Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019

01-11-2019 | Mastectomy | Epidemiology

The impact of hospital volume on patient safety indicators following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in the US

Authors: Clifford C. Sheckter, Danielle Rochlin, Harriet Kiwanuka, Catherine Curtin, Arash Momeni

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the growing spotlight on value-based care and patient safety, little is known about the influence of patient-, reconstruction-, and facility-level factors on safety events following breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to characterize postoperative complications in light of hospital-level risk factors.

Methods

Using the National Inpatient Sample, all patients who underwent free flap and prosthetic breast reconstruction from 2012 to 2014 were identified. Predictor variables included patient demographic and clinical characteristics, type and timing of reconstruction, annual hospital reconstructive volume, hospital bed size, hospital setting (rural vs. urban), and length of stay. Patient safety indicators (PSIs) were based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s designation of preventable hospital complications: venous thromboembolism, bleeding, wound complications, pneumonia, and sepsis. Logistic models were used to analyze outcomes.

Results

The sample included 103,301 women, of which 27,695 (26.8%) underwent free flap reconstruction. 3.6% of patients experienced ≥ 1 PSI, most commonly wound PSI (4.9% and 2.5% for free flap and prosthetic reconstruction, respectively). Significant predictors of PSIs included rural setting (p < 0.01) and Elixhauser score ≥ 4 (p < 0.01) for the free flap group, and delayed reconstruction (p < 0.01) for the prosthetic group. Annual reconstructive facility volume was not associated with increased odds of PSIs in either prosthetic or free flap reconstruction (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

