Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 1/2008

01-01-2008 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction

Authors: Jin-Young Choi, Myeong-Jin Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jae Young Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Ki Whang Kim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose was to retrospectively compare two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) including breath-hold single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and multislice half-Fourier RARE versus navigator-triggered 3D-RARE MRC in the evaluation of biliary malignancy. MRC findings were evaluated in 31 patients with malignant biliary obstruction, including biliary malignancy, gallbladder carcinoma, and ampullary cancer. Two observers independently reviewed the images to assess the overall image quality, artifacts, ductal conspicuity, extent of disease, diagnostic confidence of tumor extent, and origin of tumor. The results were compared with surgical and histopathologic findings. Studies obtained with 3D-MRC were of significantly higher technical quality than those obtained with 2D-MRC. However, the accuracy between two sequences for classification of tumor showed no statistical significance. There was no significant difference between the Az values of 2D- and 3D-MRC for overall tumor extent in bilateral second order branch, intrapancreatic common bile duct (CBD) involvement (Az = 0.889, 0.881 for 2D and Az = 0.903, 0.864 for 3D). Nor was there a significant difference between two sequences in the assessment of the origin of tumor. Although 3D-MRC has superior image quality over 2D-MRC, 3D-MRC showed no statistically significant difference in accuracy compared with 2D-MRC for evaluating the extent of disease in malignant biliary obstructions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schwartz LH, Coakley FV, Sun Y, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Panicek DM (1998) Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1491–1495PubMed Schwartz LH, Coakley FV, Sun Y, Blumgart LH, Fong Y, Panicek DM (1998) Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1491–1495PubMed
2.
go back to reference Becker CD, Grossholz M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions. Eur Radiol 7:865–874PubMedCrossRef Becker CD, Grossholz M, Mentha G, de Peyer R, Terrier F (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions. Eur Radiol 7:865–874PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60:721–731PubMedCrossRef Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J (2004) Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 60:721–731PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB et al (1982) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 144:109–114PubMedCrossRef Frey CF, Burbige EJ, Meinke WB et al (1982) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 144:109–114PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21–32PubMed Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207:21–32PubMed
7.
go back to reference Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ (1999) A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol 54:513–520PubMedCrossRef Varghese JC, Farrell MA, Courtney G, Osborne H, Murray FE, Lee MJ (1999) A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract disease. Clin Radiol 54:513–520PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R (1996) Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110:589–597PubMedCrossRef Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R (1996) Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 110:589–597PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN (2003) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 139:547–557PubMed Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN (2003) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 139:547–557PubMed
10.
go back to reference Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W et al (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29:182–187PubMedCrossRef Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W et al (1997) Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 29:182–187PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau D et al (1998) Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2482–2490PubMedCrossRef Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau D et al (1998) Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2482–2490PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M et al (2006) Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16:2317–2325PubMedCrossRef Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M et al (2006) Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16:2317–2325PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Fabiano S, Passariello R (1999) MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 9:1513–1522PubMedCrossRef Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Fabiano S, Passariello R (1999) MRI of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. Eur Radiol 9:1513–1522PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S et al (2007) Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 17:241–250PubMedCrossRef Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Novellas S et al (2007) Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur Radiol 17:241–250PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Coakley FV, Schwartz LH (1999) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:157–162PubMedCrossRef Coakley FV, Schwartz LH (1999) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:157–162PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, Zou KH, Thibodeau S, Tempany CM (2006) Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 238:549–559PubMedCrossRef Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, Zou KH, Thibodeau S, Tempany CM (2006) Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 238:549–559PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT (1995) MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:295–300PubMed Barish MA, Yucel EK, Soto JA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT (1995) MR cholangiopancreatography: efficacy of three-dimensional turbo spin-echo technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:295–300PubMed
18.
go back to reference Wielopolski PA, Gaa J, Wielopolski DR, Oudkerk M (1999) Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional, segmented, echo-planar imaging and volume rendering. Radiology 210:247–252PubMed Wielopolski PA, Gaa J, Wielopolski DR, Oudkerk M (1999) Breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional, segmented, echo-planar imaging and volume rendering. Radiology 210:247–252PubMed
19.
go back to reference Textor HJ, Flacke S, Pauleit D et al (2002) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 34:984–990PubMedCrossRef Textor HJ, Flacke S, Pauleit D et al (2002) Three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with respiratory triggering in the diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Endoscopy 34:984–990PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:31–38PubMedCrossRef Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:31–38PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, Medina S (2000) Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 215:737–745PubMed Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, Medina S (2000) Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single- and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 215:737–745PubMed
22.
go back to reference Asbach P, Klessen C, Kroencke TJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction. Magn Reson Imaging 23:939–945PubMedCrossRef Asbach P, Klessen C, Kroencke TJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence with navigator-triggered prospective acquisition correction. Magn Reson Imaging 23:939–945PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Klessen C, Asbach P, Kroencke TJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:576–582PubMedCrossRef Klessen C, Asbach P, Kroencke TJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:576–582PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for assessment of malignant biliary obstruction
Authors
Jin-Young Choi
Myeong-Jin Kim
Jeong Min Lee
Jae Young Lee
Se Hyung Kim
Ki Whang Kim
Joon Koo Han
Byung Ihn Choi
Publication date
01-01-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0670-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

European Radiology 1/2008 Go to the issue