Published in:
01-09-2018 | Review Article
Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in: Hepatology International | Issue 5/2018
Login to get accessAbstract
Aims
Current evidence supporting the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)-B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the benefits of liver resection (LR) versus TACE in BCLC-B HCC.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive literature review of the EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases for retrospective or prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of LR and TACE for the treatment of BCLC-B HCC.
Results
Eleven studies incorporating 3366 patients were included in this analysis. 1-year (RR 0.52 95% CI 0.43–0.63, p < 0.001; I2 = 59%, p = 0.006), 3-year (RR 0.63 95% CI 0.59–0.67, p < 0.001; I2 = 16%, p = 0.29), and 5-year (RR 0.69 95% CI 0.63–0.75, p < 0.001; I2 = 56%, p = 0.021) OS were significantly improved in BCLC-B HCC patients that underwent LR compared to those that underwent TACE. Child–Pugh A liver disease (B vs. A) (HR 1.45 95% CI 1.17–1.79, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%, p = 0.49) and AFP levels (> 400 vs. ≤ 400 ng/ml) (HR 1.36 95% CI 1.09–1.71, p = 0.007; I2 = 90%, p = 0.001) were associated with improved OS.
Conclusion
Liver resection had significant survival benefits over TACE in selected BCLC-B HCC patients in comparison to TACE. However, LR was associated with a significantly increased incidence of treatment-related mortality and infection compared to TACE.