Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009

01-10-2009

Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation

Authors: Jennifer E. Keller, Charles J. Dolce, Daniel Griffin, B. Todd Heniford, Kent W. Kercher

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 10/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Studies have shown donor and recipient outcomes to be equivalent for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and open donor nephrectomy. In the past, LDN has been avoided in the procurement of the right kidney or organs with multiple arteries. This study compares procurement of right and left kidneys as well as procurement of single- and multiple artery organs.

Methods

A review of all LDNs at a single institution between August 2000 and December 2007 was performed. The data included estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion, operative time, warm ischemia time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and delayed graft function. Arterial supply was assessed using renal arteriogram or computed tomographic (CT) angiography. Outcomes for multiple versus single artery and left versus right LDN were compared. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical comparison.

Results

A total of 230 LDNs were performed. Multiple arteries were present in 37 donors. The right kidney was procured from 36 donors. No significant difference in EBL, transfusions, operative time, or LOS was noted between multiple and single or right and left LDNs. Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for multiple arteries (mean, 83 s) than for single arteries (mean, 63 s; p = 0.007), and for right kidneys (mean, 86 s) than for left kidneys (mean, 62 s; p = 0.001). No significant difference in delayed graft function was seen in the comparison of multiple (21.6%) and single (11.4%) artery organs (p = 0.11) or of right (13.9%) and left (12.9%) kidneys (p = 0.79).

Conclusions

The presence of multiple arteries or the need to procure the right kidney does not affect the operative outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Warm ischemia time may be greater for these groups, but this does not result in delayed allograft function. The laparoscopic approach should be the standard of care even when expansion of the donor pool includes organs with multiple arteries and procurement of the right kidney.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:58–70CrossRefPubMed Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:58–70CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Smith TI, Lincourt AE, Hayes DH, Eskind LB, Irby PB, Teigland CM (2003) Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 17:1889–1895CrossRefPubMed Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Smith TI, Lincourt AE, Hayes DH, Eskind LB, Irby PB, Teigland CM (2003) Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 17:1889–1895CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, Rajfer J, Schulam PG (2003) Quality of life, pain, and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021CrossRefPubMed Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, Rajfer J, Schulam PG (2003) Quality of life, pain, and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV (2003) Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 3:1295–1301CrossRefPubMed Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV (2003) Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 3:1295–1301CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Del Pizzo JJ, Sklar GN, You-Cheong JW, Levin B, Krebs T, Jacobs SC (1999) Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 162:31–34CrossRefPubMed Del Pizzo JJ, Sklar GN, You-Cheong JW, Levin B, Krebs T, Jacobs SC (1999) Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 162:31–34CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bhatti AA, Chugtai A, Haslam P, Talbot D, Rix DA, Soomro NA (2005) Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. BJU Int 96:1105–1108CrossRefPubMed Bhatti AA, Chugtai A, Haslam P, Talbot D, Rix DA, Soomro NA (2005) Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. BJU Int 96:1105–1108CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV (2001) Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 136:897–907CrossRefPubMed Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV (2001) Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 136:897–907CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kuo PC, Cho ES, Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Bartlett ST, Johnson LB (1998) Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries. Am J Surg 176:559–563CrossRefPubMed Kuo PC, Cho ES, Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Bartlett ST, Johnson LB (1998) Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries. Am J Surg 176:559–563CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR (2003) Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:323–327CrossRefPubMed Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR (2003) Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:323–327CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Carter JT, Freise CE, McTaggart RA, Mahanty HD, Kang SM, Chan SH, Feng S, Roberts JP, Posselt AM (2005) Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant 5:1312–1318CrossRefPubMed Carter JT, Freise CE, McTaggart RA, Mahanty HD, Kang SM, Chan SH, Feng S, Roberts JP, Posselt AM (2005) Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant 5:1312–1318CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Breda A, Veale J, Liao J, Schulam PG (2007) Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience. Urology 69:49–52CrossRefPubMed Breda A, Veale J, Liao J, Schulam PG (2007) Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience. Urology 69:49–52CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Buzdon MM, Cho E, Jacobs SC, Jarrell B, Flowers JL (2003) Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 17:746–749CrossRefPubMed Buzdon MM, Cho E, Jacobs SC, Jarrell B, Flowers JL (2003) Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 17:746–749CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Meng MV, Freise CE, Kang SM, Duh QY, Stoller ML (2003) Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:93–97; discussion 97–98CrossRefPubMed Meng MV, Freise CE, Kang SM, Duh QY, Stoller ML (2003) Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:93–97; discussion 97–98CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Woodle ES (2003) Maximizing renal artery length in right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by retrocaval exposure of the aortorenal junction. Transplantation 75:83–85CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Woodle ES (2003) Maximizing renal artery length in right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by retrocaval exposure of the aortorenal junction. Transplantation 75:83–85CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M, Li C, Koffron A, Cho E, Kuo P, Johnson L, Hanaway M, Potter SR, Bruce DS, Cronin DC, Newell KA, Leventhal J, Jacobs S, Woodle ES, Bartlett ST, Flowers JL (2001) Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg 233:645–651CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M, Li C, Koffron A, Cho E, Kuo P, Johnson L, Hanaway M, Potter SR, Bruce DS, Cronin DC, Newell KA, Leventhal J, Jacobs S, Woodle ES, Bartlett ST, Flowers JL (2001) Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg 233:645–651CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Swartz DE, Cho E, Flowers JL, Dunkin BJ, Ramey JR, Bartlett ST, Jarrell B, Jacobs SC (2001) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: technique and comparison with left nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 15:1390–1394PubMed Swartz DE, Cho E, Flowers JL, Dunkin BJ, Ramey JR, Bartlett ST, Jarrell B, Jacobs SC (2001) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: technique and comparison with left nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 15:1390–1394PubMed
19.
go back to reference Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, Roberts JP, Freise CE (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669CrossRefPubMed Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, Roberts JP, Freise CE (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Husted TL, Hanaway MJ, Thomas MJ, Woodle ES, Buell JF (2005) Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 37:631–632CrossRefPubMed Husted TL, Hanaway MJ, Thomas MJ, Woodle ES, Buell JF (2005) Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 37:631–632CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Weimar W, Jaap Bonjer H, IJ JN (2002) Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation 74:1045–1048CrossRefPubMed Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Weimar W, Jaap Bonjer H, IJ JN (2002) Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation 74:1045–1048CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation
Authors
Jennifer E. Keller
Charles J. Dolce
Daniel Griffin
B. Todd Heniford
Kent W. Kercher
Publication date
01-10-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0330-9

Other articles of this Issue 10/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 10/2009 Go to the issue

News and notices

News and Notices