Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Development and validation of a four-dimensional registration technique for DCE breast MRI

Authors: Chiara Mattusch, Ulrich Bick, Florian Michallek

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patient motion can degrade image quality of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) due to subtraction artifacts. By objectively and subjectively assessing the impact of principal component analysis (PCA)-based registration on pretreatment DCE-MRIs of breast cancer patients, we aim to validate four-dimensional registration for DCE breast MRI.

Results

After applying a four-dimensional, PCA-based registration algorithm to 154 pretreatment DCE-MRIs of histopathologically well-described breast cancer patients, we quantitatively determined image quality in unregistered and registered images. For subjective assessment, we ranked motion severity in a clinical reading setting according to four motion categories (0: no motion, 1: mild motion, 2: moderate motion, 3: severe motion with nondiagnostic image quality). The median of images with either moderate or severe motion (median category 2, IQR 0) was reassigned to motion category 1 (IQR 0) after registration. Motion category and motion reduction by registration were correlated (Spearman’s rho: 0.83, p < 0.001). For objective assessment, we performed perfusion model fitting using the extended Tofts model and calculated its volume transfer coefficient Ktrans as surrogate parameter for motion artifacts. Mean Ktrans decreased from 0.103 (± 0.077) before registration to 0.097 (± 0.070) after registration (p < 0.001). Uncertainty in perfusion quantification was reduced by 7.4% after registration (± 15.5, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Four-dimensional, PCA-based image registration improves image quality of breast DCE-MRI by correcting for motion artifacts in subtraction images and reduces uncertainty in quantitative perfusion modeling. The improvement is most pronounced when moderate-to-severe motion artifacts are present.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coughlin SS (2019) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Women. Adv Exp Med Biol 1152:9–29CrossRef Coughlin SS (2019) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Women. Adv Exp Med Biol 1152:9–29CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Galati F, Moffa G, Pediconi F (2021) Breast imaging: beyond the detection. Eur J Radiol 146:110051CrossRef Galati F, Moffa G, Pediconi F (2021) Breast imaging: beyond the detection. Eur J Radiol 146:110051CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Weinstein S, Rosen M (2010) Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques. Radiol Clin N Am 48:1013–1042CrossRef Weinstein S, Rosen M (2010) Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques. Radiol Clin N Am 48:1013–1042CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fiorica JV (2016) Breast cancer screening, mammography, and other modalities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 59:688–709CrossRef Fiorica JV (2016) Breast cancer screening, mammography, and other modalities. Clin Obstet Gynecol 59:688–709CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McDonald ES, Hammersley JA, Chou SH et al (2016) Performance of DWI as a rapid unenhanced technique for detecting mammographically occult breast cancer in elevated-risk women with dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:205–216CrossRef McDonald ES, Hammersley JA, Chou SH et al (2016) Performance of DWI as a rapid unenhanced technique for detecting mammographically occult breast cancer in elevated-risk women with dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:205–216CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK (2019) Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening: rationale, concept, and transfer to clinical practice. Annu Rev Med 70:501–519CrossRef Kuhl CK (2019) Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening: rationale, concept, and transfer to clinical practice. Annu Rev Med 70:501–519CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology 292:520–536CrossRef Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: State of the Art. Radiology 292:520–536CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tian J, Xue J, Dai Y, Chen J, Zheng J (2008) A novel software platform for medical image processing and analyzing. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12:800–812CrossRef Tian J, Xue J, Dai Y, Chen J, Zheng J (2008) A novel software platform for medical image processing and analyzing. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 12:800–812CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP (2010) elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:196–205CrossRef Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP (2010) elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29:196–205CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boehler T, Zoehrer F, Harz M, Hahn HK (2012) Breast image registration and deformation modeling. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:235–258CrossRef Boehler T, Zoehrer F, Harz M, Hahn HK (2012) Breast image registration and deformation modeling. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:235–258CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, Schnabel JA (2013) Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:327–357CrossRef Giger ML, Karssemeijer N, Schnabel JA (2013) Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:327–357CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Melbourne A, Hipwell J, Modat M et al (2011) The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol 56:7693–7708CrossRef Melbourne A, Hipwell J, Modat M et al (2011) The effect of motion correction on pharmacokinetic parameter estimation in dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI. Phys Med Biol 56:7693–7708CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Melbourne A, Atkinson D, White MJ, Collins D, Leach M, Hawkes D (2007) Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR). Phys Med Biol 52:5147–5156CrossRef Melbourne A, Atkinson D, White MJ, Collins D, Leach M, Hawkes D (2007) Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a progressive principal component registration (PPCR). Phys Med Biol 52:5147–5156CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bick U, Engel C, Krug B et al (2019) High-risk breast cancer surveillance with MRI: 10-year experience from the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 175:217–228CrossRef Bick U, Engel C, Krug B et al (2019) High-risk breast cancer surveillance with MRI: 10-year experience from the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 175:217–228CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Huizinga W, Poot DH, Guyader JM et al (2016) PCA-based groupwise image registration for quantitative MRI. Med Image Anal 29:65–78CrossRef Huizinga W, Poot DH, Guyader JM et al (2016) PCA-based groupwise image registration for quantitative MRI. Med Image Anal 29:65–78CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tofts PS (1997) Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:91–101CrossRef Tofts PS (1997) Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:91–101CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mouawad M, Biernaski H, Brackstone M et al (2020) The effect of registration on voxel-wise Tofts model parameters and uncertainties from DCE-MRI of early-stage breast cancer patients using 3DSlicer. J Digit Imaging 33:1065–1072CrossRef Mouawad M, Biernaski H, Brackstone M et al (2020) The effect of registration on voxel-wise Tofts model parameters and uncertainties from DCE-MRI of early-stage breast cancer patients using 3DSlicer. J Digit Imaging 33:1065–1072CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Marrone S, Piantadosi G, Fusco R, Petrillo A, Sansone M, Sansone C (2014) A novel model-based measure for quality evaluation of image registration techniques in DCE-MRI. In: 2014 IEEE 27th international symposium on computer-based medical systems, pp 209–214 Marrone S, Piantadosi G, Fusco R, Petrillo A, Sansone M, Sansone C (2014) A novel model-based measure for quality evaluation of image registration techniques in DCE-MRI. In: 2014 IEEE 27th international symposium on computer-based medical systems, pp 209–214
20.
go back to reference Michallek F, Nakamura S, Kurita T et al (2022) Fractal analysis of dynamic stress CT-perfusion imaging for detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 15:1591–1601CrossRef Michallek F, Nakamura S, Kurita T et al (2022) Fractal analysis of dynamic stress CT-perfusion imaging for detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 15:1591–1601CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Michallek F, Nakamura S, Ota H et al (2022) Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study. Sci Rep 12:5085CrossRef Michallek F, Nakamura S, Ota H et al (2022) Fractal analysis of 4D dynamic myocardial stress-CT perfusion imaging differentiates micro- and macrovascular ischemia in a multi-center proof-of-concept study. Sci Rep 12:5085CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zuo CS, Jiang A, Buff BL, Mahon TG, Wong TZ (1996) Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging. Radiology 198:903–906CrossRef Zuo CS, Jiang A, Buff BL, Mahon TG, Wong TZ (1996) Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging. Radiology 198:903–906CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721CrossRef Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:712–721CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Chung D et al (2000) Volume and shape preservation of enhancing lesions when applying non-rigid registration to a time series of contrast enhancing MR breast images. In: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 327–337 Tanner C, Schnabel JA, Chung D et al (2000) Volume and shape preservation of enhancing lesions when applying non-rigid registration to a time series of contrast enhancing MR breast images. In: Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 327–337
26.
go back to reference Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, Bluemke DA, Jacobs MA (2003) Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:730–741CrossRef Rohlfing T, Maurer CR, Bluemke DA, Jacobs MA (2003) Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:730–741CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Martel AL, Froh MS, Brock KK, Plewes DB, Barber DC (2007) Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Phys Med Biol 52:3803–3816CrossRef Martel AL, Froh MS, Brock KK, Plewes DB, Barber DC (2007) Evaluating an optical-flow-based registration algorithm for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Phys Med Biol 52:3803–3816CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Schnabel JA, Tanner C, Castellano-Smith AD et al (2003) Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:238–247CrossRef Schnabel JA, Tanner C, Castellano-Smith AD et al (2003) Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22:238–247CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Denton ER, Sonoda LI, Rueckert D et al (1999) Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:800–805CrossRef Denton ER, Sonoda LI, Rueckert D et al (1999) Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:800–805CrossRef
30.
go back to reference García E, Diez Y, Diaz O et al (2018) A step-by-step review on patient-specific biomechanical finite element models for breast MRI to x-ray mammography registration. Med Phys 45:e6–e31CrossRef García E, Diez Y, Diaz O et al (2018) A step-by-step review on patient-specific biomechanical finite element models for breast MRI to x-ray mammography registration. Med Phys 45:e6–e31CrossRef
31.
go back to reference García E, Diez Y, Diaz O et al (2019) Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values. Med Image Anal 54:76–87CrossRef García E, Diez Y, Diaz O et al (2019) Breast MRI and X-ray mammography registration using gradient values. Med Image Anal 54:76–87CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Solves-Llorens JA, Rupérez MJ, Monserrat C, Feliu E, García M, Lloret M (2014) A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images. Med Phys 41:081903CrossRef Solves-Llorens JA, Rupérez MJ, Monserrat C, Feliu E, García M, Lloret M (2014) A complete software application for automatic registration of x-ray mammography and magnetic resonance images. Med Phys 41:081903CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Marami B, Sirouspour S, Capson DW (2014) Non-rigid registration of medical images based on estimation of deformation states. Phys Med Biol 59:6891–6921CrossRef Marami B, Sirouspour S, Capson DW (2014) Non-rigid registration of medical images based on estimation of deformation states. Phys Med Biol 59:6891–6921CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dmitriev ID, Loo CE, Vogel WV, Pengel KE, Gilhuijs KG (2013) Fully automated deformable registration of breast DCE-MRI and PET/CT. Phys Med Biol 58:1221–1233CrossRef Dmitriev ID, Loo CE, Vogel WV, Pengel KE, Gilhuijs KG (2013) Fully automated deformable registration of breast DCE-MRI and PET/CT. Phys Med Biol 58:1221–1233CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Atuegwu NC, Li X, Arlinghaus LR et al (2014) Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results. Med Phys 41:052302CrossRef Atuegwu NC, Li X, Arlinghaus LR et al (2014) Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results. Med Phys 41:052302CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Wessel C, Schnabel JA, Brady M (2013) Realistic biomechanical model of a cancerous breast for the registration of prone to supine deformations. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013:7249–7252 Wessel C, Schnabel JA, Brady M (2013) Realistic biomechanical model of a cancerous breast for the registration of prone to supine deformations. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2013:7249–7252
37.
go back to reference Wu C, Pineda F, Hormuth DA, Karczmar GS, Yankeelov TE (2019) Quantitative analysis of vascular properties derived from ultrafast DCE-MRI to discriminate malignant and benign breast tumors. Magn Reson Med 81:2147–2160CrossRef Wu C, Pineda F, Hormuth DA, Karczmar GS, Yankeelov TE (2019) Quantitative analysis of vascular properties derived from ultrafast DCE-MRI to discriminate malignant and benign breast tumors. Magn Reson Med 81:2147–2160CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Drisis S, El Adoui M, Flamen P et al (2020) Early prediction of neoadjuvant treatment outcome in locally advanced breast cancer using parametric response mapping and radial heterogeneity from breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:1403–1411CrossRef Drisis S, El Adoui M, Flamen P et al (2020) Early prediction of neoadjuvant treatment outcome in locally advanced breast cancer using parametric response mapping and radial heterogeneity from breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 51:1403–1411CrossRef
39.
go back to reference El Adoui M, Drisis S, Benjelloun M (2018) A PRM approach for early prediction of breast cancer response to chemotherapy based on registered MR images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:1233–1243CrossRef El Adoui M, Drisis S, Benjelloun M (2018) A PRM approach for early prediction of breast cancer response to chemotherapy based on registered MR images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:1233–1243CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Zhao C, Dewey BE, Pham DL, Calabresi PA, Reich DS, Prince JL (2021) SMORE: a self-supervised anti-aliasing and super-resolution algorithm for MRI using deep learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 40:805–817CrossRef Zhao C, Dewey BE, Pham DL, Calabresi PA, Reich DS, Prince JL (2021) SMORE: a self-supervised anti-aliasing and super-resolution algorithm for MRI using deep learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 40:805–817CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sui Y, Afacan O, Jaimes C, Gholipour A, Warfield SK (2022) Scan-Specific generative neural network for MRI super-resolution reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 41:1383–1399CrossRef Sui Y, Afacan O, Jaimes C, Gholipour A, Warfield SK (2022) Scan-Specific generative neural network for MRI super-resolution reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 41:1383–1399CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Tofts PS, Parker GJM (2013) DCE-MRI: acquisition and analysis techniques. Clin Perfus MRI Tech Appl 9781107013:16 Tofts PS, Parker GJM (2013) DCE-MRI: acquisition and analysis techniques. Clin Perfus MRI Tech Appl 9781107013:16
43.
go back to reference Hill A, Mehnert A, Crozier S, McMahon K (2009) Evaluating the accuracy and impact of registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Eng) 35:14 Hill A, Mehnert A, Crozier S, McMahon K (2009) Evaluating the accuracy and impact of registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Eng) 35:14
44.
go back to reference Kang SR, Kim HW, Kim HS (2020) Evaluating the relationship between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters and pathological characteristics in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 52:1360–1373CrossRef Kang SR, Kim HW, Kim HS (2020) Evaluating the relationship between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) parameters and pathological characteristics in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 52:1360–1373CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Mehrabian H, Richmond L, Lu Y, Martel AL (2018) Deformable registration for longitudinal breast MRI screening. J Digit Imaging 31:718–726CrossRef Mehrabian H, Richmond L, Lu Y, Martel AL (2018) Deformable registration for longitudinal breast MRI screening. J Digit Imaging 31:718–726CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and validation of a four-dimensional registration technique for DCE breast MRI
Authors
Chiara Mattusch
Ulrich Bick
Florian Michallek
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01362-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue