Top

International Orthopaedics

Published in:

Open Access 01-06-2012 | Review Article

Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair

Author: Tim Schepers

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2012

Abstract

Purpose

Recently, a new suture-button fixation device has emerged for the treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries and its use is rapidly increasing. The current systematic review was undertaken to compare the biomechanical properties, functional outcome, need for implant removal, and the complication rate of syndesmotic disruptions treated with a suture-button device with the current 'gold standard', i.e. the syndesmotic screw.

Method

A literature search in the electronic databases of the Cochrane Library, EMbase, Pubmed Medline, and Google Scholar, between January 1st 2000 to December 1st 2011, was conducted to identify studies in which unstable ankle fractures with concomitant distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injury were treated with either a syndesmotic screw or a suture-button device.

Results

A total of six biomechanical studies, seven clinical full-text studies and four abstracts on the TightRope system, and 27 studies on syndesmotic screw or bolt fixation were identified. The AOFAS of 133 patients treated with TightRope was 89.1 points, with an average study follow-up of 19 months. The AOFAS score in studies with 253 patients treated with syndesmotic screws (metallic and absorbable) or bolts was 86.3 points, with an average study follow-up of 42 months. Two studies reported an earlier return to work in the TightRope group. Implant removal was reported in 22 (10%) of 220 patients treated with a TightRope (range, 0–25%), in the screw or bolt group the average was 51.9% of 866 patients (range, 5.8–100%).

Conclusion

The TightRope system has a similar outcome compared with the syndesmotic screw or bolt fixation, but might lead to a quicker return to work. The rate of implant removal is lower than in the syndesmotic screw group. There is currently insufficient evidence on the long-term effects of the TightRope and more uniform outcome reporting is desirable. In addition, there is a need for studies on cost-effectiveness of the treatment of acute distal tibiofibular syndesmotic disruption treated with a suture-button device.

Ahmad J, Raikin SM, Pour AE, Haytmanek C (2009) Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int 30:99–105PubMedCrossRef

Albers GH, de Kort AF, Middendorf PR, van Dijk CN (1996) Distal tibiofibular synostosis after ankle fracture. A 14-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:250–252PubMed

Andrews L, Southgate C (2010) Re: Outcomes and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury 41:1096–1097, author reply 1097PubMedCrossRef

Bava E, Charlton T, Thordarson D (2010) Ankle fracture syndesmosis fixation and management: the current practice of orthopedic surgeons. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:242–246

Bell DP, Wong MK (2006) Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries–should the screw be removed before weight bearing? Injury 37:891–898PubMedCrossRef

Citak M, Backhaus M, Muhr G, Kalicke T (2011) Distal tibial fracture post syndesmotic screw removal: an adverse complication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1405–1408PubMedCrossRef

Clarke M, Covey DC (2010) Stress fracture of the distal tibia following syndesmosis screw removal. Curr Orthop Pract 21:8–12CrossRef

Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2008) Treatment of syndesmosis disruptions with TightRope fixation. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 7:196–202CrossRef

Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: A prospective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation vs TightRope® fiber wire fixation—medium term results. SA Orthop J 8:32–37

10.

Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2008) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions with the Arthrex Tightrope: a report of 25 cases. Foot Ankle Int 29:773–780PubMedCrossRef

11.

Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2009) Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 48:620–630PubMedCrossRef

12.

Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J, Wilson G (1998) Adult ankle fractures—an increasing problem? Acta Orthop Scand 69:43–47PubMedCrossRef

13.

De Vil J, Bonte F, Claes H, Bongaerts W, Verstraete K, Verdonk R (2009) Bolt fixation for syndesmotic injuries. Injury 40:1176–1179PubMedCrossRef

14.

Degroot H, Al-Omari AA, El Ghazaly SA (2011) Outcomes of suture button repair of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 32:250–256PubMedCrossRef

15.

Dittmer H, Dettmann E (1999) Treatment of the rupture of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis with "Engelbrecht's syndesmosis hook". Unfallchirurg 102:770–775PubMedCrossRef

16.

Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani NC, Davidovitch RI, Koval KJ (2010) Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma 24:7–11PubMedCrossRef

17.

Forsythe K, Freedman KB, Stover MD, Patwardhan AG (2008) Comparison of a novel FiberWire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int 29:49–54PubMedCrossRef

18.

Gadd R, Storey P, Davies M, Blundell C (2011) Ankle Tightrope synesmosis fixation: a review of 38 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93B:480b

19.

Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, Kellam JF, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ (2009) Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1069–1073PubMedCrossRef

20.

Heim D, Schmidlin V, Ziviello O (2002) Do type B malleolar fractures need a positioning screw? Injury 33:729–734PubMedCrossRef

21.

Hodgson P, Thomas R (2011) Avoiding suture knot prominence with suture button along distal fibula: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int 32:908–909PubMedCrossRef

22.

Hohman DW, Affonso J, Marzo JM, Ritter CA (2011) Pathologic tibia/fibula fracture through a suture button screw tract: case report. Am J Sports Med 39:645–648PubMedCrossRef

23.

Hoiness P, Stromsoe K (2004) Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18:331–337PubMedCrossRef

24.

Hovis WD, Kaiser BW, Watson JT, Bucholz RW (2002) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions of the ankle with bioabsorbable screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:26–31PubMed

25.

Hsu YT, Wu CC, Lee WC, Fan KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC (2011) Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function. Int Orthop 35:359–364PubMedCrossRef

26.

Kara AN, Esenyel CZ, Sener BT, Merih E (1999) A different approach to the treatment of the lateral malleolar fractures with syndesmosis injury: the ANK nail. J Foot Ankle Surg 38:394–402PubMedCrossRef

27.

Kaukonen JP, Lamberg T, Korkala O, Pajarinen J (2005) Fixation of syndesmotic ruptures in 38 patients with a malleolar fracture: a randomized study comparing a metallic and a bioabsorbable screw. J Orthop Trauma 19:392–395PubMedCrossRef

28.

Kennedy JG, Soffe KE, Dalla Vedova P, Stephens MM, O'Brien T, Walsh MG, McManus F (2000) Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 14:359–366PubMedCrossRef

29.

Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, Strohmeyer G, Vora A (2010) Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 31:69–75

30.

Kukreti S, Faraj A, Miles JN (2005) Does position of syndesmotic screw affect functional and radiological outcome in ankle fractures? Injury 36:1121–1124PubMedCrossRef

31.

Kwon JY, Campbell JT, Myerson MS (2011) Posterior tibial tendon tear after 4-cortex syndesmotic screw fixation: a case report and literature review. J Orthop Trauma. Aug 12. [Epub ahead of print]

32.

Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, MacLeod MD (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:2–6PubMedCrossRef

33.

Mason LW, Dodds A, Makwana NK (2010) Tibiofibular synostosis following syndesmosis fixation: A case report. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal 3

34.

McMurray D, Hornung B, Venkateswaran B, Ali Z (2007) Walking on a tightrope: Our experience in the treatment of traumatic ankle syndesmosis rupture. Inj Extra 39:182CrossRef

35.

Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2010) Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:12–16PubMedCrossRef

36.

Miller RS, Weinhold PS, Dahners LE (1999) Comparison of tricortical screw fixation versus a modified suture construct for fixation of ankle syndesmosis injury: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma 13:39–42PubMedCrossRef

37.

Mohammed R, Syed S, Ali SA (2010) Evaluation of the syndesmotic-only fixation for Weber-C ankle fractures associated with syndesmotic injury. Inj Extra 41:185CrossRef

38.

Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, Smith WR (2006) Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int 27:567–572PubMed

39.

Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2011) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: Clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury. Oct 27. [Epub ahead of print]

40.

Nelson OA (2006) Examination and repair of the AITFL in transmalleolar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 20:637–643PubMedCrossRef

41.

Petscavage JM, Perez F, Khorashadi L, Richardson ML (2010) Tightrope walking: A new technique in ankle syndesmosis fixation. Radiol Case Rep [Online] 5:1–5

42.

Qamar F, Kadakia A, Venkateswaran B (2011) An anatomical way of treating ankle syndesmotic injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 50:762–765PubMedCrossRef

43.

Rajagopalan S, Craik JD, Lloyd J, Sangar A, Upadhyay V, Taylor HP (2010) The financial impact of diastasis screw fixation versus tight-rope fixation of injuries to the syndesmosis with fractures of the ankle. Inj Extra 41:184CrossRef

44.

Rajkumar S, Clark C, Dega RK (2009) Suture endobutton fixation of distal tibio-fibular diastasis—early results. APOA 2009 Trauma & Infection, Taipei

45.

Rao SE, Muzammil S, Khan AH (2008) Syndesmosis fixation in bimalleolar Weber C ankle fractures; comparison of 3.5 and 4.5-mm screws. Prof Med J 15:49–53

46.

Rao SE, Muzammil S, Khan AH (2009) Technique of syndesmotic screw insertion in weber C ankle fractures. J Surg Pak 14:58–62

47.

Schepers T (2011) To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:879–883PubMedCrossRef

48.

Schepers T, Van Lieshout EMM, De Vries MR, Van der Elst M (2011) Complications of syndesmotic screw removal. Foot Ankle Int 32:1040–1044PubMedCrossRef

49.

Seitz WH Jr, Bachner EJ, Abram LJ, Postak P, Polando G, Brooks DB, Greenwald AS (1991) Repair of the tibiofibular syndesmosis with a flexible implant. J Orthop Trauma 5:78–82PubMedCrossRef

50.

Sewecke JJ, Schmidt GL, Sotereanos NG (2006) Distal tibial fatigue fracture secondary to a retained syndesmotic screw. Orthopedics 29:268–270PubMed

51.

Sinisaari IP, Luthje PM, Mikkonen RH (2002) Ruptured tibio-fibular syndesmosis: comparison study of metallic to bioabsorbable fixation. Foot Ankle Int 23:744–748PubMed

52.

Soin SP, Knight TA, Dinah AF, Mears SC, Swierstra BA, Belkoff SM (2009) Suture-button versus screw fixation in a syndesmosis rupture model: a biomechanical comparison. Foot Ankle Int 30:346–352PubMedCrossRef

53.

Sproule JA, Khalid M, O'Sullivan M, McCabe JP (2004) Outcome after surgery for Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. Injury 35:791–798PubMedCrossRef

54.

Stark E, Tornetta P 3rd, Creevy WR (2007) Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 21:643–646PubMedCrossRef

55.

Teramoto A, Suzuki D, Kamiya T, Chikenji T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T (2011) Comparison of different fixation methods of the suture-button implant for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Am J Sports Med 39:2226–2232PubMedCrossRef

56.

Thordarson DB, Samuelson M, Shepherd LE, Merkle PF, Lee J (2001) Bioabsorbable versus stainless steel screw fixation of the syndesmosis in pronation-lateral rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 22:335–338PubMed

57.

Thornes B, McCartan D (2006) Ankle syndesmosis injuries treated with the TightRope suture-button kit. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 5:45–53CrossRef

58.

Thornes B, Walsh A, Hislop M, Murray P, O'Brien M (2003) Suture-endobutton fixation of ankle tibio-fibular diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 24:142–146PubMed

59.

Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, Hession P, Masterson E (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212

60.

Treon K, Beastall JE, Kumar K, Hope MJ (2011) Complications of ankle syndesmosis stabilisation using a tightrope. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93B:62e

61.

van den Bekerom MP, Raven EE (2009) Arthrex tightrope distal tibiofibular syndesmotic stabilization. Foot Ankle Int 30:577–578, author reply 578PubMedCrossRef

62.

Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:102–108PubMedCrossRef

63.

Wikeroy AK, Hoiness PR, Andreassen GS, Hellund JC, Madsen JE (2010) No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24:17–23PubMedCrossRef

64.

Willmott HJ, Singh B, David LA (2009) Outcome and complications of treatment of ankle diastasis with tightrope fixation. Injury 40:1204–1206PubMedCrossRef

Title: Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair
Author: Tim Schepers
Publication date: 01-06-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1500-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Contemporary femoral designs in total knee arthroplasty: effects on the patello-femoral congruence

Long-term results of cementless femoral reconstruction following intertrochanteric osteotomy

Anterior Cruciate Ligament deficiency leads to early instability of scaffold for cartilage regeneration: a controlled laboratory ex-vivo study

Correlation between clinical tibiofemoral angle and body mass index in normal Nigerian children

Hip joint development in children with type IIb developmental dysplasia

Hip arthroscopy: evolution, current practice and future developments