Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Liver Cirrhosis | Magnetic Resonance

Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis

Authors: Sang Lim Choi, Eun Sun Lee, Ara Ko, Hyun Jeong Park, Sung Bin Park, Byung Ihn Choi, Young Youn Cho, Stephan Kannengiesser

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the technical success rates of MR elastography (MRE) according to established gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) sequences and to compare liver stiffness (LS) values between the sequences during expiratory and inspiratory phases in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.

Methods

One hundred and eight patients who underwent MRE were included in this retrospective study. MRE was performed at 3 T based on both sequences during expiration as well as inspiration. Technical failure of MRE was determined if there was no pixel value with a confidence index higher than 95% and/or no apparent shear waves imaged. LS measurements were performed using free-drawing region of interest. To evaluate clinical factors related to the technical success rate of MRE, we assessed etiology of liver disease, ascites, body habitus, iron deposition, and liver morphology of patients. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon test, Bland-Altman plot, independent t test, Mann-Whitney test, and McNemar test.

Results

The technical success rate of MRE in SE-EPI was significantly higher than that of GRE (98.1% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.0001). On the basis of univariate analysis, height, weight, and BMI were significantly associated with failure of MRE (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in LS values between GRE and SE-EPI (2.82 kPa vs. 2.92 kPa (p > 0.05)). However, the LS values were significantly higher during inspiration than expiration with both GRE and SE-EPI (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

MRE in SE-EPI during expiratory breath-hold can be used as a reliable examination to evaluate liver fibrosis.

Key Points

• The technical success rate of MR elastography in spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) was significantly higher than that in gradient-recalled echo (GRE) during both the inspiratory and expiratory phases.
• Liver stiffness values were significantly higher during inspiration than during expiration in both GRE and SE-EPI.
• MR elastography in SE-EPI during expiratory breath-hold can be used as a reliable examination in patients with liver fibrosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim YS, Jang YN, Song JS (2018) Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 28:1709–1718CrossRef Kim YS, Jang YN, Song JS (2018) Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 28:1709–1718CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRef Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2016) Liver fibrosis staging with MR elastography: comparison of diagnostic performance between patients with chronic hepatitis B and those with other etiologic causes. Radiology 280:88–97CrossRef Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2016) Liver fibrosis staging with MR elastography: comparison of diagnostic performance between patients with chronic hepatitis B and those with other etiologic causes. Radiology 280:88–97CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rockey DC (2008) Current and future anti-fibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 12:939–962CrossRef Rockey DC (2008) Current and future anti-fibrotic therapies for chronic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 12:939–962CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schuppan D, Ashfaq-Khan M, Yang AT, Kim YO (2018) Liver fibrosis: direct antifibrotic agents and targeted therapies. Matrix Biol 68:435–451CrossRef Schuppan D, Ashfaq-Khan M, Yang AT, Kim YO (2018) Liver fibrosis: direct antifibrotic agents and targeted therapies. Matrix Biol 68:435–451CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gherlan GS (2015) Liver ultrasound elastography: more than staging the disease. World J Hepatol 7:1595CrossRef Gherlan GS (2015) Liver ultrasound elastography: more than staging the disease. World J Hepatol 7:1595CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wagner M, Corcuera-Solano I, Lo G et al (2017) Technical failure of MR elastography examinations of the liver: experience from a large single-center study. Radiology 284:401–412CrossRef Wagner M, Corcuera-Solano I, Lo G et al (2017) Technical failure of MR elastography examinations of the liver: experience from a large single-center study. Radiology 284:401–412CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yoshimitsu K, Mitsufuji T, Shinagawa Y et al (2016) MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience. Eur Radiol 26:656–663CrossRef Yoshimitsu K, Mitsufuji T, Shinagawa Y et al (2016) MR elastography of the liver at 3.0 T in diagnosing liver fibrosis grades; preliminary clinical experience. Eur Radiol 26:656–663CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: clinical applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:887CrossRef Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: clinical applications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37:887CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cunha GM, Glaser KJ, Bergman A, Luz RP, De Figueiredo EH, Lobo Lopes FPP (2018) Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI. Br J Radiol 91:20180126CrossRef Cunha GM, Glaser KJ, Bergman A, Luz RP, De Figueiredo EH, Lobo Lopes FPP (2018) Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI. Br J Radiol 91:20180126CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wagner M, Besa C, Bou Ayache J et al (2016) MR Elastography of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of gradient echo and spin echo echoplanar imaging sequences. Invest Radiol 51:575 Wagner M, Besa C, Bou Ayache J et al (2016) MR Elastography of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of gradient echo and spin echo echoplanar imaging sequences. Invest Radiol 51:575
12.
go back to reference Zhan C, Kannengiesser S, Chandarana H, Fenchel M, Ream J, Shanbhogue KP (2019) MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:1825–1833CrossRef Zhan C, Kannengiesser S, Chandarana H, Fenchel M, Ream J, Shanbhogue KP (2019) MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:1825–1833CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kowdley KV (2016) Iron overload in patients with chronic liver disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 12:695–698 Kowdley KV (2016) Iron overload in patients with chronic liver disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 12:695–698
14.
go back to reference Huwart L, Salameh N, Ter Beek L et al (2008) MR elastography of liver fibrosis: preliminary results comparing spin-echo and echo-planar imaging. Eur Radiol 18:2535–2541CrossRef Huwart L, Salameh N, Ter Beek L et al (2008) MR elastography of liver fibrosis: preliminary results comparing spin-echo and echo-planar imaging. Eur Radiol 18:2535–2541CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Garteiser P, Sahebjavaher RS, Ter Beek LC et al (2013) Rapid acquisition of multifrequency, multislice and multidirectional MR elastography data with a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence. NMR Biomed 26:1326–1335CrossRef Garteiser P, Sahebjavaher RS, Ter Beek LC et al (2013) Rapid acquisition of multifrequency, multislice and multidirectional MR elastography data with a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence. NMR Biomed 26:1326–1335CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S et al (2009) Increased venous pressure increases liver stiffness (Fibroscan) independent of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 136:A–856 Millonig G, Friedrich S, Adolf S et al (2009) Increased venous pressure increases liver stiffness (Fibroscan) independent of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 136:A–856
17.
go back to reference Wang K, Manning P, Szeverenyi N et al (2017) Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2843–2854CrossRef Wang K, Manning P, Szeverenyi N et al (2017) Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42:2843–2854CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castéra L et al (2018) Quantitative elastography methods in liver disease: current evidence and future directions. Radiology 286:738–763CrossRef Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castéra L et al (2018) Quantitative elastography methods in liver disease: current evidence and future directions. Radiology 286:738–763CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kannengiesser S (2016) Iron quantification with LiverLab. MAGNETOM Flash 66:44–46 Kannengiesser S (2016) Iron quantification with LiverLab. MAGNETOM Flash 66:44–46
20.
go back to reference Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT (2016) Spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient-echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of having liver disease. Radiology 282:761–770CrossRef Serai SD, Dillman JR, Trout AT (2016) Spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography versus gradient-echo MR elastography for assessment of liver stiffness in children and young adults suspected of having liver disease. Radiology 282:761–770CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kim YS, Song JS, Kannengiesser S, Seo SY (2017) Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration. Eur Radiol 27:4120–4128CrossRef Kim YS, Song JS, Kannengiesser S, Seo SY (2017) Comparison of spin-echo echoplanar imaging and gradient recalled echo-based MR elastography at 3 Tesla with and without gadoxetic acid administration. Eur Radiol 27:4120–4128CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Petta S, Di Marco V, Cammà C, Butera G, Cabibi D, Craxi A (2011) Reliability of liver stiffness measurement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the effects of body mass index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:1350–1360CrossRef Petta S, Di Marco V, Cammà C, Butera G, Cabibi D, Craxi A (2011) Reliability of liver stiffness measurement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: the effects of body mass index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 33:1350–1360CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pang JX, Pradhan F, Zimmer S et al (2014) The feasibility and reliability of transient elastography using Fibroscan®: a practice audit of 2335 examinations. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:143–149CrossRef Pang JX, Pradhan F, Zimmer S et al (2014) The feasibility and reliability of transient elastography using Fibroscan®: a practice audit of 2335 examinations. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28:143–149CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis
Authors
Sang Lim Choi
Eun Sun Lee
Ara Ko
Hyun Jeong Park
Sung Bin Park
Byung Ihn Choi
Young Youn Cho
Stephan Kannengiesser
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06496-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

European Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue