Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2022

24-08-2022 | Metastasis | Gastrointestinal

Thermal ablation versus hepatic resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a propensity score matching study

Authors: Yun Xu, Yuqin Zhang, Charlie Zhilin Zheng, Cong Li, Tian’an Guo, Ye Xu

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Several studies have compared the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and thermal ablation (TA) for unresectable tumors; however, results remain inconsistent. Most cohorts in previous studies were heterogeneous groups of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and extrahepatic metastases. This retrospective study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy between TA and HR in synchronous CRLM without extrahepatic metastases.

Methods

Cases with initially synchronous CRLM without extrahepatic metastases between January 2007 and December 2018 were enrolled. Of the 448 cases, 346 received HR and 102 TA. Propensity score matching with a 1:1 ratio was used to improve the comparability between the HR and TA groups. Technical success, complications, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared before and after matching.

Results

All patients achieved technical success. Major complication rates in the HR and TA groups were, respectively, 36.7% and 8.8% (p < 0.001). Before matching, the 5-year OS and DFS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.020, respectively) were significantly higher in the HR group than in the TA group. After matching, no significant difference in the 5-year OS and DFS was found between the groups (p = 0.770 and p = 0.939, respectively). Local tumor progression rate was significantly higher in the TA group both before (p = 0.027) and after (p = 0.029) matching.

Conclusions

For patients with CRC with synchronous CRLM, TA and HR provide comparable OS and DFS. TA is preferable if complete ablation is predicted.

Key Points

• Thermal ablation and hepatic resection provide comparable overall survival and disease-free survival.
• Thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases and has a lower major complication rate and higher repeatability than hepatic resection.
• Thermal ablation is preferable if complete ablation is predicted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424PubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gillams A, Goldberg N, Ahmed M et al (2015) Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières meeting 2013. Eur Radiol 25:3438–3454CrossRef Gillams A, Goldberg N, Ahmed M et al (2015) Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, The Interventional Oncology Sans Frontières meeting 2013. Eur Radiol 25:3438–3454CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Strömberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J (2018) Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer 18:78CrossRef Engstrand J, Nilsson H, Strömberg C, Jonas E, Freedman J (2018) Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival. BMC Cancer 18:78CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elias D, Viganò L, Orsi F et al (2016) New perspectives in the treatment of colorectal metastases. Liver Cancer 6:90–98CrossRef Elias D, Viganò L, Orsi F et al (2016) New perspectives in the treatment of colorectal metastases. Liver Cancer 6:90–98CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN (2011) Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology 258:351–369CrossRef Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT Jr, Goldberg SN (2011) Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology 258:351–369CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sucandy I, Cheek S, Golas BJ, Tsung A, Geller DA, Marsh JW (2016) Longterm survival outcomes of patients undergoing treatment with radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer liver tumors. HPB (Oxford) 18:756–763CrossRef Sucandy I, Cheek S, Golas BJ, Tsung A, Geller DA, Marsh JW (2016) Longterm survival outcomes of patients undergoing treatment with radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer liver tumors. HPB (Oxford) 18:756–763CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M et al (2016) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors affecting outcomes--a 10-year experience at a single center. Radiology 278:601–611CrossRef Shady W, Petre EN, Gonen M et al (2016) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors affecting outcomes--a 10-year experience at a single center. Radiology 278:601–611CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nieuwenhuizen S, Puijk RS, van den Bemd B, et al (2020) Resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of liver only colorectal metastases: multidisciplinary consensus document from the COLLISION trial group. Cancers (Basel) 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12071779 Nieuwenhuizen S, Puijk RS, van den Bemd B, et al (2020) Resectability and ablatability criteria for the treatment of liver only colorectal metastases: multidisciplinary consensus document from the COLLISION trial group. Cancers (Basel) 1779. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3390/​cancers12071779
9.
go back to reference Vasiniotis Kamarinos N, Sofocleous CT (2020) Imaging and image-guided thermal ablation for oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver disease. Cancer J 26:124–128CrossRef Vasiniotis Kamarinos N, Sofocleous CT (2020) Imaging and image-guided thermal ablation for oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver disease. Cancer J 26:124–128CrossRef
10.
go back to reference McEachron KR, Ankeny JS, Robbins A et al (2021) Surgical microwave ablation of otherwise non-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: expanding opportunities for long term survival. Surg Oncol 36:61–64CrossRef McEachron KR, Ankeny JS, Robbins A et al (2021) Surgical microwave ablation of otherwise non-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: expanding opportunities for long term survival. Surg Oncol 36:61–64CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Reuter NP, Woodall CE, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC (2009) Radiofrequency ablation vs. resection for hepatic colorectal metastasis: therapeutically equivalent? J Gastrointest Surg 13:486–491CrossRef Reuter NP, Woodall CE, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC (2009) Radiofrequency ablation vs. resection for hepatic colorectal metastasis: therapeutically equivalent? J Gastrointest Surg 13:486–491CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Minami Y, Kudo M (2013) Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a literature review. Gut Liver 7:1–6CrossRef Minami Y, Kudo M (2013) Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a literature review. Gut Liver 7:1–6CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Imai K, Allard MA, Castro Benitez C et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation combined with hepatectomy compared with hepatectomy alone for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 104:570–579CrossRef Imai K, Allard MA, Castro Benitez C et al (2017) Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation combined with hepatectomy compared with hepatectomy alone for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 104:570–579CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lei P, Ruan Y, Tan L, Wei H, Chen T (2020) Laparoscopic colorectal resection combined with simultaneous thermal ablation or surgical resection of liver metastasis: a retrospective comparative study. Int J Hyperth 37:137–143CrossRef Lei P, Ruan Y, Tan L, Wei H, Chen T (2020) Laparoscopic colorectal resection combined with simultaneous thermal ablation or surgical resection of liver metastasis: a retrospective comparative study. Int J Hyperth 37:137–143CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tinguely P, Dal G, Bottai M, Nilsson H, Freedman J, Engstrand J (2020) Microwave ablation versus resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases - a propensity score analysis from a population-based nationwide registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 46:476–485CrossRef Tinguely P, Dal G, Bottai M, Nilsson H, Freedman J, Engstrand J (2020) Microwave ablation versus resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases - a propensity score analysis from a population-based nationwide registry. Eur J Surg Oncol 46:476–485CrossRef
17.
go back to reference van Amerongen MJ, van der Stok EP, Fütterer JJ et al (2019) Results after simultaneous surgery and RFA liver ablation for patients with colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:2334–2339CrossRef van Amerongen MJ, van der Stok EP, Fütterer JJ et al (2019) Results after simultaneous surgery and RFA liver ablation for patients with colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 45:2334–2339CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dupré A, Jones RP, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ (2017) Curative-intent treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases: a comparison between ablation and resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1901–1907CrossRef Dupré A, Jones RP, Diaz-Nieto R, Fenwick SW, Poston GJ, Malik HZ (2017) Curative-intent treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases: a comparison between ablation and resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1901–1907CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Xu Y, Shen Q, Wang N et al (2017) Percutaneous microwave ablation of 5-6 cm unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: local efficacy and long-term outcomes. Int J Hyperth 33:247–254CrossRef Xu Y, Shen Q, Wang N et al (2017) Percutaneous microwave ablation of 5-6 cm unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: local efficacy and long-term outcomes. Int J Hyperth 33:247–254CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Xu Y, Shen Q, Liu P et al (2017) Microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma that met up-to-seven criteria: feasibility, local efficacy and long-term outcomes. Eur Radiol 27:3877–3887CrossRef Xu Y, Shen Q, Liu P et al (2017) Microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma that met up-to-seven criteria: feasibility, local efficacy and long-term outcomes. Eur Radiol 27:3877–3887CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Xu Y, Shen Q, Wang N et al (2017) Microwave ablation is as effective as radiofrequency ablation for very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 36:14CrossRef Xu Y, Shen Q, Wang N et al (2017) Microwave ablation is as effective as radiofrequency ablation for very-early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin J Cancer 36:14CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Teratani T, Yoshida H, Shiina S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in so-called high-risk locations. Hepatology 43:1101–1108CrossRef Teratani T, Yoshida H, Shiina S et al (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma in so-called high-risk locations. Hepatology 43:1101–1108CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Howard C, Clements TW, Edwards JP et al (2018) Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a national survey of surgeon opinions on simultaneous resection and multidisciplinary cooperation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:242–250CrossRef Howard C, Clements TW, Edwards JP et al (2018) Synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a national survey of surgeon opinions on simultaneous resection and multidisciplinary cooperation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:242–250CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Boudjema K, Locher C, Sabbagh C et al (2021) Simultaneous versus delayed resection for initially resectable synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 273:49–56CrossRef Boudjema K, Locher C, Sabbagh C et al (2021) Simultaneous versus delayed resection for initially resectable synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 273:49–56CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Vasiniotis Kamarinos N, Sofocleous CT (2020) Role of image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 9:235–238CrossRef Vasiniotis Kamarinos N, Sofocleous CT (2020) Role of image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastases. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 9:235–238CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Cucchetti A, Zhong J, Berhane S et al (2020) The chances of hepatic resection curing hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 72:711–717CrossRef Cucchetti A, Zhong J, Berhane S et al (2020) The chances of hepatic resection curing hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 72:711–717CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Franzese C, Comito T, Clerici E et al (2018) Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: propensity score-based comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. microwave ablation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144:1777–1783CrossRef Franzese C, Comito T, Clerici E et al (2018) Liver metastases from colorectal cancer: propensity score-based comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy vs. microwave ablation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144:1777–1783CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Thermal ablation versus hepatic resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a propensity score matching study
Authors
Yun Xu
Yuqin Zhang
Charlie Zhilin Zheng
Cong Li
Tian’an Guo
Ye Xu
Publication date
24-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09080-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

European Radiology 10/2022 Go to the issue