PSIs were associated with rural hospitals and greater comorbidities for patients undergoing reconstruction with free flaps. Annual reconstructive facility volume was not associated with adverse inpatient outcomes with either method of reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee GK, Sheckter CC (2018) Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment-2018. JAMA 320(12):1277–1278CrossRef Lee GK, Sheckter CC (2018) Breast reconstruction following breast cancer treatment-2018. JAMA 320(12):1277–1278CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kobraei EM, Nimtz J, Wong L, Buseman J, Kemper P, Wright H et al (2012) Risk factors for adverse outcome following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):234e–241eCrossRef Kobraei EM, Nimtz J, Wong L, Buseman J, Kemper P, Wright H et al (2012) Risk factors for adverse outcome following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate prosthetic reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(2):234e–241eCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sousa J, Sood R, Liu D, Calhoun K, Louie O, Neligan P et al (2018) Comparison of outcomes in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone. Plast Surg 26(1):18–25CrossRef Sousa J, Sood R, Liu D, Calhoun K, Louie O, Neligan P et al (2018) Comparison of outcomes in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction versus mastectomy alone. Plast Surg 26(1):18–25CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG (2018) Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):901–908CrossRef Bennett KG, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG (2018) Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg 153(10):901–908CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA (2004) Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care 42(4):355–360CrossRef Southern DA, Quan H, Ghali WA (2004) Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Med Care 42(4):355–360CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gourin CG, Stewart CM, Frick KD, Fakhry C, Pitman KT, Eisele DW et al (2018) Association of hospital volume with laryngectomy outcomes in patients with larynx cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:62–70CrossRef Gourin CG, Stewart CM, Frick KD, Fakhry C, Pitman KT, Eisele DW et al (2018) Association of hospital volume with laryngectomy outcomes in patients with larynx cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145:62–70CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fox N, Willcutt R, Elberfeld A, Porter J, Mazzarelli AJ (2017) A critical review of patient safety indicators attributed to trauma surgeons. Injury 48:1994–1998CrossRef Fox N, Willcutt R, Elberfeld A, Porter J, Mazzarelli AJ (2017) A critical review of patient safety indicators attributed to trauma surgeons. Injury 48:1994–1998CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zhou X (ed) (2014) Applied missing data analysis in the health sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, p 230 Zhou X (ed) (2014) Applied missing data analysis in the health sciences. Wiley, Hoboken, p 230
12.
go back to reference Kamali P, Curiel D, van Veldhuisen CL, Bucknor AEM, Lee BT, Rakhorst HA et al (2017) Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and early complication rates among older women: a big data analysis. J Surg Oncol 115(7):870–877CrossRef Kamali P, Curiel D, van Veldhuisen CL, Bucknor AEM, Lee BT, Rakhorst HA et al (2017) Trends in immediate breast reconstruction and early complication rates among older women: a big data analysis. J Surg Oncol 115(7):870–877CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast Edinb Scotl 32:7–12CrossRef Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM (2017) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast Edinb Scotl 32:7–12CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sabino J, Lucas DJ, Shriver CD, Vertrees AE, Valerio IL, Singh DP (2016) NSQIP analysis: increased immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Am Surg 82(6):540–545PubMed Sabino J, Lucas DJ, Shriver CD, Vertrees AE, Valerio IL, Singh DP (2016) NSQIP analysis: increased immediate reconstruction in the treatment of breast cancer. Am Surg 82(6):540–545PubMed
15.
go back to reference Hernandez-Boussard T, McDonald KM, Rhoads KF, Curtin CM (2015) Patient safety in plastic surgery: identifying areas for quality improvement efforts. Ann Plast Surg 74(5):597–602CrossRef Hernandez-Boussard T, McDonald KM, Rhoads KF, Curtin CM (2015) Patient safety in plastic surgery: identifying areas for quality improvement efforts. Ann Plast Surg 74(5):597–602CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Alderman AKMD, Wilkins EGMD, Kim HMSD, Lowery JC (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274CrossRef Alderman AKMD, Wilkins EGMD, Kim HMSD, Lowery JC (2002) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: two-year results of the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(7):2265–2274CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Kim JY, Greco RJ, Qi J et al (2018) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction one-year outcomes of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study. Ann Surg 267(1):164–170CrossRef Wilkins EG, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Kim JY, Greco RJ, Qi J et al (2018) Complications in postmastectomy breast reconstruction one-year outcomes of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study. Ann Surg 267(1):164–170CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Panchal H, Matros E (2017) Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S–13SCrossRef Panchal H, Matros E (2017) Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S–13SCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN (2007) Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:35CrossRef Shervin N, Rubash HE, Katz JN (2007) Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:35CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK (2011) The association between hospital volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care for congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 154(2):94–102CrossRef Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK (2011) The association between hospital volume and processes, outcomes, and costs of care for congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 154(2):94–102CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS et al (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230(3):404CrossRef Harmon JW, Tang DG, Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Choti MA, Kaufman HS et al (1999) Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection. Ann Surg 230(3):404CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar REM (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. BJS 98(4):485–494CrossRef Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar REM (2011) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. BJS 98(4):485–494CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jain NB, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Bond TK, Higgins LD (2005) Comorbidities increase complication rates in patients having arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:232CrossRef Jain NB, Guller U, Pietrobon R, Bond TK, Higgins LD (2005) Comorbidities increase complication rates in patients having arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:232CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Peleg AY, Hooper DC (2010) Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med 362(19):1804–1813CrossRef Peleg AY, Hooper DC (2010) Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med 362(19):1804–1813CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Horn SR, Liu TC, Horowitz JA, Oh C, Bortz CA, Segreto FA et al (2018) Clinical impact and economic burden of hospital-acquired conditions following common surgical procedures. Spine 43(22):E1358–E1363CrossRef Horn SR, Liu TC, Horowitz JA, Oh C, Bortz CA, Segreto FA et al (2018) Clinical impact and economic burden of hospital-acquired conditions following common surgical procedures. Spine 43(22):E1358–E1363CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Haut ER, Lau BD, Kraus PS, Hobson DB, Maheshwari B, Pronovost PJ et al (2015) Preventability of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg 150(9):912–915CrossRef Haut ER, Lau BD, Kraus PS, Hobson DB, Maheshwari B, Pronovost PJ et al (2015) Preventability of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg 150(9):912–915CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bond CA, Raehl CL, Franke T (2002) Clinical pharmacy services, hospital pharmacy staffing, and medication errors in United States Hospitals. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther 22(2):134–147CrossRef Bond CA, Raehl CL, Franke T (2002) Clinical pharmacy services, hospital pharmacy staffing, and medication errors in United States Hospitals. Pharmacother J Hum Pharmacol Drug Ther 22(2):134–147CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Downs RK, Hedges K (2016) An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e821CrossRef Downs RK, Hedges K (2016) An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(7):e821CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J et al (2017) Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):287–294CrossRef Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J et al (2017) Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):287–294CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stanley SS, Hoppe IC, Ciminello FS (2012) Pain control following breast augmentation: a qualitative systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):964–972CrossRef Stanley SS, Hoppe IC, Ciminello FS (2012) Pain control following breast augmentation: a qualitative systematic review. Aesthet Surg J 32(8):964–972CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Coffey RM, Andrews RM, Moy E (2005) Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in estimates of AHRQ patient safety indicators. Med Care 43(3 Suppl):I48–I57PubMed Coffey RM, Andrews RM, Moy E (2005) Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in estimates of AHRQ patient safety indicators. Med Care 43(3 Suppl):I48–I57PubMed
34.
go back to reference Greenland S, Finkle WD (1995) A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol 142(12):1255–1264CrossRef Greenland S, Finkle WD (1995) A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol 142(12):1255–1264CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of hospital volume on patient safety indicators following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in the US
Authors
Clifford C. Sheckter
Danielle Rochlin
Harriet Kiwanuka
Catherine Curtin
Arash Momeni
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Mastectomy
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05361-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine