Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics 3/2005

01-09-2005 | Pricing and Reimbursement Systems in Europe

Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden

Do health-economic evaluations support decision making?

Authors: Anders Anell, Ulf Persson

Published in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction of the new Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (LFN; 1 October 2002) has markedly changed the principles of pricing and reimbursement of drugs in Sweden. The Board is required to make decisions based on information on cost-effectiveness, and pharmaceutical companies must submit economic evaluations when relevant as part of their applications for reimbursement. This study examined experience to date regarding the use of health-economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness information by the LFN. We also describe activities and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis by Swedish local formulary committees organized by the 21 county councils. It is concluded that economic evaluations have supported decision making by LFN, although cost-effectiveness seems to be of varying importance in different situations. While the use of health-economic evaluations and the outcome of decision making by LFN are similar to comparable committees in other countries, there is presently a gap in this sense between the LFN and Swedish local formulary committees. Coordinated decision making is much needed but may be difficult to implement as the perspective, expertise, and objectives of the two public authorities differ.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoffman C, Graf von der Schulenburg MJ (2000) The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making—a European survey. Health Policy 52:179–192CrossRefPubMed Hoffman C, Graf von der Schulenburg MJ (2000) The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making—a European survey. Health Policy 52:179–192CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Anell A (2004) Priority setting for pharmaceuticals-the use of economic evidence by reimbursement and clinical guidance committees. Eur J Health Econ 5:28–35CrossRefPubMed Anell A (2004) Priority setting for pharmaceuticals-the use of economic evidence by reimbursement and clinical guidance committees. Eur J Health Econ 5:28–35CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Persson U, Anell A, Persson M (2001) Parallellhandel med läkemedel i Sverige—en ekonomisk analys (Parallel trade of pharmaceuticals in Sweden-an economic analysis). IHE: Lund Persson U, Anell A, Persson M (2001) Parallellhandel med läkemedel i Sverige—en ekonomisk analys (Parallel trade of pharmaceuticals in Sweden-an economic analysis). IHE: Lund
5.
go back to reference Apoteket AB (2003) Landstingsförbundet, Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden (2003-06-30) Utbyte av läkemedel. En uppföljning av de första sex månaderna med den nya reformen (Substitution of pharmaceuticals. Experiences following the first six months after the new reform) Apoteket AB (2003) Landstingsförbundet, Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden (2003-06-30) Utbyte av läkemedel. En uppföljning av de första sex månaderna med den nya reformen (Substitution of pharmaceuticals. Experiences following the first six months after the new reform)
6.
go back to reference Anell A, Svarvar P (2000) Pharmacoeconomics and clinical practice guidelines—a survey of attitudes in Swedish formulary committees. Pharmacoeconomics 17:175–185PubMed Anell A, Svarvar P (2000) Pharmacoeconomics and clinical practice guidelines—a survey of attitudes in Swedish formulary committees. Pharmacoeconomics 17:175–185PubMed
7.
go back to reference Persson U, Anell A, Persson U, Anell A, Nordling S (2002) Pris, subvention och läkemedel-användning av hälsoekonomiska utvärderingar (Price, reimbursement and pharmaceuticals-use of health economic evaluations). IHE: Lund Persson U, Anell A, Persson U, Anell A, Nordling S (2002) Pris, subvention och läkemedel-användning av hälsoekonomiska utvärderingar (Price, reimbursement and pharmaceuticals-use of health economic evaluations). IHE: Lund
8.
go back to reference Socialstyrelsen (2003) En uppföljning av läkemedelskommittéernas arbete-Hur påverkas läkemedelsanvändningen? (Review of activities of fomulary commttees). Socialstyrelsen: Stockholm Socialstyrelsen (2003) En uppföljning av läkemedelskommittéernas arbete-Hur påverkas läkemedelsanvändningen? (Review of activities of fomulary commttees). Socialstyrelsen: Stockholm
9.
go back to reference Melander A, Nilsson L-G (2001) Läkares relationer till läkemedelskommittéer. Attityder och faktisk förskrivning (Physicians attitudes towards formulary committees and actual prescribing patterns). Apotekarsocieteten: Stockholm Melander A, Nilsson L-G (2001) Läkares relationer till läkemedelskommittéer. Attityder och faktisk förskrivning (Physicians attitudes towards formulary committees and actual prescribing patterns). Apotekarsocieteten: Stockholm
10.
go back to reference Nordling S, Anell A, Jansson, S (2003) Kostnadsansvar och belöningssystem för förbättrad läkemedelsanvändning (Budget responsibility and incentive schemes for a rational use of drugs). IHE: Lund Nordling S, Anell A, Jansson, S (2003) Kostnadsansvar och belöningssystem för förbättrad läkemedelsanvändning (Budget responsibility and incentive schemes for a rational use of drugs). IHE: Lund
11.
go back to reference Jansson S, Anell A (2004) Prioriteringar av läkemedel i praktiken-Vilken betydelse har kostnader för förskrivare? (Attitudes among precsribing physicians towards responsibility for drug expanditures and consideration of cost-effectiveness in decision-making). Lund: IHE Jansson S, Anell A (2004) Prioriteringar av läkemedel i praktiken-Vilken betydelse har kostnader för förskrivare? (Attitudes among precsribing physicians towards responsibility for drug expanditures and consideration of cost-effectiveness in decision-making). Lund: IHE
12.
go back to reference Ramsberg J, Odeberg S, Engström A, Lundin D (2004) Examining the quality of health economic analysis submitted to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board in Sweden. The first year. Eur J Health Econ 5:351–356CrossRefPubMed Ramsberg J, Odeberg S, Engström A, Lundin D (2004) Examining the quality of health economic analysis submitted to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board in Sweden. The first year. Eur J Health Econ 5:351–356CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jönsson B, Arvidsson G, Levin L-Å, Rehnberg C (2004) Hälsa, vård och tillväxt. Välfärdspolitiska rådets rapport 2004 (Health, health-care and economic growth). SNS: Stockholm Jönsson B, Arvidsson G, Levin L-Å, Rehnberg C (2004) Hälsa, vård och tillväxt. Välfärdspolitiska rådets rapport 2004 (Health, health-care and economic growth). SNS: Stockholm
14.
go back to reference Buxton M (2001) Implications of the appraisal function of the National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE). Value Health 4:212–216CrossRefPubMed Buxton M (2001) Implications of the appraisal function of the National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness (NICE). Value Health 4:212–216CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Raftery J (2001) NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. BMJ 323:1300–1303CrossRefPubMed Raftery J (2001) NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. BMJ 323:1300–1303CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden
Do health-economic evaluations support decision making?
Authors
Anders Anell
Ulf Persson
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Electronic ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-005-0301-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

The European Journal of Health Economics 3/2005 Go to the issue