Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Short Communication

Medical students’ perception of dyad practice

Authors: Martin G. Tolsgaard, Maria B. Rasmussen, Sebastian Bjørck, Amandus Gustafsson, Charlotte V. Ringsted

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Training in pairs (dyad practice) has been shown to improve efficiency of clinical skills training compared with single practice but little is known about students’ perception of dyad practice. The aim of this study was to explore the reactions and attitudes of medical students who were instructed to work in pairs during clinical skills training. A follow-up pilot survey consisting of four open-ended questions was administered to 24 fourth-year medical students, who completed four hours of dyad practice in managing patient encounters. The responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. The students felt dyad practice improved their self-efficacy through social interaction with peers, provided useful insight through observation, and contributed with shared memory of what to do, when they forgot essential steps of the physical examination of the patient. However, some students were concerned about decreased hands-on practice and many students preferred to continue practising alone after completing the initial training. Dyad practice is well received by students during initial skills training and is associated with several benefits to learning through peer observation, feedback and cognitive support. Whether dyad training is suited for more advanced learners is a subject for future research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tolsgaard MG, Bjørck S, Rasmussen MB, Gustafsson A, Ringsted C. Improving efficiency of clinical skills training: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1072–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tolsgaard MG, Bjørck S, Rasmussen MB, Gustafsson A, Ringsted C. Improving efficiency of clinical skills training: a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(8):1072–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shanks D, Brydges R, den Brok W, Nair P, Hatala R. Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1215–22.PubMedCrossRef Shanks D, Brydges R, den Brok W, Nair P, Hatala R. Are two heads better than one? Comparing dyad and self-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1215–22.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Räder SB, Henriksen AH, Butrymovich V, Sander M, Jørgensen E, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning and of students' perceptions of how and why dyad practice contributes to learning. Acad Med. [Epub ahead of print]. Räder SB, Henriksen AH, Butrymovich V, Sander M, Jørgensen E, Lönn L, Ringsted CV. A study of the effect of dyad practice versus that of individual practice on simulation-based complex skills learning and of students' perceptions of how and why dyad practice contributes to learning. Acad Med. [Epub ahead of print].
4.
go back to reference Shea CH, Wulf G, Whitacre C. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness though the use of dyad training. J Mot Behav. 1999;31:119–25.PubMedCrossRef Shea CH, Wulf G, Whitacre C. Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness though the use of dyad training. J Mot Behav. 1999;31:119–25.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shebilske WL, Regian JW, Arthur W, Jordan JA. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Hum Factors. 1992;34:369–74. Shebilske WL, Regian JW, Arthur W, Jordan JA. A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Hum Factors. 1992;34:369–74.
6.
go back to reference Arthur W, Day EA, Bennett W, McNelly TL, Jordan JA. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:783–91.CrossRef Arthur W, Day EA, Bennett W, McNelly TL, Jordan JA. Dyadic versus individual training protocols: loss and reacquisition of a complex skill. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82:783–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH, Whitacre CA. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(3):299–303.PubMedCrossRef Wulf G, Clauss A, Shea CH, Whitacre CA. Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(3):299–303.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kirschner F, Paas F, Kirschner PA. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ Psychol Rev. 2009;21:31–42.CrossRef Kirschner F, Paas F, Kirschner PA. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: united brains for complex tasks. Educ Psychol Rev. 2009;21:31–42.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78:197–203.PubMed Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;78:197–203.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Crook AE, Beier ME. When training with a partner is inferior to training alone: the importance of dyad type and interaction quality. J Exp Psychol. 2010;6:335–48. Crook AE, Beier ME. When training with a partner is inferior to training alone: the importance of dyad type and interaction quality. J Exp Psychol. 2010;6:335–48.
Metadata
Title
Medical students’ perception of dyad practice
Authors
Martin G. Tolsgaard
Maria B. Rasmussen
Sebastian Bjørck
Amandus Gustafsson
Charlotte V. Ringsted
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0138-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2014 Go to the issue