Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2019

01-06-2019 | Mastectomy | Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Surgical Therapy for Women with Multiple Synchronous Ipsilateral Breast Cancer (MIBC): Current Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice

Authors: David Linshaw, Jennifer Tonneson, Kari Rosenkranz

Published in: Current Breast Cancer Reports | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Based on retrospective, historic data, surgeons have long recommended mastectomy as the surgical approach for women with multiple ipsilateral synchronous (multifocal or multi-centric) breast cancer (MIBC). In the modern era, however, local recurrence rates have significantly decreased due to improved imaging techniques and earlier detection through breast cancer screening, more accurate delivery of radiation, and the advent of targeted systemic therapies. Given the significant non-surgical advancements in the field of breast cancer care, the role of maximally invasive surgery in improving breast cancer outcomes has diminished. This raises the question as to whether the routine recommendation for mastectomy in MIBC is rooted in current evidence or archaic data. This review summarizes data regarding surgical options for women with MIBC.

Recent Findings

The incidence of MIBC is increasing as a result of improved imaging modalities and the use of breast MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. MIBC tends toward more aggressive biology and higher rates of nodal positivity but recent data contradict the notion that more aggressive surgery improves outcomes. Retrospective studies and meta-analyses performed in the current era of targeted therapy and more sensitive breast cancer detection have demonstrated equivalent rates of local regional recurrence (LRR) in women with MIBC undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) when compared stage to stage with women with unifocal disease. Alliance Z11102, the first national, prospective trial of breast conservation in the MIBC population in the USA, demonstrated the feasibility of BCT in this patient population with acceptable rates of conversion to mastectomy in the MIBC cohort. Prospective data regarding LRR and cosmetic outcomes for women undergoing BCT from completed clinical trials continue to mature, and new randomized clinical trials investigating the biology and treatment of MIBC are under design.

Summary

The incidence of MIBC is increasing due to screening mammography, improved quality of imaging, and the utilization of breast MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. Local regional recurrence rates in women with unifocal disease have decreased due to earlier detection and improved regional and systemic therapy. As adjuvant therapy improves, the extent of surgery is less impactful on LRR and long-term survival. Current data demonstrate acceptable LRR in women undergoing BCT for MIBC for whom negative surgical margins are achieved and appropriate adjuvant therapy is administered. While additional prospective data regarding biology, LRR, cosmesis, and long-term survival in women with MIBC continue to be collected, current evidence supports the role of patient choice in deciding between breast conservation and mastectomy in this population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilson LD, Beinfield M, McKhann CF, Haffty BG. Conservative surgery and radiation in the treatment of synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers. Cancer. 1993;72:137–42.PubMed Wilson LD, Beinfield M, McKhann CF, Haffty BG. Conservative surgery and radiation in the treatment of synchronous ipsilateral breast cancers. Cancer. 1993;72:137–42.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Leopold KA, Recht A, Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Rose MA, Silver B, et al. Results of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for multiple synchronous cancers of one breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16:11–6.PubMed Leopold KA, Recht A, Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Rose MA, Silver B, et al. Results of conservative surgery and radiation therapy for multiple synchronous cancers of one breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16:11–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.PubMedPubMedCentral Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Amalric R, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for macroscopically multiple cancers. Ann Surg. 1990;212:38–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hartsell WF, Recine DC, Griem KL, Cobleigh MA, Witt TR, Murthy AK. Should multicentric disease be an absolute contraindication to the use of breast-conserving therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30:49–53 22.PubMed Hartsell WF, Recine DC, Griem KL, Cobleigh MA, Witt TR, Murthy AK. Should multicentric disease be an absolute contraindication to the use of breast-conserving therapy? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;30:49–53 22.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Fowble B, Yeh IT, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ, Rosato EF, Jardines L, et al. The role of mastectomy in patients with stage I-II breast cancer presenting with gross multifocal or multicentric disease or diffuse microcalcifications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27:567–73.PubMed Fowble B, Yeh IT, Schultz DJ, Solin LJ, Rosato EF, Jardines L, et al. The role of mastectomy in patients with stage I-II breast cancer presenting with gross multifocal or multicentric disease or diffuse microcalcifications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27:567–73.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Wood WC. Should the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy be increasing as it is? Breast. 2009;18(Suppl 3):S93–5.PubMed Wood WC. Should the use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy be increasing as it is? Breast. 2009;18(Suppl 3):S93–5.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2691–6.PubMed Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2691–6.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597–605.PubMed Sorbero ME, Dick AW, Beckjord EB, Ahrendt G. Diagnostic breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1597–605.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697–704.PubMed Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697–704.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wilkinson LS, Given-Wilson R, Hall T, Potts H, Sharma AK, Smith E. Increasing the diagnosis of multifocal primary breast cancer by the use of bilateral whole-breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:573–8.PubMed Wilkinson LS, Given-Wilson R, Hall T, Potts H, Sharma AK, Smith E. Increasing the diagnosis of multifocal primary breast cancer by the use of bilateral whole-breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:573–8.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258(1):59–72.PubMedPubMedCentral Berg WA, Madsen KS, Schilling K, et al. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011;258(1):59–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference • Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58. This meta-analysis confirms the role of staging breast MRI in the increased detection of MIBC resulting in the need for more extensive surgery. PubMed • Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, Lord SJ, Warren RM, Dixon JM, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58. This meta-analysis confirms the role of staging breast MRI in the increased detection of MIBC resulting in the need for more extensive surgery. PubMed
13.
go back to reference Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology. 2002;224:569–76.PubMed Moon WK, Noh DY, Im JG. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients. Radiology. 2002;224:569–76.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2000;214:59–66.PubMed Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2000;214:59–66.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Morrow M, Harris JR. More mastectomies: is this what patients really want? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4038–40.PubMed Morrow M, Harris JR. More mastectomies: is this what patients really want? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4038–40.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7 quiz 294-5.PubMedPubMedCentral Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, Sesa L, Evers K, Sigurdson ER, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–7 quiz 294-5.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMed Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, Schnall M, Reynolds C, Spitz FR, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. Ajr. 2004;182:473–80.PubMed Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. Ajr. 2004;182:473–80.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMed Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203–9.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Bendifallah S, Werkoff G, Borie-Moutafoff C, Antoine M, Chopier J, Gligorov J, et al. Multiple synchronous (multifocal and multicentric) breast cancer: clinical implications. Surg Oncol. 2010;19(4):e115–23.PubMed Bendifallah S, Werkoff G, Borie-Moutafoff C, Antoine M, Chopier J, Gligorov J, et al. Multiple synchronous (multifocal and multicentric) breast cancer: clinical implications. Surg Oncol. 2010;19(4):e115–23.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, Boughey JC, Loprinzi C, Grant CS, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90.PubMed McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682–90.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Cho LC, Senzer N, Peters GN. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for macroscopically multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2002;183:650–4.PubMed Cho LC, Senzer N, Peters GN. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for macroscopically multiple ipsilateral invasive breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2002;183:650–4.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Gentilini O, Botteri E, Rotmensz N, da Lima L, Caliskan M, Garcia-Etienne CA, et al. Conservative surgery in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113:577–83.PubMed Gentilini O, Botteri E, Rotmensz N, da Lima L, Caliskan M, Garcia-Etienne CA, et al. Conservative surgery in patients with multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;113:577–83.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Bauman L, Barth RJ, Rosenkranz KM. Breast conservation in women with multifocal-multicentric breast cancer: is it feasible? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):325–9.PubMed Bauman L, Barth RJ, Rosenkranz KM. Breast conservation in women with multifocal-multicentric breast cancer: is it feasible? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(Suppl 3):325–9.PubMed
27.
go back to reference • Ataseven B, Lederer B, Blohmer JU, et al. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on surgery and locoregional, distant and overall survival in 6134 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Onc. 2015;22(4):1118–27. This trial utilized the patients from large multicenter trials to address the questions of LRFS, DFS, and OS in women with MIBC. It is one of the largest series with 1401 patients with MIBC in comparison with 4733 with unifocal disease. This study also provides insight into the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on outcomes in the MIBC population. • Ataseven B, Lederer B, Blohmer JU, et al. Impact of multifocal or multicentric disease on surgery and locoregional, distant and overall survival in 6134 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Onc. 2015;22(4):1118–27. This trial utilized the patients from large multicenter trials to address the questions of LRFS, DFS, and OS in women with MIBC. It is one of the largest series with 1401 patients with MIBC in comparison with 4733 with unifocal disease. This study also provides insight into the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the impact on outcomes in the MIBC population.
28.
go back to reference Holland R, Veling DH, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications or clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMed Holland R, Veling DH, et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications or clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty year follow up of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy , and lumpectomy plus radiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMed Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, et al. Twenty year follow up of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy , and lumpectomy plus radiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinellli N, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMed Veronesi U, Cascinellli N, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Schell AM, Rosernkranz K, Lewis P. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR. 2009;192:1438–44.PubMed Schell AM, Rosernkranz K, Lewis P. Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR. 2009;192:1438–44.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Lynch SP, Lei X, Hsu L et al. Breast cancer multifocality and multicentricity and locoregional recurrence. Oncologist 2013; 18(11):1167–73.PubMedPubMedCentral Lynch SP, Lei X, Hsu L et al. Breast cancer multifocality and multicentricity and locoregional recurrence. Oncologist 2013; 18(11):1167–73.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference •• Rosenkranz KM, Ballman K, McCall L, Kubicky C, Cuttino L, le-Petross H, et al. The feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: an initial report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2858–66. This is the first prospective trial to address the issue of MIBC. The trial confirms the feasibility—defined as low conversion to mastectomy rate—of BCT for MIBC. PubMed •• Rosenkranz KM, Ballman K, McCall L, Kubicky C, Cuttino L, le-Petross H, et al. The feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: an initial report from ACOSOG Z11102 (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(10):2858–66. This is the first prospective trial to address the issue of MIBC. The trial confirms the feasibility—defined as low conversion to mastectomy rate—of BCT for MIBC. PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kapoor NS, Chung, et al. Preliminary results: double lumpectomies for multicentric breast carcinoma. Am Surg. 2012;78(12):1345–8.PubMed Kapoor NS, Chung, et al. Preliminary results: double lumpectomies for multicentric breast carcinoma. Am Surg. 2012;78(12):1345–8.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Nijrenhuis M, Rutgers E. Conservative surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24:S96–9. Nijrenhuis M, Rutgers E. Conservative surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast. 2015;24:S96–9.
36.
go back to reference •• Yerushalmi R, Tyldesley S, Woods R, Kennecke HF, Speers C, Gelmon KA. Is breast-conserving therapy a safe option for patients with tumor multicentricity and multifocality? Ann Oncol. 2012;23:876–81. This one of the largest and most recent publications which addresses LRR for MIBC when comparing BCT to mastectomy. The results provide insight into risk factors for recurrence. These data may help with patient selection for BCT in the setting of MIBC. PubMed •• Yerushalmi R, Tyldesley S, Woods R, Kennecke HF, Speers C, Gelmon KA. Is breast-conserving therapy a safe option for patients with tumor multicentricity and multifocality? Ann Oncol. 2012;23:876–81. This one of the largest and most recent publications which addresses LRR for MIBC when comparing BCT to mastectomy. The results provide insight into risk factors for recurrence. These data may help with patient selection for BCT in the setting of MIBC. PubMed
37.
go back to reference Milulescu A, DiMarino I, et al. Management of multifocal-multicenric breast cancer: current perspective. Chirurgia. 2018;112(1):12–7. Milulescu A, DiMarino I, et al. Management of multifocal-multicenric breast cancer: current perspective. Chirurgia. 2018;112(1):12–7.
38.
go back to reference Nos C, Bourgeois D, et al. Conservative treatment of multifocal breast cancer: a comparative study. Bull Cancer. 1999;86(2):184–8.PubMed Nos C, Bourgeois D, et al. Conservative treatment of multifocal breast cancer: a comparative study. Bull Cancer. 1999;86(2):184–8.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Kaplan J, Giron G, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Estabrook A, Smith SR. Breast conservation in patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous cancers. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(5):726–9.PubMed Kaplan J, Giron G, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Estabrook A, Smith SR. Breast conservation in patients with multiple ipsilateral synchronous cancers. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(5):726–9.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Oh JL, Dryden MK, et al. Locoregional control of clinically diagnosed multifocal or multicentric breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4971–5.PubMed Oh JL, Dryden MK, et al. Locoregional control of clinically diagnosed multifocal or multicentric breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(31):4971–5.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Lim W, Park E-H, Choi SL, Seo JY, Kim HJ, Chang MA, et al. Breast conserving surgery for multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):87–90.PubMed Lim W, Park E-H, Choi SL, Seo JY, Kim HJ, Chang MA, et al. Breast conserving surgery for multifocal breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):87–90.PubMed
42.
go back to reference •• Lynch SP, Lei C, et al. Breast cancer and multifocality and multicentricity and locoregional recurrence. Oncologist. 2013;18(11):1167–73. This is one of the largest trials confirming acceptable local recurrence rates in women with MIBC treated with breast conservation. Upon multivariate analysis, the authors concluded that “MIBC” is not an independent risk factor for local recurrence. •• Lynch SP, Lei C, et al. Breast cancer and multifocality and multicentricity and locoregional recurrence. Oncologist. 2013;18(11):1167–73. This is one of the largest trials confirming acceptable local recurrence rates in women with MIBC treated with breast conservation. Upon multivariate analysis, the authors concluded that “MIBC” is not an independent risk factor for local recurrence.
43.
go back to reference Kadioglu H, Yucel S, et al. Feasibility of breast conserving therapy in multifocal breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2014;208:457–64.PubMed Kadioglu H, Yucel S, et al. Feasibility of breast conserving therapy in multifocal breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2014;208:457–64.PubMed
44.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast guidelines version 4; 2018. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast guidelines version 4; 2018.
45.
go back to reference •• Curigliano G, Bursetin HJ, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1700–12. The St Gallen consensus makes a strong argument for de-escalating surgical care in favor of well-delivered radiation and guideline adherent administration of systemic therapies. The panel supports BCT in MIBC. PubMedPubMedCentral •• Curigliano G, Bursetin HJ, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1700–12. The St Gallen consensus makes a strong argument for de-escalating surgical care in favor of well-delivered radiation and guideline adherent administration of systemic therapies. The panel supports BCT in MIBC. PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Chao SLW, Woo C, et al. Reliable lymphatic drainage to axillary sentinel lymph nodes regardless of tumor location within the breast. Am J Surg. 2001;182:307–11.PubMed Chao SLW, Woo C, et al. Reliable lymphatic drainage to axillary sentinel lymph nodes regardless of tumor location within the breast. Am J Surg. 2001;182:307–11.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Carpenter S, Fraser J, Flemming M, Gray R, Halyard M, Pockaj B. Optimal treatment of multiple ipsilateral primary breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2008;196:530–6.PubMed Carpenter S, Fraser J, Flemming M, Gray R, Halyard M, Pockaj B. Optimal treatment of multiple ipsilateral primary breast cancers. Am J Surg. 2008;196:530–6.PubMed
48.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, et al. Sentinal-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349:1864–7.PubMed Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, et al. Sentinal-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;349:1864–7.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Fernandez K, Swnason M, Verbanac M. Is sentinel lymphadenectomy accurate in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:S16–7. Fernandez K, Swnason M, Verbanac M. Is sentinel lymphadenectomy accurate in multifocal and multicentric breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:S16–7.
50.
go back to reference • van la Parra RF, de Roos WK, Contant CM, et al. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric breast cancer: SMMaC trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1250–5. This prospective trial confirms the validity of sentinel node excision for MIBC. • van la Parra RF, de Roos WK, Contant CM, et al. A prospective validation study of sentinel lymph node biopsy in multicentric breast cancer: SMMaC trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1250–5. This prospective trial confirms the validity of sentinel node excision for MIBC.
51.
go back to reference Donker M, Straver ME, van Tienhoven G, van de Velde CJH, Mansel RE, Litière S, et al. Comparison of the sentinel node procedure between patients with multifocal and unifocal breast cancer in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial: identification rate and nodal outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(9):2093–100.PubMed Donker M, Straver ME, van Tienhoven G, van de Velde CJH, Mansel RE, Litière S, et al. Comparison of the sentinel node procedure between patients with multifocal and unifocal breast cancer in the EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial: identification rate and nodal outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(9):2093–100.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Vera-Badillo FE, Napoleone M, Ocana A, Templeton AJ, Seruga B, al-Mubarak M, et al. Effect of multifocality and multicentricity on outcome in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):235–44.PubMed Vera-Badillo FE, Napoleone M, Ocana A, Templeton AJ, Seruga B, al-Mubarak M, et al. Effect of multifocality and multicentricity on outcome in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):235–44.PubMed
53.
go back to reference •• Wolters R, Wockel A, et al. Comparing the outcome between multicenric and multifocal breast cancer: what is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent therapy? A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(3):579–90. This large retrospective study is critical to understanding the importance of guideline adherent treatment in optimizing outcomes for all women with breast cancer including the MIBC population. These data emphasize the importance of adjuvant therapies in the care of breast cancer patients. PubMed •• Wolters R, Wockel A, et al. Comparing the outcome between multicenric and multifocal breast cancer: what is the impact on survival, and is there a role for guideline-adherent therapy? A retrospective multicenter cohort study of 8,935 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;142(3):579–90. This large retrospective study is critical to understanding the importance of guideline adherent treatment in optimizing outcomes for all women with breast cancer including the MIBC population. These data emphasize the importance of adjuvant therapies in the care of breast cancer patients. PubMed
54.
go back to reference Neri A, Marrelli D, Megha T, Bettarini F, Tacchini D, de Franco L, et al. Clinical significance of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers and choice of surgical treatment: a retrospective study on a series of 1158 cases. BMC Surg. 2015;15(1). Neri A, Marrelli D, Megha T, Bettarini F, Tacchini D, de Franco L, et al. Clinical significance of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers and choice of surgical treatment: a retrospective study on a series of 1158 cases. BMC Surg. 2015;15(1).
55.
go back to reference Lynch SP, Lei X, Chavez-MacGregor M, Hsu L, Meric-Bernstam F, Buchholz TA, et al. Multifocality and multicentricity in breast cancer and survival outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;23(12):3063–9. Lynch SP, Lei X, Chavez-MacGregor M, Hsu L, Meric-Bernstam F, Buchholz TA, et al. Multifocality and multicentricity in breast cancer and survival outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;23(12):3063–9.
56.
go back to reference Winters Z, Bernaudo L. Evaluating the current evidence to support therapeutic mammoplasty or breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers. Gland Surg. 2018;7(6):525–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Winters Z, Bernaudo L. Evaluating the current evidence to support therapeutic mammoplasty or breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy in the treatment of multifocal and multicentric breast cancers. Gland Surg. 2018;7(6):525–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
57.
go back to reference Tan MP, Sitoh NY, Sitoh YY. Optimizing breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: a worthwhile endeavor? World J Surg. 2016;40(2):315–22.PubMed Tan MP, Sitoh NY, Sitoh YY. Optimizing breast conservation treatment for multifocal and multicentric breast cancer: a worthwhile endeavor? World J Surg. 2016;40(2):315–22.PubMed
58.
go back to reference Patani N, Carpenter R. Oncologic and aesthetic considerations of conservational surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16(3):222–32.PubMed Patani N, Carpenter R. Oncologic and aesthetic considerations of conservational surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer. Breast J. 2010;16(3):222–32.PubMed
59.
go back to reference Fung KW, Lau Y, Fielding R, Or A, Yip AW. The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life of Chinese women. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:202–6.PubMed Fung KW, Lau Y, Fielding R, Or A, Yip AW. The impact of mastectomy, breast-conserving treatment and immediate breast reconstruction on the quality of life of Chinese women. ANZ J Surg. 2001;71:202–6.PubMed
60.
go back to reference Zhao R, Qiao Q, Yue Y, Yi SB, Chen L, Chen J, et al. The psychological impact of mastectomy on women with breast cancer. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;19:294–6.PubMed Zhao R, Qiao Q, Yue Y, Yi SB, Chen L, Chen J, et al. The psychological impact of mastectomy on women with breast cancer. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;19:294–6.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:1059–70.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Barlow WE, Taplin SH, Yoshida CK, Buist DS, Seger D, Brown M. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:447–55.PubMed Barlow WE, Taplin SH, Yoshida CK, Buist DS, Seger D, Brown M. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:447–55.PubMed
63.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.PubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1938–43.PubMed
64.
go back to reference Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA. Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;45:7–14.PubMed Norum J, Olsen JA, Wist EA. Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;45:7–14.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Surgical Therapy for Women with Multiple Synchronous Ipsilateral Breast Cancer (MIBC): Current Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice
Authors
David Linshaw
Jennifer Tonneson
Kari Rosenkranz
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Breast Cancer Reports / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1943-4588
Electronic ISSN: 1943-4596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-019-0309-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Current Breast Cancer Reports 2/2019 Go to the issue

Breast Cancer Imaging and Screening (N Sharma, Section Editor)

Management of B3 Lesions—Practical Issues

Local-Regional Evaluation and Therapy (DM Euhus, Section Editor)

Role of Liquid Biopsy in Clinical Decision-Making for Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer Imaging and Screening (N Sharma, Section Editor)

Interval Cancers and Duty of Candour, a UK Perspective

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine