Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4/2012

01-07-2012 | Current Opinion

A New Reimbursement System for Innovative Pharmaceuticals Combining Value-Based and Free Market Pricing

Authors: Professor Ulf Persson, Johanna Svensson, Billie Pettersson

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Sweden has experienced a national value-based pricing (VBP) system for innovative outpatient drugs operated by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board — LFN (now called the Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits agency — TLV) since 2002. VBP has the character of a monopoly system, leading to reimbursement decisions where usage of new medicines is limited to subgroups and not the population for which the drug is approved. VBP relies on a broad societal perspective, encouraging innovations by signaling to firms that value-adding treatments are demanded. However, the VBP system is operated without a drug budget responsibility. The budget responsibility lies at the regional level, not operating VBP, thus an intrinsic conflict is built into the system.
The aim of this article is to suggest a modification to the current reimbursement system in Sweden where payment for pharmaceuticals is split between the regional and national levels. The system is expected to make new innovative pharmaceuticals accessible to a larger number of patients and provide more consumer surplus without reducing the producer surplus. In short, the county councils pay the marginal cost of production while the state pays for the innovation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? Manag Decis Econ 2007; 28(4–5): 469–79CrossRef DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG. The cost of biopharmaceutical R&D: is biotech different? Manag Decis Econ 2007; 28(4–5): 469–79CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Grabowski H. Are the economics of pharmaceutical research and development changing?: productivity, patents and political pressures. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22 (2 Suppl. 2): 15–24PubMedCrossRef Grabowski H. Are the economics of pharmaceutical research and development changing?: productivity, patents and political pressures. Pharmacoeconomics 2004; 22 (2 Suppl. 2): 15–24PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Freemantle N, Hill S. Evaluating pharmaceuticals for health policy and reimbursement. London: BMJ Books; 2004CrossRef Freemantle N, Hill S. Evaluating pharmaceuticals for health policy and reimbursement. London: BMJ Books; 2004CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Engstrom A, Jacob J, Lundin D. [Reduced pharmaceutical prices after introduction of generic substitution] Kraftig prispress på läkemedel efter introduktionen av generiskt utbyte. Solna: Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden 2006 Engstrom A, Jacob J, Lundin D. [Reduced pharmaceutical prices after introduction of generic substitution] Kraftig prispress på läkemedel efter introduktionen av generiskt utbyte. Solna: Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden 2006
6.
go back to reference Claxton K, Briggs A, Buxton MJ, et al. Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? BMJ 2008 Feb 2; 336(7638): 251–4PubMedCrossRef Claxton K, Briggs A, Buxton MJ, et al. Value based pricing for NHS drugs: an opportunity not to be missed? BMJ 2008 Feb 2; 336(7638): 251–4PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Godman A, Schwabe U, et al. Having your cake and eating it: office of fair trading proposal for funding new drugs to benefit patients and innovative companies. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(2): 91–8PubMedCrossRef Godman A, Schwabe U, et al. Having your cake and eating it: office of fair trading proposal for funding new drugs to benefit patients and innovative companies. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(2): 91–8PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Towse A. Value based pricing, research and development, and patient access schemes: will the United Kingdom get it right or wrong? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 70(3): 360–6PubMedCrossRef Towse A. Value based pricing, research and development, and patient access schemes: will the United Kingdom get it right or wrong? Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010 Sep; 70(3): 360–6PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Towse A, Garrison Jr LP. Can’t get no satisfaction? Will pay for performance help?: toward an economic framework for understanding performance-based risk-sharing agreements for innovative medical products. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28(2): 93–102PubMedCrossRef Towse A, Garrison Jr LP. Can’t get no satisfaction? Will pay for performance help?: toward an economic framework for understanding performance-based risk-sharing agreements for innovative medical products. Pharmacoeconomics 2010; 28(2): 93–102PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Trueman P, Grainger DL, Downs KE. Coverage with evidence development: applications and issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010 Jan; 26(1): 79–85PubMedCrossRef Trueman P, Grainger DL, Downs KE. Coverage with evidence development: applications and issues. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010 Jan; 26(1): 79–85PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Willis M, Persson U, Zoellner Y, et al. Reducing uncertainty in value-based pricing using evidence development agreements: the case of continuous intraduodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa(R)) in Sweden. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010; 8(6): 377–86PubMedCrossRef Willis M, Persson U, Zoellner Y, et al. Reducing uncertainty in value-based pricing using evidence development agreements: the case of continuous intraduodenal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (Duodopa(R)) in Sweden. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010; 8(6): 377–86PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Drummond MF, Jonsson et al. Are key principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010 Jan; 26(1): 71–8PubMedCrossRef Neumann PJ, Drummond MF, Jonsson et al. Are key principles for improved health technology assessment supported and used by health technology assessment organizations? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010 Jan; 26(1): 71–8PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mueller T. Drug regulation and reimbursement of drugs in health systems: cost-effectiveness-analysis is not a sufficient and adequate basis for a fair and reasonable decision making. EMAUD Market Access Newsletter 2010 Jun; 1 Mueller T. Drug regulation and reimbursement of drugs in health systems: cost-effectiveness-analysis is not a sufficient and adequate basis for a fair and reasonable decision making. EMAUD Market Access Newsletter 2010 Jun; 1
15.
go back to reference Lundin D, Ramsberg J. Dynamic cost-effectiveness: a more efficient reimbursement criterion. Forum Health Econ Policy 2008; 11(2): 1–15 Lundin D, Ramsberg J. Dynamic cost-effectiveness: a more efficient reimbursement criterion. Forum Health Econ Policy 2008; 11(2): 1–15
16.
go back to reference Lindgren P, Jonsson Cost-effectiveness of statins revisited: lessons learned about the value of innovation. Eur J Health Econ. Epub 2011 Apr 29 Lindgren P, Jonsson Cost-effectiveness of statins revisited: lessons learned about the value of innovation. Eur J Health Econ. Epub 2011 Apr 29
17.
go back to reference Ramsberg J, Ekelund M. Silo mentality results in unnecessarily high health-related societal costs Stuprörstänkande gör samhällets kostnader för ohälsa onödigt höga. Ekonomisk Debatt 2011; 39(5): 41–53 Ramsberg J, Ekelund M. Silo mentality results in unnecessarily high health-related societal costs Stuprörstänkande gör samhällets kostnader för ohälsa onödigt höga. Ekonomisk Debatt 2011; 39(5): 41–53
18.
go back to reference TLV. [General Advice from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board] Läkemedelsförmånsnämndens allmänna råd. Solna: Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden, 2003 TLV. [General Advice from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board] Läkemedelsförmånsnämndens allmänna råd. Solna: Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden, 2003
19.
go back to reference Hugosson K, Engstrom A. Threshold value for a QALY: correlation with disease severity and decision uncertainty [abstract]. Value Health 2008; 11(3): A49CrossRef Hugosson K, Engstrom A. Threshold value for a QALY: correlation with disease severity and decision uncertainty [abstract]. Value Health 2008; 11(3): A49CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Anell A, Persson U. Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making? Eur J Health Econ 2005 Sep; 6(3): 274–9PubMedCrossRef Anell A, Persson U. Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making? Eur J Health Econ 2005 Sep; 6(3): 274–9PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Persson U, Willis M, Odegaard A case study of ex ante, value-based price and reimbursement decision-making: TLV and rimonabant in Sweden. Eur J Health Econ 2010 Apr; 11(2): 195–203PubMedCrossRef Persson U, Willis M, Odegaard A case study of ex ante, value-based price and reimbursement decision-making: TLV and rimonabant in Sweden. Eur J Health Econ 2010 Apr; 11(2): 195–203PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Svensk Reumatologis Kvalitetsregister: Årsrapport 2009–10 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.swerre.se/documents/%C3%85rsrapport%202010.pdf [Accessed 2012 May 9] Svensk Reumatologis Kvalitetsregister: Årsrapport 2009–10 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​swerre.​se/​documents/​%C3%85rsrapport%202010.pdf [Accessed 2012 May 9]
25.
go back to reference Region Västra Götaland. Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis with TNF-alpha inhibitors [TNF-hämmare vid tidig RA]. HTA report, 2009: 20 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.sahlgrenska.se/upload/SU/HTA-centrum/HTA-rapporter/HTA-rapport%20TNF%20inkl%20bilagor%202011-11-24%20till%20publicering.doc.pdf [Accessed 2011 Dec 09] Region Västra Götaland. Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis with TNF-alpha inhibitors [TNF-hämmare vid tidig RA]. HTA report, 2009: 20 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​sahlgrenska.​se/​upload/​SU/​HTA-centrum/​HTA-rapporter/​HTA-rapport%20TNF%20inkl%20bilagor%202011-11-24%20till%20publicering.doc.pdf [Accessed 2011 Dec 09]
27.
go back to reference Wilking U, Jonsson B, Wilking N, et al. Trastuzumab use in breast cancer patients in the six health care regions in Sweden. Acta Oncol 2010 Aug; 49(6): 844–50PubMedCrossRef Wilking U, Jonsson B, Wilking N, et al. Trastuzumab use in breast cancer patients in the six health care regions in Sweden. Acta Oncol 2010 Aug; 49(6): 844–50PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Persson U. Utvärdering av medicinsk teknologi och hälsoekonomi. In: Anell A, Gerdtham U-G, editors. Vårdens utmaningar. Stockholm: SNS Förlag; 2010 Persson U. Utvärdering av medicinsk teknologi och hälsoekonomi. In: Anell A, Gerdtham U-G, editors. Vårdens utmaningar. Stockholm: SNS Förlag; 2010
29.
go back to reference The National Board of Health and Welfare. [Government directive] Tilläggsdirektiv till utredningen om vissa frågor om prissättning, tillgänglighet och marknadsförutsättningar inom läkemedels- och apoteksområdet (S 2011:07). 2011: 82 The National Board of Health and Welfare. [Government directive] Tilläggsdirektiv till utredningen om vissa frågor om prissättning, tillgänglighet och marknadsförutsättningar inom läkemedels- och apoteksområdet (S 2011:07). 2011: 82
Metadata
Title
A New Reimbursement System for Innovative Pharmaceuticals Combining Value-Based and Free Market Pricing
Authors
Professor Ulf Persson
Johanna Svensson
Billie Pettersson
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11633930-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 4/2012 Go to the issue