Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2021

01-02-2021 | Liver Transplantation | Original Article

Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts complications after liver transplantation

Authors: Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Thomas Røjkjær Daugaard, Andreas Arendtsen Rostved, Nicolai Aagaard Schultz, Jens Hillingsø, Paul Suno Krohn, Allan Rasmussen

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Increased model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score measured in the early postoperative course is associated with one-year mortality and graft loss. However, the correlation with postoperative complications has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between postoperative MELD score and subsequent complications.

Methods

Adult liver transplant recipients transplanted from January 2011 until December 2016 were included. MELD score days 1–5 were correlated with complications day 6–30, subdivided into type and severity according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results

We included 246 adult liver transplant recipients. Between days 6 and 30, 671 complications occurred in 201 of the patients (82%) corresponding to 64% of all postoperative complications in the whole postoperative period (days 0–30). In multivariate analyses adjusted for recipient gender and age, preoperative MELD score, and Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index, postoperative MELD score was significantly associated with having one or more complications, any type of complication except cardiovascular and renal complications, and complication severity.

Conclusions

Postoperative MELD score days 1–5 were associated with complications arising in the subsequent period 6–30 days after transplantation. An increased MELD score should heighten the clinician’s awareness of a possible complication.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Elwir S, Lake J (2016) Current status of liver allocation in the United States. Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(3):166–170 Elwir S, Lake J (2016) Current status of liver allocation in the United States. Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(3):166–170
7.
go back to reference Nagler E, Van Vlierberghe H, Colle I, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2005) Impact of MELD on short-term and long-term outcome following liver transplantation: a European perspective. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(8):849–856CrossRefPubMed Nagler E, Van Vlierberghe H, Colle I, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2005) Impact of MELD on short-term and long-term outcome following liver transplantation: a European perspective. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17(8):849–856CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Fosby B, Melum E, Bjoro K, Bennet W, Rasmussen A, Andersen IM, Castedal M, Olausson M, Wibeck C, Gotlieb M, Gjertsen H, Toivonen L, Foss S, Makisalo H, Nordin A, Sanengen T, Bergquist A, Larsson ME, Soderdahl G, Nowak G, Boberg KM, Isoniemi H, Keiding S, Foss A, Line PD, Friman S, Schrumpf E, Ericzon BG, Hockerstedt K, Karlsen TH (2015) Liver transplantation in the Nordic countries—an intention to treat and post-transplant analysis from The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry 1982-2013. Scand J Gastroenterol 50(6):797–808. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2015.1036359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fosby B, Melum E, Bjoro K, Bennet W, Rasmussen A, Andersen IM, Castedal M, Olausson M, Wibeck C, Gotlieb M, Gjertsen H, Toivonen L, Foss S, Makisalo H, Nordin A, Sanengen T, Bergquist A, Larsson ME, Soderdahl G, Nowak G, Boberg KM, Isoniemi H, Keiding S, Foss A, Line PD, Friman S, Schrumpf E, Ericzon BG, Hockerstedt K, Karlsen TH (2015) Liver transplantation in the Nordic countries—an intention to treat and post-transplant analysis from The Nordic Liver Transplant Registry 1982-2013. Scand J Gastroenterol 50(6):797–808. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3109/​00365521.​2015.​1036359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O'Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, Castaing D, Neuhaus P, Jamieson N, Salizzoni M, Pollard S, Lerut J, Paul A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Rodriguez FS, Burroughs A, All contributing c, European L, Intestine Transplant A (2012) Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 57(3):675–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.015CrossRefPubMed Adam R, Karam V, Delvart V, O'Grady J, Mirza D, Klempnauer J, Castaing D, Neuhaus P, Jamieson N, Salizzoni M, Pollard S, Lerut J, Paul A, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Rodriguez FS, Burroughs A, All contributing c, European L, Intestine Transplant A (2012) Evolution of indications and results of liver transplantation in Europe. A report from the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). J Hepatol 57(3):675–688. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jhep.​2012.​04.​015CrossRefPubMed
23.
Metadata
Title
Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts complications after liver transplantation
Authors
Hans-Christian Pommergaard
Thomas Røjkjær Daugaard
Andreas Arendtsen Rostved
Nicolai Aagaard Schultz
Jens Hillingsø
Paul Suno Krohn
Allan Rasmussen
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02018-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue