Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Machine learning-driven clinical decision support system for concept-based searching: a field trial in a Norwegian hospital

Authors: G. T. Berge, O. C. Granmo, T. O. Tveit, B. E. Munkvold, A. L. Ruthjersen, J. Sharma

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Natural language processing (NLP) based clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have demonstrated the ability to extract vital information from patient electronic health records (EHRs) to facilitate important decision support tasks. While obtaining accurate, medical domain interpretable results is crucial, it is demanding because real-world EHRs contain many inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Further, testing of such machine learning-based systems in clinical practice has received limited attention and are yet to be accepted by clinicians for regular use.

Methods

We present our results from the evaluation of an NLP-driven CDSS developed and implemented in a Norwegian Hospital. The system incorporates unsupervised and supervised machine learning combined with rule-based algorithms for clinical concept-based searching to identify and classify allergies of concern for anesthesia and intensive care. The system also implements a semi-supervised machine learning approach to automatically annotate medical concepts in the narrative.

Results

Evaluation of system adoption was performed by a mixed methods approach applying The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a theoretical lens. Most of the respondents demonstrated a high degree of system acceptance and expressed a positive attitude towards the system in general and intention to use the system in the future. Increased detection of patient allergies, and thus improved quality of practice and patient safety during surgery or ICU stays, was perceived as the most important advantage of the system.

Conclusions

Our combined machine learning and rule-based approach benefits system performance, efficiency, and interpretability. The results demonstrate that the proposed CDSS increases detection of patient allergies, and that the system received high-level acceptance by the clinicians using it. Useful recommendations for further system improvements and implementation initiatives are reducing the quantity of alarms, expansion of the system to include more clinical concepts, closer EHR system integration, and more workstations available at point of care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hegvik JA, Rygnestad T. Treatment of serious allergic reactions. Tidsskr Den Nor Laegeforening Tidsskr Prakt Med Ny Raekke. 2002;122:1018. Hegvik JA, Rygnestad T. Treatment of serious allergic reactions. Tidsskr Den Nor Laegeforening Tidsskr Prakt Med Ny Raekke. 2002;122:1018.
2.
go back to reference Fernando B, Kalra D, Morrison Z, Byrne E, Sheikh A. Benefits and risks of structuring and/or coding the presenting patient history in the electronic health record: systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:337–46.CrossRef Fernando B, Kalra D, Morrison Z, Byrne E, Sheikh A. Benefits and risks of structuring and/or coding the presenting patient history in the electronic health record: systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:337–46.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pradhan H, Stokes J. Does your electronic health record system introduce patient safety risks. Wash Patient Saf Coalit. 2015. Pradhan H, Stokes J. Does your electronic health record system introduce patient safety risks. Wash Patient Saf Coalit. 2015.
4.
go back to reference Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR trap—the future of health IT. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2240–2.CrossRef Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR trap—the future of health IT. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2240–2.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bowden T, Coiera E. The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:138.CrossRef Bowden T, Coiera E. The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:138.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Demner-Fushman D, Chapman WW, McDonald CJ. What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:760–72.CrossRef Demner-Fushman D, Chapman WW, McDonald CJ. What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:760–72.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Meystre SM, Savova GK, Kipper-Schuler KC, Hurdle JF. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearb Med Inf. 2008;35:128–44. Meystre SM, Savova GK, Kipper-Schuler KC, Hurdle JF. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearb Med Inf. 2008;35:128–44.
8.
go back to reference Pons E, Braun LM, Hunink MM, Kors JA. Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology. 2016;279:329–43.CrossRef Pons E, Braun LM, Hunink MM, Kors JA. Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology. 2016;279:329–43.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wang Y, Wang L, Rastegar-Mojarad M, Moon S, Shen F, Afzal N, et al. Clinical information extraction applications: a literature review. J Biomed Inform. 2017. Wang Y, Wang L, Rastegar-Mojarad M, Moon S, Shen F, Afzal N, et al. Clinical information extraction applications: a literature review. J Biomed Inform. 2017.
10.
go back to reference Mack R, Mukherjea S, Soffer A, Uramoto N, Brown E, Coden A, et al. Text analytics for life science using the unstructured information management architecture. IBM Syst J. 2004;43:490–515.CrossRef Mack R, Mukherjea S, Soffer A, Uramoto N, Brown E, Coden A, et al. Text analytics for life science using the unstructured information management architecture. IBM Syst J. 2004;43:490–515.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jonnalagadda S, Cohen T, Wu S, Gonzalez G. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:129–40.CrossRef Jonnalagadda S, Cohen T, Wu S, Gonzalez G. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45:129–40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mykowiecka A, Marciniak M, Kupść A. Rule-based information extraction from patients’ clinical data. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:923–36.CrossRef Mykowiecka A, Marciniak M, Kupść A. Rule-based information extraction from patients’ clinical data. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:923–36.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Kirsch H, Couto F. Facts from text—is text mining ready to deliver? PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e65.CrossRef Rebholz-Schuhmann D, Kirsch H, Couto F. Facts from text—is text mining ready to deliver? PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e65.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Berge GT, Granmo O-C, Tveit TO. Combining unsupervised, supervised, and rule-based algorithms for text mining of electronic health records-a clinical decision support system for identifying and classifying allergies of concern for anesthesia during surgery. 2017. Berge GT, Granmo O-C, Tveit TO. Combining unsupervised, supervised, and rule-based algorithms for text mining of electronic health records-a clinical decision support system for identifying and classifying allergies of concern for anesthesia during surgery. 2017.
15.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003; 425–478. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003; 425–478.
16.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X. Just what the doctor ordered: a revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In: 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). IEEE; 2011. pp. 1–10. Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X. Just what the doctor ordered: a revised UTAUT for EMR system adoption and use by doctors. In: 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). IEEE; 2011. pp. 1–10.
17.
go back to reference Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. 2016. Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. 2016.
18.
go back to reference English D, Ankem K, English K. Acceptance of clinical decision support surveillance technology in the clinical pharmacy. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42:135–52.CrossRef English D, Ankem K, English K. Acceptance of clinical decision support surveillance technology in the clinical pharmacy. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42:135–52.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lomotan EA, Hoeksema LJ, Edmonds DE, Ramírez-Garnica G, Shiffman RN, Horwitz LI. Evaluating the use of a computerized clinical decision support system for asthma by pediatric pulmonologists. Int J Med Inf. 2012;81:157–65.CrossRef Lomotan EA, Hoeksema LJ, Edmonds DE, Ramírez-Garnica G, Shiffman RN, Horwitz LI. Evaluating the use of a computerized clinical decision support system for asthma by pediatric pulmonologists. Int J Med Inf. 2012;81:157–65.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systemsa systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:29–43.CrossRef Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R, Bristow E, Bastian L, Coeytaux RR, et al. Effect of clinical decision-support systemsa systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:29–43.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330:765.CrossRef Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330:765.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Main C, Moxham T, Wyatt JC, Kay J, Anderson R, Stein K. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems. 2010. Main C, Moxham T, Wyatt JC, Kay J, Anderson R, Stein K. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems. 2010.
23.
go back to reference Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:327–34.CrossRef Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:327–34.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hemmerling TM, Cirillo F, Cyr S. Decision support systems in medicine-anesthesia, critical care and intensive care medicine. In: Decision support systems. InTech; 2012. Hemmerling TM, Cirillo F, Cyr S. Decision support systems in medicine-anesthesia, critical care and intensive care medicine. In: Decision support systems. InTech; 2012.
25.
go back to reference Berner ES. Clinical decision support systems: state of the art. AHRQ Publ. 2009;90069:1–26. Berner ES. Clinical decision support systems: state of the art. AHRQ Publ. 2009;90069:1–26.
26.
go back to reference Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. In: Biomedical informatics. Springer; 2014. pp. 643–674. Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. In: Biomedical informatics. Springer; 2014. pp. 643–674.
27.
go back to reference Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
28.
go back to reference Lahner E, Intraligi M, Buscema M, Centanni M, Vannella L, Grossi E, et al. Artificial neural networks in the recognition of the presence of thyroid disease in patients with atrophic body gastritis. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2008;14:563.CrossRef Lahner E, Intraligi M, Buscema M, Centanni M, Vannella L, Grossi E, et al. Artificial neural networks in the recognition of the presence of thyroid disease in patients with atrophic body gastritis. World J Gastroenterol WJG. 2008;14:563.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Payton FC, Pare G, Le Rouge CM, Reddy M. Health care IT: process, people, patients and interdisciplinary considerations. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;12:4. Payton FC, Pare G, Le Rouge CM, Reddy M. Health care IT: process, people, patients and interdisciplinary considerations. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;12:4.
30.
go back to reference Sittig DF, Krall MA, Dykstra RH, Russell A, Chin HL. A survey of factors affecting clinician acceptance of clinical decision support. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:6.CrossRef Sittig DF, Krall MA, Dykstra RH, Russell A, Chin HL. A survey of factors affecting clinician acceptance of clinical decision support. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:6.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M, Group EbmS. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Fam Pract. 2008;25: 162–167. Varonen H, Kortteisto T, Kaila M, Group EbmS. What may help or hinder the implementation of computerized decision support systems (CDSSs): a focus group study with physicians. Fam Pract. 2008;25: 162–167.
32.
go back to reference Uzuner Ö, South BR, Shen S, DuVall SL. 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:552–6.CrossRef Uzuner Ö, South BR, Shen S, DuVall SL. 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:552–6.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dabek F, Caban JJ. Leveraging big data to model the likelihood of developing psychological conditions after a concussion. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;53:265–73.CrossRef Dabek F, Caban JJ. Leveraging big data to model the likelihood of developing psychological conditions after a concussion. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;53:265–73.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Grundmeier RW, Masino AJ, Casper TC, Dean JM, Bell J, Enriquez R, et al. Identification of long bone fractures in radiology reports using natural language processing to support healthcare quality improvement. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7:1051–68.CrossRef Grundmeier RW, Masino AJ, Casper TC, Dean JM, Bell J, Enriquez R, et al. Identification of long bone fractures in radiology reports using natural language processing to support healthcare quality improvement. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7:1051–68.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Li Z, Liu F, Antieau L, Cao Y, Yu H. Lancet: a high precision medication event extraction system for clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:563–7.CrossRef Li Z, Liu F, Antieau L, Cao Y, Yu H. Lancet: a high precision medication event extraction system for clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17:563–7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kovačević A, Dehghan A, Filannino M, Keane JA, Nenadic G. Combining rules and machine learning for extraction of temporal expressions and events from clinical narratives. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:859–66.CrossRef Kovačević A, Dehghan A, Filannino M, Keane JA, Nenadic G. Combining rules and machine learning for extraction of temporal expressions and events from clinical narratives. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:859–66.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Goss FR, Plasek JM, Lau JJ, Seger DL, Chang FY, Zhou L. An evaluation of a natural language processing tool for identifying and encoding allergy information in emergency department clinical notes. In: AMIA Annual symposium proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2014. p. 580. Goss FR, Plasek JM, Lau JJ, Seger DL, Chang FY, Zhou L. An evaluation of a natural language processing tool for identifying and encoding allergy information in emergency department clinical notes. In: AMIA Annual symposium proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2014. p. 580.
38.
go back to reference Kordık P. Meta-learning templates: beyond algorithm selection in data mining. 2016. Kordık P. Meta-learning templates: beyond algorithm selection in data mining. 2016.
40.
go back to reference Fong A, Ratwani R. An evaluation of patient safety event report categories using unsupervised topic modeling. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54:338–45.CrossRef Fong A, Ratwani R. An evaluation of patient safety event report categories using unsupervised topic modeling. Methods Inf Med. 2015;54:338–45.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000387.CrossRef Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1000387.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wu Y, Denny JC, Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Giuse DA, Xu H. A comparative study of current clinical natural language processing systems on handling abbreviations in discharge summaries. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2012. p. 997. Wu Y, Denny JC, Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Giuse DA, Xu H. A comparative study of current clinical natural language processing systems on handling abbreviations in discharge summaries. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings. American Medical Informatics Association; 2012. p. 997.
43.
go back to reference Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35:982–1003.CrossRef Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35:982–1003.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hung S-Y, Tsai JC-A, Chuang C-C. Investigating primary health care nurses’ intention to use information technology: An empirical study in Taiwan. Decis Support Syst. 2014;57:331–42.CrossRef Hung S-Y, Tsai JC-A, Chuang C-C. Investigating primary health care nurses’ intention to use information technology: An empirical study in Taiwan. Decis Support Syst. 2014;57:331–42.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Moores TT. Towards an integrated model of IT acceptance in healthcare. Decis Support Syst. 2012;53:507–16.CrossRef Moores TT. Towards an integrated model of IT acceptance in healthcare. Decis Support Syst. 2012;53:507–16.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Chang I-C, Hwang H-G, Hung W-F, Li Y-C. Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;33:296–303.CrossRef Chang I-C, Hwang H-G, Hung W-F, Li Y-C. Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;33:296–303.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Hsiao J-L, Chen R-F, Wu W-C. Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:16.CrossRef Hsiao J-L, Chen R-F, Wu W-C. Factors of accepting pain management decision support systems by nurse anesthetists. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:16.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Lee C-C, Lin S-P, Yang S-L, Tsou M-Y, Chang K-Y. Evaluating the influence of perceived organizational learning capability on user acceptance of information technology among operating room nurse staff. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013;51:22–7.CrossRef Lee C-C, Lin S-P, Yang S-L, Tsou M-Y, Chang K-Y. Evaluating the influence of perceived organizational learning capability on user acceptance of information technology among operating room nurse staff. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2013;51:22–7.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Shibl R, Lawley M, Debuse J. Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Decis Support Syst. 2013;54:953–61.CrossRef Shibl R, Lawley M, Debuse J. Factors influencing decision support system acceptance. Decis Support Syst. 2013;54:953–61.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4:S73.CrossRef Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug reactions. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4:S73.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Eriksson R, Jensen PB, Frankild S, Jensen LJ, Brunak S. Dictionary construction and identification of possible adverse drug events in Danish clinical narrative text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:947–53.CrossRef Eriksson R, Jensen PB, Frankild S, Jensen LJ, Brunak S. Dictionary construction and identification of possible adverse drug events in Danish clinical narrative text. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:947–53.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW. Natural language processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:544–51.CrossRef Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW. Natural language processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18:544–51.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Giunchiglia F, Kharkevich U, Zaihrayeu I. Concept search. Semantic Web Res Appl. 2009; 429–444. Giunchiglia F, Kharkevich U, Zaihrayeu I. Concept search. Semantic Web Res Appl. 2009; 429–444.
55.
go back to reference Heart T, Parmet Y, Pliskin N, Zuker A, Pliskin JS. Investigating Physicians’ Compliance with Drug Prescription Notifications. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;12:235. Heart T, Parmet Y, Pliskin N, Zuker A, Pliskin JS. Investigating Physicians’ Compliance with Drug Prescription Notifications. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;12:235.
56.
go back to reference Hosack B, Hall D, Paradice D, Courtney JF. A look toward the future: decision support systems research is alive and well. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13:315. Hosack B, Hall D, Paradice D, Courtney JF. A look toward the future: decision support systems research is alive and well. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13:315.
57.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda Md Natl Inst Health. 2011; 2094–2103. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano Clark VL, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda Md Natl Inst Health. 2011; 2094–2103.
58.
go back to reference Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. Int J Med Inf. 2013;82:940–53.CrossRef Bossen C, Jensen LG, Udsen FW. Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors. Int J Med Inf. 2013;82:940–53.CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Carayon P, Kianfar S, Li Y, Xie A, Alyousef B, Wooldridge A. A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care. Appl Ergon. 2015;51:291–321.CrossRef Carayon P, Kianfar S, Li Y, Xie A, Alyousef B, Wooldridge A. A systematic review of mixed methods research on human factors and ergonomics in health care. Appl Ergon. 2015;51:291–321.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013. Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
61.
go back to reference Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.CrossRef Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Bushko RG. Future of health technology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002. Bushko RG. Future of health technology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2002.
63.
go back to reference Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 2002. Bernard HR. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press; 2002.
64.
go back to reference Myers M. Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. Commun AIS. 1999;2:1. Myers M. Investigating information systems with ethnographic research. Commun AIS. 1999;2:1.
65.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 1990. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 1990.
66.
go back to reference Perneger TV. What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236.CrossRef Perneger TV. What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ. 1998;316:1236.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Bagozzi RP, Edwards JR. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 1998;1:45–87.CrossRef Bagozzi RP, Edwards JR. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 1998;1:45–87.CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Nunnally J. Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978. Nunnally J. Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
69.
go back to reference Ohmann C, Boy O, Yang Q. A systematic approach to the assessment of user satisfaction with health care systems: constructs, models and instruments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43:781–5. Ohmann C, Boy O, Yang Q. A systematic approach to the assessment of user satisfaction with health care systems: constructs, models and instruments. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43:781–5.
70.
go back to reference Phansalkar S, Van der Sijs H, Tucker AD, Desai AA, Bell DS, Teich JM, et al. Drug—drug interactions that should be non-interruptive in order to reduce alert fatigue in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;20:489–93.CrossRef Phansalkar S, Van der Sijs H, Tucker AD, Desai AA, Bell DS, Teich JM, et al. Drug—drug interactions that should be non-interruptive in order to reduce alert fatigue in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;20:489–93.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.CrossRef Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1409–16.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Percha B, Nassif H, Lipson J, Burnside E, Rubin D. Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:913–6.CrossRef Percha B, Nassif H, Lipson J, Burnside E, Rubin D. Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:913–6.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Heselmans A, Aertgeerts B, Donceel P, Geens S, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D. Family physicians’ perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3677–84.CrossRef Heselmans A, Aertgeerts B, Donceel P, Geens S, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D. Family physicians’ perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of implementation. J Med Syst. 2012;36:3677–84.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Parasuraman R, Manzey DH. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum Factors. 2010;52:381–410.CrossRef Parasuraman R, Manzey DH. Complacency and bias in human use of automation: an attentional integration. Hum Factors. 2010;52:381–410.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:984–90.CrossRef Walton R, Dovey S, Harvey E, Freemantle N. Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 1999;318:984–90.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference OECD. Health at a Glance,. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. p. 2017. OECD. Health at a Glance,. OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017. p. 2017.
78.
go back to reference Ross C, Swetlitz I. IBM pitched its Watson supercomputer as a revolution in cancer care: it’s nowhere close. Statnews. 2017. Ross C, Swetlitz I. IBM pitched its Watson supercomputer as a revolution in cancer care: it’s nowhere close. Statnews. 2017.
79.
go back to reference Sim LLW, Ban KHK, Tan TW, Sethi SK, Loh TP. Development of a clinical decision support system for diabetes care: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0173021.CrossRef Sim LLW, Ban KHK, Tan TW, Sethi SK, Loh TP. Development of a clinical decision support system for diabetes care: a pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0173021.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Castaneda C, Nalley K, Mannion C, Bhattacharyya P, Blake P, Pecora A, et al. Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine. J Clin Bioinforma. 2015;5:4.CrossRef Castaneda C, Nalley K, Mannion C, Bhattacharyya P, Blake P, Pecora A, et al. Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine. J Clin Bioinforma. 2015;5:4.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Machine learning-driven clinical decision support system for concept-based searching: a field trial in a Norwegian hospital
Authors
G. T. Berge
O. C. Granmo
T. O. Tveit
B. E. Munkvold
A. L. Ruthjersen
J. Sharma
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02101-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023 Go to the issue