Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 3/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Macroscopic tumor size as an independent prognostic factor for stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1

Authors: Toru Aoyama, Takaki Yoshikawa, Takafumi Watanabe, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takashi Ogata, Haruhiko Cho, Akira Tsuburaya

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In patients with stage II/III gastric cancer, tumors often recur even after curative D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy. The objective of this retrospective study was to clarify the prognostic factors in these patients that might be useful for future patients.

Methods

Overall survival (OS) was examined in 82 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative D2 surgery; were diagnosed with stage IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC pathologically; and received adjuvant S-1 after surgery between June 2002 and March 2010.

Results

When length of OS was evaluated by the log-rank test, significant differences were observed with regard to macroscopic tumor diameter and the depth of tumor invasion. A macroscopic tumor diameter >70 mm was regarded as a critical point of classification considering survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard analyses demonstrated that macroscopic tumor diameter was the only significant independent prognosticator. The 5-year survival was 64.9% in patients with a macroscopic tumor diameter <70 mm, and 33.1% in patients with a macroscopic tumor diameter ≥70 mm (P = 0.022).

Conclusions

The macroscopic tumor diameter was the most important prognostic factor for survival in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy. Prognostic factors can be affected by adjuvant chemotherapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ohtsu A, Yoshida S, Saijo N. Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2188–96.CrossRefPubMed Ohtsu A, Yoshida S, Saijo N. Disparities in gastric cancer chemotherapy between the East and West. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2188–96.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shiraishi N, Inomata M, Osawa N, Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Kitano S. Early and late recurrence after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Univariate and multivariate analyses. Cancer. 2000;89:255–61.CrossRefPubMed Shiraishi N, Inomata M, Osawa N, Yasuda K, Adachi Y, Kitano S. Early and late recurrence after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Univariate and multivariate analyses. Cancer. 2000;89:255–61.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Mori M, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Prediction of early and late recurrence after curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:2445–8.CrossRefPubMed Adachi Y, Oshiro T, Mori M, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Prediction of early and late recurrence after curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:2445–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Morabito A, Bufalino R, Menotti V, Andreola S, et al. A multifactorial approach for the prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the stomach after curative resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162:229–34.PubMed Bozzetti F, Bonfanti G, Morabito A, Bufalino R, Menotti V, Andreola S, et al. A multifactorial approach for the prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the stomach after curative resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986;162:229–34.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Maruyama K. The most important prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients: a study using univariate and multivariate analyses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22:63–8.CrossRef Maruyama K. The most important prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients: a study using univariate and multivariate analyses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1987;22:63–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.CrossRefPubMed Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1810–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 14th Japanese ed. Tokyo: Kanehara-shuppan; 2010. p. 5–17. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. 14th Japanese ed. Tokyo: Kanehara-shuppan; 2010. p. 5–17.
8.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R, Oshima T, Nagano Y, Kosaka T, et al. Tumor diameter as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1959–67.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Makino H, Takagawa R, Oshima T, Nagano Y, Kosaka T, et al. Tumor diameter as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1959–67.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saito H, Osaki T, Murakami D, Sakamoto T, Kanaji S, Oro S, et al. Macroscopic tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192:296–300.CrossRefPubMed Saito H, Osaki T, Murakami D, Sakamoto T, Kanaji S, Oro S, et al. Macroscopic tumor size as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with gastric cancer. Am J Surg. 2006;192:296–300.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Macroscopic tumor size as an independent prognostic factor for stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1
Authors
Toru Aoyama
Takaki Yoshikawa
Takafumi Watanabe
Tsutomu Hayashi
Takashi Ogata
Haruhiko Cho
Akira Tsuburaya
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0038-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Gastric Cancer 3/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.