Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2020

01-11-2020 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine | Scientific Article

Differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation on contrast-enhanced and unenhanced MRI in the postoperative lumbar spine

Authors: Zita Passavanti, Sebastian Leschka, Simon Wildermuth, Thomas Forster, Tobias Johannes Dietrich

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine diagnostic confidence and inter-observer/intra-observer agreement in differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis parameters on magnetic resonance images (MRI) in postoperative lumbar spines with (Gad-MRI) and without (unenhanced MRI) intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agent.

Subjects and methods

N = 124 lumbar spine MRI examinations of four groups were included: 1–6 months, 7–18 months, 19–36 months, more than 37 months between lumbar spine surgery and imaging. Two radiologists evaluated Gad-MRI and unenhanced MRI: diagnostic confidence was determined as confident or unconfident. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement were assessed in differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation and for lumbar spinal stenosis parameters on MRI. Fisher’s exact test and Cohen’s kappa served for statistics.

Results

Diagnostic confidence in differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation was significantly higher on Gad-MR images compared with unenhanced MRI at 1–18 months for observer 1 and at 1–6 months postoperatively for observer 2 (p values: 0.01–0.025). Inter-observer agreement at 1–6 months postoperatively for identification of epidural fibrosis was higher on Gad-MRI (kappa values: 0.53 versus 0.24). Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement for identification of disc herniation and for assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis parameters revealed inconsistent data, without a trend for higher inter-observer or intra-observer agreement on Gad-MRI compared with unenhanced MRI (kappa values: 0.17–0.75).

Conclusion

Gad-MR images compared with unenhanced MRI improved diagnostic confidence and agreement in differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation for both observers in the first 6 months and for one observer in the first 18 months after lumbar spine surgery. After 18 months, Gad-MR images compared with unenhanced MRI did neither improve confidence nor agreement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Schrader M, Gentili A, Bohlman H, Modic MT. MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: assessment with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:867–72.CrossRef Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Schrader M, Gentili A, Bohlman H, Modic MT. MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: assessment with gadopentetate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:867–72.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ross JS, Delamarter R, Hueftle MG, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: time course and mechanism of enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:825–34.CrossRef Ross JS, Delamarter R, Hueftle MG, et al. Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: time course and mechanism of enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:825–34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS, et al. Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1988;167:817–24.CrossRef Hueftle MG, Modic MT, Ross JS, et al. Lumbar spine: postoperative MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1988;167:817–24.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:564–70.CrossRef Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:564–70.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Eichinger P, Schön S, Pongratz V, et al. Accuracy of unenhanced MRI in the detection of new brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 2019;291:429–35.CrossRef Eichinger P, Schön S, Pongratz V, et al. Accuracy of unenhanced MRI in the detection of new brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. Radiology. 2019;291:429–35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ai T, Morelli JN, Hu X, et al. A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations. Investig Radiol. 2012;47:725–41.CrossRef Ai T, Morelli JN, Hu X, et al. A historical overview of magnetic resonance imaging, focusing on technological innovations. Investig Radiol. 2012;47:725–41.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sutter R, Stoel BC, Buck FM, et al. Internal derangements of joints-past, present, and future. Investig Radiol. 2015;50:601–14.CrossRef Sutter R, Stoel BC, Buck FM, et al. Internal derangements of joints-past, present, and future. Investig Radiol. 2015;50:601–14.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wood ML, Griswold MA, Henkelman M, Hennig J. Inflection points in magnetic resonance imaging technology—35 years of collaborative research and development. Investig Radiol. 2015;50:645–56.CrossRef Wood ML, Griswold MA, Henkelman M, Hennig J. Inflection points in magnetic resonance imaging technology—35 years of collaborative research and development. Investig Radiol. 2015;50:645–56.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dhagat PK, Jain M, Singh SN, Arora S, Leelakanth K. Failed back surgery syndrome: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:TC05–9. Dhagat PK, Jain M, Singh SN, Arora S, Leelakanth K. Failed back surgery syndrome: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:TC05–9.
10.
go back to reference Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L Eur Study Group Neurosurg. 1996;38:855–61. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RC, et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. ADCON-L Eur Study Group Neurosurg. 1996;38:855–61.
11.
go back to reference Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine. 2010;35:1919–24.CrossRef Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine. 2010;35:1919–24.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bartynski WS, Lin L. Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:348–60.PubMed Bartynski WS, Lin L. Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:348–60.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology. 2004;230:583–8.CrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Dora C, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. MR image-based grading of lumbar nerve root compromise due to disk herniation: reliability study with surgical correlation. Radiology. 2004;230:583–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363–74.CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics. 1977;33:363–74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.PubMed Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–3.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Andreisek G, Hodler J, Steurer J. Uncertainties in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiology. 2011;261:681–4.CrossRef Andreisek G, Hodler J, Steurer J. Uncertainties in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiology. 2011;261:681–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mamisch N, Brumann M, Hodler J, Held U, Brunner F, Steurer J. Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Radiology. 2012;264:174–9.CrossRef Mamisch N, Brumann M, Hodler J, Held U, Brunner F, Steurer J. Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis. Radiology. 2012;264:174–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Winklhofer S, Held U, Burgstaller JM, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:353–61.CrossRef Winklhofer S, Held U, Burgstaller JM, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine canal stenosis: intra- and inter-reader agreement for magnetic resonance imaging parameters. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:353–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lohrke J, Frenzel T, Endrikat J, et al. 25 years of contrast-enhancend MRI: developments, current challenges and future perspectives. Adv Ther. 2016;33:1–28.CrossRef Lohrke J, Frenzel T, Endrikat J, et al. 25 years of contrast-enhancend MRI: developments, current challenges and future perspectives. Adv Ther. 2016;33:1–28.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ross JS, Obuchowski N, Zepp R. The postoperative lumbar spine: evaluation of epidural scar over a 1-year period. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:183–6.PubMed Ross JS, Obuchowski N, Zepp R. The postoperative lumbar spine: evaluation of epidural scar over a 1-year period. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:183–6.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Falk Delgado A, Van Westen D, Nilsson M, et al. Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging-a comprehensive overview. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:84.CrossRef Falk Delgado A, Van Westen D, Nilsson M, et al. Diagnostic value of alternative techniques to gadolinium-based contrast agents in MR neuroimaging-a comprehensive overview. Insights Imaging. 2019;10:84.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Eisenmenger L, Clark AJ, Shah VN. Postoperative spine what the surgeon wants to know. 2019;57:415–38. Eisenmenger L, Clark AJ, Shah VN. Postoperative spine what the surgeon wants to know. 2019;57:415–38.
23.
go back to reference Farshad-Amacker NA, Farshad M, Winklehner A, Andreisek G. MR imaging of degenerative disc disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1768–76.CrossRef Farshad-Amacker NA, Farshad M, Winklehner A, Andreisek G. MR imaging of degenerative disc disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1768–76.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Differentiating epidural fibrosis from disc herniation on contrast-enhanced and unenhanced MRI in the postoperative lumbar spine
Authors
Zita Passavanti
Sebastian Leschka
Simon Wildermuth
Thomas Forster
Tobias Johannes Dietrich
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03488-8

Other articles of this Issue 11/2020

Skeletal Radiology 11/2020 Go to the issue