Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiology Reports 1/2012

01-02-2012 | Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

Low-Dose Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Where are the Limits?

Authors: Paul Schoenhagen, Carla M. Thompson, Sandra S. Halliburton

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Since its introduction in the 1970s, diagnostic computed tomography (CT) imaging has grown rapidly and developed into a standard diagnostic test for a wide variety of cardiovascular conditions. Although this has undoubtedly led to improved medical care, it has also been associated with a significant increase in population-based radiation exposure and the potential downstream increase in cancer is a justified concern. For cardiovascular CT, new CT scanner technologies were initially directed toward maximizing image quality rather than minimizing radiation exposure. Only more recently have technologic advances yielded dose-saving protocols for cardiovascular applications, with impressive reduction of radiation exposure. The achievable limits of population-based exposure are dependent on responsible, evidence-based use of CT for cardiovascular imaging as well as exploitation of available and emerging dose-saving strategies.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Raju TN. The Nobel chronicles. 1979: Allan MacLeod Cormack (b 1924); and Sir Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (b 1919). Lancet. 1999;354:1653.PubMedCrossRef Raju TN. The Nobel chronicles. 1979: Allan MacLeod Cormack (b 1924); and Sir Godfrey Newbold Hounsfield (b 1919). Lancet. 1999;354:1653.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goodman LR. The Beatles, the Nobel Prize, and CT scanning of the chest. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:1–7.PubMedCrossRef Goodman LR. The Beatles, the Nobel Prize, and CT scanning of the chest. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:1–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Yoon YE, Choi EK, Cho IS, et al. Impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography results on patient and physician behavior in a low-risk population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1260–8.PubMedCrossRef McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Yoon YE, Choi EK, Cho IS, et al. Impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography results on patient and physician behavior in a low-risk population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1260–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference • Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298:317–23. This is an important paper that focused the field of cardiovascular CT imaging on radiation exposure. • Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298:317–23. This is an important paper that focused the field of cardiovascular CT imaging on radiation exposure.
6.
go back to reference Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2071–2077. Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:2071–2077.
7.
go back to reference • Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277–84. This is an important paper that focused the field of cardiovascular CT imaging on radiation exposure. • Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277–84. This is an important paper that focused the field of cardiovascular CT imaging on radiation exposure.
8.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:849–57.PubMedCrossRef Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:849–57.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056–65.PubMedCrossRef Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056–65.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011;258:236–42.PubMedCrossRef Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011;258:236–42.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EvP, Rodríguez R, Schneider K, Calzado A, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, W. Panzer, Shrimpton PCT, G. . European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP 2004. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EvP, Rodríguez R, Schneider K, Calzado A, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, W. Panzer, Shrimpton PCT, G. . European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP 2004.
14.
go back to reference McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, Geise R, Gould B, Keat N, Huda W, Judy P, Kalender W, McNitt-Gray M, Morin R, Payne T, Stern S, Rothenberg L, Shrimpton P, Timmer J, Wilson C. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee, 2008:1–28. McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, Geise R, Gould B, Keat N, Huda W, Judy P, Kalender W, McNitt-Gray M, Morin R, Payne T, Stern S, Rothenberg L, Shrimpton P, Timmer J, Wilson C. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee, 2008:1–28.
15.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, Chen MY, Mather R, Pearson GD, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology. 2010;254:698–706.PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Elliston CD, Arai AE, Chen MY, Mather R, Pearson GD, et al. Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner. Radiology. 2010;254:698–706.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M, de Roos A, Zankl M, Cantera AC, et al. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1126–32.PubMedCrossRef Geleijns J, Joemai RM, Dewey M, de Roos A, Zankl M, Cantera AC, et al. Radiation exposure to patients in a multicenter coronary angiography trial (CORE 64). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1126–32.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.PubMedCrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–86.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Strzelczyk J, Damilakis J, Marx MV, Macura KJ. Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 2: low-level exposures and cancer risk. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:32–9.PubMedCrossRef Strzelczyk J, Damilakis J, Marx MV, Macura KJ. Facts and controversies about radiation exposure, part 2: low-level exposures and cancer risk. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4:32–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tubiana M, Feinendegen LR, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology. 2009;251:13–22.PubMedCrossRef Tubiana M, Feinendegen LR, Yang C, Kaminski JM. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology. 2009;251:13–22.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ, Boufffler SD, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Risks associated with low doses or low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251:6–12.PubMedCrossRef Little MP, Wakeford R, Tawn EJ, Boufffler SD, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Risks associated with low doses or low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do. Radiology. 2009;251:6–12.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rixe J, Conradi G, Rolf A, Schmermund A, Magedanz A, Erkapic D, et al. Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT. Heart. 2009;95:1337–42.PubMedCrossRef Rixe J, Conradi G, Rolf A, Schmermund A, Magedanz A, Erkapic D, et al. Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT. Heart. 2009;95:1337–42.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference • Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, McCollough C, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schömig A, Achenbach S. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500–7. This is an important paper that demonstrated the wide variation of radiation exposure in cardiovascular CT. • Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, Hadamitzky M, Krebs M, Gerber TC, McCollough C, Martinoff S, Kastrati A, Schömig A, Achenbach S. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500–7. This is an important paper that demonstrated the wide variation of radiation exposure in cardiovascular CT.
23.
go back to reference Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Krebs M, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, et al. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1495–9.PubMedCrossRef Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Krebs M, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, et al. Comparison of sequential and helical scanning for radiation dose and image quality: results of the Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiation Dose Estimates of Cardiac CT Angiography (PROTECTION) I Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1495–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1113–23.PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1113–23.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schömig A, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:940–6.PubMedCrossRef Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Martinoff S, Schömig A, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:940–6.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference • Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al.: Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur. Heart J. 2008; 29, 191–197. This is an important early paper that described one of the most effective dose-saving techniques. • Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al.: Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur. Heart J. 2008; 29, 191–197. This is an important early paper that described one of the most effective dose-saving techniques.
27.
go back to reference Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1809–17.PubMedCrossRef Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, Scheffel H, Stinn B, Marincek B, et al. Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1809–17.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Blanke P, Baumann T, Langer M, Pache G. Imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy using low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2010;74:354–2. Blanke P, Baumann T, Langer M, Pache G. Imaging of pulmonary vein anatomy using low-dose prospective ECG-triggered dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2010;74:354–2.
29.
go back to reference Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T, Siepe M, Winterer JT, Euringer W, et al. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT–feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction. Radiology. 2010;255:207–17.PubMedCrossRef Blanke P, Bulla S, Baumann T, Siepe M, Winterer JT, Euringer W, et al. Thoracic aorta: prospective electrocardiographically triggered CT angiography with dual-source CT–feasibility, image quality, and dose reduction. Radiology. 2010;255:207–17.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C. Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb 27. [Epub ahead of print] Leipsic J, Heilbron BG, Hague C. Iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: finding its way. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Feb 27. [Epub ahead of print]
31.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:649–54.PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:649–54.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:655–60.PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:655–60.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1095–9.PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1095–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Individualized assessment of radiation dose in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography with 256-slice scanning. Circulation. 2010;122:1033–4.CrossRef Perisinakis K, Seimenis I, Tzedakis A, Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Individualized assessment of radiation dose in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography with 256-slice scanning. Circulation. 2010;122:1033–4.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:340–6.PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:340–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Buechel RR, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou R, Ghadri JR, et al. Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering feasibility in a large population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:332–6.PubMedCrossRef Buechel RR, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou R, Ghadri JR, et al. Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering feasibility in a large population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:332–6.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference von Ballmoos MW, Haring B, Juillerat P, Alkadhi H. Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:848. von Ballmoos MW, Haring B, Juillerat P, Alkadhi H. Meta-analysis: diagnostic performance of low-radiation-dose coronary computed tomography angiography. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:848.
38.
go back to reference Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, Goraya TY, Kazerooni EA, Moscucci M, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340–8.PubMedCrossRef Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, Goraya TY, Kazerooni EA, Moscucci M, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340–8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR, et al. Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–97.PubMedCrossRef Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR, et al. Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1475–97.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O'Gara P, et al. Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc. Comput Tomogr. 2010;56:1864–94. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, Mark D, Min J, O'Gara P, et al. Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Cardiovasc. Comput Tomogr. 2010;56:1864–94.
41.
go back to reference Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, Yen A, Hallett R, Roychoudhury K, et al. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):623–30.PubMedCrossRef Christe A, Torrente JC, Lin M, Yen A, Hallett R, Roychoudhury K, et al. CT screening and follow-up of lung nodules: effects of tube current-time setting and nodule size and density on detectability and of tube current-time setting on apparent size. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):623–30.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wang D, Hu XH, Zhang SZ, et al. Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study. Imaging: Int. J. Cardiovasc; 2011. Wang D, Hu XH, Zhang SZ, et al. Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study. Imaging: Int. J. Cardiovasc; 2011.
43.
go back to reference Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2010;3:811–20. Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT.JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2010;3:811–20.
45.
go back to reference Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Baumueller S, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, et al. Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2092–9.PubMedCrossRef Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Baumueller S, Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, et al. Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2092–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Schoenhagen P, Hachamovitch R, Achenbach S. Coronary CT angiography and comparative effectiveness research prognostic value of atherosclerotic disease burden in appropriately indicated clinical examinations. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:492–5.PubMedCrossRef Schoenhagen P, Hachamovitch R, Achenbach S. Coronary CT angiography and comparative effectiveness research prognostic value of atherosclerotic disease burden in appropriately indicated clinical examinations. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:492–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Low-Dose Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Where are the Limits?
Authors
Paul Schoenhagen
Carla M. Thompson
Sandra S. Halliburton
Publication date
01-02-2012
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-011-0225-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Current Cardiology Reports 1/2012 Go to the issue

Cardiac PET, CT, and MRI (S Achenbach, Section Editor)

The Prognostic Significance of Coronary CT Angiography

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (ND Wong, Section Editor)

Projected and Observed Diabetes Epidemics in China and Beyond

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (ND Wong, Section Editor)

Provider and Systems Factors in Diabetes Quality of Care

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (ND Wong, Section Editor)

Do Persons with Diabetes Benefit from Combination Statin and Fibrate Therapy?