Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Effect of low-frequency noise exposure on cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Peng Liang, Jiangjing Li, Zenglei Li, Jing Wei, Jing Li, Shenghao Zhang, Shenglong Xu, Zhaohui Liu, Jin Wang

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low-frequency noise may cause changes in cognitive function. However, there is no established consensus on the effect of low-frequency noise on cognitive function. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the relationship between low-frequency noise exposure and cognitive function.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and identified original studies written in English on low-frequency noise and cognition published before December 2022 using the PsycINFO, PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science databases. The risk of bias was evaluated according to established guidelines. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. To explore the association between low-frequency noise exposure and cognitive function, we reviewed eight relevant studies. These studies covered cognitive functions grouped into four domains: attention, executive function, memory, and higher-order cognitive functions. The data extraction process was followed by a random-effects meta-analysis for each domain, which allowed us to quantify the overall effect.

Results

Our analysis of the selected studies suggested that interventions involving low-frequency noise only had a negative impact on higher-order cognitive functions (Z = 2.42, p = 0.02), with a standardized mean difference of -0.37 (95% confidence interval: -0.67, -0.07). A moderate level of heterogeneity was observed among studies (p = 0.24, I2 = 29%, Tau2 = 0.03).

Conclusions

Our study findings suggest that low-frequency noise can negatively impact higher-order cognitive functions, such as logical reasoning, mathematical calculation, and data processing. Therefore, it becomes important to consider the potential negative consequences of low-frequency noise in everyday situations, and proactive measures should be taken to address this issue and mitigate the associated potential adverse outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Babisch W, Fromme H, Beyer A, Ising H. Increased catecholamine levels in urine in subjects exposed to road traffic noise: the role of stress hormones in noise research. Environ Int. 2001;26:475–81.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
4.
Leventhall HG. Low frequency noise and annoyance. Noise Health. 2004;6:59–72.PubMed
5.
Leventhall G. Low frequency noise. What we know, what we do not know, and what we would like to know. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control. 2019;28:79–104.CrossRef
6.
Pawlaczyk-Luszczyniska M, Dudarewicz A, Waszkowska M, Szymczak W, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. The impact of low-frequency noise on human mental performance. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2005;18:185–98.PubMed
7.
Waye KP, Clow A, Edwards S, Hucklebridge F, Rylander R. Effects of nighttime low frequency noise on the cortisol response to awakening and subjective sleep quality. Life Sci. 2003;72:863–75.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M, Dudarewicz A, Szymczak W, Sliwinska-Kowalska M. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions. Noise Health. 2010;12:166–81.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH. New who guidelines for community noise. Noise & Vibration Worldwide. 2000;31:24–9.CrossRef
10.
Heroux ME, Braubach M, Dramac D, Korol N, Paunovic E, Zastenskaya I. [Summary of ongoing activities on environmental noise and health at the WHO regional office for Europe]. Gig Sanit. 2014;5:25–8.
11.
Jarosinska D, Heroux ME, Wilkhu P, Creswick J, Verbeek J, Wothge J, et al. Development of the WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: an introduction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:813.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
WHO. Burden of disease from environmental noise. Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. 2011.
13.
Ascone L, Kling C, Wieczorek J, Koch C, Kuhn S. A longitudinal, randomized experimental pilot study to investigate the effects of airborne infrasound on human mental health, cognition, and brain structure. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3190.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
15.
Clark C, Paunovic K. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and cognition. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15: 285.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
Thompson R, Smith RB, Bou KY, Shen C, Drummond K, Teng C, et al. Noise pollution and human cognition: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence. Environ Int. 2022;158: 106905.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383:1325–32.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Clark C, Martin R, van Kempen E, Alfred T, Head J, Davies HW, et al. Exposure-effect relations between aircraft and road traffic noise exposure at school and reading comprehension: the RANCH project. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:27–37.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Hahad O, Prochaska JH, Daiber A, Muenzel T. Environmental noise-Induced effects on stress hormones, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction: key factors in the relationship between cerebrocardiovascular and psychological disorders. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:4623109.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Stansfeld S, Clark C. Health effects of noise exposure in children. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2015;2:171–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Liu Z, Gong L, Li X, Ye L, Wang B, Liu J, et al. Infrasound increases intracellular calcium concentration and induces apoptosis in hippocampi of adult rats. Mol Med Rep. 2012;5:73–7.PubMed
22.
Berglund B, Hassmén P, Job R. Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996;99:2985–3002.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Waye KP. Adverse effects of moderate levels of low frequency noise in the occupational environment. ASHRAE Trans. 2005;111:672–83.
24.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Sterne J, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Belojevic G, Ohrstrom E, Rylander R. Effects of noise on mental performance with regard to subjective noise sensitivity. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1992;64:293–301.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Gianola S, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Banzi R. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;126:37–44.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10:D142.
29.
Cumpston MS, McKenzie JE, Welch VA, Brennan SE. Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: Guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022;44:e588-592.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Crocker TF, Lam N, Jordao M, Brundle C, Prescott M, Forster A, et al. Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane’s revised tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;161:39–45.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Lan Y, Roberts H, Kwan MP, Helbich M. Transportation noise exposure and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2020;191:110118.
32.
McKenzie JE, Beller EM, Forbes AB. Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Respirology. 2016;21:626–37.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Doi S, Furuya-Kanamori L. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020;18:86–94.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Bender R, Kuss O, Langan D, Higgins J, et al. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10:23–43.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:97–111.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Schmidt FL, Oh IS, Hayes TL. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: Model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009;62:97–128.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;1:101–29.CrossRef
38.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Gill LN, Renault R, Campbell E, Rainville P, Khoury B. Mindfulness induction and cognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Conscious Cogn. 2020;84: 102991.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Maldonado T, Goen J, Imburgio MJ, Eakin SM, Bernard JA. Single session high definition transcranial direct current stimulation to the cerebellum does not impact higher cognitive function. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e222995.CrossRef
42.
E KH, Chen SH, Ho MH, Desmond JE. A meta-analysis of cerebellar contributions to higher cognition from PET and fMRI studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:593–615.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Schaffer B, Taghipour A, Wunderli JM, Brink M, Bartha L, Schlittmeier SJ. Does the macro-temporal pattern of road traffic noise affect noise annoyance and cognitive performance? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19: 4255.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Schlittmeier SJ, Feil A, Liebl A, Hellbr CJ. The impact of road traffic noise on cognitive performance in attention-based tasks depends on noise level even within moderate-level ranges. Noise Health. 2015;17:148–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Tangermann L, Vienneau D, Saucy A, Hattendorf J, Schaffer B, Wunderli JM, et al. The association of road traffic noise with cognition in adolescents: a cohort study in Switzerland. Environ Res. 2023;218: 115031.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Gomes LM, Martinho PA, Castelo BN. Effects of occupational exposure to low frequency noise on cognition. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999;70:A115-118.PubMed
47.
Javadi A, Pourabdian S, Forouharmajd F. The effect of low frequency noises exposure on the precision of human at the mathematical tasks. Int J Prev Med. 2022;13:33.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Ljung R, Sorqvist P, Hygge S. Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children’s reading and mathematical performance. Noise Health. 2009;11:194–8.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Nakashima A, Abel SM, Duncan M, Smith D. Hearing, communication and cognition in low-frequency noise from armoured vehicles. Noise Health. 2007;9:35–41.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Alimohammadi I, Sandrock S, Gohari MR. The effects of low frequency noise on mental performance and annoyance. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:7043–51.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Gao H, Shi J, Cheng H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. The impact of long- and short-term exposure to different ambient air pollutants on cognitive function in China. Environ Int. 2021;151: 106416.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Liang P, Li Z, Li J, Wei J, Li J, Zhang S, et al. Impacts of complex electromagnetic radiation and low-frequency noise exposure conditions on the cognitive function of operators. Front Public Health. 2023;11: 1138118.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Persson WK, Bengtsson J, Kjellberg A, Benton S. Low frequency noise pollution interferes with performance. Noise Health. 2001;4:33–49.
Metadata
Title
Effect of low-frequency noise exposure on cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Peng Liang
Jiangjing Li
Zenglei Li
Jing Wei
Jing Li
Shenghao Zhang
Shenglong Xu
Zhaohui Liu
Jin Wang
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17593-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

The regional disparities in liver disease comorbidity among elderly Chinese based on a health ecological model: the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

Research

Association of volatile organic compound exposure with metabolic syndrome and its components: a nationwide cross-sectional study

Research

Level of completion of a continuum of age-appropriate infant feeding practices and barriers among breastfeeding mothers in Ethiopia: a mixed methods study

Research

Out-of-pocket expenditures associated with double disease burden in Pakistan: a quantile regression analysis

Research

Integrating China in the International Consortium for Personalised Medicine: a position paper on innovation and digitalization in Personalized Medicine

Research

What may encourage or deter health services utilization by people living with or at the risk of HIV/AIDS in special health centers? Qualitative evidence from a stigmatized community