Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2017

01-11-2017 | Otology

Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process

Authors: Yoon Ah Park, Tae Hoon Kong, Jin Soon Chang, Young Joon Seo

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 11/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to report a vibrant soundbridge (VSB) implant revision surgical method involving adhesiolysis at the short incus process under local anesthesia and demonstrate successful hearing performance after surgery. Three cases of VSB surgery, performed in 2016, were enrolled. All cases had diagnoses of device failure. This ‘seven-incision line’ exposed the floating mass transducer directly, after which the three steps (adhesiolysis, curettage, and hydrocortisone injection) were performed. Upon fitting the VSB, sound fields were evaluated immediately and at 3 months after the revision. During the revisions of surgery, all patients achieved immediate hearing gains and noticed differences in the outer devices with different amplifications. Satisfactory improvements in hearing thresholds and speech recognition abilities were confirmed by improvements of 20–30 dB in hearing loss 3 months after revision surgery. The VSB implant revision surgical method involving adhesiolysis is safe and efficient for patients who experience a VSB device failure. This method will reduce the requirement for surgery under general anesthesia, reduce the overall period of clinical therapy and, therefore, minimize patients’ medical costs.
Level of Evidence 4
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fisch U, Cremers WRJ, Lenarz T et al (2001) Clinical experience with the vibrant soundbridge implant device. Otol Neurotol 22:962–972CrossRefPubMed Fisch U, Cremers WRJ, Lenarz T et al (2001) Clinical experience with the vibrant soundbridge implant device. Otol Neurotol 22:962–972CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Bouccara D et al (2008) Benefit of the vibrant soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years. Ear Hear 29:281–284CrossRefPubMed Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Bouccara D et al (2008) Benefit of the vibrant soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years. Ear Hear 29:281–284CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Maier H, Hinze AL, Gerdes T et al (2015) Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20:136–146CrossRefPubMed Maier H, Hinze AL, Gerdes T et al (2015) Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 20:136–146CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sterkers O, Boucarra D, Labassi S et al (2003) A middle ear implant, the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France. Otol Neurotol 24:427–436CrossRefPubMed Sterkers O, Boucarra D, Labassi S et al (2003) A middle ear implant, the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France. Otol Neurotol 24:427–436CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rameh C, Meller R, Lavieille JP et al (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction with different middle ear hearing implants in sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31:883–892CrossRef Rameh C, Meller R, Lavieille JP et al (2010) Long-term patient satisfaction with different middle ear hearing implants in sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 31:883–892CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schraven SP, Dalhoff E, Wildenstein D et al (2014) Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process. Audiol Neurootol 19:1–11CrossRefPubMed Schraven SP, Dalhoff E, Wildenstein D et al (2014) Alternative fixation of an active middle ear implant at the short incus process. Audiol Neurootol 19:1–11CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Reich H (1995) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis. In: Arregui ME, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Katkhouda N et al (eds) Principles of laparoscopic surgery. Springer, New York, pp 283–298CrossRef Reich H (1995) Laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis. In: Arregui ME, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Katkhouda N et al (eds) Principles of laparoscopic surgery. Springer, New York, pp 283–298CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Morgan DE, Dirks DD, Bower DR (1979) Suggested threshold sound pressure levels for frequency modulated (warble) tones in the sound field. J Speech Hear Disord 44:37–54CrossRefPubMed Morgan DE, Dirks DD, Bower DR (1979) Suggested threshold sound pressure levels for frequency modulated (warble) tones in the sound field. J Speech Hear Disord 44:37–54CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR et al (2001) Vibrant soundbridge system: ein neuartiges hörimplantat für innenohrschwerhörige—teil 2: audiologische ergebnisse. Laryngo Rhino Otol 80:370–380CrossRef Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR et al (2001) Vibrant soundbridge system: ein neuartiges hörimplantat für innenohrschwerhörige—teil 2: audiologische ergebnisse. Laryngo Rhino Otol 80:370–380CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Todt I, Seidl RO, Gross M et al (2002) Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 23:669–673CrossRefPubMed Todt I, Seidl RO, Gross M et al (2002) Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 23:669–673CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Beltrame AM, Martini A, Prosser S et al (2009) Coupling the vibrant soundbridge to cochlea round window. Otol Neurol 30:194–201CrossRef Beltrame AM, Martini A, Prosser S et al (2009) Coupling the vibrant soundbridge to cochlea round window. Otol Neurol 30:194–201CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Böheim K, Mlynski R, Lenarz T et al (2012) Round window vibroplasty: long-term results. Acta Otolaryngol 132:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed Böheim K, Mlynski R, Lenarz T et al (2012) Round window vibroplasty: long-term results. Acta Otolaryngol 132:1042–1048CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Huber AM, Mlynski R, Müller J et al (2012) A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses. Otol Neurotol 33:613–617CrossRefPubMed Huber AM, Mlynski R, Müller J et al (2012) A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses. Otol Neurotol 33:613–617CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Brito R, Monteiro TA, Leal AF et al (2012) Complicações em 550 cirurgias consecutivas de implante coclear. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:80–85CrossRefPubMed Brito R, Monteiro TA, Leal AF et al (2012) Complicações em 550 cirurgias consecutivas de implante coclear. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 78:80–85CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Truy E, Eshraghi AA, Balkany TJ et al (2006) Vibrant soundbridge surgery. Otol Neurotol 27:887–895CrossRefPubMed Truy E, Eshraghi AA, Balkany TJ et al (2006) Vibrant soundbridge surgery. Otol Neurotol 27:887–895CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Polanski JF, Soares AD, Dos Santos ZM et al (2016) Active middle-ear implant fixation in an unusual place: clinical and audiological outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 130:404–407CrossRefPubMed Polanski JF, Soares AD, Dos Santos ZM et al (2016) Active middle-ear implant fixation in an unusual place: clinical and audiological outcomes. J Laryngol Otol 130:404–407CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pankowsky DA, Ziats NP, Topham NS et al (1990) Morphologic characteristics of adsorbed human plasma proteins on vascular grafts and biomaterials. J Vasc Surg 11:599–606CrossRefPubMed Pankowsky DA, Ziats NP, Topham NS et al (1990) Morphologic characteristics of adsorbed human plasma proteins on vascular grafts and biomaterials. J Vasc Surg 11:599–606CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bonfield TL, Colton E, Anderson JM (1992) Protein adsorption of biomedical polymers influences activated monocytes to produce fibroblast stimulating factors. J Biomed Mater Res 26:457–465CrossRefPubMed Bonfield TL, Colton E, Anderson JM (1992) Protein adsorption of biomedical polymers influences activated monocytes to produce fibroblast stimulating factors. J Biomed Mater Res 26:457–465CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Collier TO, Anderson JM (2002) Protein and surface effects on monocyte and macrophage adhesion, maturation, and survival. J Biomed Mater Res 60:487–496CrossRefPubMed Collier TO, Anderson JM (2002) Protein and surface effects on monocyte and macrophage adhesion, maturation, and survival. J Biomed Mater Res 60:487–496CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Li TC, Cooke ID (1995) The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed®, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:190–192CrossRef Li TC, Cooke ID (1995) The value of an absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed®, in the prevention of adhesion reformation following microsurgical adhesiolysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50:190–192CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zwartenkot JW, Mulder JJ, Snik AF et al (2016) Active middle ear implantation: long-term medical and technical follow-up, implant survival, and complications. Otol Neurotol 37:513–519CrossRefPubMed Zwartenkot JW, Mulder JJ, Snik AF et al (2016) Active middle ear implantation: long-term medical and technical follow-up, implant survival, and complications. Otol Neurotol 37:513–519CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process
Authors
Yoon Ah Park
Tae Hoon Kong
Jin Soon Chang
Young Joon Seo
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 11/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4715-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2017 Go to the issue