Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Show and Tell

Combining Peyton’s four-step approach and Gagne’s instructional model in teaching slit-lamp examination

Author: Jia Yu Ng

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Developing skills in performing basic slit-lamp biomicroscopy is an important element of the ophthalmology undergraduate curriculum. As a doctor working in an ophthalmology department, I often provide slit-lamp teaching for medical students. This paper describes a lesson plan for this technique using Gagne’s nine events of instruction. The presented lesson plan is a combination of Gagne’s nine events of instruction and Peyton’s four-step approach. Gagne’s nine events of instruction correlate with and address the mental conditions of learning when adult learners are presented with various stimuli. Peyton’s four-step approach is a model for teaching practical skills that consists of demonstration, deconstruction, explanation, and performance. This article describes a slit-lamp biomicroscopy teaching session using Gagne’s nine events of instruction. Each step is carefully elaborated with relevant activities to suit learners with various learning styles. Peyton’s approach is used to teach the actual skill. This lesson plan is particularly relevant for tutors designing slit-lamp biomicroscopy teaching for undergraduate students, foundation doctors, general practitioners and emergency department staff. Ultimately, this lesson plan also serves as a model that is applicable for acquiring many other practical skills. The flexible adoption of Gagne’s nine events of instruction in combination with other teaching models helps in the planning of effective teaching sessions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gagne RM, Wager WW, Golas KG, Keller JM. Principles of instructional design. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth; 2005. Gagne RM, Wager WW, Golas KG, Keller JM. Principles of instructional design. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth; 2005.
3.
go back to reference Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching—learning strategies of first year medical students. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1089–92.PubMedCentralPubMed Kharb P, Samanta PP, Jindal M, Singh V. The learning styles and the preferred teaching—learning strategies of first year medical students. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(6):1089–92.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Merrill MD. Constructivism and instructional design. Educ Technol. 1991;31(5):45–53. Merrill MD. Constructivism and instructional design. Educ Technol. 1991;31(5):45–53.
7.
go back to reference Gardner H. Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books; 1999. Gardner H. Intelligence reframed: multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books; 1999.
8.
go back to reference The Peyton R, Cycle Learning. Teaching and learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth, UK: Manticore Europe Limited; 1998. The Peyton R, Cycle Learning. Teaching and learning in medical practice. Rickmansworth, UK: Manticore Europe Limited; 1998.
9.
go back to reference Chowdhury RR, Kalu G. Learning to give feedback in medical education. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;6:243–7.CrossRef Chowdhury RR, Kalu G. Learning to give feedback in medical education. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;6:243–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Combining Peyton’s four-step approach and Gagne’s instructional model in teaching slit-lamp examination
Author
Jia Yu Ng
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-014-0136-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Perspectives on Medical Education 6/2014 Go to the issue