Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2009

01-03-2009 | Review Article

The Role of Peer Support in Diabetes Care and Self-Management

Authors: Carol A. Brownson, Michele Heisler

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

In light of the growing prevalence and healthcare costs of diabetes mellitus, it is critically important for healthcare providers to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their diabetes care. A key element of effective disease management for diabetes is support for patient self-management. Barriers to care exist for both patients and healthcare systems. As a result, many people with diabetes do not get the care and support needed to successfully manage their diabetes.
Disease management approaches that incorporate peer support may be a promising way to help provide self-management support to patients with diabetes. Trained peers provide emotional support, instrumental (tangible or material) support, education, and skills training to those they serve, and outreach and care coordination for provider systems. They play a unique role that complements and supports clinical care.
To describe how peers are currently supporting diabetes care, a number of databases were searched for studies describing the roles of peers using relevant key words. This paper reviews current literature that describes the roles and duties of peers in interventions to improve diabetes care, with a focus on their contributions to six essential elements of self-management support: (i) access to regular, high-quality clinical care; (ii) an individualized approach to assessment and treatment; (iii) patient-centered collaborative goal setting; (iv) education and skills training; (v) ongoing follow-up and support; and (vi) linkages to community resources.
Peers worked under a variety of titles, which did not define their duties. The scope of their work ranged from assisting health professionals to playing a central role in care. Providing education and follow-up support were the two most common roles. In all but one study, these roles were carried out during face-to-face contact, most frequently in community sites.
A growing body of literature supports the value of peer models for diabetes management. Additional research can answer remaining questions related to such issues as cost effectiveness, sustainability, integration of peers into health and social service delivery systems, and recruitment, training, and support of peers. Continuing to develop and evaluate innovative models for more effectively mobilizing and integrating peers into diabetes care has great potential for improving diabetes outcomes worldwide.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(5): 1047–53PubMedCrossRef
2.
King H, Aubert R, Herman W. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(9): 1414–31PubMedCrossRef
3.
Narayan K, Gregg E, Fagot-Campagna A, et al. Diabetes: a common, growing, serious, costly, and potentially preventable public health problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50(Suppl. 2): S77–84PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
Roglic G, Unwin N. Global mortality attributable to diabetes: time for a realistic estimate. Diabetes Voice 2005; 50(1): 33–4
6.
7.
8.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(3): 1–20
9.
Diabetes Atlas. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2008
10.
Logminienë Ž, Norkus AV, Valius L. Direct and indirect diabetes costs in the world [in Lithuanian]. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004; 40(1): 16–26
11.
Mangione C, Gerzoff R, Williamson D, et al. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Int Med 2006; 145(2): 107–16PubMed
12.
Norris S, Nichols P, Caspersen C, et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22(4 Suppl.): 15–38PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 2001; 27(2): 63–80PubMed
14.
Glasgow R, Funnell M, Bonomi A, et al. Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams. Ann Behav Med 2002; 24(2): 80–7PubMedCrossRef
15.
Smedley B, Stith A, Nelson A. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2003
16.
Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. J Am Med Assoc 2002; 288(19): 2469–75CrossRef
17.
Fisher E, Brownson C, O’Toole M, et al. Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes. Am J Pub Health 2005; 95(9): 1523–35CrossRef
18.
Adams K, Corrigan M. Priority areas for national action: transforming health care quality. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2003
19.
Sabate E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Geneva: WHO, 2003
20.
Saaddine J, Cadwell B, Gregg E, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988–2002. Ann Int Med 2006; 144(7): 465–74PubMed
21.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2008. Diabetes Care 2008; 31(Suppl. 1): S12–54CrossRef
22.
IDF Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2005
23.
Segal K. Type 2 diabetes and disease management: exploring the connections. Dis Manag 2004; 7Suppl. 1: S1 1–22
24.
25.
Strine T, Okoro C, Chapman D, et al. The impact of formal diabetes education on the preventive health practices and behaviors of persons with type 2 diabetes. Prev Med 2005; 41(1): 79–84PubMedCrossRef
26.
Funnell M, Brown T, Childs B, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2008; 31Suppl. 1: S97–104PubMedCrossRef
27.
Norris S, Engelgau M, Narayan K. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001; 24(3): 561–87PubMedCrossRef
28.
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001
29.
Zweifler J. The missing link: improving quality with a chronic disease management intervention for the primary care office. Ann Fam Med 2007; 5(5): 453–6PubMedCrossRef
30.
Dower C, Knox M, Lindler V, et al. Advancing community health worker practice and utilization: the focus on financing. San Francisco (CA): National Fund for Medical Education, 2006
31.
Ruddy G, Rhee K. Transdisciplinary teams in primary care for the underserved: a literature review. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2005; 16(2): 248–56PubMedCrossRef
32.
Leninger M. Culture care diversity and universality: a theory of nursing. New York: National League of Nursing, 1991
33.
Israel B. Social networks and social support: implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Educ Q 1985; 12(1): 65–80PubMedCrossRef
34.
Satterfield D, Burd C, Valdez L, et al. The ‘in-between’ people: participation of community health representatives in diabetes prevention and care in American Indian and Alaskan Native communities. Health Promot Pract 2002; 3(2): 166–75
35.
University of Arizona, Annie E. Casey Foundation. The National Community Health Advisor Study: weaving the future. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press, 1998
36.
Hopper S, Miller J, Birge C, et al. A randomized study of the impact of home health aides on diabetic control and utilization patterns. Am J Public Health 1984; 74(6): 600–2PubMedCrossRef
37.
Dennis C. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2003; 40(3): 321–32PubMedCrossRef
38.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Bureau of Health Professions. Community Health Worker National Workforce study. 2007 March [online]. Available from URL: ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/bhpr/workforce/chw307.pdf [Accessed 2009 Jan 28]
39.
Nemcek M, Sabatier R. State of evaluation: community health workers. Public Health Nurs 2003; 20(4): 260–70PubMedCrossRef
40.
Musick M, Herzog A, House J. Volunteering and mortality among older adults: findings from a national sample. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1999; 54(3): S173–80PubMedCrossRef
41.
Schwartz C, Sendor M. Helping others helps oneself: response shift effects in peer support. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48(11): 1563–75PubMedCrossRef
42.
Brown S, Nesse R, Vinokur A, et al. Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychol Sci 2003; 14(4): 320–7PubMedCrossRef
43.
Ruggiero L, Spirito A, Bond A, et al. Impact of social support and stress on compliance in women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 1990; 13(4): 441–3PubMedCrossRef
44.
Tillotson L, Smith M. Locus of control, social support, and adherence to the diabetes regimen. Diabetes Educ 1996; 22(2): 133–9PubMedCrossRef
45.
Gallant M. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003; 30(2): 170–95PubMedCrossRef
46.
Swider S. Outcome effectiveness of community health workers: an integrative literature review. Public Health Nurs 2002; 19(1): 11–20PubMedCrossRef
47.
Lewin S, Dick J, Pond P, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 25(1): CD004015
48.
Lehmann U, Sanders D. Community health workers: what do we know about them? The state of the evidence on programmes, activities, costs and impact on health outcomes of using community health workers. Geneva: WHO, 2007
49.
50.
51.
52.
Norris S, Chowdhury F, Van Le K, et al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabetic Med 2006; 23(5): 544–56PubMedCrossRef
53.
Balcazar H, Alvarado M, Hollen M, et al. Evaluation of Salud Para Su Corazón (Health for Your Heart): National Council of La Raza Promotora Outreach Program. Prev Chronic Dis 2005; 2(3): 1–9
54.
Lorig K, Sobel D, Stewart AB, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care 1999; 37(1): 5–14PubMedCrossRef
55.
Lorig KR, Ritter PL, González VM. Hispanic chronic disease self-management: a randomized community-based outcome trial. Nurs Res 2003; 52(6): 361–9PubMedCrossRef
