Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neurology 5/2024

Open Access 17-01-2024 | Migraine | Original Communication

Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

Authors: Piero Barbanti, Cinzia Aurilia, Gabriella Egeo, Stefania Proietti, Florindo D’Onofrio, Paola Torelli, Marco Aguggia, Davide Bertuzzo, Cinzia Finocchi, Michele Trimboli, Sabina Cevoli, Giulia Fiorentini, Bianca Orlando, Maurizio Zucco, Laura Di Clemente, Ilaria Cetta, Bruno Colombo, Monica Laura Bandettini di Poggio, Valentina Favoni, Licia Grazzi, Antonio Salerno, Antonio Carnevale, Micaela Robotti, Fabio Frediani, Claudia Altamura, Massimo Filippi, Fabrizio Vernieri, Stefano Bonassi, ERT; for the Italian Migraine Registry study group

Published in: Journal of Neurology | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Nearly 60% of migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway experience a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at 12 weeks compared to baseline (responders). However, approximately half of the patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 12 weeks do respond ≤ 24 weeks (late responders). We assessed frequency and characteristics of patients responding to anti-CGRP mAbs only > 24 weeks (ultra-late responders).

Methods

In this multicenter (n = 16), prospective, observational, real-life study, we enrolled all consecutive adults affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM), with ≥ 3 prior therapeutic failures, treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 48 weeks. We defined responders patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 12 weeks, late responders those with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 24 weeks, and ultra-late responders those achieving a ≥ 50% response only > 24 weeks.

Results

A total of 572 migraine patients completed ≥ 48 weeks of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Responders accounted for 60.5% (346/572), late responders for 15% (86/572), and ultra-late responders for 15.7% (90/572). Among ultra-late responders, 7.3% (42/572) maintained the ≥ 50% response rate across all subsequent time intervals (weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) and were considered persistent ultra-late responders, while 8.4% (48/572) missed the ≥ 50% response rate at ≥ 1 subsequent time interval and were classified as fluctuating ultra-late responders. Fifty patients (8.7%) did not respond at any time interval ≤ 48 weeks. Ultra-late responders differed from responders for higher BMI (p = 0.033), longer duration of medication overuse (p < 0.001), lower NRS (p = 0.017) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.002), higher frequency of dopaminergic symptoms (p = 0.002), less common unilateral pain—either alone (p = 0.010) or in combination with UAS (p = 0.023), allodynia (p = 0.043), or UAS and allodynia (p = 0.012)—a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.012), psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.010) and a higher proportion of patients with ≥ 1 comorbidity (p = 0.020).

Conclusion

Two-thirds of patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 24 weeks do respond later, while non-responders ≤ 48 weeks are quite rare (8.7%). These findings suggest to rethink the duration of migraine prophylaxis and the definition of resistant and refractory migraine, currently based on the response after 2–3 months of treatment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Katsarava Z, Mania M, Lampl C, Herberhold J, Steiner TJ (2018) Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe – evidence from the Eurolight study. J Headache Pain 19(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Katsarava Z, Mania M, Lampl C, Herberhold J, Steiner TJ (2018) Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe – evidence from the Eurolight study. J Headache Pain 19(1):10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Lipton RB, Nicholson RA, Reed ML, Araujo AB, Jaffe DH, Faries DE, Buse DC, Shapiro RE, Ashina S, Cambron-Mellott MJ, Rowland JC, Pearlman EM (2022) Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache 62(2):122–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lipton RB, Nicholson RA, Reed ML, Araujo AB, Jaffe DH, Faries DE, Buse DC, Shapiro RE, Ashina S, Cambron-Mellott MJ, Rowland JC, Pearlman EM (2022) Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache 62(2):122–140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20(1):22–33PubMed Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20(1):22–33PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C (2022) European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01431-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C (2022) European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23(1):67. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s10194-022-01431-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Serie Generale n; 2020. Accessed January 17, 2023. gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio? dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2020–07–21&numeroGazzetta=182. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Serie Generale n; 2020. Accessed January 17, 2023. gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio? dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2020–07–21&numeroGazzetta=182.
10.
go back to reference Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Dall’Armi V, Egeo G, Fofi L, Bonassi S (2016) The phenotype of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms documents increased peripheral and central trigeminal sensitization. a case series of 757 patients. Cephalalgia 36(14):1334–1340CrossRefPubMed Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Dall’Armi V, Egeo G, Fofi L, Bonassi S (2016) The phenotype of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms documents increased peripheral and central trigeminal sensitization. a case series of 757 patients. Cephalalgia 36(14):1334–1340CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Guadagni F, Ferroni P (2020) Dopaminergic symptoms in migraine: a cross-sectional study on 1148 consecutive headache center-based patients. Cephalalgia 40(11):1168–1176CrossRefPubMed Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Guadagni F, Ferroni P (2020) Dopaminergic symptoms in migraine: a cross-sectional study on 1148 consecutive headache center-based patients. Cephalalgia 40(11):1168–1176CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, Wang SJ (2008) Task force of the international headache society clinical trials subcommittee guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 28(5):484–495CrossRefPubMed Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, Wang SJ (2008) Task force of the international headache society clinical trials subcommittee guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 28(5):484–495CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sauro KM, Rose MS, Becker WJ, Christie SN, Giammarco R, Mackie GF, Eloff AG, Gawel MJ (2010) HIT-6 and MIDAS as measures of headache disability in a headache referral population. Headache 50(3):383–395CrossRefPubMed Sauro KM, Rose MS, Becker WJ, Christie SN, Giammarco R, Mackie GF, Eloff AG, Gawel MJ (2010) HIT-6 and MIDAS as measures of headache disability in a headache referral population. Headache 50(3):383–395CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Mathe AA, Agren H, Lindstrom L, Theodorsson E (1994) Increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide in cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients a possible trait marker of major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett 182(2):138–142CrossRefPubMed Mathe AA, Agren H, Lindstrom L, Theodorsson E (1994) Increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide in cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients a possible trait marker of major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett 182(2):138–142CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference D’Andrea G, D’Amico D, Bussone G, Bolner A, Aguggia M, Saracco MG, Galloni E, De Riva V, Colavito D, Leon A, Rosteghin V, Perini F (2013) The role of tyrosine metabolism in the pathogenesis of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 33(11):932–937CrossRefPubMed D’Andrea G, D’Amico D, Bussone G, Bolner A, Aguggia M, Saracco MG, Galloni E, De Riva V, Colavito D, Leon A, Rosteghin V, Perini F (2013) The role of tyrosine metabolism in the pathogenesis of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 33(11):932–937CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM, Pozo-Rosich P, Reuter U, de la Torre ER, Sanchez Del Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain 21(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01130-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM, Pozo-Rosich P, Reuter U, de la Torre ER, Sanchez Del Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain 21(1):76. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s10194-020-01130-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Manack A, Buse DC, Serrano D, Turkel CC, Lipton RB (2011) Rates, predictors, and consequences of remission from chronic migraine to episodic migraine. Neurology 76(8):711–718CrossRefPubMed Manack A, Buse DC, Serrano D, Turkel CC, Lipton RB (2011) Rates, predictors, and consequences of remission from chronic migraine to episodic migraine. Neurology 76(8):711–718CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study
Authors
Piero Barbanti
Cinzia Aurilia
Gabriella Egeo
Stefania Proietti
Florindo D’Onofrio
Paola Torelli
Marco Aguggia
Davide Bertuzzo
Cinzia Finocchi
Michele Trimboli
Sabina Cevoli
Giulia Fiorentini
Bianca Orlando
Maurizio Zucco
Laura Di Clemente
Ilaria Cetta
Bruno Colombo
Monica Laura Bandettini di Poggio
Valentina Favoni
Licia Grazzi
Antonio Salerno
Antonio Carnevale
Micaela Robotti
Fabio Frediani
Claudia Altamura
Massimo Filippi
Fabrizio Vernieri
Stefano Bonassi
ERT; for the Italian Migraine Registry study group
Publication date
17-01-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords
Migraine
Erenumab
Published in
Journal of Neurology / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-5354
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1459
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-12103-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2024

Journal of Neurology 5/2024 Go to the issue