Top

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Published in:

01-10-2018 | Ankle

Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device

Authors: Christian Colcuc, Marc Blank, Thomas Stein, Florian Raimann, Sanjay Weber-Spickschen, Sebastian Fischer, Reinhard Hoffmann

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 10/2018

Abstract

Purpose

Suture button devices for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries provide semirigid dynamic stabilization, but complications including knot irritation have been reported. No randomized trials of the new knotless suture button devices have been performed. We hypothesized that knotless suture button devices eliminate knot irritation and facilitate quicker return to sports. This study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, and time to return to sports between a new knotless suture button device and syndesmotic screw fixation.

Methods

This study included 54 patients treated for ankle syndesmotic injury from 2012 to 2014 with a knotless suture button device or syndesmotic screw fixation. Clinical outcomes were measured using the American Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Society score, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, Olerud and Molander score, and visual analog scale for pain and function. Secondary outcome measures were the complication rate and time required to return to sports. Patients underwent clinical and radiological evaluations preoperatively and three times during the 1-year postoperative follow-up.

Results

54 of 62 eligible patients were analyzed, median age 37 (18–60) and underwent the 1-year follow-up. The screw fixation and knotless suture button groups comprised 26 and 28 patients, respectively. The complication rate was significantly lower (p = 0.03) and time to return to sports was significantly shorter in the knotless suture button than screw fixation group (average, 14 versus 19 weeks, respectively; p = 0.006). No significant differences were identified in clinical outcomes or visual analog scale scores for pain and function between the groups. Age, injury mechanism, and body mass index did not significantly affect the time required to return to sports activities. The type of fixation was the only independent variable that reached statistical significance (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Syndesmotic screw fixation and the new knotless suture button device both resulted in good clinical results. Lower complication rate and the earlier time to return to sports make the new knotless suture button device recommendable especially for highly active patients.

Level of evidence

Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Niesing R et al (2004) Radiographic measure-ment of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:227–234CrossRef

Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L (1991) Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 19(3):294–298CrossRef

Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: a pro-spective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation vs TightRope fiber wire fixation—medium term results. South Afr Orthop J 8(1):32–37

Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69(1):43–47CrossRef

Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32(3):250–256CrossRef

Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, Mekhail AO, Yeasting RA (1997) Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 18(11):693–698CrossRef

Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, Arciero RA, Taylor DC (1998) Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int 19(10):653–660CrossRef

Hodgson P, Thomas R (2011) Avoiding suture knot prominence with suture button along distal fibula: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int 32 (9):908–909CrossRef

Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, Wheeler JH (1990) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle 10(6):325–330CrossRef

10.

Jordan TH, Talarico RH, Schuberth JM (2011) The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:407–412CrossRef

11.

Katznelson A, Lin E, Militiano J (1983) Ruptures of the ligaments about the tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Injury 15(3):170–172CrossRef

12.

Kitaoka HB (1991) Salvage of nonunion following ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:37–43

13.

Kortekangas T, Savola O, Flinkkilä T et al (2015) A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. Injury 46(6):1119–1126CrossRef

14.

Laflamme M, Belzile EL, Bedard L, van den Bekerom MP, Glazebrook M, Pelet S (2015) A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated surgically with a static or dynamic implant for acute ankle syndesmosis rupture. J Orthop Trauma 29(5):216–223CrossRef

15.

Lepojärvi S, Pakarinen H, Savola O, Haapea M, Sequeiros RB, Niinimäki J (2014) Posterior translation of the fibula may indicate malreduction: CT study of normal variation in uninjured ankles. J Orthop Trauma 28(4):205–209CrossRef

16.

Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, ContiSF, Van Swearingen JM (2005) Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int 26(11):968–983CrossRef

17.

Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of TightRope fixation and sydesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmostic reduction. Am Sports Med 40(12):2828–2835CrossRef

18.

Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2012) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury 43(6):838–842CrossRef

19.

Needleman RL, Skrade DA, Stiehl JB (1989) Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion. Foot Ankle 10(1):17–24CrossRef

20.

Nilsson GM, Eneroth M, Ekdahl CS (2013) The Swedish version of OMAS is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with ankle fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25:14:109CrossRef

21.

Olerud C, Molander H (1984) A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 103(3):190–194CrossRef

22.

Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkilä TE, Ohtonen PP et al (2011) Syndesmotic Fixation in Supination-External Rotation Ankle Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study. Foot Ankle Int 32(12):1103–1119CrossRef

23.

Peterson KS, Chapman WD, Hyer CF, Berlet GC (2015) Maintenance of reduction with suture button fixation devices for ankle syndesmosis repair. Foot Ankle Int 36(6):679–684CrossRef

24.

Rammelt S, Schneiders W, Grass R, Rein S, Zwipp H (2011) Bandverletzungen am oberen Sprunggelenk. Z Orthop Unfall 149(5):e45–e67CrossRef

25.

Rigby RB, Cottom JM (2013) Does the Arthrex TightRope®provide maintenance of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis? A 2-year follow-up of 64 TightRopes® in 37 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(5):563–567CrossRef

26.

Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW (2012) The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 26(7):439–443CrossRef

27.

Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36(6):1199–1206CrossRef

28.

Seitz WH Jr, Bachner EJ, Abram LJ et al (1991) Repair of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with a flexibel implant. J Orthop Trauma 5(1):78–82CrossRef

29.

Storey P, Gadd RJ, Blundell C, Davies MB (2012) Complications of suture button ankle syndesmosis stabilization with modifications of surgical technique. Foot Ankle Int 33(9):717–721CrossRef

30.

Stuart K, Panchbhavi VK (2011) The fate of syndesmotic screws. Foot Ankle Int 32(5):519–525CrossRef

31.

Taylor DC, Enlehardt DL, Bassett FH 3rd (1992) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med 20(2):146–150CrossRef

32.

Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat res 431:207–212CrossRef

33.

Tucker A, Street J, Kealey D, McDonald S, Stevenson M (2013) Functional outcomes following syndesmotic fixation: a comparison of screws retained in situ versus routine removal – Is it really necessary? Injury 44(12):1880–1884CrossRef

34.

Weckbach S, Hahnhaussen J, Losacco JT, Gebhard F, Stahel PF (2014) Is the standard retention of syndesmotic positioning screws after ankle fracture fixation safe and feasible? A retrospective cohort study in 140 consecutive patients at a North American Trauma Centre. Z Orthop Unfall 152(6):554–557CrossRef

Title: Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device
Authors: Christian Colcuc
Marc Blank
Thomas Stein
Florian Raimann
Sanjay Weber-Spickschen
Sebastian Fischer
Reinhard Hoffmann
Publication date: 01-10-2018
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4820-3

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2018

Microfracture provides better clinical results than debridement in the treatment of acute talar osteochondral lesions using arthroscopic assisted fixation of acute ankle fractures

Results and recurrence of pigmented villonodular synovitis of the ankle: does diffuse PVNS with extra-articular extension tend to recur more often?

Mapping functions in health-related quality of life: mapping from the Achilles Tendon Rupture Score to the EQ-5D

The increase in posterior tibial slope provides a positive biomechanical effect in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Contralateral knee hyperextension is associated with increased anterior tibial translation and fewer meniscal injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee

Surgeon experience with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization does not influence risk of failure