Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica 5/2016

Open Access 01-05-2016 | CLINICAL ARTICLE - SPINE

Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI

Authors: Catharina Schenck, Job van Susante, Maarten van Gorp, Ruben Belder, Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp

Published in: Acta Neurochirurgica | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In cases of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with surgical decompression, a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is sometimes required. In the experience of the investigators of this study, the obtained decompression observed on early postoperative MRI tends to be disappointing compared to the decompression achieved intraoperatively. This raises the question of whether the early postoperative MRI, performed after lumbar decompression, is a fair representation of the ‘real’ decompression. This study investigated the correlation between intraoperative and postoperative measurements of the lumbar spinal canal.

Method

Twenty patients with LSS underwent surgical decompression on a single level. The orthopaedic surgeon performed direct intraoperative measurements of width, length and height of the spinal canal. Preoperative supine MR images and postoperative prone and supine MR images were acquired. Two radiologists (R.B. and M.G.) measured width, length and height of the spinal canal on the preoperative and postoperative MRIs. Intraoperative measurements were compared to measurements on postoperative MRI in prone position (thus reproducing the intraoperative situation) to avoid positioning bias. Preoperative and postoperative measurements on MR images were also compared. In addition to this, postoperative measurements on supine and prone MR images were also compared.

Results

Interobserver reliability for MRI measurements by both radiologists was generally excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥0.71). The postoperative spinal canal dimensions improved on both prone and supine MRI compared to the preoperative imaging (P < 0.05). Intraoperatively measured dimensions demonstrated a significantly greater height (difference 2.8 ± 3.3 [R.B.] and 1.9 ± 3.7 [M.G.]) and greater width (difference 2.1 ± 3.2 [R.B.] and 2.5 ± 2.7 [M.G.]) compared to postoperative MRI in the prone position (P < 0.05). Postoperative dural sac height was greater on the supine MRI compared to the prone MRI (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Surgical decompression of the spinal canal effectively decreases the compression of the dural sac. However, early postoperative MRI after lumbar decompression does not adequately represent the decompression achieved intraoperatively.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(12):1441–1445CrossRef Deyo RA, Gray DT, Kreuter W, Mirza S, Martin BI (2005) United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(12):1441–1445CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303(13):1259–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG (2010) Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303(13):1259–1265CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK (2004) Spinal-fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350(7):722–726CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK (2004) Spinal-fusion surgery—the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350(7):722–726CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2006) Is the X STOP interspinous implant a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2(1):22–23CrossRefPubMed Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2006) Is the X STOP interspinous implant a safe and effective treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2(1):22–23CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, Takiguchi N, Minamide A, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M (2012) Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama spine study. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(10):1103–1108CrossRefPubMed Ishimoto Y, Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Yamada H, Nagata K, Hashizume H, Takiguchi N, Minamide A, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Yoshida M (2012) Prevalence of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and its association with physical performance in a population-based cohort in Japan: the Wakayama spine study. Osteoarthr Cartil 20(10):1103–1108CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Oba H, Takahashi J, Futatsugi T, Mogami Y, Shibata S, Ohji Y, Tanikawa H (2013) Study of dural sac cross sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery. Spine 13(9):1088–1094CrossRef Oba H, Takahashi J, Futatsugi T, Mogami Y, Shibata S, Ohji Y, Tanikawa H (2013) Study of dural sac cross sectional area in early and late phases after lumbar decompression surgery. Spine 13(9):1088–1094CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):141–144CrossRef Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):141–144CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):145–150CrossRef Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of low-back pain. Part II: development of guidelines for trials of treatment in primary care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(2):145–150CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schubert GA, Diepers M, Hegewald AA, Seiz M, Thome C (2013) Routine postoperative imaging early after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(20):E1263–E1268CrossRef Schubert GA, Diepers M, Hegewald AA, Seiz M, Thome C (2013) Routine postoperative imaging early after lumbar decompression surgery: a prospective evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(20):E1263–E1268CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senegas J (1991) Surgery of the intervertebral ligaments, alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of degenerative instabilities. Acta Orthop Belg 57(Suppl 1):221–226PubMed Senegas J (1991) Surgery of the intervertebral ligaments, alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of degenerative instabilities. Acta Orthop Belg 57(Suppl 1):221–226PubMed
14.
go back to reference Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11(2):S164–S169PubMedPubMedCentral Senegas J (2002) Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 11(2):S164–S169PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Verbiest H (1950) Primary stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal in adults, a new syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 94(33):2415–2433PubMed Verbiest H (1950) Primary stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal in adults, a new syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 94(33):2415–2433PubMed
17.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, Investigators SPORT (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, Herkowitz H, Cammisa F, Albert T, Boden SD, Hilibrand A, Goldberg H, Berven S, An H, Investigators SPORT (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358(8):794–810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13(1):22–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13(1):22–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(12):1351–1358CrossRef Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, Mehalic TF, Implicito DA, Martin MJ, Johnson DR 2nd, Skidmore GA, Vessa PP, Dwyer JW, Puccio ST, Cauthen JC, Ozuna RM (2005) A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(12):1351–1358CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI
Authors
Catharina Schenck
Job van Susante
Maarten van Gorp
Ruben Belder
Carmen Vleggeert-Lankamp
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0001-6268
Electronic ISSN: 0942-0940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2777-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

Acta Neurochirurgica 5/2016 Go to the issue