Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 2/2022

26-02-2022 | Metastasis | Original Article

Lymph Node Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Vietnam: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Authors: Lan Thi Nguyen, Dang Hai Do, Hung Van Nguyen, Khiem Thanh Nguyen, Chinh Duc Nguyen

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Special Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. According to GLOBOCAN, 450,000 individuals were diagnosed with PC and lost annually, and the number is increasing. Radical surgery with standard lymphadenectomy is the only curative treatment and has been implemented in Vietnam recently. The aim of our study was to evaluate lymph node characteristics and short-term outcomes after radical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A retrospective study enrolled 89 PDAC patients who underwent radical resection was conducted in VietDuc University Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, from 2013 to 2020. Database on lymph node and short-term surgical outcomes was collected. Male: female ratio was 1.78:1; 51.7% of patients were in the age group 40–60. Most patients were at stage II (70.3%). A total of 85.4% underwent standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, respectively. Histopathological results were mainly low/none differentiation (48.3%). Lymph node (LN) metastasis and neural invasion were observed in 60.7% and 52.8%, respectively. Median examined and positive LN were 9 and 1, respectively; 29.2% had LN ratio ≥ 0.2. A total of 64% had no complications; 12.4% had POPF at biochemical leak level. Eleven patients (12.4%) had PPH; of them, 4 patients were reoperated, and 1 had an arterial embolization. Ninety-day mortality was 5.7%. Venous resection was the only predictor for near outcomes. The data suggested that standard lymphadenectomy is an indispensable part of the procedures. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with standard lymphadenectomy had an acceptable complication rate. The procedures should be applied as a standard for pancreatic head cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V (2019) Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol 10(1):10–27CrossRef Rawla P, Sunkara T, Gaduputi V (2019) Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors. World J Oncol 10(1):10–27CrossRef
2.
go back to reference H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, et al., Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J Clin (2021). H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R.L. Siegel, et al., Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J Clin (2021).
3.
go back to reference Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P et al (2017) European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer. Ann Oncol 28(5):1117–1123CrossRef Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P et al (2017) European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer. Ann Oncol 28(5):1117–1123CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Can Res 74(11):2913–2921CrossRef Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM (2014) Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Can Res 74(11):2913–2921CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ferlay J, Partensky C, Bray F (2016) More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 55(9–10):1158–1160CrossRef Ferlay J, Partensky C, Bray F (2016) More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) 55(9–10):1158–1160CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D (2020) The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep 10(1):16425CrossRef Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D (2020) The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep 10(1):16425CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Huang L, Jansen L, Balavarca Y et al (2018) Stratified survival of resected and overall pancreatic cancer patients in Europe and the USA in the early twenty-first century: a large, international population-based study. BMC Med 16(1):125CrossRef Huang L, Jansen L, Balavarca Y et al (2018) Stratified survival of resected and overall pancreatic cancer patients in Europe and the USA in the early twenty-first century: a large, international population-based study. BMC Med 16(1):125CrossRef
8.
go back to reference M.A. Tempero, M.P. Malafa, M. Al-Hawary, et al., Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 15(8) (2017) 1028. M.A. Tempero, M.P. Malafa, M. Al-Hawary, et al., Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 15(8) (2017) 1028.
9.
go back to reference Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST et al (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270(1):248–260CrossRef Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST et al (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Radiology 270(1):248–260CrossRef
10.
go back to reference W. Wang, Y. He, L. Wu, L. Ye, L. Yao, Z. Tang, Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. An update meta-analysis, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 19(8) (2019) 1074–1080. W. Wang, Y. He, L. Wu, L. Ye, L. Yao, Z. Tang, Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. An update meta-analysis, Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] 19(8) (2019) 1074–1080.
11.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Saiura A, Oba A et al (2019) Optimal extent of superior mesenteric artery dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: balancing surgical and oncological safety. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 23(7):1373–1383CrossRef Inoue Y, Saiura A, Oba A et al (2019) Optimal extent of superior mesenteric artery dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: balancing surgical and oncological safety. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 23(7):1373–1383CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hackert T, Strobel O, Michalski CW et al (2017) The TRIANGLE operation - radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study. HPB (Oxford) 19(11):1001–1007CrossRef Hackert T, Strobel O, Michalski CW et al (2017) The TRIANGLE operation - radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study. HPB (Oxford) 19(11):1001–1007CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J et al (2016) Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 34(21):2541–2556CrossRef Khorana AA, Mangu PB, Berlin J et al (2016) Potentially curable pancreatic cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 34(21):2541–2556CrossRef
14.
go back to reference M. Ducreux, A.S. Cuhna, C. Caramella, et al., Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Ann Oncol 26 Suppl 5(suppl_5) (2015) 56–68. M. Ducreux, A.S. Cuhna, C. Caramella, et al., Cancer of the pancreas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Ann Oncol 26 Suppl 5(suppl_5) (2015) 56–68.
15.
go back to reference S.B. Edge, C.C. Compton, The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM, Annals of surgical oncology 17(6) (2010) 1471–4. S.B. Edge, C.C. Compton, The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM, Annals of surgical oncology 17(6) (2010) 1471–4.
16.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161(3):584–591CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRef Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142(1):20–25CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600CrossRef Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600CrossRef
20.
go back to reference A. Kardosh, D.Y. Lichtensztajn, M.A. Gubens, P.L. Kunz, G.A. Fisher, C.A. Clarke, Long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer: a California population-based study, Pancreas 47(8) (2018). A. Kardosh, D.Y. Lichtensztajn, M.A. Gubens, P.L. Kunz, G.A. Fisher, C.A. Clarke, Long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer: a California population-based study, Pancreas 47(8) (2018).
21.
go back to reference J.M. Winter, J.L. Cameron, K.A. Campbell, et al., 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience, Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 10(9) (2006) 1199–210; discussion 1210–1. J.M. Winter, J.L. Cameron, K.A. Campbell, et al., 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience, Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 10(9) (2006) 1199–210; discussion 1210–1.
22.
go back to reference Epstein JD, Kozak G, Fong ZV et al (2017) Microscopic lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 116(6):658–664CrossRef Epstein JD, Kozak G, Fong ZV et al (2017) Microscopic lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 116(6):658–664CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F et al (2015) Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 50(6):694–702CrossRef Sho M, Murakami Y, Motoi F et al (2015) Postoperative prognosis of pancreatic cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a multicenter study on 822 patients. J Gastroenterol 50(6):694–702CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T et al (2005) Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 137(6):606–611CrossRef Sakai M, Nakao A, Kaneko T et al (2005) Para-aortic lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Surgery 137(6):606–611CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M et al (2014) Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 101(5):530–538CrossRef Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M et al (2014) Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 101(5):530–538CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer 115(15):3379–3391CrossRef Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks JA, Berger DH, Albo D (2009) Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer 115(15):3379–3391CrossRef
27.
go back to reference F. Liebl, I.E. Demir, K. Mayer, et al., The impact of neural invasion severity in gastrointestinal malignancies: a clinicopathological study, Annals of surgery 260(5) (2014) 900–7; discussion 907–8. F. Liebl, I.E. Demir, K. Mayer, et al., The impact of neural invasion severity in gastrointestinal malignancies: a clinicopathological study, Annals of surgery 260(5) (2014) 900–7; discussion 907–8.
28.
go back to reference Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T, Monma H, Yano S, Tajima Y (2012) Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of. Surg Oncol 38(7):574–579 Kawabata Y, Tanaka T, Nishi T, Monma H, Yano S, Tajima Y (2012) Appraisal of a total meso-pancreatoduodenum excision with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of. Surg Oncol 38(7):574–579
29.
go back to reference Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R et al (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262(6):1092–1101CrossRef Inoue Y, Saiura A, Yoshioka R et al (2015) Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann Surg 262(6):1092–1101CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD et al (2018) Risk of neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer undergoing long-term surveillance. Gastroenterology 155(3):740-751.e2CrossRef Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD et al (2018) Risk of neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer undergoing long-term surveillance. Gastroenterology 155(3):740-751.e2CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13CrossRef
32.
go back to reference A.A. Duarte Garcés, S. Andrianello, G. Marchegiani, et al., Reappraisal of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) classifications: do we need to redefine grades A and B?, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 20(8) (2018) 702–707. A.A. Duarte Garcés, S. Andrianello, G. Marchegiani, et al., Reappraisal of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) classifications: do we need to redefine grades A and B?, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 20(8) (2018) 702–707.
33.
go back to reference McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ et al (2016) Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann Surg 264(2):344–352CrossRef McMillan MT, Soi S, Asbun HJ et al (2016) Risk-adjusted outcomes of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy: a model for performance evaluation. Ann Surg 264(2):344–352CrossRef
34.
go back to reference M.I. van Berge Henegouwen, J.H. Allema, T.M. van Gulik, P.C. Verbeek, H. Obertop, D.J. Gouma, Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery, The British journal of surgery 82(11) (1995) 1527–31. M.I. van Berge Henegouwen, J.H. Allema, T.M. van Gulik, P.C. Verbeek, H. Obertop, D.J. Gouma, Delayed massive haemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery, The British journal of surgery 82(11) (1995) 1527–31.
35.
go back to reference Jin K-M, Liu W, Wang K, Bao Q, Wang H-W, Xing B-C (2020) The individualized selection of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg 20(1):140CrossRef Jin K-M, Liu W, Wang K, Bao Q, Wang H-W, Xing B-C (2020) The individualized selection of pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg 20(1):140CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, Malleo G et al (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial. JAMA urg 155(4):313–321 Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, Malleo G et al (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy with externalized stent vs pancreaticogastrostomy with externalized stent for patients with high-risk pancreatic anastomosis: a single-center, phase 3, randomized clinical trial. JAMA urg 155(4):313–321
37.
go back to reference Y. Lyu, T. Li, Y. Cheng, B. Wang, L. Chen, S. Zhao, Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs applying the ISGPS (2016) criteria, surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques 28(3) (2018) 139–146. Y. Lyu, T. Li, Y. Cheng, B. Wang, L. Chen, S. Zhao, Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs applying the ISGPS (2016) criteria, surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques 28(3) (2018) 139–146.
38.
go back to reference He T, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Wang X, Lin H, Han W (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30(1):56–69CrossRef He T, Zhao Y, Chen Q, Wang X, Lin H, Han W (2013) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 30(1):56–69CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Torres SM, Vaz da Silva DG, Ribeiro HSC et al (2020) Short-term outcomes after vascular resection for pancreatic tumors: lessons learned from 72 cases from a single Brazilian Cancer Center. J Surg Oncol 121(5):857–862PubMed Torres SM, Vaz da Silva DG, Ribeiro HSC et al (2020) Short-term outcomes after vascular resection for pancreatic tumors: lessons learned from 72 cases from a single Brazilian Cancer Center. J Surg Oncol 121(5):857–862PubMed
Metadata
Title
Lymph Node Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Vietnam: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
Authors
Lan Thi Nguyen
Dang Hai Do
Hung Van Nguyen
Khiem Thanh Nguyen
Chinh Duc Nguyen
Publication date
26-02-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03344-0

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2022

Indian Journal of Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue