Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Measuring General Health Literacy in Chinese adults: validation of the HLS19-Q12 instrument

Authors: Rongmei Liu, Qiuping Zhao, Mingyang Yu, Hui Chen, Xiaomo Yang, Shuaibin Liu, Orkan Okan, Xinghan Chen, Yuhan Xing, Shuaijun Guo

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health literacy measurement lays a solid foundation to identify associations with health outcomes and monitor population health literacy levels over time. In mainland China, most existing health literacy instruments are either knowledge-based or practice-based, making health literacy results incomparable between China and other countries. This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the 12-item Health Literacy Population Survey (HLS19-Q12) in a general population of Chinese adults.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to recruit primary carers of students from 11 schools in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, using convenience cluster sampling. Participants completed an online self-administered survey that collected information on key sociodemographics, health literacy (HLS19-Q12 and a comparison tool: Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)), and health-related outcomes. Using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist as a guideline, we tested internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, structural validity, concurrent predictive validity, and convergent validity of the HLS19-Q12.

Results

Overall, 14,184 participants completed the full survey. The HLS19-Q12 showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.93), moderate test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.54), satisfactory content validity (based on the 12-matrix health literacy model), and strong structural validity (comparative fit index = 0.94, Tucker and Lewis’s index of fit = 0.93, root mean square error of approximation = 0.095). Concurrent predictive validity results showed health literacy was associated with both health determinants and health-related outcomes. The HLS19-Q12 had weak to strong correlations (coefficients = 0.24 to 0.42) with the nine scales of the HLQ. Respondents had an average score of 81.6 (± 23.0) when using the HLS19-Q12, with 35.0% and 7.5% having problematic and inadequate levels of health literacy, respectively.

