Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022

Open Access 01-02-2022 | Liver Resection

IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections

Authors: Kevin P. Labadie, David J. Droullard, Alex W. Lois, Sara K. Daniel, Kathryn E. McNevin, Jaqueline Valdez Gonzalez, Yongwoo D. Seo, Kevin M. Sullivan, Kyle S. Bilodeau, Lindsay K. Dickerson, Alan F. Utria, John Calhoun, Venu G. Pillarisetty, Jonathan G. Sham, Raymond S. Yeung, James O. Park

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Robotic hepatectomy (RH) is increasingly utilized for minor and major liver resections. The IWATE criteria were developed to classify minimally invasive liver resections by difficulty. The objective of this study was to apply the IWATE criteria in RH and to describe perioperative and oncologic outcomes of RH over the last decade at our institution.

Methods

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent RH between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively collected. The difficulty level of each operation was assessed using the IWATE criteria, and outcomes were compared at each level. Univariate linear regression was performed to characterize the relationship between IWATE criteria and perioperative outcomes (OR time, EBL, and LOS), and a multivariable model was also developed to address potential confounding by patient characteristics (age, sex, BMI, prior abdominal surgery, ASA class, and simultaneous non-hepatectomy operation).

Results

Two hundred and twenty-five RH were performed. Median IWATE criteria for RH were 6 (IQR 5–9), with low, intermediate, advanced, and expert resections accounting for 23% (n = 51), 34% (n = 77), 32% (n = 72), and 11% (n = 25) of resections, respectively. The majority of resections were parenchymal-sparing approaches, including anatomic segmentectomies and non-anatomic partial resections. 30-day complication rate was 14%, conversion to open surgery occurred in 9 patients (4%), and there were no deaths within 30 days postoperatively. In the univariate linear regression analysis, IWATE criteria were positively associated with OR time, EBL, and LOS. In the multivariable model, IWATE criteria were independently associated with greater OR time, EBL, and LOS. Two-year overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was 94% and 50%, respectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the IWATE criteria are associated with surgical outcomes after RH. This series highlights the utility of RH for difficult hepatic resections, particularly parenchymal-sparing resections in the posterosuperior sector, extending the indication of minimally invasive hepatectomy in experienced hands and potentially offering select patients an alternative to open hepatectomy or other less definitive liver-directed treatment options.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:311–321CrossRef Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:311–321CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beard RE, Khan S, Troisi RI, Montalti R, Vanlander A, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Boerner T, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Buell JF, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Shen C, Molinari M, Geller DA, Tsung A (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44:887–895CrossRef Beard RE, Khan S, Troisi RI, Montalti R, Vanlander A, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Boerner T, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Buell JF, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Shen C, Molinari M, Geller DA, Tsung A (2020) Long-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis. World J Surg 44:887–895CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. Hpb 12:583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. Hpb 12:583–586CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lee KF, Lai PBS (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 1–7 Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, Fong AKW, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lee KF, Lai PBS (2019) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc 1–7
5.
go back to reference Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Molenaar IQ, Santvoort HCV, Fong Y, Hagendoorn J (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. Hpb 18:113–120CrossRef Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Molenaar IQ, Santvoort HCV, Fong Y, Hagendoorn J (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies. Hpb 18:113–120CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Morise Z, Wakabayashi G (2017) First quarter century of laparoscopic liver resection. World J Gastroenterol 23:3581–3588CrossRef Morise Z, Wakabayashi G (2017) First quarter century of laparoscopic liver resection. World J Gastroenterol 23:3581–3588CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim H-J, Choi G-H, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y, He J, Boggi U, Troisi RI, Efanov M, Azoulay D, Panaro F, Pessaux P, Wang X-Y, Zhu J-Y, Zhang S-G, Sun C-D, Wu Z, Tao K-S, Yang K-H, Fan J, Chen X-P (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 25:1432–1444CrossRef Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Kim H-J, Choi G-H, Yiengpruksawan A, Fong Y, He J, Boggi U, Troisi RI, Efanov M, Azoulay D, Panaro F, Pessaux P, Wang X-Y, Zhu J-Y, Zhang S-G, Sun C-D, Wu Z, Tao K-S, Yang K-H, Fan J, Chen X-P (2019) International consensus statement on robotic hepatectomy surgery in 2018. World J Gastroenterol 25:1432–1444CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sucandy I, Giovannetti A, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Institutional first 100 case experience and outcomes of robotic hepatectomy for liver tumors. Am Surg 86:200–207PubMed Sucandy I, Giovannetti A, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Institutional first 100 case experience and outcomes of robotic hepatectomy for liver tumors. Am Surg 86:200–207PubMed
9.
go back to reference Sucandy I, Luberice K, Lippert T, Castro M, Krill E, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Robotic major hepatectomy: an institutional experience and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 27:4970–4979CrossRef Sucandy I, Luberice K, Lippert T, Castro M, Krill E, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Robotic major hepatectomy: an institutional experience and clinical outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 27:4970–4979CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Ceribelli C, Spaziani A (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25:3815–3824CrossRef Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Ceribelli C, Spaziani A (2011) Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesions located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc 25:3815–3824CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Leung U, Fong Y (2014) Robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutrition 3:288–294 Leung U, Fong Y (2014) Robotic liver surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutrition 3:288–294
12.
go back to reference Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, Boerner T, Molenaar IQ, Choi GH, Kingham TP, Latorre K, Rinkes IHMB, Hagendoorn J, Fong Y (2019) Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 26:583–590CrossRef Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, Boerner T, Molenaar IQ, Choi GH, Kingham TP, Latorre K, Rinkes IHMB, Hagendoorn J, Fong Y (2019) Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol 26:583–590CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato-bil-pan Sci 21:745–753 Ban D, Tanabe M, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Nitta H, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Katagiri T, Takagi C, Itano O, Kaneko H, Wakabayashi G (2014) A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J Hepato-bil-pan Sci 21:745–753
14.
go back to reference Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:281–289CrossRef Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5:281–289CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Couinaud C (1954) Liver lobes and segments: notes on the anatomical architecture and surgery of the liver. Presse Med 62:709–712PubMed Couinaud C (1954) Liver lobes and segments: notes on the anatomical architecture and surgery of the liver. Presse Med 62:709–712PubMed
16.
go back to reference Association TCotIH-P-B, Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, Garden JO, Lau WY, Makuuchi M, Strong RW (2000) The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. Hpb 2:333-339 Association TCotIH-P-B, Strasberg SM, Belghiti J, Clavien PA, Gadzijev E, Garden JO, Lau WY, Makuuchi M, Strong RW (2000) The Brisbane 2000 Terminology of liver anatomy and resections. Hpb 2:333-339
17.
go back to reference Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350PubMed Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350PubMed
18.
go back to reference Yoshida H, Katayose Y, Rikiyama T, Motoi F, Onogawa T, Egawa S, Unno M (2012) Segmentectomy of the liver. J Hepato-bil-pan Sci 19:67–71 Yoshida H, Katayose Y, Rikiyama T, Motoi F, Onogawa T, Egawa S, Unno M (2012) Segmentectomy of the liver. J Hepato-bil-pan Sci 19:67–71
19.
go back to reference Khan S, Beard RE, Kingham PT, Fong Y, Boerner T, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Buell JF, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Troisi RI, Vanlander A, Molinari M, Tsung A (2018) Long-term oncologic outcomes following robotic liver resections for primary hepatobiliary malignancies: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2652–2660CrossRef Khan S, Beard RE, Kingham PT, Fong Y, Boerner T, Martinie JB, Vrochides D, Buell JF, Berber E, Kahramangil B, Troisi RI, Vanlander A, Molinari M, Tsung A (2018) Long-term oncologic outcomes following robotic liver resections for primary hepatobiliary malignancies: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2652–2660CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Krenzien F, Wabitsch S, Haber P, Kamali C, Brunnbauer P, Benzing C, Atanasov G, Wakabayashi G, Ollinger R, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M (2018) Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:403–411CrossRef Krenzien F, Wabitsch S, Haber P, Kamali C, Brunnbauer P, Benzing C, Atanasov G, Wakabayashi G, Ollinger R, Pratschke J, Schmelzle M (2018) Validity of the Iwate criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:403–411CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaibori M, Kojima T, Otsuka Y, Fuks D, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Kaneko H, Gayet B, Wakabayashi G (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165:731–740CrossRef Tanaka S, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo S, Kanazawa A, Takeda Y, Hirokawa F, Nitta H, Nakajima T, Kaizu T, Kaibori M, Kojima T, Otsuka Y, Fuks D, Hasegawa K, Kokudo N, Kaneko H, Gayet B, Wakabayashi G (2019) Validation of index-based IWATE criteria as an improved difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. Surgery 165:731–740CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Luberice K, Sucandy I, Modasi A, Castro M, Krill E, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a "robotic effect"? HPB (Oxford) 22:S85 Luberice K, Sucandy I, Modasi A, Castro M, Krill E, Ross S, Rosemurgy A (2020) Applying IWATE criteria to robotic hepatectomy: is there a "robotic effect"? HPB (Oxford) 22:S85
23.
go back to reference Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Medical Robotics Comput Assisted Surg 9:160–166CrossRef Troisi RI, Patriti A, Montalti R, Casciola L (2013) Robot assistance in liver surgery: a real advantage over a fully laparoscopic approach? Results of a comparative bi-institutional analysis. Int J Medical Robotics Comput Assisted Surg 9:160–166CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Patriti A, Cipriani F, Ratti F, Bartoli A, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Aldrighetti L (2014) Robot-assisted versus open liver resection in the right posterior section. Jsls J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(e2014):00040 Patriti A, Cipriani F, Ratti F, Bartoli A, Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Aldrighetti L (2014) Robot-assisted versus open liver resection in the right posterior section. Jsls J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 18(e2014):00040
25.
go back to reference Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Shin S-H (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38CrossRef Cho JY, Han H-S, Yoon Y-S, Shin S-H (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection for tumors located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver, with a special reference to overcoming current limitations on tumor location. Surgery 144:32–38CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Alvarez FA, Sanchez Claria R, Oggero S, de Santibanes E (2016) Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:407–423CrossRef Alvarez FA, Sanchez Claria R, Oggero S, de Santibanes E (2016) Parenchymal-sparing liver surgery in patients with colorectal carcinoma liver metastases. World J Gastrointest Surg 8:407–423CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Moris D, Dimitroulis D, Vernadakis S, Papalampros A, Spartalis E, Petrou A, Pawlik TM, Felekouras E (2017) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy as the new doctrine in the treatment of liver-metastatic colorectal disease: beyond oncological outcomes. Anticancer Res 37:9–14CrossRef Moris D, Dimitroulis D, Vernadakis S, Papalampros A, Spartalis E, Petrou A, Pawlik TM, Felekouras E (2017) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy as the new doctrine in the treatment of liver-metastatic colorectal disease: beyond oncological outcomes. Anticancer Res 37:9–14CrossRef
Metadata
Title
IWATE criteria are associated with perioperative outcomes in robotic hepatectomy: a retrospective review of 225 resections
Authors
Kevin P. Labadie
David J. Droullard
Alex W. Lois
Sara K. Daniel
Kathryn E. McNevin
Jaqueline Valdez Gonzalez
Yongwoo D. Seo
Kevin M. Sullivan
Kyle S. Bilodeau
Lindsay K. Dickerson
Alan F. Utria
John Calhoun
Venu G. Pillarisetty
Jonathan G. Sham
Raymond S. Yeung
James O. Park
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08345-w

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 2/2022 Go to the issue