Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2019

01-12-2019 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROSCOPY

The relationship between graft intensity on MRI and tibial tunnel placement in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction

Authors: Takanori Teraoka, Yusuke Hashimoto, Shinji Takahashi, Shinya Yamasaki, Yohei Nishida, Hiroaki Nakamura

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether the graft signal intensity of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) on MRI was related to the tibial tunnel placement, anterior–posterior (A–P) stability, and/or cyclops lesion formation following double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

Between January 2010 and August 2016, 65 patients underwent arthroscopic DB-ACL reconstruction and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Follow-up included 1-week postoperative CT evaluation, 1-year postoperative MRI evaluation, and 2-year postoperative measurement of A–P instability using a KT-2000 arthrometer. Tibial tunnel placement and the location of Parson’s knob were expressed as percentages. Patients were divided into two groups according to the graft signal intensity of the AMB on MRI: the high group (grades 2, 3; group H) and the low group (grade 1; group L).

Results

There were 23 knees in group H and 42 knees in group L. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the position of Parson’s knob. The AMB placement in the tibial tunnel in group H was more anterior than that in group L. The incidence of a cyclops lesion was significantly greater in group H [13 cases (56.5%)] compared with group L [7 cases (16.7%); P = .05]. The arthrometric side-to-side difference was significantly greater in group H (1.67 mm) than in group L (0.90 mm; P = .019).

Conclusion

Group H had a more anterior tunnel location and significantly greater incidence of cyclops lesions than group L. An increased signal intensity of the AMB on MRI indicates A–P instability.

Level of evidence

Level III retrospective cohort study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD et al (1986) The phenomenon of ‘‘ligamentization’’: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 4:162–172PubMed Amiel D, Kleiner JB, Roux RD et al (1986) The phenomenon of ‘‘ligamentization’’: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon. J Orthop Res 4:162–172PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med 39(2):366–373PubMed Bedi A, Maak T, Musahl V, Citak M, O’Loughlin PF, Choi D, Pearle AD (2011) Effect of tibial tunnel position on stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the tibial tunnel position most important? Am J Sports Med 39(2):366–373PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bencardino JT, Beltran J (2009) MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics 29:2115–2126PubMed Bencardino JT, Beltran J (2009) MR imaging of complications of anterior cruciate ligament graft reconstruction. Radiographics 29:2115–2126PubMed
4.
go back to reference Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg Winter 10(1):14–21 Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg Winter 10(1):14–21
5.
go back to reference Cha J, Sang-Hee C, Kwon JW, Lee S-H, Ahn JH (2012) Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single-bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques. Skeletal Radiol 41:997–1002PubMed Cha J, Sang-Hee C, Kwon JW, Lee S-H, Ahn JH (2012) Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single-bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques. Skeletal Radiol 41:997–1002PubMed
6.
go back to reference Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R et al (2011) The ‘‘ligamentization’’ process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 39:2476–2483PubMed Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R et al (2011) The ‘‘ligamentization’’ process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 39:2476–2483PubMed
7.
go back to reference Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726PubMed Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726PubMed
8.
go back to reference David M, Bradley A, Bergman G (2000) MR imaging of cyclops lesions. Am J Roentgenol 174(3):719–726 David M, Bradley A, Bergman G (2000) MR imaging of cyclops lesions. Am J Roentgenol 174(3):719–726
9.
go back to reference Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Robak OR, Molster A, Viset AT, Engebretsen L (2006) A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:944–952PubMed Drogset JO, Grontvedt T, Robak OR, Molster A, Viset AT, Engebretsen L (2006) A sixteen-year follow-up of three operative techniques for the treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:944–952PubMed
10.
go back to reference Fernandes TL, Fregni F, Weaver K, Pedrinelli A, Camanho GL, Hernandez AJ (2014) The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:97–103PubMed Fernandes TL, Fregni F, Weaver K, Pedrinelli A, Camanho GL, Hernandez AJ (2014) The influence of femoral tunnel position in single-bundle ACL reconstruction on functional outcomes and return to sports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:97–103PubMed
11.
go back to reference Fujii M, Furumatsu T (2015) Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1092–1099PubMed Fujii M, Furumatsu T (2015) Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1092–1099PubMed
12.
go back to reference Fujii M, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Okada Y, Tanaka T, Ozaki T, Abe N (2015) Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(4):1092–1099PubMed Fujii M, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Okada Y, Tanaka T, Ozaki T, Abe N (2015) Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(4):1092–1099PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hatayama K, Terauchi M, Saito K, Higuchi H, Yanagisawa S, Takagishi K (2013) The importance of tibial tunnel placement in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligamentreconstruction. Arthroscopy 29(6):1072–1078PubMed Hatayama K, Terauchi M, Saito K, Higuchi H, Yanagisawa S, Takagishi K (2013) The importance of tibial tunnel placement in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligamentreconstruction. Arthroscopy 29(6):1072–1078PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hoteya K, Kato Y, Motojima S, Ingham SJ, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y (2011) Association between intercondylar notch narrowing and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(3):371–376PubMed Hoteya K, Kato Y, Motojima S, Ingham SJ, Horaguchi T, Saito A, Tokuhashi Y (2011) Association between intercondylar notch narrowing and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(3):371–376PubMed
15.
go back to reference Howell SM, Clark JA, Farley TE (1991) A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 19:276–282PubMed Howell SM, Clark JA, Farley TE (1991) A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 19:276–282PubMed
16.
go back to reference Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD (1991) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. A preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 19:42–47PubMed Howell SM, Clark JA, Blasier RD (1991) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament autografts during the first year of implantation. A preliminary study. Am J Sports Med 19:42–47PubMed
17.
go back to reference Howell SM, Berns GS, Farley TE (1991) Unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts: MR signal intensity measurements. Radiology 179:639–643PubMed Howell SM, Berns GS, Farley TE (1991) Unimpinged and impinged anterior cruciate ligament grafts: MR signal intensity measurements. Radiology 179:639–643PubMed
18.
go back to reference Howell SM, Knox KE, Farley TE, Taylor MA (1995) Revascularization of a human anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first two years of implantation. Am J Sports Med 23:42–49PubMed Howell SM, Knox KE, Farley TE, Taylor MA (1995) Revascularization of a human anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first two years of implantation. Am J Sports Med 23:42–49PubMed
19.
go back to reference Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):674–679PubMed Iriuchishima T, Horaguchi T, Kubomura T, Morimoto Y, Fu FH (2011) Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):674–679PubMed
20.
go back to reference Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH. (2013) Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Mar;21(3):664-70PubMed Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH. (2013) Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. Mar;21(3):664-70PubMed
21.
go back to reference Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH (2013) Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(3):664–670PubMed Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH (2013) Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(3):664–670PubMed
22.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbone KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613 Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbone KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613
23.
go back to reference Janssen RP, Scheffler SU (2014) Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2102–2108PubMed Janssen RP, Scheffler SU (2014) Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2102–2108PubMed
24.
go back to reference Janssen RP, van der Wijk J, Fiedler A (2011) Remodelling of human hamstring autografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1299–1306PubMedPubMedCentral Janssen RP, van der Wijk J, Fiedler A (2011) Remodelling of human hamstring autografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1299–1306PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Kiekara T, Järvelä T, Huhtala H, Paakkala A (2012) MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings. Skeltal Radiol 41:835–842 Kiekara T, Järvelä T, Huhtala H, Paakkala A (2012) MRI of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: evaluation of graft findings. Skeltal Radiol 41:835–842
26.
go back to reference Lane JG, McFadden P, Bowden K (1993) The ligamentization process: a 4 year case study following ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosis graft. Arthroscopy 9:149–153PubMed Lane JG, McFadden P, Bowden K (1993) The ligamentization process: a 4 year case study following ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosis graft. Arthroscopy 9:149–153PubMed
27.
go back to reference Lebel B, Hulet C, Galaud B, Burdin G, Locker B, Vielpeau C (2008) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a minimun 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 36:1275–1282PubMed Lebel B, Hulet C, Galaud B, Burdin G, Locker B, Vielpeau C (2008) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: a minimun 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 36:1275–1282PubMed
28.
go back to reference Lertwanich P, Martins CA, Asai S, Ingham SJ, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position measurement reliability on 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography. Arthroscopy 27(3):391–398PubMed Lertwanich P, Martins CA, Asai S, Ingham SJ, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position measurement reliability on 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography. Arthroscopy 27(3):391–398PubMed
29.
go back to reference Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154PubMed Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154PubMed
30.
go back to reference Marumo K, Saito M, Yamagishi T (2005) The ‘‘ligamentization’’ process in human anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar and hamstring tendons. Am J Sports Med 33:1166–1173PubMed Marumo K, Saito M, Yamagishi T (2005) The ‘‘ligamentization’’ process in human anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar and hamstring tendons. Am J Sports Med 33:1166–1173PubMed
31.
go back to reference Matassi F, Sirleo L, Carulli C, Innocenti M (2015) Anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: transtibial versus outside–in technique. Joints 3(1):6–14PubMedPubMedCentral Matassi F, Sirleo L, Carulli C, Innocenti M (2015) Anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: transtibial versus outside–in technique. Joints 3(1):6–14PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Mueller T, Kdolsky R, Großschmidt K, Schabus R, Kwasny O, Plenk H Jr (1999) Cyclops and cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:284–289 Mueller T, Kdolsky R, Großschmidt K, Schabus R, Kwasny O, Plenk H Jr (1999) Cyclops and cyclopoid formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and histomorphological differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:284–289
33.
go back to reference Nishimori M, Furuta T, Deie M (2014) Parsons’ knob, the bony landmark of the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament, evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. Asia-Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 1:126–131 Nishimori M, Furuta T, Deie M (2014) Parsons’ knob, the bony landmark of the tibial insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament, evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. Asia-Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 1:126–131
34.
go back to reference Ohsawa T et al (2012) Clinical and second-look arthroscopic study comparing 2 tibial landmarks for tunnel insertions during double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:2479PubMed Ohsawa T et al (2012) Clinical and second-look arthroscopic study comparing 2 tibial landmarks for tunnel insertions during double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:2479PubMed
35.
go back to reference Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31(1):83–91PubMed Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31(1):83–91PubMed
37.
go back to reference Pećina M, Bajok I, Pećina HI (2001) Tuberculum intercondylare tibiae tertium as a predictive factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 29(6):709–711PubMed Pećina M, Bajok I, Pećina HI (2001) Tuberculum intercondylare tibiae tertium as a predictive factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 29(6):709–711PubMed
38.
go back to reference Sadoghi P, Kropfl A, Jansson V, Muller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364PubMed Sadoghi P, Kropfl A, Jansson V, Muller PE, Pietschmann MF, Fischmeister MF (2011) Impact of tibial and femoral tunnel position on clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:355–364PubMed
39.
go back to reference Saupe N, White LM, Chiavaras MM et al (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up-correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology 249(2):581–590PubMed Saupe N, White LM, Chiavaras MM et al (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts: MR imaging features at long-term follow-up-correlation with functional and clinical evaluation. Radiology 249(2):581–590PubMed
40.
go back to reference Sim JA, Kim JM, Lee S, Bae JY, Seon JK (2017) Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1227–1233PubMed Sim JA, Kim JM, Lee S, Bae JY, Seon JK (2017) Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(4):1227–1233PubMed
41.
go back to reference Simpfendorfer C et al (2015) Pseudocyclops: two cases of ACL graft partial tears mimicking cyclops lesions on MRI. Skeletal Radiol 44:1169–1173PubMed Simpfendorfer C et al (2015) Pseudocyclops: two cases of ACL graft partial tears mimicking cyclops lesions on MRI. Skeletal Radiol 44:1169–1173PubMed
42.
go back to reference Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H (2007) Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic resonance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(6):936–942PubMed Sonoda M, Morikawa T, Tsuchiya K, Moriya H (2007) Correlation between knee laxity and graft appearance on magnetic resonance imaging after double-bundle hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(6):936–942PubMed
43.
go back to reference Strand T, Molster A, Hordvik M, Krukhaug Y (2005) Long-term follow-up after primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: clinical and radiological evaluation 15-23 years postoperatively. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:217–221PubMed Strand T, Molster A, Hordvik M, Krukhaug Y (2005) Long-term follow-up after primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: clinical and radiological evaluation 15-23 years postoperatively. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:217–221PubMed
44.
go back to reference Takahashi M, Doi M (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34(5):787–792PubMed Takahashi M, Doi M (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34(5):787–792PubMed
45.
go back to reference Takeda Y, Iwame T, Takasago T, Kondo K, Goto T, Fujii K, Naruse A (2013) Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy 29(2):195–204PubMed Takeda Y, Iwame T, Takasago T, Kondo K, Goto T, Fujii K, Naruse A (2013) Comparison of tunnel orientation between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy 29(2):195–204PubMed
46.
go back to reference Taylor DC, Posner M, Curl WW, Feagin JA (2009) Isolated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: over 30-year follow-up of patients treated with arthrotomy and primary repair. Am J Sports Med 37:65–71PubMed Taylor DC, Posner M, Curl WW, Feagin JA (2009) Isolated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: over 30-year follow-up of patients treated with arthrotomy and primary repair. Am J Sports Med 37:65–71PubMed
47.
go back to reference Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13(2):122–129PubMed Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13(2):122–129PubMed
48.
go back to reference Van der Bracht H et al (2014) Can a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy 22:291–297 Van der Bracht H et al (2014) Can a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy 22:291–297
49.
go back to reference Van der Bracht H, Bellemans J, Victor J, Verhelst L, Page B, Verdonk P (2014) An a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):291–297PubMed Van der Bracht H, Bellemans J, Victor J, Verhelst L, Page B, Verdonk P (2014) An a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(2):291–297PubMed
Metadata
Title
The relationship between graft intensity on MRI and tibial tunnel placement in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction
Authors
Takanori Teraoka
Yusuke Hashimoto
Shinji Takahashi
Shinya Yamasaki
Yohei Nishida
Hiroaki Nakamura
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02518-z

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 8/2019 Go to the issue