Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2003

01-05-2003

Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Authors: M. M. Buzdon, E. Cho, S. C. Jacobs, B. Jarrell, J. L. Flowers

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective option for renal procurement. Studies comparing open nephrectomy and hand-assisted laparoscopy have emphasized decreased warm ischemia time when compared with “pure” laparoscopic retrieval. However, no data exist that define exactly what constitutes a prolonged warm ischemia time in terms of recipient graft function. The aim of this study was to use a large, single-institution experience with LDN to determine if warm ischemia time correlates with recipient graft function as measured by serum creatinine levels. Methods: A total of 640 LDNs were performed from March 1996 to August 2001. Warm ischemia times were prospectively collected and were defined as the time from renal artery occlusion to immersion in iced saline. Serial recipient creatinine levels were measured at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (when possible) from the transplant. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis at a confidence interval of 95%. Results: Mean warm ischemia time was 151 s with a standard error of 3.4 s and ranged from 35 to 720 s. Recipient creatinine mean at 1 week was 1.94 mg/dl with a standard error of 0.06 mg/dl and ranged from 0.5 to 10.5 mg/dl. Recipient creatinine mean at 1 month was 1.68 mg/dl with a standard error of 0.06 mg/dl and ranged from 0.6 to 8.5 mg/dl. Recipient creatinine mean at 3 months was 1.60 mg/dl with a standard error of 0.04 mg/dl and ranged from 0.6 to 8.8 mg/dl. Recipient creatinine mean at 6 months was 1.63 mg/dl with a standard error of 0.06 mg/dl and ranged from 0.7 to 13.5 mg/dl. Recipient creatinine mean at 12 months was 1.70 mg/dl with a standard error of 0.07 mg/dl and ranged from 0.5 to 14.5 mg/dl. No correlation was found between warm ischemia time and recipient creatinine levels at 1 week (p = 0.4737), 1 month (p = 0.9180), 3 months (p = 0.6227), 6 months (p = 0.8349), or 12 months (p = 0.2835). Conclusions: Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in LDN within the range of times studied. Shorter warm ischemia time associated with open donor nephrectomy and hand-assisted LDN does not necessarily offer a measurable advantage in recipient graft function. During extraction of the kidney, expediency to minimize warm ischemia time should not supersede controlled and safe maneuvers in renal vessel division and extraction of the kidney.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown, SL, Biehl, TR, Rawlins, MC, Hefty, TR 2001Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach.J Urol165766769PubMed Brown, SL, Biehl, TR, Rawlins, MC, Hefty, TR 2001Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the conventional open approach.J Urol165766769PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jacobs, SC, Cho, E, Dunkin, BJ, Flowers, JL, Schweitzer, E, Cangro, C, Fink, J, Farney, A, Philosophe, B, Jarrell, B, Bartlett, ST 2000Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience.J Urol16414941499PubMed Jacobs, SC, Cho, E, Dunkin, BJ, Flowers, JL, Schweitzer, E, Cangro, C, Fink, J, Farney, A, Philosophe, B, Jarrell, B, Bartlett, ST 2000Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience.J Urol16414941499PubMed
3.
go back to reference Jacobs, SC, Flowers, JL, Dunkin, BJ, Sklar, GK, Cho, E 1999Living donor nephrectomy.Curr Opin Urol9115120CrossRefPubMed Jacobs, SC, Flowers, JL, Dunkin, BJ, Sklar, GK, Cho, E 1999Living donor nephrectomy.Curr Opin Urol9115120CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kercher, K, Dahl, D, Harland, R, Blute, R, Gallagher, K, Litwin, D 2001Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia.Urology58152156CrossRefPubMed Kercher, K, Dahl, D, Harland, R, Blute, R, Gallagher, K, Litwin, D 2001Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes warm ischemia.Urology58152156CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Koffron, A, Herman, C, Gross, O, Ferrario, M, Kaufman, D, Abecassis, M, Fryer, J, Stuart, F, Leventhal, J 2001Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: analysis of donor and recipient outcomes.Transplant Proc331111CrossRefPubMed Koffron, A, Herman, C, Gross, O, Ferrario, M, Kaufman, D, Abecassis, M, Fryer, J, Stuart, F, Leventhal, J 2001Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: analysis of donor and recipient outcomes.Transplant Proc331111CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference London, E, Rudich, S, McVicar, J, Wolfe, B, Perez, R 1999Equivalent renal allograft function with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomies.Transplant Proc31258260 London, E, Rudich, S, McVicar, J, Wolfe, B, Perez, R 1999Equivalent renal allograft function with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomies.Transplant Proc31258260
7.
go back to reference Novotny, MJ 2001Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Urol Clin North Am28127135PubMed Novotny, MJ 2001Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.Urol Clin North Am28127135PubMed
8.
go back to reference Opelz, G 1998Cadaver kidney graft outcome in relation to ischemia time and HLA match.Transplant Proc3042944296PubMed Opelz, G 1998Cadaver kidney graft outcome in relation to ischemia time and HLA match.Transplant Proc3042944296PubMed
9.
go back to reference Rudich, SM, Marcovich, R, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Campbell, DA, Merion, RM, Konnak, JW, Wolf, JS 2001Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy.Transplant Proc3311061107CrossRefPubMed Rudich, SM, Marcovich, R, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Campbell, DA, Merion, RM, Konnak, JW, Wolf, JS 2001Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: comparable donor/recipient outcomes, costs, and decreased convalescence as compared to open donor nephrectomy.Transplant Proc3311061107CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ruiz-Deya, G, Cheng, S, Palmer, E, Thomas, R, Slakey, D 2001Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes.J Urol16612701274PubMed Ruiz-Deya, G, Cheng, S, Palmer, E, Thomas, R, Slakey, D 2001Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes.J Urol16612701274PubMed
11.
go back to reference Schweitzer, EJ, Wilson, J, Jacobs, SC, Machan, CH, Philosophe, B, Farney, A, Colonna, J, Jarrell, BE, Bartlett, ST 2000Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg232392400CrossRefPubMed Schweitzer, EJ, Wilson, J, Jacobs, SC, Machan, CH, Philosophe, B, Farney, A, Colonna, J, Jarrell, BE, Bartlett, ST 2000Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.Ann Surg232392400CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shiroki, R, Hoshinaga, K, Higuchi, T, Tsukiashi, Y, Kubota, Y, Maruyama, M, Izumitani, M, Horiba, M, Naide, Y, Kanno, T 1998Prolonged warm ischemia affects long-term prognosis of kidney transplant allografts from non-heart-beating donors.Transplant Proc30111113CrossRefPubMed Shiroki, R, Hoshinaga, K, Higuchi, T, Tsukiashi, Y, Kubota, Y, Maruyama, M, Izumitani, M, Horiba, M, Naide, Y, Kanno, T 1998Prolonged warm ischemia affects long-term prognosis of kidney transplant allografts from non-heart-beating donors.Transplant Proc30111113CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Slakey, DP, Wood, JC, Hender, D, Thomas, R, Cheng, S 1999Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: advantages of hand-assist method.Transplantation68581583PubMed Slakey, DP, Wood, JC, Hender, D, Thomas, R, Cheng, S 1999Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: advantages of hand-assist method.Transplantation68581583PubMed
14.
go back to reference Stifelman, MD, Hull, D, Sosa, RE, Su, L, Hyman, M, Stubenbord, W, Shichman, S 2001Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach.J Urol166444448PubMed Stifelman, MD, Hull, D, Sosa, RE, Su, L, Hyman, M, Stubenbord, W, Shichman, S 2001Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach.J Urol166444448PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wolf, JS, Marcovich, R, Merion, R, Konnak, J 2001Prospective, case-matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.J Urol16316501653 Wolf, JS, Marcovich, R, Merion, R, Konnak, J 2001Prospective, case-matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.J Urol16316501653
16.
go back to reference Wolf, JS, Merion, RM, Leitchman, AB, Campbell, DA, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Turcotte, JG, Konnak, JW 2001Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation72284290PubMed Wolf, JS, Merion, RM, Leitchman, AB, Campbell, DA, Magee, JC, Punch, JD, Turcotte, JG, Konnak, JW 2001Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy.Transplantation72284290PubMed
Metadata
Title
Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
Authors
M. M. Buzdon
E. Cho
S. C. Jacobs
B. Jarrell
J. L. Flowers
Publication date
01-05-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2003
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8860-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2003

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2003 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Construct validity