997) Prevalence of migraine in Japan: a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 17(1):15–22CrossRefPubMed Sakai F, Igarashi H (1997) Prevalence of migraine in Japan: a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 17(1):15–22CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F et al (2017) A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine. N Engl J Med 377(22):2123–2132CrossRefPubMed Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallström Y, Broessner G, Bonner JH, Zhang F et al (2017) A Controlled Trial of Erenumab for Episodic Migraine. N Engl J Med 377(22):2123–2132CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY (2018) Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 38(8):1442–1454CrossRefPubMed Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY (2018) Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia 38(8):1442–1454CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2018) Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319(19):1999–2008CrossRefPubMed Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, Yeung PP, Goadsby PJ, Blankenbiller T et al (2018) Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319(19):1999–2008CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sakai F, Ozeki A, Skljarevski V. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia Reports. 2020;3. Sakai F, Ozeki A, Skljarevski V. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for prevention of migraine headache in Japanese patients with episodic migraine: A phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia Reports. 2020;3.
7.
go back to reference Takeshima T, Sakai F, Hirata K, Imai N, Matsumori Y, Yoshida R et al (2021) Erenumab treatment for migraine prevention in Japanese patients: Efficacy and safety results from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache 61(6):927–935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takeshima T, Sakai F, Hirata K, Imai N, Matsumori Y, Yoshida R et al (2021) Erenumab treatment for migraine prevention in Japanese patients: Efficacy and safety results from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache 61(6):927–935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sakai F, Suzuki N, Kim BK, Tatsuoka Y, Imai N, Ning X et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for episodic migraine prevention: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in Japanese and Korean patients. Headache 61(7):1102–1111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sakai F, Suzuki N, Kim BK, Tatsuoka Y, Imai N, Ning X et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for episodic migraine prevention: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in Japanese and Korean patients. Headache 61(7):1102–1111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Sakai F, Suzuki N, Kim BK, Igarashi H, Hirata K, Takeshima T et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for chronic migraine prevention: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in Japanese and Korean patients. Headache 61(7):1092–1101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sakai F, Suzuki N, Kim BK, Igarashi H, Hirata K, Takeshima T et al (2021) Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for chronic migraine prevention: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in Japanese and Korean patients. Headache 61(7):1092–1101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Takizawa T, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Miyazaki N, Ishizuchi K, Sekiguchi K et al (2022) Real-world evidence of galcanezumab for migraine treatment in Japan: a retrospective analysis. BMC Neurol 22(1):512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Takizawa T, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Miyazaki N, Ishizuchi K, Sekiguchi K et al (2022) Real-world evidence of galcanezumab for migraine treatment in Japan: a retrospective analysis. BMC Neurol 22(1):512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Shiina T, Tatsumoto M, Fujita H, Haruyama Y et al (2023) Effectiveness of three calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: A 12-month, single-center, observational real-world study in Japan. Cephalalgia 43(5):3331024231177649CrossRefPubMed Suzuki K, Suzuki S, Shiina T, Tatsumoto M, Fujita H, Haruyama Y et al (2023) Effectiveness of three calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for migraine: A 12-month, single-center, observational real-world study in Japan. Cephalalgia 43(5):3331024231177649CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R et al (2022) European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23(1):67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R et al (2022) European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23(1):67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hong JB, Lange KS, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Triller P, Siebert A et al (2023) Impact of a reimbursement policy change on treatment with erenumab in migraine - a real-world experience from Germany. J Headache Pain 24(1):144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hong JB, Lange KS, Fitzek M, Overeem LH, Triller P, Siebert A et al (2023) Impact of a reimbursement policy change on treatment with erenumab in migraine - a real-world experience from Germany. J Headache Pain 24(1):144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference American HS (2019) The American Headache Society Position Statement On Integrating New Migraine Treatments Into Clinical Practice. Headache 59(1):1–18CrossRef American HS (2019) The American Headache Society Position Statement On Integrating New Migraine Treatments Into Clinical Practice. Headache 59(1):1–18CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pascual J, Nunez M, Panni T, Diaz-Cerezo S, Novick D, Ciudad A (2023) Burden and Unmet Needs in Migraine Patients: Results from the OVERCOME (Spain) Study. Pain Ther 12(5):1209–1220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pascual J, Nunez M, Panni T, Diaz-Cerezo S, Novick D, Ciudad A (2023) Burden and Unmet Needs in Migraine Patients: Results from the OVERCOME (Spain) Study. Pain Ther 12(5):1209–1220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ihara K, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Takahashi N, Miyazaki N, Ishizuchi K et al (2023) Predicting response to CGRP-monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine in Japan: a single-centre retrospective observational study. J Headache Pain 24(1):23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ihara K, Ohtani S, Watanabe N, Takahashi N, Miyazaki N, Ishizuchi K et al (2023) Predicting response to CGRP-monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine in Japan: a single-centre retrospective observational study. J Headache Pain 24(1):23CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Torelli P, Proietti S, Cevoli S et al (2023) Late Response to Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study. Neurology 101(11):482–488CrossRefPubMed Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Torelli P, Proietti S, Cevoli S et al (2023) Late Response to Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study. Neurology 101(11):482–488CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sacco S, Lampl C, Maassen van den Brink A, Caponnetto V, Braschinsky M, Ducros A et al (2021) Burden and attitude to resistant and refractory migraine: a survey from the European Headache Federation with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance. J Headache Pain 22(1):39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sacco S, Lampl C, Maassen van den Brink A, Caponnetto V, Braschinsky M, Ducros A et al (2021) Burden and attitude to resistant and refractory migraine: a survey from the European Headache Federation with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance. J Headache Pain 22(1):39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
CGRP-monoclonal antibodies in Japan: insights from an online survey of physician members of the Japanese headache society
Authors
Tsubasa Takizawa
Keiko Ihara
Narumi Watanabe
Ryo Takemura
Nobuyuki Takahashi
Naoki Miyazaki
Mamoru Shibata
Keisuke Suzuki
Noboru Imai
Norihiro Suzuki
Koichi Hirata
Takao Takeshima
Jin Nakahara
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Milan
Keywords
Migraine
Headache
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Electronic ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01737-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2024 Go to the issue