Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Practice

Characteristics of gadolinium-based contrast media cancellation at the point of care: a 15-month assessment of FDA-inspired medication guides on gadolinium retention

Authors: Laura S. O’Donohue, Prasad R. Shankar, Erica B. Stein, Matthew S. Davenport

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-inspired patient handouts, regarding gadolinium retention, on the frequency of patient-initiated cancellations of gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) at the point of care.

Methods

This is a single center retrospective cohort review of MRI examinations protocolled to receive GBCM but performed without GBCM from October 2017 to January 2019. The study period spans an FDA-inspired safety intervention (December 2017 to May 2018) to provide patients with a handout on gadolinium retention. Examinations were coded according to rationale for GBCM cancellation. Process control charts were created to statistically evaluate trends in GBCM cancellations over time.

Results

From October 2017 to January 2019, GBCM was canceled at the point of care for 0.22% (131/58,837; 95% CI 0.19–0.26) of examinations in which GBCM was indicated. This did not significantly vary during the study period. No cancellations (0/131) were due to stated concern for gadolinium retention. However, 38% (50/131; 95% CI 30–47) were canceled due to kidney impairment and 21% (28/131; 95% CI 13–30) were canceled for an unknown reason.

Conclusion

FDA-inspired handouts informing patients about gadolinium retention did not significantly change the frequency of GBCM cancellation. GBCM cancellations at the point of care remain uncommon.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference AF F. Update on FDA approach to safety issue of gadolinium retention after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. In: FDA, editor. Pediatric Advisory Committee2018. AF F. Update on FDA approach to safety issue of gadolinium retention after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. In: FDA, editor. Pediatric Advisory Committee2018.
2.
go back to reference [2] McDonald RJ, Levine D, Weinreb J, Kanal E, Davenport MS, Ellis JH, et al. Gadolinium Retention: A Research Roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA Workshop on Gadolinium Chelates. Radiology. 2018;289(2):517-34.CrossRef [2] McDonald RJ, Levine D, Weinreb J, Kanal E, Davenport MS, Ellis JH, et al. Gadolinium Retention: A Research Roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA Workshop on Gadolinium Chelates. Radiology. 2018;289(2):517-34.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference [4] Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270(3):834-41.CrossRef [4] Kanda T, Ishii K, Kawaguchi H, Kitajima K, Takenaka D. High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology. 2014;270(3):834-41.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference [5] McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Dai D, Schroeder D, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, et al. Comparison of Gadolinium Concentrations within Multiple Rat Organs after Intravenous Administration of Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelates. Radiology. 2017;285(2):536-45.CrossRef [5] McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Dai D, Schroeder D, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, et al. Comparison of Gadolinium Concentrations within Multiple Rat Organs after Intravenous Administration of Linear versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium Chelates. Radiology. 2017;285(2):536-45.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference [6] Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K, Fligner C, Dills R, Hippe D, et al. Macrocyclic and Other Non-Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(7):447-53.CrossRef [6] Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K, Fligner C, Dills R, Hippe D, et al. Macrocyclic and Other Non-Group 1 Gadolinium Contrast Agents Deposit Low Levels of Gadolinium in Brain and Bone Tissue: Preliminary Results From 9 Patients With Normal Renal Function. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(7):447-53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference [7] McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Paolini MA, Murray DL, et al. Gadolinium Deposition in Human Brain Tissues after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Adult Patients without Intracranial Abnormalities. Radiology. 2017;285(2):546-54.CrossRef [7] McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Paolini MA, Murray DL, et al. Gadolinium Deposition in Human Brain Tissues after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Adult Patients without Intracranial Abnormalities. Radiology. 2017;285(2):546-54.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference [8] White GW, Gibby WA, Tweedle MF. Comparison of Gd(DTPA-BMA) (Omniscan) versus Gd(HP-DO3A) (ProHance) relative to gadolinium retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Invest Radiol. 2006;41(3):272-8.CrossRef [8] White GW, Gibby WA, Tweedle MF. Comparison of Gd(DTPA-BMA) (Omniscan) versus Gd(HP-DO3A) (ProHance) relative to gadolinium retention in human bone tissue by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Invest Radiol. 2006;41(3):272-8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting: Gadolinium Retention after Gadolinium Based Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Normal Renal Function. In: FDA, editor. 2017. Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting: Gadolinium Retention after Gadolinium Based Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Normal Renal Function. In: FDA, editor. 2017.
10.
go back to reference FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA evaluating the risk of brain deposits with repeated use of gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In: FDA, editor. www.FDA.gov2015. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA evaluating the risk of brain deposits with repeated use of gadolinium-based contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In: FDA, editor. www.​FDA.​gov2015.
11.
go back to reference FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA identifies no harmful effects to date with brain retention of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRIs; review to continue. In: FDA, editor. www.FDA.gov2017. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA identifies no harmful effects to date with brain retention of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MRIs; review to continue. In: FDA, editor. www.​FDA.​gov2017.
12.
go back to reference FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warnings. In: FDA, editor. www.FDA.gov2018. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA warns that gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are retained in the body; requires new class warnings. In: FDA, editor. www.​FDA.​gov2018.
13.
go back to reference [13] Wolf MS, Davis TC, Shrank WH, Neuberger M, Parker RM. A critical review of FDA-approved Medication Guides. Patient education and counseling. 2006;62(3):316-22.CrossRef [13] Wolf MS, Davis TC, Shrank WH, Neuberger M, Parker RM. A critical review of FDA-approved Medication Guides. Patient education and counseling. 2006;62(3):316-22.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference [14] Wolf MS, King J, Wilson EA, Curtis LM, Bailey SC, Duhig J, et al. Usability of FDA-approved medication guides. Journal of general internal medicine. 2012;27(12):1714-20.CrossRef [14] Wolf MS, King J, Wilson EA, Curtis LM, Bailey SC, Duhig J, et al. Usability of FDA-approved medication guides. Journal of general internal medicine. 2012;27(12):1714-20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference [15] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2007;18(6):800-4.CrossRef [15] von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass). 2007;18(6):800-4.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Prins J. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods: Counts Control Charts. 2012. Prins J. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods: Counts Control Charts. 2012.
19.
22.
go back to reference Woolen SA, Shankar PR, Gagnier JJ, MacEachern MP, Singer L, Davenport MS. Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. Woolen SA, Shankar PR, Gagnier JJ, MacEachern MP, Singer L, Davenport MS. Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019.
23.
go back to reference [23] Shankar PR, Parikh K, Davenport MS. Financial Implications of Revised ACR Guidelines for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Testing Before Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2018;15(2):250-7.CrossRef [23] Shankar PR, Parikh K, Davenport MS. Financial Implications of Revised ACR Guidelines for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Testing Before Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR. 2018;15(2):250-7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference [24] Davenport MS, Perazella MA, Yee J, Dillman JR, Fine D, McDonald RJ, et al. Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology. 2020;294(3):660-8.CrossRef [24] Davenport MS, Perazella MA, Yee J, Dillman JR, Fine D, McDonald RJ, et al. Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Radiology. 2020;294(3):660-8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of gadolinium-based contrast media cancellation at the point of care: a 15-month assessment of FDA-inspired medication guides on gadolinium retention
Authors
Laura S. O’Donohue
Prasad R. Shankar
Erica B. Stein
Matthew S. Davenport
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02670-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Abdominal Radiology 2/2021 Go to the issue

SAR DFP Report

GI Bleed DFP report

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.