Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2023

05-01-2023 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Scientific Article

Rapid lumbar MRI protocol using 3D imaging and deep learning reconstruction

Authors: J. Levi Chazen, Ek Tsoon Tan, Jake Fiore, Joseph T. Nguyen, Simon Sun, Darryl B. Sneag

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

Three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the spine, augmented with AI-enabled image enhancement and denoising, has the potential to reduce imaging times without compromising image quality or diagnostic performance. This work evaluates the time savings afforded by a novel, rapid lumbar spine MRI protocol as well as image quality and diagnostic differences stemming from the use of an AI-enhanced 3D T2 sequence combined with a single Dixon acquisition.

Materials and methods

Thirty-five subjects underwent MRI using standard 2D lumbar imaging in addition to a “rapid protocol” consisting of 3D imaging, enhanced and denoised using a prototype DL reconstruction algorithm as well as a two-point Dixon sequence. Images were graded by subspecialized radiologists and imaging times were collected. Comparison was made between 2D sagittal T1 and Dixon fat images for neural foraminal stenosis, intraosseous lesions, and fracture detection.

Results

This study demonstrated a 54% reduction in total acquisition time of a 3D AI-enhanced imaging lumbar spine MRI rapid protocol combined with a sagittal 2D Dixon sequence, compared to a 2D standard-of-care protocol. The rapid protocol also demonstrated strong agreement with the standard-of-care protocol with respect to osseous lesions (κ = 0.88), fracture detection (κ = 0.96), and neural foraminal stenosis (ICC > 0.9 at all levels).

Conclusion

3D imaging of the lumbar spine with AI-enhanced DL reconstruction and Dixon imaging demonstrated a significant reduction in imaging time with similar performance for common diagnostic metrics. Although previously limited by long postprocessing times, this technique has the potential to enhance patient throughput in busy radiology practices while providing similar or improved image quality.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Sebro R. Leveraging the electronic health record to evaluate the validity of the current RVU system for radiologists. Clin Imaging. 2021;78:286–92.CrossRefPubMed Sebro R. Leveraging the electronic health record to evaluate the validity of the current RVU system for radiologists. Clin Imaging. 2021;78:286–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sartoretti E, et al. Reduction of procedure times in routine clinical practice with compressed SENSE magnetic resonance imaging technique. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0214887.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sartoretti E, et al. Reduction of procedure times in routine clinical practice with compressed SENSE magnetic resonance imaging technique. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0214887.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Chea P, Mandell JC. Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:183–97.CrossRefPubMed Chea P, Mandell JC. Current applications and future directions of deep learning in musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:183–97.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Martín Noguerol T, Paulano-Godino F, Martín-Valdivia MT, Menias CO, Luna A. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in radiology. J American College of Radiol. 2019;16:1239–47.CrossRef Martín Noguerol T, Paulano-Godino F, Martín-Valdivia MT, Menias CO, Luna A. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in radiology. J American College of Radiol. 2019;16:1239–47.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lundervold AS, Lundervold A. An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI. Z Med Phys. 2019;29:102–27.CrossRefPubMed Lundervold AS, Lundervold A. An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI. Z Med Phys. 2019;29:102–27.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fritz J, Kijowski R, Recht MP. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: a perspective on value propositions, clinical use, and obstacles. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51:239–43.CrossRefPubMed Fritz J, Kijowski R, Recht MP. Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: a perspective on value propositions, clinical use, and obstacles. Skeletal Radiol. 2022;51:239–43.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hossein J, Fariborz F, Mehrnaz R, Babak R. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging. Europ J of Radiol Open. 2019;6:36–41.CrossRef Hossein J, Fariborz F, Mehrnaz R, Babak R. Evaluation of diagnostic value and T2-weighted three-dimensional isotropic turbo spin-echo (3D-SPACE) image quality in comparison with T2-weighted two-dimensional turbo spin-echo (2D-TSE) sequences in lumbar spine MR imaging. Europ J of Radiol Open. 2019;6:36–41.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sayah A, Jay AK, Toaff JS, Makariou EV, Berkowitz F. Effectiveness of a rapid lumbar spine MRI protocol using 3D T2-weighted SPACE imaging versus a standard protocol for evaluation of degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. American J Roentgenol. 2016;207:614–20.CrossRef Sayah A, Jay AK, Toaff JS, Makariou EV, Berkowitz F. Effectiveness of a rapid lumbar spine MRI protocol using 3D T2-weighted SPACE imaging versus a standard protocol for evaluation of degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. American J Roentgenol. 2016;207:614–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Argentieri EC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of zero-echo time MRI for the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:928–33.CrossRefPubMed Argentieri EC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of zero-echo time MRI for the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43:928–33.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
go back to reference Blizzard DJ, et al. 3D-FSE Isotropic MRI of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disor Tech. 2015;28:152–7.CrossRef Blizzard DJ, et al. 3D-FSE Isotropic MRI of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disor Tech. 2015;28:152–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee S, et al. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:174–81.CrossRefPubMed Lee S, et al. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T. Acta Radiol. 2015;56:174–81.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
20.
go back to reference Glaser C, et al. Understanding 3D TSE sequences: advantages, disadvantages, and application in MSK imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:321–7.CrossRefPubMed Glaser C, et al. Understanding 3D TSE sequences: advantages, disadvantages, and application in MSK imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:321–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kawakyu-O’Connor D, Bordia R, Nicola R. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal emergencies. Magnet Reso Imaging Clin. 2016;24:325–44.CrossRef Kawakyu-O’Connor D, Bordia R, Nicola R. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal emergencies. Magnet Reso Imaging Clin. 2016;24:325–44.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bash S, et al. Deep learning enables 60% accelerated volumetric brain MRI while preserving quantitative performance: a prospective, multicenter, multireadertrial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:2130–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bash S, et al. Deep learning enables 60% accelerated volumetric brain MRI while preserving quantitative performance: a prospective, multicenter, multireadertrial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:2130–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Rapid lumbar MRI protocol using 3D imaging and deep learning reconstruction
Authors
J. Levi Chazen
Ek Tsoon Tan
Jake Fiore
Joseph T. Nguyen
Simon Sun
Darryl B. Sneag
Publication date
05-01-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2023
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04268-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2023

Skeletal Radiology 7/2023 Go to the issue