56.
Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Jacquez A. Outcomes of border health Spanish/English chronic disease self-management programs. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31(3): 401–9PubMedCrossRef
57.
Lorig K, Ritter P, Laurent D, et al. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care 2006; 44(11): 964–71PubMedCrossRef
58.
McDermott R, Tulip F, Schmidt B, et al. Sustaining better diabetes care in remote indigenous Australian communities. BMJ 2003; 327(7412): 428–30PubMedCrossRef
59.
60.
Thompson J, Horton C, Flores C. Advancing diabetes self-management in the Mexican American population: a community health worker model in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33Suppl. 6: 159S–65SPubMedCrossRef
61.
Fedder D, Chang R, Curry S, et al. The effectiveness of a community health worker outreach program on healthcare utilization of west Baltimore City Medicaid patients with diabetes, with or without hypertension. Ethn Dis 2003; 13(1): 22–7PubMed
62.
Corkery E, Palmer C, Foley M, et al. Effect of a bicultural community health worker on completion of diabetes education in a Hispanic population. Diabetes Care 1997; 20(3): 254–7PubMedCrossRef
63.
Moore K, Mengel M. Expanding the team: the use of volunteers in a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educ 2002; 28(4): 554–8PubMedCrossRef
64.
Liebman J, Heffernan D. Quality improvement in diabetes care using community health workers. Clin Diabetes 2008; 26(2): 75–6CrossRef
65.
Ingram M, Torres E, Redondo F, et al. The impact of promotoras on social support and glycemic control among members of a farmworker community on the US-Mexico border. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33Suppl. 6: 172s–8sPubMedCrossRef
66.
Two Feathers J, Kieffer E, Palmisano G, et al. Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH) Detroit partnership: improving diabetes-related outcomes among African American and Latino adults. Am J Pub Health 2005; 95(9): 1552–60CrossRef
67.
Brown S, Garcia A, Kouzekanani K, et al. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County border health initiative. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(2): 259–68PubMedCrossRef
68.
Gary T, Bone L, Hill M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk factors for diabetes-related complications in urban African Americans. Prev Med 2003; 37(1): 23–32PubMedCrossRef
69.
Vetter M, Bristow L, Ahrens J. A model for home care clinician and home health aide collaboration: diabetes care by nurse case managers and community health workers. Home Healthc Nurse 2004; 22(9): 645–8PubMedCrossRef
70.
Humphry J, Jameson L, Beckham S. Overcoming social and cultural barriers to care for patients with diabetes. West J Med 1997; 167(3): 138–44PubMed
71.
Liebman J, Heffernan D, Sarvela P. Establishing diabetes self-management in a community health center serving low-income Latinos. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33Suppl. 6: 132S–8SPubMedCrossRef
72.
Griffin J, Gilliland S, Perez G, et al. Participant satisfaction with a culturally appropriate diabetes education program: the Native American Diabetes Project. Diabetes Educ 1999; 25(3): 351–63PubMedCrossRef
73.
Gilmer T, Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C. Outcomes of Project Dulce: a culturally specific diabetes management program. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39(5): 817–22PubMedCrossRef
74.
Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C. Improved care for diabetes in underserved populations. J Ambul Care Manage 2001; 24(1): 39–43PubMed
75.
Philis-Tsimikas A, Walker C, Rivard L, et al. Improvement in diabetes care of underinsured patients enrolled in Project Dulce: a community-based, culturally appropriate, nurse case management and peer education diabetes care model. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(1): 110–5PubMedCrossRef
76.
Lujan J, Ostwald S, Ortiz M. Promotora diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33(4): 660–70PubMedCrossRef
77.
Quinn M, McNabb W. Training lay health educators to conduct a church-based weight-loss program for African American women. Diabetes Educ 2001; 27(2): 231–8PubMedCrossRef
78.
Sixta C, Ostwald S. Texas-Mexico border intervention by promotores for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2008; 34(2): 299–309PubMedCrossRef
79.
Struthers R, Hodge F, De Cora L, et al. The experience of native peer facilitators in the campaign against type 2 diabetes. J Rural Health 2003; 19(2): 174–80PubMedCrossRef
80.
81.
Heath G, Wilson R, Smith J, et al. Community-based exercise and weight control: diabetes risk reduction and glycemic control in Zuni Indians. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53(6 Suppl.): 1642S–6SPubMed
82.
Keyserling T, Samuel-Hodge C, Ammerman A, et al. A randomized trial of an intervention to improve self-care behaviors of African-American women with type 2 diabetes: impact on physical activity. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(9): 1576–83PubMedCrossRef
83.
Joseph D, Griffin M, Hall R, et al. Peer coaching: an intervention for individuals struggling with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2001; 27(5): 703–10PubMedCrossRef
84.
Wilson W, Pratt C. The impact of diabetes education and peer support upon weight and glycemic control of elderly persons with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Am J Public Health 1987; 77(5): 634–5PubMedCrossRef
85.
Plescia M, Groblewski M, Chavis L. A lay health advisor program to promote community capacity and change among change agents. Health Promot Pract 2008; 9(4): 434–9PubMedCrossRef
86.
May M, Kash B, Contreras R. Community health worker certification and training: a national survey of regionally and state-based programs. College Station (TX): Southwest Rural Health Research Center, 2005
87.
88.
Duthie P, Philippi E, Schultz J. Collaboration for training: a partnership to improve quality, consistency and cost-effectiveness of essential training for community health workers. Am J Health Educ 2005; 36(2): 113–6
89.
Maurana C, Rodney M. Strategies for developing a successful community health advocate program: key elements of community health advocacy. Fam Community Health 2000; 23(1): 40–9CrossRef
90.
Proulx D. Project Jumpstart: a community college and AHEC partnership initiative for community health worker education. Texas J Rural Health 2000; 18(3): 6–16
91.
Hill-Briggs F, Batts-Turner M, Gary T, et al. Training community health workers as diabetes educators for urban African Americans: value added using participatory methods. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2006; 1(2): 185–94CrossRef
92.
Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, et al. Community health worker incentives and disincentives: how they affect motivation, retention, and sustainability. Arlington (VA): Basic Support for Institutionalizing Child Survival Project (BASICS II) for the United States Agency for International Development, 2001 October
93.
Whitley E, Everhart R, Wright R. Measuring return on investment of outreach by community health workers. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006; 17(1 Suppl.): 6–15PubMed
94.
95.
Davis K, O’Toole M, Brownson C, et al. Teaching how, not what: the contributions of community health workers to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33Suppl. 6: 208S–15SPubMedCrossRef
96.
Reinschmidt K, Hunter J, Fernández M, et al. Understanding the success of promotoras in increasing chronic diseases screening. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2006; 17(2): 256–64PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Role of Peer Support in Diabetes Care and Self-Management
Authors
Carol A. Brownson
Michele Heisler
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/01312067-200902010-00002

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2009 Go to the issue

Original Research Article

Patient Expectations of Hip and Knee Joint Replacement Surgery and Postoperative Health Status

Original Research Article

And Tell Yourself, “This is not Me, it’s the Drug”

Original Research Article

Measuring Preferred Role Orientations for Patients and Providers in Veterans Administration and University General Medicine Clinics

Original Research Article

Patient Preferences for an Oral Anticoagulant after Major Orthopedic Surgery

Pioneer Profile

Lester Firkins

Original Research Article

Stakeholder Satisfaction with the Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD)
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Reserve your place

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

Read more

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Pediatric Cardiology Video

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

Cardiopulmonary Comorbidity Video

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Valvular Heart Disease Video

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

ACC 2024 Congress Coverage

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Heart Failure Video

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.

Watch now

Semaglutide benefits people with type 2 diabetes and obesity-related heart failure

16-04-2024 Type 2 Diabetes News

Incentivised to exercise

11-04-2024 Lifestyle Modifications News

New intervention for STEMI-related cardiogenic shock

10-04-2024 Myocardial Infarction News

» View more highlights on the ACC 2024 congress hub page

Image Credits