Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 3/2020

01-03-2020 | Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Comparison between ROI-based and volumetric measurements in quantifying heterogeneity of liver stiffness using MR elastography

Authors: Roya Rezvani Habibabadi, Pegah Khoshpouri, Maryam Ghadimi, Mohammadreza Shaghaghi, Sanaz Ameli, Bita Hazhirkarzar, Pallavi Pandey, Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh, Ankur Pandey, Ihab R. Kamel

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

This study was conducted to quantify the heterogeneity of liver stiffness (LS) on MR elastography (MRE) by comparing ROI-based and volumetric measurements.

Methods

LS was measured by ROI-based and volumetric segmentation of the liver parenchyma. Mean LS (MLS) was calculated and used to assign stages of fibrosis. Volumetric measurements of stiffness maps were used to determine the percentage of liver volume above/below MLS and presence of LS heterogeneity. Heterogeneous stiffness was defined when the first and second most predominant stages were more than one category apart. MLS values by each method were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

We included 128 patients with suspected liver fibrosis (mean age 54.4 ± 14.8 years). MLS was 2.7 ± 1.0 kPa for ROI measurements and 2.6 ± 0.9 kPa for the volumetric method (p = 0.001). Of 59 patients with normal stage (F0), 31 patients (52.5%) had > 20% of liver volume with abnormal LS (F1–F4). Heterogeneous LS was reported in 18 patients (14%).

Conclusions

MLS measurement may not represent the entire spectrum of hepatic fibrosis. Volumetric segmentation may potentially improve the detection of heterogeneous fibrosis and the accuracy of LS measurement.

Key Points

• Heterogeneity of hepatic fibrosis may occur in patients with chronic liver disease.
• MR elastography is used to assess hepatic fibrosis by measuring liver stiffness.
• Measuring liver stiffness by the ROI method and reporting a mean value may fail to detect heterogeneity of hepatic fibrosis. Volumetric assessment of liver stiffness by MR elastography may detect heterogeneity of parenchymal involvement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedman SL (2003) Liver fibrosis—from bench to bedside. J Hepatol 38(Suppl 1):S38–S53CrossRef Friedman SL (2003) Liver fibrosis—from bench to bedside. J Hepatol 38(Suppl 1):S38–S53CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pinzani M, Rombouts K (2004) Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis 36:231–242CrossRef Pinzani M, Rombouts K (2004) Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Dig Liver Dis 36:231–242CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Poynard T, Mathurin P, Lai CL et al (2003) A comparison of fibrosis progression in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 38:257–265CrossRef Poynard T, Mathurin P, Lai CL et al (2003) A comparison of fibrosis progression in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 38:257–265CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Caballero T, Perez-Milena A, Masseroli M et al (2001) Liver fibrosis assessment with semiquantitative indexes and image analysis quantification in sustained-responder and non-responder interferon-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 34:740–747CrossRef Caballero T, Perez-Milena A, Masseroli M et al (2001) Liver fibrosis assessment with semiquantitative indexes and image analysis quantification in sustained-responder and non-responder interferon-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Hepatol 34:740–747CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Duchatelle V, Marcellin P, Giostra E et al (1998) Changes in liver fibrosis at the end of alpha interferon therapy and 6 to 18 months later in patients with chronic hepatitis C: quantitative assessment by a morphometric method. J Hepatol 29:20–28CrossRef Duchatelle V, Marcellin P, Giostra E et al (1998) Changes in liver fibrosis at the end of alpha interferon therapy and 6 to 18 months later in patients with chronic hepatitis C: quantitative assessment by a morphometric method. J Hepatol 29:20–28CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Friedman SL, Bansal MB (2006) Reversal of hepatic fibrosis—fact or fantasy? Hepatology 43:S82–S88CrossRef Friedman SL, Bansal MB (2006) Reversal of hepatic fibrosis—fact or fantasy? Hepatology 43:S82–S88CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD (2009) Liver biopsy. Hepatology 49:1017–1044CrossRef Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD (2009) Liver biopsy. Hepatology 49:1017–1044CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Goldstein NS, Hastah F, Galan MV, Gordon SC (2005) Fibrosis heterogeneity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus needle core biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 123:382–387CrossRef Goldstein NS, Hastah F, Galan MV, Gordon SC (2005) Fibrosis heterogeneity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus needle core biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 123:382–387CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dhall D, Kim SA, Mc Phaul C et al (2018) Heterogeneity of fibrosis in liver biopsies of patients with heart failure undergoing heart transplant evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol 42:1617–1624CrossRef Dhall D, Kim SA, Mc Phaul C et al (2018) Heterogeneity of fibrosis in liver biopsies of patients with heart failure undergoing heart transplant evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol 42:1617–1624CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tacke F, Zimmermann HW (2014) Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. J Hepatol 60:1090–1096CrossRef Tacke F, Zimmermann HW (2014) Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. J Hepatol 60:1090–1096CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Li J, Qureshi M, Gupta A, Anderson SW, Soto J, Li B (2019) Quantification of degree of liver fibrosis using fibrosis area fraction based on statistical chi-square analysis of heterogeneity of liver tissue texture on routine ultrasound images. Acad Radiol 26:1001–1007CrossRef Li J, Qureshi M, Gupta A, Anderson SW, Soto J, Li B (2019) Quantification of degree of liver fibrosis using fibrosis area fraction based on statistical chi-square analysis of heterogeneity of liver tissue texture on routine ultrasound images. Acad Radiol 26:1001–1007CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRef Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Ehman RL (2013) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:544–555CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1207–1213 e1202CrossRef Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:1207–1213 e1202CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kim BH, Lee JM, Lee YJ et al (2011) MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: experience from a tertiary center in Asia. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:1110–1116CrossRef Kim BH, Lee JM, Lee YJ et al (2011) MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: experience from a tertiary center in Asia. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:1110–1116CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B et al (2010) Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology 257:80–86CrossRef Asbach P, Klatt D, Schlosser B et al (2010) Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. Radiology 257:80–86CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Standish RA, Cholongitas E, Dhillon A, Burroughs AK, Dhillon AP (2006) An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis. Gut 55:569–578CrossRef Standish RA, Cholongitas E, Dhillon A, Burroughs AK, Dhillon AP (2006) An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis. Gut 55:569–578CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morisaka H, Motosugi U, Ichikawa S et al (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography is as accurate as liver biopsy for liver fibrosis staging. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1268–1275CrossRef Morisaka H, Motosugi U, Ichikawa S et al (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography is as accurate as liver biopsy for liver fibrosis staging. J Magn Reson Imaging 47:1268–1275CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2010) Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 23:497–511CrossRef Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2010) Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 23:497–511CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40CrossRef Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E et al (2008) Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology 135:32–40CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hoodeshenas S, Yin M, Venkatesh SK (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: current update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:319–333CrossRef Hoodeshenas S, Yin M, Venkatesh SK (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: current update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:319–333CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Venkatesh SK, Xu S, Tai D, Yu H, Wee A (2014) Correlation of MR elastography with morphometric quantification of liver fibrosis (Fibro-C-Index) in chronic hepatitis B. Magn Reson Med 72:1123–1129CrossRef Venkatesh SK, Xu S, Tai D, Yu H, Wee A (2014) Correlation of MR elastography with morphometric quantification of liver fibrosis (Fibro-C-Index) in chronic hepatitis B. Magn Reson Med 72:1123–1129CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000) Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1599–1607PubMed Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000) Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1599–1607PubMed
23.
go back to reference Pinzani M, Rombouts K, Colagrande S (2005) Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 42(Suppl):S22–S36CrossRef Pinzani M, Rombouts K, Colagrande S (2005) Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: diagnosis and management. J Hepatol 42(Suppl):S22–S36CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wanless IR, Shiota K (2004) The pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and other fatty liver diseases: a four-step model including the role of lipid release and hepatic venular obstruction in the progression to cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 24:99–106CrossRef Wanless IR, Shiota K (2004) The pathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and other fatty liver diseases: a four-step model including the role of lipid release and hepatic venular obstruction in the progression to cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 24:99–106CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sakaida I, Nagatomi A, Hironaka K, Uchida K, Okita K (1999) Quantitative analysis of liver fibrosis and stellate cell changes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after interferon therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 94:489–496CrossRef Sakaida I, Nagatomi A, Hironaka K, Uchida K, Okita K (1999) Quantitative analysis of liver fibrosis and stellate cell changes in patients with chronic hepatitis C after interferon therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 94:489–496CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Enomoto N, Onishi H (2019) Magnetic resonance elastography can predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma with longitudinally acquired two-point data. Eur Radiol 29:1013–1021CrossRef Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Enomoto N, Onishi H (2019) Magnetic resonance elastography can predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma with longitudinally acquired two-point data. Eur Radiol 29:1013–1021CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vizzotto L, Vertemati M, Gambacorta M, Sabatella G, Spina V, Minola E (2002) Analysis of histological and immunohistochemical patterns of the liver in posthepatitic and alcoholic cirrhosis by computerized morphometry. Mod Pathol 15:798–806CrossRef Vizzotto L, Vertemati M, Gambacorta M, Sabatella G, Spina V, Minola E (2002) Analysis of histological and immunohistochemical patterns of the liver in posthepatitic and alcoholic cirrhosis by computerized morphometry. Mod Pathol 15:798–806CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cassiman D, Roskams T (2002) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: emerging concepts and pitfalls in hepatic stellate cell research. J Hepatol 37:527–535CrossRef Cassiman D, Roskams T (2002) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: emerging concepts and pitfalls in hepatic stellate cell research. J Hepatol 37:527–535CrossRef
31.
32.
go back to reference Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2016) Liver fibrosis staging with MR elastography: comparison of diagnostic performance between patients with chronic hepatitis B and those with other etiologic causes. Radiology 280:88–97CrossRef Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH et al (2016) Liver fibrosis staging with MR elastography: comparison of diagnostic performance between patients with chronic hepatitis B and those with other etiologic causes. Radiology 280:88–97CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lee VS, Miller FH, Omary RA et al (2011) Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 92:581–586CrossRef Lee VS, Miller FH, Omary RA et al (2011) Magnetic resonance elastography and biomarkers to assess fibrosis from recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients. Transplantation 92:581–586CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Glaser K et al (2013) Stable automated segmentation of liver MR elastography images for clinical stiffness measurement. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, 8672 Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Glaser K et al (2013) Stable automated segmentation of liver MR elastography images for clinical stiffness measurement. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng, 8672
35.
go back to reference Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2016) Automated liver elasticity calculation for MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1055–1063CrossRef Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2016) Automated liver elasticity calculation for MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1055–1063CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bonekamp D, Bonekamp S, Halappa VG et al (2014) Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 83:487–496CrossRef Bonekamp D, Bonekamp S, Halappa VG et al (2014) Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 83:487–496CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison between ROI-based and volumetric measurements in quantifying heterogeneity of liver stiffness using MR elastography
Authors
Roya Rezvani Habibabadi
Pegah Khoshpouri
Maryam Ghadimi
Mohammadreza Shaghaghi
Sanaz Ameli
Bita Hazhirkarzar
Pallavi Pandey
Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh
Ankur Pandey
Ihab R. Kamel
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06478-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

European Radiology 3/2020 Go to the issue