Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2021

Open Access 01-01-2021 | Middle Ear Implant | Otology

A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers

Authors: Torsten Rahne, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Rudolf Hagen, Andreas Radeloff, Luis Lassaletta, Maurizio Barbara, Stefan K. Plontke, Robert Mlynski

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and performance of three novel vibroplasty couplers that allow attachment of the floating mass transducer of a transcutaneous active middle ear implant (AMEI) to the round window (RW) membrane, the long process (LP), or the incus body and the short process (SP) of the incus.

Methods

Retrospective multicenter cohort study of 25 AMEI users with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss that were among the first implanted with an AMEI vibrating ossicular prosthesis in combination with the third generation of vibroplasty couplers between 2014 and 2016. Main Outcome Measures were bone-conduction pure-tone and vibroplasty thresholds, postoperative aided sound field thresholds and postoperative aided word recognition score (WRS).

Results

Bone conduction threshold changes of more than 10 dB in 4PTABC were observed in two subjects. A mean improvement of 57.8% in speech recognition was observed with a mean WRS at 65 dB SPL improving from 14.8% (SD 21.9%) preoperatively to a mean aided score of 72.6% (SD 18.6%). Sound field thresholds improved from an average 4PTASF of 64.1 dB HL (SD 9.8 dB HL) to 37.0 dB HL (SD 8.9 dB HL), resulting in a mean functional gain of 27.1 dB. There was no significant difference in WRS or functional gain between the coupler types.

Conclusion

Initial experience shows that all three third generation vibroplasty couplers represent safe and efficient attachment options for the FMT allowing the surgeon to choose the coupling type based on the present pathology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Luetje CM, Brackman D, Balkany TJ et al (2002) Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:97–107CrossRef Luetje CM, Brackman D, Balkany TJ et al (2002) Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:97–107CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Huber AM, Ball GR, Veraguth D et al (2006) A new implantable middle ear hearing device for mixed hearing loss: a feasibility study in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 27:1104–1109CrossRef Huber AM, Ball GR, Veraguth D et al (2006) A new implantable middle ear hearing device for mixed hearing loss: a feasibility study in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 27:1104–1109CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hüttenbrink K-B, Zahnert T, Bornitz M et al (2008) TORP-vibroplasty: a new alternative for the chronically disabled middle ear. Otol Neurotol 29:965–971CrossRef Hüttenbrink K-B, Zahnert T, Bornitz M et al (2008) TORP-vibroplasty: a new alternative for the chronically disabled middle ear. Otol Neurotol 29:965–971CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fisch U, Cremers CW, Lenarz T et al (2001) Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device. Otol Neurotol 22:962–972CrossRef Fisch U, Cremers CW, Lenarz T et al (2001) Clinical experience with the Vibrant Soundbridge implant device. Otol Neurotol 22:962–972CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lenarz T, Weber BP, Mack KF et al (1998) The Vibrant Soundbridge system: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences. Laryngo Rhino Otol 77:247–255CrossRef Lenarz T, Weber BP, Mack KF et al (1998) The Vibrant Soundbridge system: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences. Laryngo Rhino Otol 77:247–255CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB, Zahnert T et al (2013) Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 34:1005–1012CrossRef Luers JC, Huttenbrink KB, Zahnert T et al (2013) Vibroplasty for mixed and conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 34:1005–1012CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schraven SP, Gromann W, Rak K et al (2016) Long-term stability of the active middle-ear implant with floating-mass transducer technology: a single-center study. Otol Neurotol 37:252–266CrossRef Schraven SP, Gromann W, Rak K et al (2016) Long-term stability of the active middle-ear implant with floating-mass transducer technology: a single-center study. Otol Neurotol 37:252–266CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Zahnert T, Mlynski R, Lowenheim H et al (2019) Long-term outcomes of vibroplasty coupler implantations to treat mixed/conductive hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 23:316–325CrossRef Zahnert T, Mlynski R, Lowenheim H et al (2019) Long-term outcomes of vibroplasty coupler implantations to treat mixed/conductive hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 23:316–325CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen T, Ren LJ, Yin DM et al (2017) A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head. Hear Res 353:97–103CrossRef Chen T, Ren LJ, Yin DM et al (2017) A comparative study of MED-EL FMT attachment to the long process of the incus in intact middle ears and its attachment to disarticulated stapes head. Hear Res 353:97–103CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schraven SP, Mlynski R, Dalhoff E et al (2016) Coupling of an active middle-ear implant to the long process of the incus using an elastic clip attachment. Hear Res 340:179–184CrossRef Schraven SP, Mlynski R, Dalhoff E et al (2016) Coupling of an active middle-ear implant to the long process of the incus using an elastic clip attachment. Hear Res 340:179–184CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A et al (2015) Standardized active middle-ear implant coupling to the short incus process. Otol Neurotol 36:1390–1398CrossRef Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A et al (2015) Standardized active middle-ear implant coupling to the short incus process. Otol Neurotol 36:1390–1398CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schraven SP, Rak K, Cebulla M et al (2018) Surgical impact of coupling an active middle ear implant to short incus process. Otol Neurotol 39:688–692CrossRef Schraven SP, Rak K, Cebulla M et al (2018) Surgical impact of coupling an active middle ear implant to short incus process. Otol Neurotol 39:688–692CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M et al (2006) Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window. Int J Audiol 45:600–608CrossRef Colletti V, Soli SD, Carner M et al (2006) Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window. Int J Audiol 45:600–608CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Skarzynski H, Olszewski L, Skarzynski PH et al (2014) Direct round window stimulation with the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge: 5 years of experience using a technique without interposed fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:477–482CrossRef Skarzynski H, Olszewski L, Skarzynski PH et al (2014) Direct round window stimulation with the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge: 5 years of experience using a technique without interposed fascia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:477–482CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Olszewski L, Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A et al (2017) Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: comparison of direct and indirect coupling. Laryngoscope 127:2843–2849CrossRef Olszewski L, Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A et al (2017) Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: comparison of direct and indirect coupling. Laryngoscope 127:2843–2849CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schwab B, Grigoleit S, Teschner M (2013) Do we really need a coupler for the round window application of an AMEI? Otol Neurotol 34:1181–1185CrossRef Schwab B, Grigoleit S, Teschner M (2013) Do we really need a coupler for the round window application of an AMEI? Otol Neurotol 34:1181–1185CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Zahnert T, Lowenheim H, Beutner D et al (2016) Multicenter clinical trial of vibroplasty couplers to treat mixed/conductive hearing loss: first results. Audiol Neurootol 21:212–222CrossRef Zahnert T, Lowenheim H, Beutner D et al (2016) Multicenter clinical trial of vibroplasty couplers to treat mixed/conductive hearing loss: first results. Audiol Neurootol 21:212–222CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schraven SP, Dalhoff E, Wildenstein D et al (2014) Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process. Audiol Neurootol 19:1–11CrossRef Schraven SP, Dalhoff E, Wildenstein D et al (2014) Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process. Audiol Neurootol 19:1–11CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Celerier C, Thierry B, Coudert C et al (2017) Results of VSB implantation at the short process of the incus in children with ear atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 93:83–87CrossRef Celerier C, Thierry B, Coudert C et al (2017) Results of VSB implantation at the short process of the incus in children with ear atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 93:83–87CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Thomas JP, Voelter C, Neumann K et al (2017) Vibroplasty in severe congenital or acquired meatal stenosis by coupling an active middle ear implant to the short process of the incus. Otol Neurotol 38:996–1004CrossRef Thomas JP, Voelter C, Neumann K et al (2017) Vibroplasty in severe congenital or acquired meatal stenosis by coupling an active middle ear implant to the short process of the incus. Otol Neurotol 38:996–1004CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lee JM, Lee YH, Jung J et al (2017) Audiologic gain of incus short process vibroplasty with conventional incus long process vibroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 36 patients. Otol Neurotol 38:1063–1070CrossRef Lee JM, Lee YH, Jung J et al (2017) Audiologic gain of incus short process vibroplasty with conventional incus long process vibroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 36 patients. Otol Neurotol 38:1063–1070CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Skarzynski PH, Osinska K, Krol B et al (2018) Use of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant with short process Incus Coupler for chronic obstructive inflammation of the external ear canal: case study. J Hear Sci 8:25–31 Skarzynski PH, Osinska K, Krol B et al (2018) Use of the Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant with short process Incus Coupler for chronic obstructive inflammation of the external ear canal: case study. J Hear Sci 8:25–31
23.
go back to reference Muller A, Mir-Salim P, Zellhuber N et al (2017) Influence of floating-mass transducer coupling efficiency for active middle-ear implants on speech recognition. Otol Neurotol 38:809–814CrossRef Muller A, Mir-Salim P, Zellhuber N et al (2017) Influence of floating-mass transducer coupling efficiency for active middle-ear implants on speech recognition. Otol Neurotol 38:809–814CrossRef
24.
go back to reference ANSI (2004) Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. American National Standard, ANSI S3.21-2004 ANSI (2004) Methods for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. American National Standard, ANSI S3.21-2004
25.
go back to reference Maier H, Baumann U, Baumgartner WD et al (2018) Minimal reporting standards for active middle ear hearing implants. Audiol Neurootol 23:105–115CrossRef Maier H, Baumann U, Baumgartner WD et al (2018) Minimal reporting standards for active middle ear hearing implants. Audiol Neurootol 23:105–115CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H (2016) Comparison of alternative coupling methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge floating mass transducer. Audiol Neurootol 21:347–355CrossRef Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H (2016) Comparison of alternative coupling methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge floating mass transducer. Audiol Neurootol 21:347–355CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R et al (2011) Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty. Otol Neurotol 32:271–277CrossRef Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R et al (2011) Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty. Otol Neurotol 32:271–277CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maier H, Hinze AL, Gerdes T et al (2015) Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20:136–146CrossRef Maier H, Hinze AL, Gerdes T et al (2015) Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20:136–146CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Park YA, Kong TH, Chang JS et al (2017) Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for Vibrant Soundbridge device failures at the short incus process. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:3867–3873CrossRef Park YA, Kong TH, Chang JS et al (2017) Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for Vibrant Soundbridge device failures at the short incus process. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:3867–3873CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers
Authors
Torsten Rahne
Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
Rudolf Hagen
Andreas Radeloff
Luis Lassaletta
Maurizio Barbara
Stefan K. Plontke
Robert Mlynski
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06064-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2021 Go to the issue