Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 9/2017

01-09-2017 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Locking attachment plate fixation around a well-fixed stem in periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures

Authors: Min Bom Kim, Jae-Woo Cho, Young Ho Lee, Won-Yong Shon, Jung Wee Park, Jinil Kim, Jong-Keon Oh

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Periprosthetic fractures are difficult to manage. Plating technique has been considered a reliable form of management of periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem, but a dependable and stable method of plate fixation to the bone is lacking. This study reports the clinical results using a locking attachment plate (LAP) instead of cable fixation to fix locking plates to a periprosthetic femoral shaft fracture.

Materials and methods

Nineteen patients with periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed stemmed implants were studied between August 2012 and December 2014. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year postoperatively. Median age was 74 years (range 56–96 years). Fractures were classified according to the Unified Classification System, Vancouver classification, and Su classification.

Procedure

Open reduction was performed under minimal incision and the locking plate was fixed to the lateral cortex of the femoral shaft. The part of the shaft without a stem was fixed to the plate using 5.0-mm locking screws, and the part with an underlying stem was fixed using 3.5-mm locking screws through the LAP instead of cables. Postoperatively, patients were managed using general principles for femoral shaft fractures.

Results

Average follow-up was 16 months (range 12–36 months). All cases achieved fracture healing without loss of reduction. There were no cases of implant breakage or stem loosening at final follow-up. The average number of LAPs per fixation construct was 2.1 (range 1–4), and the average number of 3.5-mm locking screws through each LAP was 3.3 (range 2–4). The average value of plate screw density was 0.55 (range 0.37–0.8), and the average working length was four holes (range 2–8).