Conclusions

The HLS19-Q12 is a reliable and valid instrument to measure health literacy in our sample. Further validation is needed with a more nationally representative sample of Chinese adults. The HLS19-Q12 could be used as a comprehensive, skills-based, and easy-to-administer health literacy assessment tool integrated into population surveys and intervention evaluations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Bitzer EM, Schwendemann HE. The significance of health literacy for public health and health promotion. New Approaches Health Literacy: Link Different Perspect 2021:83–97.
2.
Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, Brand H. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Guo S, Davis E, Yu X, Naccarella L, Armstrong R, Abel T, Browne G, Shi Y. Measuring functional, interactive and critical health literacy of Chinese secondary school students: reliable, valid and feasible? Glob Health Promot. 2018;25(4):6–14.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Nutbeam D, Lloyd JE. Understanding and responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2021;42(1):159–73.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Yusoff HAM, Hamzah MR, Manaf ARA, Ismail A, Ahmad Y, Hussin H. The influence of health literacy on health outcomes: a systematic literature review perspective. In: 2021: AIP Publishing.
6.
Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(2):97–107.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care: National Statement on Health Literacy. In: Sydney NSW, editor. Taking action to improve safety and quality. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2014.
8.
9.
Dietscher C, Pelikan J, Bobek J, Nowak P, World Health O. The Action Network on Measuring Population and Organizational Health Literacy (M-POHL): a network under the umbrella of the WHO European Health Information Initiative (EHII). Public Health Panorama. 2019;5(01):65–71.
10.
Dodson S, Good S, Osborne R. Health literacy toolkit for low-and middle-income countries: a series of information sheets to empower communities and strengthen health systems. In. New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2015.
11.
12.
Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, Fullam J, Kondilis B, Agrafiotis D, Uiters E. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(6):1053–8.CrossRef
13.
Mialhe FL, Moraes KL, Bado FMR, Brasil VV, Sampaio HADC, Rebustini F. Psychometric properties of the adapted instrument European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire short-short form. Rev Latinoam Enferm 2021, 29.
14.
Mekhail KT, Burström B, Marttila A, Wångdahl J, Lindberg L. Psychometric qualities of the HLS-EU-Q16 instrument for parental health literacy in Swedish multicultural settings. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
17.
Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the health literacy questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013;13:658.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
Okan O, Lopes E, Bollweg TM, Bröder J, Messer M, Bruland D, Bond E, Carvalho GS, Sørensen K, Saboga-Nunes LJBPH. Generic health literacy measurement instruments for children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):166.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Haun JN, Valerio MA, McCormack LA, Sørensen K, Paasche-Orlow MK. Health literacy measurement: an inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments. J Health Commun. 2014;19(sup2):302–33.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Guo S, Armstrong R, Waters E, Sathish T, Alif SM, Browne GR, Yu X. Quality of health literacy instruments used in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e020080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Pelikan JM, Link T, Straßmayr C, Waldherr K, Alfers T, Bøggild H, Griebler R, Lopatina M, Mikšová D, Nielsen MG et al. Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population: the Development and Validation of the HLS(19)-Q12 instrument in Seventeen Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022, 19(21).
23.
Lopatina M, Berens E-M, Klinger J, Levin-Zamir D, Kostareva U, Aringazina A, Drapkina O, Pelikan JM. Adaptation of the health literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS19-Q) for russian-speaking populations—international collaboration across Germany, Israel, Kazakhstan, Russia, and the USA. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6):3572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zhang L, Ding D, Fethney J, Neubeck L, Gallagher R. Tools to measure health literacy among Chinese speakers: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(5):888–97.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Huang Y, Ruan T, Yi Q, Wang T, Guo Z. The health literacy questionnaire among the aged in Changsha, China: confirmatory factor analysis. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Mantwill S, Schulz PJ. Health literacy in Mainland China: validation of a functional health literacy test in simplified Chinese. Health Promot Int. 2016;31(4):742–8.PubMed
27.
Sun X, Chen J, Shi Y, Zeng Q, Wei N, Xie R, Chang C, Du W. Measuring health literacy regarding infectious respiratory diseases: a new skills-based instrument. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64153.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Chang L-C, Chen Y-C, Liao L-L, Wu FL, Hsieh P-L, Chen H-J. Validation of the instrument of health literacy competencies for chinese-speaking health professionals. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0172859.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Charter RA. Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1999;21(4):559–66.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.CrossRef
31.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–91.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Haddock CK, Poston WS, Pyle SA, Klesges RC, Vander Weg MW, Peterson A, Debon M. The validity of self-rated health as a measure of health status among young military personnel: evidence from a cross-sectional survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006;4:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Guo S, Naccarella L, Yu X, Armstrong R, Browne G, Shi Y, Davis E. Health literacy and its mediating role in predicting health behaviors among Chinese secondary students. Asia Pac J Public Health 2020:1010539520980926.
35.
Guo S. Understanding and measuring health literacy among secondary students in Beijing and Melbourne. PhD thesis Melbourne, Australia: The University of Melbourne; 2018.
36.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2023.
37.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Barber MN, Staples M, Osborne RH, Clerehan R, Elder C, Buchbinder R. Up to a quarter of the Australian population may have suboptimal health literacy depending upon the measurement tool: results from a population-based survey. Health Promot Int. 2009;24(3):252–61.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Kostareva U, Albright CL, Berens E-M, Klinger J, Ivanov LL, Guttersrud Ø, Liu M, Sentell TL. Health literacy in former Soviet Union immigrants in the US: a mixed methods study. Appl Nurs Res. 2022;67:151598.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Fleary SA, Joseph P, Pappagianopoulos JE. Adolescent health literacy and health behaviors: a systematic review. J Adolesc. 2018;62:116–27.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Vandenbosch J, Van den Broucke S, Vancorenland S, Avalosse H, Verniest R, Callens M. Health literacy and the use of healthcare services in Belgium. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(10):1032–8.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Lee S-YD, Tsai T-I, Tsai Y-W. Accuracy in self-reported health literacy screening: a difference between men and women in Taiwan. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11):e002928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Measuring General Health Literacy in Chinese adults: validation of the HLS19-Q12 instrument
Authors
Rongmei Liu
Qiuping Zhao
Mingyang Yu
Hui Chen
Xiaomo Yang
Shuaibin Liu
Orkan Okan
Xinghan Chen
Yuhan Xing
Shuaijun Guo
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17977-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Correction

Correction: Racial discrimination is associated with food insecurity, stress, and worse physical health among college students

Research

The effects of dietary diversity on health status among the older adults: an empirical study from China

Publisher Correction

Publisher Correction: Association between the circulating very long-chain saturated fatty acid and cognitive function in older adults: findings from the NHANES

Research

Effect of low-frequency noise exposure on cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research

Participatory development of an mHealth intervention delivered in general practice to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour of patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (ENERGISED)

Research

A rapid review of opportunities and challenges in the implementation of social prescription interventions for addressing the unmet needs of individuals living with long-term chronic conditions