Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022

23-08-2022 | Liver Resection | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Study Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Authors: Iswanto Sucandy, MD, FACS, Shlomi Rayman, MD, Eric C. Lai, MBChB, FRACS, Chung-Ngai Tang, MBBS, FRCS, Yvette Chong, MBBS, Mikhail Efanov, MD, PhD, David Fuks, MD, PhD, Gi-Hong Choi, MD, Charing C. Chong, MBChB, MSc, FRCS, Adrian K. H. Chiow, MBBS, MMed, FRCS, Marco V. Marino, MD, PhD, FACS, FEBS, Mikel Prieto, MD, Jae-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD, T. Peter Kingham, MD, Mathieu D’Hondt, MD, PhD, Roberto I. Troisi, MSc, MD, PhD, FEBS, Sung Hoon Choi, MD, Robert P. Sutcliffe, MD, FRCS, Tan-To Cheung, MBBS, FRCS, Fernando Rotellar, MD, PhD, James O. Park, MD, Olivier Scatton, MD, PhD, Ho-Seong Han, MD, PhD, Johann Pratschke, MD, Xiaoying Wang, MD, Rong Liu, MD, PhD, Brian K. P. Goh, MBBS, MSc, MMed, FRCS, International Robotic, Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Investigators

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Controversies exist among liver surgeons regarding clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus the robotic approach for major complex hepatectomies. The authors therefore designed a study to examine and compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (L-LH/L-ELH) versus robotic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (R-LH/R-ELH) using a large international multicenter collaborative database.

Methods

An international multicenter retrospective analysis of 580 patients undergoing L-LH/L-ELH or R-LH/R-ELH at 25 specialized hepatobiliary centers worldwide was undertaken. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used at a 1:1 nearest-neighbor ratio according to 15 perioperative variables, including demographics, tumor characteristics, Child-Pugh score, presence of portal hypertension, multiple resections, histologic diagnosis, and Iwate difficulty grade.

Results

Before the PSM, 190 (32 %) patients underwent R-LH/R-ELH, and 390 (68 %) patients underwent L-LH/L-ELH. After the matching, 164 patients were identified in each arm without significant differences in demographics, preoperative variables, medical history, tumor pathology, tumor characteristics, or Iwate score. Regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes, the rebotic approach had significantly less estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml [IQR 200 ml] vs 200 ml [IQR 235 ml]; p = 0.029), fewer conversions to open operations (n = 4 [2.4 %] vs n = 13, [7.9 %]; p = 0.043), and a shorter hospital stay (6 days [IQR 3 days] vs 7 days [IQR 3.3 days]; p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Both techniques are safe and feasible in major hepatic resections. Compared with L-LH/L-ELH, R-LH/R-ELH is associated with less EBL, fewer conversions to open operations, and a shorter hospital stay.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miyasaka Y, Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G. Pioneers in laparoscopic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2018;25:109–11.CrossRef Miyasaka Y, Nakamura M, Wakabayashi G. Pioneers in laparoscopic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. 2018;25:109–11.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goh BKP, Lee SY, Teo JY, et al. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4658–65.CrossRefPubMed Goh BKP, Lee SY, Teo JY, et al. Changing trends and outcomes associated with the adoption of minimally invasive hepatectomy: a contemporary single-institution experience with 400 consecutive resections. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:4658–65.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sucandy I, Luberice K, Lippert T, et al. Robotic major hepatectomy: an institutional experience and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:4970–9.CrossRefPubMed Sucandy I, Luberice K, Lippert T, et al. Robotic major hepatectomy: an institutional experience and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:4970–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Goh BKP, Lee SY, Koh YX, et al. Minimally invasive major hepatectomies: a Southeast Asian single-institution contemporary experience with its first 120 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:553–7.CrossRefPubMed Goh BKP, Lee SY, Koh YX, et al. Minimally invasive major hepatectomies: a Southeast Asian single-institution contemporary experience with its first 120 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90:553–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mathew RP, Venkatesh SK. Liver vascular anatomy: a refresher. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43:1886–95.CrossRef Mathew RP, Venkatesh SK. Liver vascular anatomy: a refresher. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43:1886–95.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nagino M, DeMatteo R, Lang H, et al. Proposal of a new comprehensive notation for hepatectomy: the “New World” terminology. Ann Surg. 2021;274:1–3.CrossRefPubMed Nagino M, DeMatteo R, Lang H, et al. Proposal of a new comprehensive notation for hepatectomy: the “New World” terminology. Ann Surg. 2021;274:1–3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sucandy I, Schlosser S, Bourdeau T, et al. Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:75–80.CrossRefPubMed Sucandy I, Schlosser S, Bourdeau T, et al. Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:75–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Broering D, Sturdevant ML, Zidan A. Robotic donor hepatectomy: a major breakthrough in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:14–23.CrossRefPubMed Broering D, Sturdevant ML, Zidan A. Robotic donor hepatectomy: a major breakthrough in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:14–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, et al. A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic, and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1214–24.CrossRefPubMed Gavriilidis P, Roberts KJ, Aldrighetti L, et al. A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic, and open hepatectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1214–24.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Kostakis ID, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Updates Surg. 2017;69:291–311.CrossRefPubMed Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Kostakis ID, et al. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Updates Surg. 2017;69:291–311.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kamel MK, Tuma F, Keane CA, et al. National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted hepatectomy in the USA: a propensity score-matched analysis from the National Cancer Database. World J Surg. 2022;46:189–96.CrossRefPubMed Kamel MK, Tuma F, Keane CA, et al. National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted hepatectomy in the USA: a propensity score-matched analysis from the National Cancer Database. World J Surg. 2022;46:189–96.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, et al. International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg. 2021;108:1513–20.CrossRefPubMed Chiow AKH, Fuks D, Choi GH, et al. International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy. Br J Surg. 2021;108:1513–20.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, et al. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg. 2018;267:13–7.CrossRefPubMed Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, et al. Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Surg. 2018;267:13–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, et al. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg United States. 2019;165:731–40. Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, et al. Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surg United States. 2019;165:731–40.
22.
go back to reference Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259:549–55.CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259:549–55.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.1022. Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Magistri P, et al. Pure laparoscopic versus robotic liver resections: multicentric propensity score-based analysis with stratification according to difficulty scores. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sci. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jhbp.​1022.
24.
go back to reference Cai JP, Chen W, Chen LH, et al. Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:265–8.CrossRefPubMed Cai JP, Chen W, Chen LH, et al. Comparison between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. Asian J Surg. 2022;45:265–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hu Y, Guo K, Xu J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:615–28.CrossRefPubMed Hu Y, Guo K, Xu J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2021;44:615–28.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Study Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
Authors
Iswanto Sucandy, MD, FACS
Shlomi Rayman, MD
Eric C. Lai, MBChB, FRACS
Chung-Ngai Tang, MBBS, FRCS
Yvette Chong, MBBS
Mikhail Efanov, MD, PhD
David Fuks, MD, PhD
Gi-Hong Choi, MD
Charing C. Chong, MBChB, MSc, FRCS
Adrian K. H. Chiow, MBBS, MMed, FRCS
Marco V. Marino, MD, PhD, FACS, FEBS
Mikel Prieto, MD
Jae-Hoon Lee, MD, PhD
T. Peter Kingham, MD
Mathieu D’Hondt, MD, PhD
Roberto I. Troisi, MSc, MD, PhD, FEBS
Sung Hoon Choi, MD
Robert P. Sutcliffe, MD, FRCS
Tan-To Cheung, MBBS, FRCS
Fernando Rotellar, MD, PhD
James O. Park, MD
Olivier Scatton, MD, PhD
Ho-Seong Han, MD, PhD
Johann Pratschke, MD
Xiaoying Wang, MD
Rong Liu, MD, PhD
Brian K. P. Goh, MBBS, MSc, MMed, FRCS
International Robotic, Laparoscopic Liver Resection Study Group Investigators
Publication date
23-08-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2022
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12216-6

Other articles of this Issue 13/2022

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2022 Go to the issue