Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Mastectomy | Original Article

Unilateral Tissue Expander/Implant Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction with the Assistance of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging

Authors: Jian-Xun Ma, You-Chen Xia, Bi Li, Hong-Mei Zhao, Yu-Tao Lei

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In China, traditional preoperative planning of unilateral breast reconstruction mainly depends on anthropometric measurement and visual assessment. Thus, the lack of objective assessment of breast volume and shape would likely result in suboptimal reconstruction outcomes. Three-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI), which could provide objective measurement data of the breast, may be a promising solution to this problem.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing tissue expander (TE)/implant breast reconstruction without any mammoplasty surgery on the contralateral sides in our hospital from August 2013 to May 2018 was performed. All the patients underwent unilateral mastectomy with immediate or delayed insertion of TE, followed by an exchange of a silicone gel implant without contralateral procedures. 3D images were obtained at the time of preoperation, the routine expansion visit, and post-exchange of implant. The breast volume measured by 3D-SI served as a guide to conduct the surgery management, such as in deciding the total volume of expansion and guiding the final implant size selection. 3D-SI also provided objective data to evaluate the final outcomes of the reconstruction.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included in this study, in which eighteen patients underwent immediate TE insertion and thirty-three patients underwent delayed TE insertion. The ptosis degree of contralateral breasts was assessed as follows: forty-four were normal, and seven showed mild ptosis. The average expansion degree was controlled at 161.6% ± 14.1% compared to the contralateral breasts. The volume of implants exchanged had a strong linear correlation with the 3D volume of the contralateral breasts at the end of expansion (P < 0.01). The mean time of follow-up was 9.1 ± 6.6 months. There was only one patient who experienced TE leakage with secondary infection and received TE exchange. For the immediate reconstruction group, the overall breast symmetry improved at the completion of implant exchange (P < 0.01), with an average asymmetry of 5.3% ± 4.0% compared with 10.6% ± 6.1% initially. For the delayed reconstruction group, the reconstructed side achieved good volume symmetry to the contralateral side (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in breast basal width between bilateral breasts post-reconstruction (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

3D-SI serves as a valuable adjunct by providing accurate 3D volume of breasts within TE/implant breast reconstruction in Chinese patients without obvious breast ptosis, which could facilitate surgeons to achieve good reconstructive outcomes.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chen Y, Chen J, Chen J, Yang B, Li L, Huang X, Shao Z, Shen Z, Yu P, Wu J (2014) Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China: a survey report. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 36:851–857 (Article in Chinese) PubMed Chen Y, Chen J, Chen J, Yang B, Li L, Huang X, Shao Z, Shen Z, Yu P, Wu J (2014) Current trends of breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer patients in China: a survey report. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 36:851–857 (Article in Chinese) PubMed
2.
go back to reference Panchal H, Matros E (2017) Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:7S–13SCrossRef Panchal H, Matros E (2017) Current trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:7S–13SCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S (2013) Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgions 2010. Ann Plast Surg 70:103–110CrossRef Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S (2013) Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgions 2010. Ann Plast Surg 70:103–110CrossRef
4.
go back to reference de Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C (2010) Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2129–2135CrossRef de Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C (2010) Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2129–2135CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rosati R, De Menezes M, Rossetti A, Sforza C, Ferrario VF (2010) Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:84–88CrossRef Rosati R, De Menezes M, Rossetti A, Sforza C, Ferrario VF (2010) Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138:84–88CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hameeteman M, Verhulst AC, Maal TJ, Ulrich DJ (2016) An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:1609–1613CrossRef Hameeteman M, Verhulst AC, Maal TJ, Ulrich DJ (2016) An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:1609–1613CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liu C, Ji K, Sun J, Luan J (2014) Does respiration influence breast volumetric change measurement with the three-dimensional scanning technique? Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:115–119CrossRef Liu C, Ji K, Sun J, Luan J (2014) Does respiration influence breast volumetric change measurement with the three-dimensional scanning technique? Aesthetic Plast Surg 38:115–119CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203PubMed
9.
go back to reference Freeman MD, Vemula R, Rao R, Matatov TS, Strong AL, Tandon R, Chaffin AE, Jansen DA (2016) Refinements in the techniques of 2-stage breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 76:S304–S311CrossRef Freeman MD, Vemula R, Rao R, Matatov TS, Strong AL, Tandon R, Chaffin AE, Jansen DA (2016) Refinements in the techniques of 2-stage breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 76:S304–S311CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Szychta P, Raine C, Butterworth M, Stewart K, Witmanowski H, Zadrozny M, Rykala J (2014) Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging. Comput Biol Med 44:136–143CrossRef Szychta P, Raine C, Butterworth M, Stewart K, Witmanowski H, Zadrozny M, Rykala J (2014) Preoperative implant selection for two stage breast reconstruction with 3D imaging. Comput Biol Med 44:136–143CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e316CrossRef Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e316CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRef Choppin SB, Wheat JS, Gee M, Goyal A (2016) The accuracy of breast volume measurement methods: a systematic review. Breast 28:121–129CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chae MP, Rozen WM, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ (2016) Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques. Gland Surg 5:212–226PubMedPubMedCentral Chae MP, Rozen WM, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ (2016) Breast volumetric analysis for aesthetic planning in breast reconstruction: a literature review of techniques. Gland Surg 5:212–226PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I, Hold A, Placheta E, Kropatsch WG, Frey M (2014) Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRef Tzou CH, Artner NM, Pona I, Hold A, Placheta E, Kropatsch WG, Frey M (2014) Comparison of three-dimensional surface-imaging systems. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:489–497CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wesselius TS, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, Xi T, Maal TJJ, Ulrich DJO (2018) Accuracy of three software applications for breast volume calculations from three-dimensional surface images. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:858–865CrossRef Wesselius TS, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, Xi T, Maal TJJ, Ulrich DJO (2018) Accuracy of three software applications for breast volume calculations from three-dimensional surface images. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:858–865CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rinker B, Veneracion M, Walsh CP (2010) Breast ptosis: causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg 64:579–584PubMed Rinker B, Veneracion M, Walsh CP (2010) Breast ptosis: causes and cure. Ann Plast Surg 64:579–584PubMed
17.
go back to reference Coltman CE, McGhee DE, Steele JR (2017) Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design. Ergonomics 60:439–445CrossRef Coltman CE, McGhee DE, Steele JR (2017) Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design. Ergonomics 60:439–445CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unilateral Tissue Expander/Implant Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction with the Assistance of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging
Authors
Jian-Xun Ma
You-Chen Xia
Bi Li
Hong-Mei Zhao
Yu-Tao Lei
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Keywords
Mastectomy
Ptosis
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01513-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue