Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Mastectomy | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Invasive ductal carcinoma with coexisting ductal carcinoma in situ (IDC/DCIS) versus pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): a comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes

Authors: Chih Wan Goh, Jiayi Wu, Shuning Ding, Caijin Lin, Xiaosong Chen, Ou Huang, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Kunwei Shen, Li Zhu

Published in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is widely recognized as the precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of coexisting DCIS component in IDC and its clinical significance according to molecular subtypes.

Methods

Data from 3001 patients with IDC (79.4%) and IDC/DCIS (20.6%) who underwent surgery from January 2009 to June 2016 were retrospectively assessed. The clinical outcomes of IDC with coexistent DCIS in different molecular subtypes were evaluated.

Results

IDC/DCIS patients were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), had low tumor grade (P = 0.001), had less lymph node involvement (P = 0.038) and received more mastectomy (P = 0.002) than IDC patients. In the comparison of molecular subtype prevalence, IDC/DCIS patients were more frequently presented with luminal B/HER2 positive (12.5% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) and HER2 positive subtypes (20.9% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS, 90.9% vs 87.5%, P = 0.021) and 5-year overall survival (OS 96.1% vs 94.0%, P = 0.018) were significantly improved in IDC/DCIS patients compared to IDC patients. In multivariate analysis, the presence of coexisting DCIS (P = 0.048), tumor size (P < 0.001), lymph node status (P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.007) and molecular subtypes (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Furthermore, coexistence of DCIS component in IDC significantly improved DFS in HER2 positive (94.8% vs 78.5%, P = 0.003), but had no association in luminal and triple negative subtypes.

Conclusions

IDC with coexisting DCIS was associated with improved prognosis. Patients with IDC/DCIS presented with more HER2 positive expression and might improve DFS in HER2 positive breast cancer.
Literature
go back to reference Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410CrossRefPubMed Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gupta SK, Douglas-Jones AG, Fenn N, Morgan JM, Mansel RE (1997) The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ). Cancer 80:1740–1745CrossRefPubMed Gupta SK, Douglas-Jones AG, Fenn N, Morgan JM, Mansel RE (1997) The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ). Cancer 80:1740–1745CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornelia PJ (2011) Heterogeneity in breast cancer. JoCI 121:3786–3788 Kornelia PJ (2011) Heterogeneity in breast cancer. JoCI 121:3786–3788
go back to reference Lee JS, Oh M, Ko SS, Min HP, Oh SJ, Song JY, Kim SWJ (2016) IHC-breast cancer subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma with predominant intraductal component as an insignificant prognostic factor: a register-based study from Korea. CTC 7:52–57 Lee JS, Oh M, Ko SS, Min HP, Oh SJ, Song JY, Kim SWJ (2016) IHC-breast cancer subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma with predominant intraductal component as an insignificant prognostic factor: a register-based study from Korea. CTC 7:52–57
go back to reference Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758CrossRefPubMed Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ: introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern Pathol Off J US Canadian Acad Pathol Inc 11:140–154 Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ: introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern Pathol Off J US Canadian Acad Pathol Inc 11:140–154
go back to reference Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM, Kane RL, Wilt TJ (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep/Technol Assess 185:1–549 Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM, Kane RL, Wilt TJ (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep/Technol Assess 185:1–549
Metadata
Title
Invasive ductal carcinoma with coexisting ductal carcinoma in situ (IDC/DCIS) versus pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): a comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes
Authors
Chih Wan Goh
Jiayi Wu
Shuning Ding
Caijin Lin
Xiaosong Chen
Ou Huang
Weiguo Chen
Yafen Li
Kunwei Shen
Li Zhu
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02930-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 7/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.