Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Breast Augmentation | Original Article

Quantitative Appraisal Through MRI of Breast Tissue Thickness and Implant Projection After Breast Augmentation with High- and Extra-High-Profile Round Implants

Authors: Antonio Carlos Abramo, Thiago Walmsley Lucena, Marcio Scartozzoni

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Changes in breast tissue thickness and in implant projection 5 years after augmentation with high- and extra-high-profile round implants were measured through MRI with a DICOM standard viewer.

Methods

Twenty-four females with small-volume breast asymmetry without hypertrophy or ptosis underwent subfascial breast augmentation for cosmetic purposes, by using micro-textured soft cohesive silicone gel-filled round implants, from a single manufacturer. MRI measured the linear antero-posterior dimension of breast tissue thickness and projection of the implants. Statistical analysis of data was performed by Pearson correlation coefficient, line graph, and scatter diagram.

Results

The “r” of Pearson for right and left breasts indicated a significant correlation between the breast tissue thickness before and 5 years after augmentation. Closeness of the lines displayed in the line graph indicated strong linear positive correlation between the breast tissue thicknesses. The “r” values for projection of right and left implants indicated a significant correlation between the projection standardized by the manufacturer and that encountered 5 years after augmentation with high- and extra-high-profile round implants. A scatter diagram of data indicated a strong positive correlation between implant projection standardized by the manufacturer and that encountered 5 years after augmentation, on both breasts.

Conclusion

Soft cohesive silicone gel-filled high- and extra-high-profile round implants supported breast tissue compressing without significant loss of the implant projection. Despite the consistency of the soft cohesive silicone gel, the implant softness and flexibility were preserved, resulting in low-pressure gradient over the mammary parenchyma without significant changes of the breast tissue thickness.

EBM Level IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tebbets JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2150–2159CrossRef Tebbets JB, Teitelbaum S (2010) High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2150–2159CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Jewell ML (2013) Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra-high-profile breast implants. Aesth Surg J 33(4):529–539CrossRef Largent JA, Reisman NR, Kaplan HM, Oefelein MG, Jewell ML (2013) Clinical trial outcomes of high- and extra-high-profile breast implants. Aesth Surg J 33(4):529–539CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2010) Discussion: high- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2165–2167CrossRef Nahabedian MY (2010) Discussion: high- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2165–2167CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) The evolution of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):12S–17SCrossRef Maxwell GP, Gabriel A (2014) The evolution of breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):12S–17SCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prosthesis: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Surg 60:482–489CrossRef Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D (2007) Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prosthesis: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Surg 60:482–489CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):6S–11SCrossRef Calobrace MB, Capizzi PJ (2014) The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1 Suppl):6S–11SCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abramo AC, Scartozzoni M, Lucena TW, Sgarbi R (2019) High- and extra-high-profile round implants in breast augmentation: guidelines to prevent rippling and implant edge visibility. Aesth Plast Surg 43:305–312CrossRef Abramo AC, Scartozzoni M, Lucena TW, Sgarbi R (2019) High- and extra-high-profile round implants in breast augmentation: guidelines to prevent rippling and implant edge visibility. Aesth Plast Surg 43:305–312CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. RadioGraphics 34(1):234–247CrossRef Giess CS, Yeh ED, Raza S, Birdwell RL (2014) Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging: normal patterns, diagnostic challenges, and potential for false-positive and false-negative interpretation. RadioGraphics 34(1):234–247CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM (2016) A survey of DICOM viewer software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 29(2):206–215CrossRef Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM (2016) A survey of DICOM viewer software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 29(2):206–215CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cai Y, See S (2014) Medixant: RadiAnt DICOM viewer. Technology and engineering. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Cai Y, See S (2014) Medixant: RadiAnt DICOM viewer. Technology and engineering. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
11.
go back to reference Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2013) Nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2013) Nonparametric statistical methods, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey
12.
go back to reference Evans TS, Lambiotte R (2010) Line graphs of weighted networks for overlapping communities. Eur Phys J 77:265–272CrossRef Evans TS, Lambiotte R (2010) Line graphs of weighted networks for overlapping communities. Eur Phys J 77:265–272CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Friendly M, Denis D (2005) The early origins and development of the scatterplot. J Hist Behav Sci 41(2):103–130CrossRef Friendly M, Denis D (2005) The early origins and development of the scatterplot. J Hist Behav Sci 41(2):103–130CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Somogyi RB, Stavrou D, Southwick G (2015) Correction of small volume breast asymmetry using deep parenchymal resection and identical silicone implants: an early experience. Aesthet Surg J 35(4):394–401CrossRef Somogyi RB, Stavrou D, Southwick G (2015) Correction of small volume breast asymmetry using deep parenchymal resection and identical silicone implants: an early experience. Aesthet Surg J 35(4):394–401CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wan D, Rohrich RJ (2017) Making sense of implant “profile” in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(5):e1343CrossRef Wan D, Rohrich RJ (2017) Making sense of implant “profile” in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(5):e1343CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jewell ML, Bengtson BP, Smither K, Nuti G, Perry TA (2019) Physical properties of silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 39(3):264–275CrossRef Jewell ML, Bengtson BP, Smither K, Nuti G, Perry TA (2019) Physical properties of silicone gel breast implants. Aesthet Surg J 39(3):264–275CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brown MH, Shenker R, Samuel A, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(3):768–779CrossRef Brown MH, Shenker R, Samuel A, Silver SA (2005) Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(3):768–779CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative Appraisal Through MRI of Breast Tissue Thickness and Implant Projection After Breast Augmentation with High- and Extra-High-Profile Round Implants
Authors
Antonio Carlos Abramo
Thiago Walmsley Lucena
Marcio Scartozzoni
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01533-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 1/2020 Go to the issue