Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Letter to the Editor

Measuring Primary Care Physician Visit Continuity and Patients’ Experiences of Visit Continuity

Authors: Hector P. Rodriguez, PhD, MPH, Dana Gelb Safran, ScD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Excerpt

To the Editor:— Dr. Wasson asserts that patient-reported visit continuity measures are valuable because they provide important information about how patients interpret the continuity of care they receive. We agree that patient-reported information is important. And we absolutely did not intend to cause the “elimination of patient reports” as Dr. Wasson says he fears. Patient-reported care experience information is key to a balanced portfolio of quality measures and indispensable to the goal of getting to a patient-centered health care system. However, our analytic findings led us to caution against relying on patient reported continuity of care measures in isolation — given evidence that they capture a combination of information about continuity along with information about other dimensions of the patient’s experience. Administrative continuity measures have proven, in our study and others,1 to provide a purer, more valid view of that dimension of care. Our results indicate that widely-used patient-reported visit continuity measures do not substitute for administrative data,2 especially if the goal is to understand how visit continuity with primary care physicians (PCPs) affects quality and outcomes of care. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(3):134–143.PubMedCrossRef Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1(3):134–143.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rodriguez HP, Marshall RE, Rogers WH, Safran DG. Primary care physician visit continuity: a comparison of patient-reported and administratively derived measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1499–1502, Sep.PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez HP, Marshall RE, Rogers WH, Safran DG. Primary care physician visit continuity: a comparison of patient-reported and administratively derived measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(9):1499–1502, Sep.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rodriguez HP, Rogers WH, Marshall RE, Safran DG. Multidisciplinary primary care teams: effects on the quality of clinician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. Med Care. 2007;45(1):19–27.PubMedCrossRef Rodriguez HP, Rogers WH, Marshall RE, Safran DG. Multidisciplinary primary care teams: effects on the quality of clinician-patient interactions and organizational features of care. Med Care. 2007;45(1):19–27.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielian T, Pincus HA. Trends in care by nonphysician clinicians in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(2):130–137.PubMedCrossRef Druss BG, Marcus SC, Olfson M, Tanielian T, Pincus HA. Trends in care by nonphysician clinicians in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(2):130–137.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, et al. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252(17):2413–2417.PubMedCrossRef Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, et al. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA. 1984;252(17):2413–2417.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring Primary Care Physician Visit Continuity and Patients’ Experiences of Visit Continuity
Authors
Hector P. Rodriguez, PhD, MPH
Dana Gelb Safran, ScD
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0840-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2009 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Substituted Judgment

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.