Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Research

Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis

Authors: Zhenxing Zhang, Yi Wang, Tao Luo, Huaguang Qi, Lin Cai, Yang Yuan, Jingfeng Li

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord function for patients with congenital scoliosis (CS).

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of patients (n = 102) who underwent DSEP (T2-S1 dermatome), of whom 60 were normal subjects and 62 with congenital scoliosis. The study analyzed the latencies and peaks of N1-L, N1-R, P1-L and P1-R recorded by DSEPs of patients’ thoracolumbar dermatomes. To observe the incidence of abnormal DSEPs and SSEPs in CS patients and to analyze the difference in sensitivity and reliability between the two in the examination of scoliosis patients. SPSS 22.0 statistical software package was used to analyze the data, and χ2 test and correlation analysis were used to indicate that the difference was statistically significant, p < 0.05.

Results

Sixty two patients with CS were evaluated with total spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Only 23 patients (37.09%) showed spinal cord malformations in the MRI findings. The DSEP recordings showed a relatively high sensitivity (97.8%) compared to the abnormality rate of SSEPs recordings, and the rates of waveform, latency and amplitude abnormalities were much higher in DSEPs recordings (36.6, 36.3, 24.8%) than in SSEPs recordings (3.2, 22.5, 14.5%). The abnormality rate of DSEP records with and without neurological symptoms was higher than the abnormality rate of SSEP records (100% vs 20, 96.2% vs 44.2%, p<0.05). And in 62 patients with CS, the rate of positive MRI (37.1%) was lower than that recorded by DSEP (79.6% / 57.9%). p < 0.05.

Conclusion

DSEPs are more sensitive to microscopic posterior column dysfunction in patients with CS that cannot be detected by either radiology or routine clinical examination. Preoperative DSEPs assessment is recommended as a baseline examination for intraoperative monitoring and comparison with the postoperative situation. DSEPs recording complements the information obtained from routine clinical and radiological evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MH. Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine. 2002;27(20):2255–9.CrossRef Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MH. Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine. 2002;27(20):2255–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Prahinski JR, Polly DW Jr, McHale KA, Ellenbogen RG. Occult intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):59–63.PubMed Prahinski JR, Polly DW Jr, McHale KA, Ellenbogen RG. Occult intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):59–63.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Belmont PJ Jr, Kuklo TR, Taylor KF, Freedman BA, Prahinski JR, Kruse RW. Intraspinal anomalies associated with isolated congenital hemivertebra: the role of routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1704–10.CrossRef Belmont PJ Jr, Kuklo TR, Taylor KF, Freedman BA, Prahinski JR, Kruse RW. Intraspinal anomalies associated with isolated congenital hemivertebra: the role of routine magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(8):1704–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Suh SW, Sarwark JF, Vora A, Huang BK. Evaluating congenital spine deformities for intraspinal anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(4):525–31.PubMed Suh SW, Sarwark JF, Vora A, Huang BK. Evaluating congenital spine deformities for intraspinal anomalies with magnetic resonance imaging. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(4):525–31.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Tsai SW, Tsai CL, Wu PT, Wu CY, Liu CL, Jou IM. Intraoperative use of somatosensory-evoked potential in monitoring nerve roots. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29(2):110–7.CrossRef Tsai SW, Tsai CL, Wu PT, Wu CY, Liu CL, Jou IM. Intraoperative use of somatosensory-evoked potential in monitoring nerve roots. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29(2):110–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aminoff MJ. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the evaluation of the central nervous system. Neurol Clin. 1988;6(4):809–23.CrossRef Aminoff MJ. The use of somatosensory evoked potentials in the evaluation of the central nervous system. Neurol Clin. 1988;6(4):809–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yue Q, Martinez Z. Monitoring superficial peroneal nerve somatosensory evoked potential during L4–5 lumbar root decompression. Spine J. 2013;13(8):922–5.CrossRef Yue Q, Martinez Z. Monitoring superficial peroneal nerve somatosensory evoked potential during L4–5 lumbar root decompression. Spine J. 2013;13(8):922–5.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hu Y, Ding Y, Ruan D, Wong YW, Cheung KM, Luk KD. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2008;33(10):E305–10.CrossRef Hu Y, Ding Y, Ruan D, Wong YW, Cheung KM, Luk KD. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2008;33(10):E305–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Plastaras CT. Electrodiagnostic challenges in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1):57–69.CrossRef Plastaras CT. Electrodiagnostic challenges in the evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1):57–69.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Assessment: dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of the American Academy of Neurology's Therapeutics and Technology Assessments Subcommittee. Neurology. 1997;49(4):1127–30. Assessment: dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials. Report of the American Academy of Neurology's Therapeutics and Technology Assessments Subcommittee. Neurology. 1997;49(4):1127–30.
11.
go back to reference Talavera-Carbajal MR, Estañol-Vidal B, López-Lomelí MM, García-Ramos G, Corona V, Plascencia N, et al. Monitoring dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials at the ERB point, the cervical spinal cord and the cerebral cortex in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Revista de Neurol. 2003;36(10):917–24.CrossRef Talavera-Carbajal MR, Estañol-Vidal B, López-Lomelí MM, García-Ramos G, Corona V, Plascencia N, et al. Monitoring dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials at the ERB point, the cervical spinal cord and the cerebral cortex in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Revista de Neurol. 2003;36(10):917–24.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kramer JK, Taylor P, Steeves JD, Curt A. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and electrical perception thresholds during recovery from cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(4):309–17.CrossRef Kramer JK, Taylor P, Steeves JD, Curt A. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and electrical perception thresholds during recovery from cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(4):309–17.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jo NG, Ko MH, Won YH, Park SH, Kim GW, Seo JH. Diagnostic Implication and Clinical Relevance of Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:8850281.PubMedPubMedCentral Jo NG, Ko MH, Won YH, Park SH, Kim GW, Seo JH. Diagnostic Implication and Clinical Relevance of Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:8850281.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Storm SA, Kraft GH. The clinical use of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004;15(1):107–15.CrossRef Storm SA, Kraft GH. The clinical use of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004;15(1):107–15.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yang DC, Lee HJ, Park JW, Nam K, Kim S, Cho KT, et al. Association Between Latency of Dermatomal Sensory-Evoked Potentials and Quantitative Radiologic Findings of Narrowing in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020;44(5):353–61.CrossRef Yang DC, Lee HJ, Park JW, Nam K, Kim S, Cho KT, et al. Association Between Latency of Dermatomal Sensory-Evoked Potentials and Quantitative Radiologic Findings of Narrowing in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020;44(5):353–61.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shields CB, Ping Zhang Y, Shields LB, Burke DA, Glassman SD. Objective assessment of cervical spinal cord injury levels by transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Surg Neurol. 2006;66(5):475–83 discussion 483.CrossRef Shields CB, Ping Zhang Y, Shields LB, Burke DA, Glassman SD. Objective assessment of cervical spinal cord injury levels by transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials. Surg Neurol. 2006;66(5):475–83 discussion 483.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Slimp JC, Rubner DE, Snowden ML, Stolov WC. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials: cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral levels. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;84(1):55–70.CrossRef Slimp JC, Rubner DE, Snowden ML, Stolov WC. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials: cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral levels. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992;84(1):55–70.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Essa ZM, Al-Hashimi AF, Nema IS. Dermatomal Versus Mixed Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis of Lumbosacral Spinal Canal Stenosis. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;35(5):388–98.CrossRef Essa ZM, Al-Hashimi AF, Nema IS. Dermatomal Versus Mixed Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis of Lumbosacral Spinal Canal Stenosis. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018;35(5):388–98.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Whitecloud TS 3rd, Brinker MR, Barrack RL, Burke SW, Roberts JM. Vibratory response in congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(4):422–6.CrossRef Whitecloud TS 3rd, Brinker MR, Barrack RL, Burke SW, Roberts JM. Vibratory response in congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(4):422–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dawson GD. Cerebral responses to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1947;10(3):134–40.CrossRef Dawson GD. Cerebral responses to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1947;10(3):134–40.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kraft GH. Dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1):71–5.CrossRef Kraft GH. Dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in the evaluation of lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;14(1):71–5.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Aminoff MJ, Goodin DS, Barbaro NM, Weinstein PR, Rosenblum ML. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Ann Neurol. 1985;17(2):171–6.CrossRef Aminoff MJ, Goodin DS, Barbaro NM, Weinstein PR, Rosenblum ML. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Ann Neurol. 1985;17(2):171–6.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sitzoglou K, Fotiou F, Tsiptsios I, Tsonidis C, Fountoulakis K, Papakostopoulos D, et al. Dermatomal SEPs--a complementary study in evaluating patients with lumbosacral disc prolapse. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997;25(3):221–6.CrossRef Sitzoglou K, Fotiou F, Tsiptsios I, Tsonidis C, Fountoulakis K, Papakostopoulos D, et al. Dermatomal SEPs--a complementary study in evaluating patients with lumbosacral disc prolapse. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997;25(3):221–6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Date ES, Rappaport M, Ortega HR. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in brachial plexus injuries. Clin EEG (electroencephalography). 1991;22(4):236–49.CrossRef Date ES, Rappaport M, Ortega HR. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in brachial plexus injuries. Clin EEG (electroencephalography). 1991;22(4):236–49.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dumitru D, Newton BY, Dreyfuss P. Segmental v dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials. Normal intertrial variation and side-to-side comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72(2):75–83.CrossRef Dumitru D, Newton BY, Dreyfuss P. Segmental v dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials. Normal intertrial variation and side-to-side comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72(2):75–83.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Dias M, Partington M. Congenital Brain and Spinal Cord Malformations and Their Associated Cutaneous Markers. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):e1105–19.CrossRef Dias M, Partington M. Congenital Brain and Spinal Cord Malformations and Their Associated Cutaneous Markers. Pediatrics. 2015;136(4):e1105–19.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bradford DS, Heithoff KB, Cohen M. Intraspinal abnormalities and congenital spine deformities: a radiographic and MRI study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(1):36–41.CrossRef Bradford DS, Heithoff KB, Cohen M. Intraspinal abnormalities and congenital spine deformities: a radiographic and MRI study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(1):36–41.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Greenberg RP, Ducker TB. Evoked potentials in the clinical neurosciences. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(1):1–18.CrossRef Greenberg RP, Ducker TB. Evoked potentials in the clinical neurosciences. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(1):1–18.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sohn SY, Seo JH, Min Y, Seo MH, Eun JP, Song KJ. Changes in Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials according to Stimulation Intensity and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;51(5):286–91.CrossRef Sohn SY, Seo JH, Min Y, Seo MH, Eun JP, Song KJ. Changes in Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials according to Stimulation Intensity and Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012;51(5):286–91.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis
Authors
Zhenxing Zhang
Yi Wang
Tao Luo
Huaguang Qi
Lin Cai
Yang Yuan
Jingfeng Li
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02579-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Neurology 1/2022 Go to the issue