Conclusions

Using the LAP to manage periprosthetic fractures with a well-fixed stem could obviate the need for cable around the stem area and yield acceptable outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fredin HO, Lindberg H, Carlsson AS (1987) Femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 58:20–22CrossRefPubMed Fredin HO, Lindberg H, Carlsson AS (1987) Femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 58:20–22CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Haidukewych GJ, Ricci W (2008) Locked plating in orthopaedic trauma: a clinical update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:347–355CrossRefPubMed Haidukewych GJ, Ricci W (2008) Locked plating in orthopaedic trauma: a clinical update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:347–355CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Haidukewych GJ, Langford JR, Liporace FA (2013) Revision for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee. Instr Course Lect 62:333–340PubMed Haidukewych GJ, Langford JR, Liporace FA (2013) Revision for periprosthetic fractures of the hip and knee. Instr Course Lect 62:333–340PubMed
4.
go back to reference Haddad FS, Duncan CP, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Gross AE, Chandler HP (2002) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:945–950CrossRef Haddad FS, Duncan CP, Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Gross AE, Chandler HP (2002) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84-A:945–950CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wahnert D, Schroder R, Schulze M, Westerhoff P, Raschke M, Stange R (2014) Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation. Int Orthop 38:47–53CrossRefPubMed Wahnert D, Schroder R, Schulze M, Westerhoff P, Raschke M, Stange R (2014) Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation. Int Orthop 38:47–53CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pike J, Davidson D, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, O’Brien PJ, Masri BA (2009) Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:677–688CrossRefPubMed Pike J, Davidson D, Garbuz D, Duncan CP, O’Brien PJ, Masri BA (2009) Principles of treatment for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures around well-fixed total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:677–688CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K (2007) Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury 38:965–972CrossRefPubMed Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K (2007) Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury 38:965–972CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:26–30CrossRef Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:26–30CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ricci WM, Haidukewych GJ (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures. Instr Course Lect 58:105–115PubMed Ricci WM, Haidukewych GJ (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures. Instr Course Lect 58:105–115PubMed
10.
go back to reference O’Toole RV, Gobezie R, Hwang R, Chandler AR, Smith RM, Estok DM 2nd, Vrahas MS (2006) Low complication rate of LISS for femur fractures adjacent to stable hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:203–210CrossRefPubMed O’Toole RV, Gobezie R, Hwang R, Chandler AR, Smith RM, Estok DM 2nd, Vrahas MS (2006) Low complication rate of LISS for femur fractures adjacent to stable hip or knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 450:203–210CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Graham SM, Mak JH, Moazen M, Leonidou A, Jones AC, Wilcox RK (2015) Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables. J Orthop Sci 20:875–880CrossRefPubMed Graham SM, Mak JH, Moazen M, Leonidou A, Jones AC, Wilcox RK (2015) Periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation: a biomechanical comparison between proximal locking screws and cables. J Orthop Sci 20:875–880CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lenz M, Windolf M, Muckley T, Hofmann GO, Wagner M, Richards RG (2012) The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures–a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Int Orthop 36:1915–1921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lenz M, Windolf M, Muckley T, Hofmann GO, Wagner M, Richards RG (2012) The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures–a biomechanical comparison of two techniques. Int Orthop 36:1915–1921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Dumpies CW, Conrad T, Marintschev I, Hofmann GO (2012) Locking attachment plate—first experience. Z Orthop Unfall 150:302–308CrossRefPubMed Dumpies CW, Conrad T, Marintschev I, Hofmann GO (2012) Locking attachment plate—first experience. Z Orthop Unfall 150:302–308CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kammerlander C, Kates SL, Wagner M, Roth T, Blauth M (2013) Minimally invasive periprosthetic plate osteosynthesis using the locking attachment plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25(398–408):410 Kammerlander C, Kates SL, Wagner M, Roth T, Blauth M (2013) Minimally invasive periprosthetic plate osteosynthesis using the locking attachment plate. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25(398–408):410
15.
go back to reference Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-B:713–716CrossRefPubMed Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-B:713–716CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (1999) Classification of the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 30:215–220CrossRef Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (1999) Classification of the hip. Orthop Clin N Am 30:215–220CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:12–20CrossRefPubMed Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:12–20CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Tp R, Wm M (2000) AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme, New York Tp R, Wm M (2000) AO Principles of Fracture Management. Thieme, New York
19.
go back to reference Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 18:488–493CrossRefPubMed Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 18:488–493CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Spina M, Rocca G, Canella A, Scalvi A (2014) Causes of failure in periprosthetic fractures of the hip at 1- to 14-year follow-up. Injury 45(Suppl 6):S85–S92CrossRefPubMed Spina M, Rocca G, Canella A, Scalvi A (2014) Causes of failure in periprosthetic fractures of the hip at 1- to 14-year follow-up. Injury 45(Suppl 6):S85–S92CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok DM 2nd, Malchau H (2007) Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:2658–2662CrossRef Bhattacharyya T, Chang D, Meigs JB, Estok DM 2nd, Malchau H (2007) Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:2658–2662CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Konstantinidis L, Hauschild O, Beckmann NA, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Helwig P (2010) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones. Injury 41:1256–1261CrossRefPubMed Konstantinidis L, Hauschild O, Beckmann NA, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Helwig P (2010) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones. Injury 41:1256–1261CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gautier E, Sommer C (2003) Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B63–B76CrossRefPubMed Gautier E, Sommer C (2003) Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B63–B76CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Selles RW, Benda E, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA (2007) The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:200–206CrossRefPubMed Hurkmans HL, Bussmann JB, Selles RW, Benda E, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA (2007) The difference between actual and prescribed weight bearing of total hip patients with a trochanteric osteotomy: long-term vertical force measurements inside and outside the hospital. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:200–206CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hustedt JW, Blizzard DJ, Baumgaertner MR, Leslie MP, Grauer JN (2012) Is it possible to train patients to limit weight bearing on a lower extremity? Orthopedics 35:e31–e37PubMed Hustedt JW, Blizzard DJ, Baumgaertner MR, Leslie MP, Grauer JN (2012) Is it possible to train patients to limit weight bearing on a lower extremity? Orthopedics 35:e31–e37PubMed
Metadata
Title
Locking attachment plate fixation around a well-fixed stem in periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures
Authors
Min Bom Kim
Jae-Woo Cho
Young Ho Lee
Won-Yong Shon
Jung Wee Park
Jinil Kim
Jong-Keon Oh
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2745-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 9/2017 Go to the issue