Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2020

01-11-2020 | Mastectomy | Breast Oncology

Post-operative Nausea and Analgesia Following Total Mastectomy is Improved After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol

Authors: Kate H. Dinh, MD, MS, Priscilla F. McAuliffe, MD, PhD, Michael Boisen, MD, Stephen A. Esper, MD, MBA, Kathirvel Subramaniam, MD, Jennifer G. Steiman, MD, Atilla Soran, MD, Ronald R. Johnson, MD, Jennifer M. Holder-Murray, MD, Emilia J. Diego, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) provide a multimodal approach to perioperative care, with the aims of improving patient outcomes while decreasing perioperative antiemetic and narcotic requirements. With high rates of post-operative nausea or vomiting (PONV) following total mastectomy (TM), we hypothesized that our institutional designed ERP would reduce PONV while improving pain control and decrease opioid use.

Methods

An ERP was implemented at a single institution for patients undergoing TM with or without implant-based reconstruction. Patients from the first two months of implementation (ERP group, N = 72) were compared with a retrospective usual-care cohort from a three-month period before implementation (UC group, N = 83). Outcomes included PONV incidence, measured with antiemetic use; patient-reported pain scores; perioperative opioid consumption, measured by oral morphine equivalents (OME); and length of stay (LOS).

Results

The characteristics of the two groups were similar. PONV incidence and perioperative opioid consumption were lower in the ERP than the UC group (21% vs. 40%, p 0.011 and mean 44.1 OME vs. 104.3 OME, p < 0.001), respectively. These differences in opioid consumption were observed in the operating room and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU); opioid consumption on the floor was similar between the two groups. Patient-reported pain scores were lower in the ERP than the UC group (mean highest pain score 6.4 vs. 7.4, p 0.003). PACU and hospital LOS were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

ERP implementation was successful in decreasing PONV following TM with and without reconstruction, while simultaneously decreasing overall opioid consumption without compromising patient comfort.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Badram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME KH. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early. Lancet. 1995;345:763–4.CrossRef Badram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME KH. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early. Lancet. 1995;345:763–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999;86(2):227–30.CrossRef Kehlet H, Mogensen T. Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg. 1999;86(2):227–30.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rix T, Jourdan L, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Fazio VW. “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:15331538. Rix T, Jourdan L, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Fazio VW. “Fast track” postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:15331538.
16.
go back to reference Sadhasivam S, Saxena A, Kathirvel S, Kannan TR, Trikha A, Mohan V. The safety and efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(6):1340.PubMed Sadhasivam S, Saxena A, Kathirvel S, Kannan TR, Trikha A, Mohan V. The safety and efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(6):1340.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(2):274–82.PubMed Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(2):274–82.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Eberhart L, Mauch M, Morin A, Wulf H, Geldner G. Impact of a multimodal anti-emetic prophylaxis on patient satisfaction in high-risk patients for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(10):1022–7.CrossRef Eberhart L, Mauch M, Morin A, Wulf H, Geldner G. Impact of a multimodal anti-emetic prophylaxis on patient satisfaction in high-risk patients for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 2002;57(10):1022–7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Watcha MF, Smith I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6(5):370–7.CrossRef Watcha MF, Smith I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiemetic therapy for ambulatory surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6(5):370–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Post-operative Nausea and Analgesia Following Total Mastectomy is Improved After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol
Authors
Kate H. Dinh, MD, MS
Priscilla F. McAuliffe, MD, PhD
Michael Boisen, MD
Stephen A. Esper, MD, MBA
Kathirvel Subramaniam, MD
Jennifer G. Steiman, MD
Atilla Soran, MD
Ronald R. Johnson, MD
Jennifer M. Holder-Murray, MD
Emilia J. Diego, MD
Publication date
01-11-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08880-1

Other articles of this Issue 12/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2020 Go to the issue