Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Lung Cancer | Research article

A competing risk nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma

Authors: Xiao Wu, Wenfeng Yu, R. H. Petersen, Hongxu Sheng, Yiqing Wang, Wang Lv, Jian Hu

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is an uncommon histological subtype of lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the cumulative incidences of lung cancer-specific mortality (LC-SM) and other cause-specific mortality (OCSM) in lung ASC patients, and construct a corresponding competing risk nomogram for LC-SM.

Methods

Data on 2705 patients with first primary lung ASC histologically diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) was utilized to calculate the 3-year and 5-year probabilities of LC-SM and OCSM, and a competing risk model was built. Based on the model, we developed a competing risk nomogram to predict the 3-year and 5-year cumulative probabilities of LC-SM and the corresponding concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves were derived to assess the model performance. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of the nomogram, decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted. Furthermore, patients were categorized into three groups according to the tertile values of the nomogram-based scores, and their survival differences were assessed using CIF curves.

Results

The 3-year and 5-year cumulative mortalities were 49.6 and 55.8% for LC-SM and 8.2 and 11.8% for OCSM, respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing age, male sex, no surgery, and advanced T, N and M stages were related to a significantly higher likelihood of LC-SM. The nomogram showed good calibration, and the 3-year and 5-year C-indexes for predicting the probabilities of LC-SM in the validation cohort were both 0.79, which were almost equal to those of the ten-fold cross validation. DCA demonstrated that using the nomogram gained more benefit when the threshold probabilities were set within the ranges of 0.24–0.89 and 0.25–0.91 for 3-year and 5-year LCSM, respectively. In both the training and validation cohorts, the high-risk group had the highest probabilities of LC-SM, followed by the medium-risk and low-risk groups (both P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The competing risk nomogram displayed excellent discrimination and calibration for predicting LC-SM. With the aid of this individualized predictive tool, clinicians can more expediently devise appropriate treatment protocols and follow-up schedules.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takamori S, Noguchi M, Morinaga S, Goya T, Tsugane S, Kakegawa T, Shimosato Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Cancer. 1991;67(3):649–54.PubMedCrossRef Takamori S, Noguchi M, Morinaga S, Goya T, Tsugane S, Kakegawa T, Shimosato Y. Clinicopathologic characteristics of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Cancer. 1991;67(3):649–54.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Shimoji M, Nakajima T, Yamatani C, Yamamoto M, Saishou S, Isaka M, Maniwa T, Ode Y, Nakagawa K, Okumura T, et al. A clinicopathological and immunohistological re-evaluation of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Pathol Int. 2011;61(12):717–22.PubMedCrossRef Shimoji M, Nakajima T, Yamatani C, Yamamoto M, Saishou S, Isaka M, Maniwa T, Ode Y, Nakagawa K, Okumura T, et al. A clinicopathological and immunohistological re-evaluation of adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Pathol Int. 2011;61(12):717–22.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mordant P, Grand B, Cazes A, Foucault C, Dujon A, Le Pimpec BF, Riquet M. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical management, pathologic characteristics, and prognostic implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1189–95.PubMedCrossRef Mordant P, Grand B, Cazes A, Foucault C, Dujon A, Le Pimpec BF, Riquet M. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical management, pathologic characteristics, and prognostic implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(4):1189–95.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhu L, Jiang L, Yang J, Gu W, He J. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma after surgical resection: results from two institutes. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(4):2397–402.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhu L, Jiang L, Yang J, Gu W, He J. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma after surgical resection: results from two institutes. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(4):2397–402.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brambilla E, Travis WD, Corrin B, Shimosato Y, Brambilla E. Adenosquamous carcinoma. WHO Histological Classification of Tumours Histological Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumours. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 51–2. Brambilla E, Travis WD, Corrin B, Shimosato Y, Brambilla E. Adenosquamous carcinoma. WHO Histological Classification of Tumours Histological Typing of Lung and Pleural Tumours. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 51–2.
6.
go back to reference Cooke DT, Nguyen DV, Yang Y, Chen SL, Yu C, Calhoun RF. Survival comparison of adenosquamous, squamous cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(3):943–8.PubMedCrossRef Cooke DT, Nguyen DV, Yang Y, Chen SL, Yu C, Calhoun RF. Survival comparison of adenosquamous, squamous cell, and adenocarcinoma of the lung after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(3):943–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Maeda H, Matsumura A, Kawabata T, Suito T, Kawashima O, Watanabe T, Okabayashi K, Kubota I, Japan National Hospital Organization Study Group for Lung C. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical results as compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(2):357–61.PubMedCrossRef Maeda H, Matsumura A, Kawabata T, Suito T, Kawashima O, Watanabe T, Okabayashi K, Kubota I, Japan National Hospital Organization Study Group for Lung C. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical results as compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41(2):357–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Janssen-Heijnen ML, Houterman S, Lemmens VE, Louwman MW, Maas HA, Coebergh JW. Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55(3):231–40.PubMedCrossRef Janssen-Heijnen ML, Houterman S, Lemmens VE, Louwman MW, Maas HA, Coebergh JW. Prognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approach. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55(3):231–40.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vaisanen JA, Alho OP, Koivunen PT, Laara E. Cause-specific mortality in patients with head and neck cancer: long-term follow-up of a population-based cohort from 1986 to 2012 accounting for competing risks. Oral Oncol. 2018;79:20–6.PubMedCrossRef Vaisanen JA, Alho OP, Koivunen PT, Laara E. Cause-specific mortality in patients with head and neck cancer: long-term follow-up of a population-based cohort from 1986 to 2012 accounting for competing risks. Oral Oncol. 2018;79:20–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Whitney CA, Howard LE, Freedland SJ, DeHoedt AM, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Daskivich TJ. Impact of age, comorbidity, and PSA doubling time on long-term competing risks for mortality among men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;22(2):252–60.PubMedCrossRef Whitney CA, Howard LE, Freedland SJ, DeHoedt AM, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Terris MK, Daskivich TJ. Impact of age, comorbidity, and PSA doubling time on long-term competing risks for mortality among men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018;22(2):252–60.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Larcher A, Trudeau V, Dell'Oglio P, Tian Z, Boehm K, Fossati N, Capitanio U, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz P. Prediction of competing mortality for decision-making between surgery or observation in elderly patients with T1 kidney Cancer. Urology. 2017;102:130–7.PubMedCrossRef Larcher A, Trudeau V, Dell'Oglio P, Tian Z, Boehm K, Fossati N, Capitanio U, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz P. Prediction of competing mortality for decision-making between surgery or observation in elderly patients with T1 kidney Cancer. Urology. 2017;102:130–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pintilie M. Competing risks: a practical perspective. Chichester: Wiley; 2006. Pintilie M. Competing risks: a practical perspective. Chichester: Wiley; 2006.
13.
go back to reference Carmona R, Zakeri K, Green G, Hwang L, Gulaya S, Xu B, Verma R, Williamson CW, Triplett DP, Rose BS, et al. Improved method to stratify elderly patients with Cancer at risk for competing events. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(11):1270–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carmona R, Zakeri K, Green G, Hwang L, Gulaya S, Xu B, Verma R, Williamson CW, Triplett DP, Rose BS, et al. Improved method to stratify elderly patients with Cancer at risk for competing events. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(11):1270–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Zeng Y, Mayne N, Yang CJ, D'Amico TA, Ng CSH, Liu CC, Petersen RH, Rocco G, Brunelli A, Liu J, et al. A Nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival of TNM 8th edition stage I non-small-cell lung Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):2053–62.PubMedCrossRef Zeng Y, Mayne N, Yang CJ, D'Amico TA, Ng CSH, Liu CC, Petersen RH, Rocco G, Brunelli A, Liu J, et al. A Nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival of TNM 8th edition stage I non-small-cell lung Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(7):2053–62.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Xiao Z, Yan Y, Zhou Q, Liu H, Huang P, Zhou Q, Lai C, Zhang J, Wang J, Mao K. Development and external validation of prognostic nomograms in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a population based study. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2691–708.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xiao Z, Yan Y, Zhou Q, Liu H, Huang P, Zhou Q, Lai C, Zhang J, Wang J, Mao K. Development and external validation of prognostic nomograms in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a population based study. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2691–708.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gross JP, Whelan TJ, Parulekar WR, Chen BE, Rademaker AW, Helenowski IB, Donnelly ED, Strauss JB. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict lymphedema following axillary surgery and radiotherapy in women with breast cancer from the NCIC CTG MA.20 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(1):165–73.PubMedCrossRef Gross JP, Whelan TJ, Parulekar WR, Chen BE, Rademaker AW, Helenowski IB, Donnelly ED, Strauss JB. Development and validation of a nomogram to predict lymphedema following axillary surgery and radiotherapy in women with breast cancer from the NCIC CTG MA.20 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105(1):165–73.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16(3):1141–54.CrossRef Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat. 1988;16(3):1141–54.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee M, Cronin KA, Gail MH, Feuer EJ. Predicting the absolute risk of dying from colorectal cancer and from other causes using population-based cancer registry data. Stat Med. 2012;31(5):489–500.PubMedCrossRef Lee M, Cronin KA, Gail MH, Feuer EJ. Predicting the absolute risk of dying from colorectal cancer and from other causes using population-based cancer registry data. Stat Med. 2012;31(5):489–500.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2008;8(1):53.CrossRef Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Elkin EB, Gonen M. Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers. BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2008;8(1):53.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wei S, Tian J, Song X, Wu B, Liu L. Causes of death and competing risk analysis of the associated factors for non-small cell lung cancer using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(1):145–55.PubMedCrossRef Wei S, Tian J, Song X, Wu B, Liu L. Causes of death and competing risk analysis of the associated factors for non-small cell lung cancer using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(1):145–55.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Zhou H, Zhang Y, Qiu Z, Chen G, Hong S, Chen X, Zhang Z, Huang Y, Zhang L. Nomogram to predict cause-specific mortality in patients with surgically resected stage I non-small-cell lung Cancer: a competing risk analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(2):e195–203.PubMedCrossRef Zhou H, Zhang Y, Qiu Z, Chen G, Hong S, Chen X, Zhang Z, Huang Y, Zhang L. Nomogram to predict cause-specific mortality in patients with surgically resected stage I non-small-cell lung Cancer: a competing risk analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2018;19(2):e195–203.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Huang XD, Zhou GQ, Lv JW, Zhou HQ, Zhong CW, Wu CF, Zheng ZQ, He XJ, Peng L, Ma J, et al. Competing risk nomograms for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a big-data, intelligence platform-based analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(2):389–95.PubMedCrossRef Huang XD, Zhou GQ, Lv JW, Zhou HQ, Zhong CW, Wu CF, Zheng ZQ, He XJ, Peng L, Ma J, et al. Competing risk nomograms for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a big-data, intelligence platform-based analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(2):389–95.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sun W, Cheng M, Zhou H, Huang W, Qiu Z. Nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in nonmetastatic male breast Cancer: a competing risk analysis. J Cancer. 2019;10(3):583–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sun W, Cheng M, Zhou H, Huang W, Qiu Z. Nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in nonmetastatic male breast Cancer: a competing risk analysis. J Cancer. 2019;10(3):583–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Song W, Lv CG, Miao DL, Zhu ZG, Wu Q, Wang YG, Chen L. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(10):1657–65.PubMedCrossRef Song W, Lv CG, Miao DL, Zhu ZG, Wu Q, Wang YG, Chen L. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(10):1657–65.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L. Melanoma-specific mortality and competing mortality in patients with non-metastatic malignant melanoma: a population-based analysis. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:413.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shen W, Sakamoto N, Yang L. Melanoma-specific mortality and competing mortality in patients with non-metastatic malignant melanoma: a population-based analysis. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:413.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Elwood M. Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. Elwood M. Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.
Metadata
Title
A competing risk nomogram predicting cause-specific mortality in patients with lung adenosquamous carcinoma
Authors
Xiao Wu
Wenfeng Yu
R. H. Petersen
Hongxu Sheng
Yiqing Wang
Wang Lv
Jian Hu
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06927-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Cancer 1/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine