Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Pathology | Breast Oncology

Hospital System Adoption of Magnetic Seeds for Wireless Breast and Lymph Node Localization

Authors: Megan E. Miller, MD, FACS, Nirav Patil, MBBS, MPH, Pamela Li, MD, Mary Freyvogel, DO, Ian Greenwalt, MD, Lisa Rock, MD, Ashley Simpson, DO, Mary Teresczuk, BA, Stephanie Carlisle, BA, Maria Peñuela, BS, Cheryl L. Thompson, PhD, Robert Shenk, MD, FACS, Jill Dietz, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As an alternative to traditional wire localization, an inducible magnetic seed system can be used to identify and remove nonpalpable breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes intraoperatively. We report the largest single-institution experience of magnetic seed placement for operative localization to date, including feasibility and short-term outcomes.

Methods

Patients who underwent placement of a magnetic seed in the breast or lymph node were identified from July 2017 to March 2019. Imaging findings, core needle biopsy, surgical pathology results, and type of surgery were collected. Outcomes included procedural complications, magnetic seed and biopsy clip retrieval rates, and need for additional surgery.

Results

A total of 842 magnetic seeds were placed by nine radiologists in 673 patients and retrieved by six surgeons at six operative locations. The majority of breast lesions were malignant (395/659, 59.9%); 136 seeds were placed for lymph node localization. The overall magnetic seed retrieval rate was 98.6%, whereas the biopsy clip retrieval rate was 90.9%. Only six patients (0.7%) experienced a complication from magnetic seed placement. Reexcision was performed in 15.2% of patients with breast cancer; 9.6% of benign/high risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy at surgical excision.

Conclusions

The magnetic seed technique is safe, effective, and accurate for localization of breast lesions and lymph nodes, and importantly uncouples surgery from the localization procedure. The high magnetic seed retrieval rate and low reexcision rate may reflect the accuracy of magnetic marker placement as a “second chance” localization procedure, especially in cases with biopsy clip migration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cheang E, Ha R, Thornton CM, Mango VL. Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170740.CrossRef Cheang E, Ha R, Thornton CM, Mango VL. Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170740.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hayes MK. Update on preoperative breast localization. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017;55:591–603.CrossRef Hayes MK. Update on preoperative breast localization. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017;55:591–603.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Gardner M, Cox CE. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.CrossRef Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Gardner M, Cox CE. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Am J Surg. 2010;199:522–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Seely J, Cordiero E, et al. Radioactive seed localization versus wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer: a cost and operating room efficiency analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3567–73.CrossRef Zhang Y, Seely J, Cordiero E, et al. Radioactive seed localization versus wire-guided localization for nonpalpable breast cancer: a cost and operating room efficiency analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3567–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jakub J, Gray R. Starting radioactive seed localization program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3197–202.CrossRef Jakub J, Gray R. Starting radioactive seed localization program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3197–202.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4121–7.CrossRef Murphy JO, Moo TA, King TA, et al. Radioactive seed localization compared to wire localization in breast-conserving surgery: initial 6-month experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:4121–7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Diego EJ, Soran A, McGuire KP, et al. Localizing high-risk lesions for excisional breast biopsy: a comparison between radioactive seed localization and wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3268–72.CrossRef Diego EJ, Soran A, McGuire KP, et al. Localizing high-risk lesions for excisional breast biopsy: a comparison between radioactive seed localization and wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3268–72.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bloomquist EV, Ajkay N, Patil S, et al. A randomized prospective comparison of patient-assessed satisfaction and clinical outcomes with radioactive seed localization vs wire localization. Breast J. 2016; 22:151–7.CrossRef Bloomquist EV, Ajkay N, Patil S, et al. A randomized prospective comparison of patient-assessed satisfaction and clinical outcomes with radioactive seed localization vs wire localization. Breast J. 2016; 22:151–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:711–5.CrossRef Gray RJ, Salud C, Nguyen K, et al. Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:711–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lovrics PJ, Goldsmith CH, Hodgson N, et al. A multi-centered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radio-guided seed localization to standard wire localization for non-palpable, invasive, and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.CrossRef Lovrics PJ, Goldsmith CH, Hodgson N, et al. A multi-centered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radio-guided seed localization to standard wire localization for non-palpable, invasive, and in situ breast carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3407–14.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pouw B, De Wit-Van Der Veen L, Stokkel M, Loo C, Peeters M, Olmos R. Heading toward radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:185–91.CrossRef Pouw B, De Wit-Van Der Veen L, Stokkel M, Loo C, Peeters M, Olmos R. Heading toward radioactive seed localization in nonpalpable breast cancer surgery? A meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:185–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3168–74.CrossRef Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A prospective, single arm, multi-site, clinical evaluation of a nonradioactive surgical guidance technology for the location of nonpalpable breast lesions during excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3168–74.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Falcon S, Weinfurtner RJ, Mooney B, Niell BL. SAVI SCOUT® localization of breast lesions as a practical alternative to wires: outcomes and suggestions for trouble-shooting. Clin Imaging. 2018;52:280–6.CrossRef Falcon S, Weinfurtner RJ, Mooney B, Niell BL. SAVI SCOUT® localization of breast lesions as a practical alternative to wires: outcomes and suggestions for trouble-shooting. Clin Imaging. 2018;52:280–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD. Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. Am J Radiol. 2018;210:913–7. Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD. Initial clinical experience with an inducible magnetic seed system for preoperative breast lesion localization. Am J Radiol. 2018;210:913–7.
15.
go back to reference Jacobs L. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1271–2.CrossRef Jacobs L. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1271–2.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, et al. Identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0–T4, N1–N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2016;263:802–7.CrossRef Boughey JC, Ballman KV, Le-Petross HT, et al. Identification and resection of clipped node decreases the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node surgery in patients presenting with node-positive breast cancer (T0–T4, N1–N2) who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg. 2016;263:802–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, et al. Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg. 2015;261:378–82.CrossRef Donker M, Straver ME, Wesseling J, et al. Marking axillary lymph nodes with radioactive iodine seeds for axillary staging after neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer patients: the MARI procedure. Ann Surg. 2015;261:378–82.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Caudle A, Yang W, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1072–8.CrossRef Caudle A, Yang W, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Improved axillary evaluation following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1072–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hospital System Adoption of Magnetic Seeds for Wireless Breast and Lymph Node Localization
Authors
Megan E. Miller, MD, FACS
Nirav Patil, MBBS, MPH
Pamela Li, MD
Mary Freyvogel, DO
Ian Greenwalt, MD
Lisa Rock, MD
Ashley Simpson, DO
Mary Teresczuk, BA
Stephanie Carlisle, BA
Maria Peñuela, BS
Cheryl L. Thompson, PhD
Robert Shenk, MD, FACS
Jill Dietz, MD, FACS
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Pathology
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09311-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2021 Go to the issue