Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

3D whole-heart noncontrast coronary MR angiography based on compressed SENSE technology: a comparative study of conventional SENSE sequence and coronary computed tomography angiography

Authors: Yang Zhang, Xinna Zhang, Yuqi Jiang, Panpan Yang, Xiankuo Hu, Bin Peng, Xiuzheng Yue, Yuanyuan Li, Peiqi Ma, Yushan Yuan, Yongqiang Yu, Bin Liu, Xiaohu Li

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The relatively long scan time has hampered the clinical use of whole-heart noncontrast coronary magnetic resonance angiography (NCMRA). The compressed sensitivity encoding (SENSE) technique, also known as the CS technique, has been found to improve scan times. This study aimed to identify the optimal CS acceleration factor for NCMRA.

Methods

Thirty-six participants underwent four NCMRA sequences: three sequences using the CS technique with acceleration factors of 4, 5, and 6, and one sequence using the conventional SENSE technique with the acceleration factor of 2. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was considered as a reference sequence. The acquisition times of the four NCMRA sequences were assessed. The correlation and agreement between the visible vessel lengths obtained via CCTA and NCMRA were also assessed. The image quality scores and contrast ratio (CR) of eight coronary artery segments from the four NCMRA sequences were quantitatively evaluated.

Results

The mean acquisition time of the conventional SENSE was 343 s, while that of CS4, CS5, and CS6 was 269, 215, and 190 s, respectively. The visible vessel length from the CS4 sequence showed good correlation and agreement with CCTA. The image quality score and CR from the CS4 sequence were not statistically significantly different from those in the other groups (p > 0.05). Moreover, the image score and CR showed a decreasing trend with the increase in the CS factor.

Conclusions

The CS technique could significantly shorten the acquisition time of NCMRA. The CS sequence with an acceleration factor of 4 was generally acceptable for NCMRA in clinical settings to balance the image quality and acquisition time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ et al (2020) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 141:e139–e596CrossRefPubMed Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ et al (2020) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 141:e139–e596CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 24:3–11CrossRefPubMed Hou Y, Ma Y, Fan W et al (2014) Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose 256-slice multi-detector coronary CT angiography using iterative reconstruction in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 24:3–11CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ko DT, Tu JV, Austin PC et al (2013) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario. JAMA 310:163–169CrossRefPubMed Ko DT, Tu JV, Austin PC et al (2013) Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease among patients undergoing elective coronary catheterization in New York State and Ontario. JAMA 310:163–169CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N et al (2010) Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:983–991CrossRefPubMed Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N et al (2010) Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:983–991CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yonezawa M, Nagata M, Kitagawa K et al (2014) Quantitative analysis of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary MR angiograms obtained with 32-channel cardiac coils: a comparison with conventional quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 271:356–364CrossRefPubMed Yonezawa M, Nagata M, Kitagawa K et al (2014) Quantitative analysis of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary MR angiograms obtained with 32-channel cardiac coils: a comparison with conventional quantitative coronary angiography. Radiology 271:356–364CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Liu X, Zhao X, Huang J et al (2007) Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1326–1332CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu X, Zhao X, Huang J et al (2007) Comparison of 3D free-breathing coronary MR angiography and 64-MDCT angiography for detection of coronary stenosis in patients with high calcium scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1326–1332CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference He Y, Pang J, Dai Q et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of self-navigated whole heart contrast-enhanced coronary 3-T MR angiography. Radiology 281:401–408CrossRefPubMed He Y, Pang J, Dai Q et al (2016) Diagnostic performance of self-navigated whole heart contrast-enhanced coronary 3-T MR angiography. Radiology 281:401–408CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Yang Q, Li K, Liu X et al (2012) 3.0T Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: a single-center experience. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:573–579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yang Q, Li K, Liu X et al (2012) 3.0T Whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography performed with 32-channel cardiac coils: a single-center experience. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:573–579CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Scott AD, Keegan J, Firmin DN (2009) Motion in cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 250:334–351CrossRef Scott AD, Keegan J, Firmin DN (2009) Motion in cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology 250:334–351CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pang J, Bhat H, Sharif B et al (2014) Whole-heart coronary MRA with 100% respiratory gating efficiency: self-navigated three-dimensional retrospective image-based motion correction (TRIM). Magn Reson Med 71:67–74CrossRefPubMed Pang J, Bhat H, Sharif B et al (2014) Whole-heart coronary MRA with 100% respiratory gating efficiency: self-navigated three-dimensional retrospective image-based motion correction (TRIM). Magn Reson Med 71:67–74CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schneider A, Cruz G, Munoz C et al (2022) Whole-heart non-rigid motion corrected coronary MRA with autofocus virtual 3D iNAV. Magn Reson Imaging 87:169–176CrossRefPubMed Schneider A, Cruz G, Munoz C et al (2022) Whole-heart non-rigid motion corrected coronary MRA with autofocus virtual 3D iNAV. Magn Reson Imaging 87:169–176CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB et al (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMed Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB et al (1999) SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 42:952–962CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tsurusaki M, Semelka RC, Uotani K et al (2008) Prospective comparison of high-and low-spatial-resolution dynamic MR imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 18:2206–2212CrossRefPubMed Tsurusaki M, Semelka RC, Uotani K et al (2008) Prospective comparison of high-and low-spatial-resolution dynamic MR imaging with sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 18:2206–2212CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lin FH, Tsai SY, Otazo R et al (2007) Sensitivity-encoded (SENSE) proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI) in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 57:249–257CrossRefPubMed Lin FH, Tsai SY, Otazo R et al (2007) Sensitivity-encoded (SENSE) proton echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI) in the human brain. Magn Reson Med 57:249–257CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Preibisch C, Wallenhorst T, Heidemann R et al (2008) Comparison of parallel acquisition techniques generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) and modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) in functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:590–598CrossRefPubMed Preibisch C, Wallenhorst T, Heidemann R et al (2008) Comparison of parallel acquisition techniques generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) and modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE) in functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:590–598CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRefPubMed Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182–1195CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK et al (2003) Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 46:3–27CrossRefPubMed van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK et al (2003) Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 46:3–27CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nakamura M, Kido T, Kido T et al (2018) Non-contrast compressed sensing whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3T: a comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Radiol 104:43–48CrossRefPubMed Nakamura M, Kido T, Kido T et al (2018) Non-contrast compressed sensing whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3T: a comparison with conventional imaging. Eur J Radiol 104:43–48CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Lu H, Guo J, Zhao S et al (2022) Assessment of non-contrast-enhanced Dixon water-fat separation compressed sensing whole-heart coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T: a single-center experience. Acad Radiol 29:S82–S90CrossRefPubMed Lu H, Guo J, Zhao S et al (2022) Assessment of non-contrast-enhanced Dixon water-fat separation compressed sensing whole-heart coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T: a single-center experience. Acad Radiol 29:S82–S90CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40CrossRefPubMed Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ding J, Duan Y, Zhuo Z et al (2021) Acceleration of brain TOF-MRA with compressed sensitivity encoding: a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42:1208–1215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ding J, Duan Y, Zhuo Z et al (2021) Acceleration of brain TOF-MRA with compressed sensitivity encoding: a multicenter clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42:1208–1215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Altahawi FF, Blount KJ, Morley NP et al (2017) Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol 46:7–15CrossRefPubMed Altahawi FF, Blount KJ, Morley NP et al (2017) Comparing an accelerated 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CS-SPACE) for knee 3-T magnetic resonance imaging with traditional 3D fast spin-echo (SPACE) and routine 2D sequences. Skeletal Radiol 46:7–15CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al (2021) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 345:1863–1869CrossRef Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al (2021) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 345:1863–1869CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ogawa R, Kido T, Nakamura M et al (2020) Comparison of compressed sensing and conventional coronary magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol 129:109124CrossRefPubMed Ogawa R, Kido T, Nakamura M et al (2020) Comparison of compressed sensing and conventional coronary magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol 129:109124CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Altmann S, Halfmann MC, Abidoye I et al (2021) Compressed sensing acceleration of cardiac cine imaging allows reliable and reproducible assessment of volumetric and functional parameters of the left and right atrium. Eur Radiol 31:7219–7230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altmann S, Halfmann MC, Abidoye I et al (2021) Compressed sensing acceleration of cardiac cine imaging allows reliable and reproducible assessment of volumetric and functional parameters of the left and right atrium. Eur Radiol 31:7219–7230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Püsken M et al (2007) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1317–1323CrossRefPubMed Seifarth H, Wienbeck S, Püsken M et al (2007) Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction windows for coronary CT angiography using dual-source CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1317–1323CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
3D whole-heart noncontrast coronary MR angiography based on compressed SENSE technology: a comparative study of conventional SENSE sequence and coronary computed tomography angiography
Authors
Yang Zhang
Xinna Zhang
Yuqi Jiang
Panpan Yang
Xiankuo Hu
Bin Peng
Xiuzheng Yue
Yuanyuan Li
Peiqi Ma
Yushan Yuan
Yongqiang Yu
Bin Liu
Xiaohu Li
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01378-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue