Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Metastasis | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Association of RAS Mutation Location and Oncologic Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Authors: Lily V. Saadat, MD, Thomas Boerner, MD, Debra A. Goldman, MS, Mithat Gonen, PhD, Timothy L. Frankel, MD, Efsevia Vakiani, MD, PhD, T. Peter Kingham, MD, William R. Jarnagin, MD, Alice C. Wei, MD, Kevin C. Soares, MD, David B. Solit, MD, Michael I. D’Angelica, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

RAS mutations are prognostic for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated clinical, pathologic, and survival differences based on RAS exon for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included patients with R0/R1 resection of CRLM from 1992 to 2016. Patients with unresected extrahepatic disease or liver-first resection were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were assessed and stratified by mutation status and location. Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and log-rank test were used, where appropriate.

Results

A total of 938 mCRC patients were identified with median age of 57 (range 19–91). Of the 445 patients with KRAS mutations, 407 (91%) had a mutation in exon 2, 14 (3%) exon 3, and 24 (5%) exon 4. Median OS was 71.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.1–76.5). Patients with KRAS mutations had worse OS compared with KRAS wild-type patients (median 55.5 vs. 91.3 months, p < 0.001). While there was no significant difference in OS based on the exon mutated (p = 0.12), 5-year OS was higher for patients with exon 4 mutations [68.8% (95% CI 0.45–0.84)] compared with those with mutations in exon 2 [45.7% (95% CI 0.40–0.51)] or exon 3 [39.1% (95% CI: 0.11–0.68)]. Patients with NRAS mutant tumors also had worse OS compared with NRAS wild-type patients (median 50.9 vs. 73.3 months, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

NRAS and KRAS exon 3/4 mutations are present in a minority of mCRC patients. Patients with exon 4 mutant tumors may have a more favorable prognosis, although the difference in oncologic outcomes based on mutated exon appears to be smaller than previously reported.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kemeny N, Kurilova I, Li J, Camacho JC, Sofocleous CT. Liver-directed and systemic therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(9):1240–54.PubMedCrossRef Kemeny N, Kurilova I, Li J, Camacho JC, Sofocleous CT. Liver-directed and systemic therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(9):1240–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery 2018;163(6):1238–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery 2018;163(6):1238–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Buisman FE, Galjart B, van der Stok EP, et al. The impact of hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy on hepatic recurrences and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2019. Buisman FE, Galjart B, van der Stok EP, et al. The impact of hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy on hepatic recurrences and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2019.
6.
go back to reference Groot Koerkamp B, Sadot E, Kemeny NE, et al. Perioperative hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy is associated with longer survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(17):1938–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Groot Koerkamp B, Sadot E, Kemeny NE, et al. Perioperative hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy is associated with longer survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(17):1938–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pollock CB, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, Kolch W, Dhillon AS. Oncogenic K-RAS is required to maintain changes in cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and motility in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1244–50.PubMedCrossRef Pollock CB, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, Kolch W, Dhillon AS. Oncogenic K-RAS is required to maintain changes in cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and motility in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1244–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pawlak G, Helfman DM. Cytoskeletal changes in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef Pawlak G, Helfman DM. Cytoskeletal changes in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Campbell PM, Der CJ. Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14(2):105–14.PubMedCrossRef Campbell PM, Der CJ. Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14(2):105–14.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1077–85.PubMedCrossRef Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1077–85.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lan YT, Jen-Kou L, Lin CH, et al. Mutations in the RAS and PI3K pathways are associated with metastatic location in colorectal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):905–10.PubMedCrossRef Lan YT, Jen-Kou L, Lin CH, et al. Mutations in the RAS and PI3K pathways are associated with metastatic location in colorectal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):905–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486(7404):532–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486(7404):532–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Odisio BC, Yamashita S, Huang SY, et al. Impact of prior hepatectomy history on local tumor progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):395–403 e391.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Odisio BC, Yamashita S, Huang SY, et al. Impact of prior hepatectomy history on local tumor progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):395–403 e391.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17.PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cercek A, Braghiroli MI, Chou JF, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancers harboring NRAS mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4753–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cercek A, Braghiroli MI, Chou JF, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancers harboring NRAS mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4753–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Summers MG, Smith CG, Maughan TS, Kaplan R, Escott-Price V, Cheadle JP. BRAF and NRAS Locus-specific variants have different outcomes on survival to colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2742–9.PubMedCrossRef Summers MG, Smith CG, Maughan TS, Kaplan R, Escott-Price V, Cheadle JP. BRAF and NRAS Locus-specific variants have different outcomes on survival to colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2742–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Frankel TL, Vakiani E, Nathan H, et al. Mutation location on the RAS oncogene affects pathologic features and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2017;123(4):568–75.PubMedCrossRef Frankel TL, Vakiani E, Nathan H, et al. Mutation location on the RAS oncogene affects pathologic features and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2017;123(4):568–75.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Janakiraman M, Vakiani E, Zeng Z, et al. Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(14):5901–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Janakiraman M, Vakiani E, Zeng Z, et al. Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(14):5901–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, Salatiello M, et al. Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist’s perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(10):940–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, Salatiello M, et al. Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist’s perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(10):940–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vakiani E, Janakiraman M, Shen R, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(24):2956–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vakiani E, Janakiraman M, Shen R, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(24):2956–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chandramohan RS, O Reilly C, Ladanyi M, Borsu L. MSK-AmpliSeq: a custom 94 gene AmpliSeq cancer panel with a custom paired tumor-normal analysis pipeline results in improved sensitivity and specificity. J Mol Diag 2015;17(6):814. Chandramohan RS, O Reilly C, Ladanyi M, Borsu L. MSK-AmpliSeq: a custom 94 gene AmpliSeq cancer panel with a custom paired tumor-normal analysis pipeline results in improved sensitivity and specificity. J Mol Diag 2015;17(6):814.
24.
go back to reference Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1:1–6. Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1:1–6.
25.
go back to reference Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5.PubMedCrossRef Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Karagkounis G, Torbenson MS, Daniel HD, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013;119(23):4137–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Karagkounis G, Torbenson MS, Daniel HD, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013;119(23):4137–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Xie MZ, Li JL, Cai ZM, Li KZ, Hu BL. Impact of primary colorectal cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xie MZ, Li JL, Cai ZM, Li KZ, Hu BL. Impact of primary colorectal cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baran B, Mert Ozupek N, Yerli Tetik N, Acar E, Bekcioglu O, Baskin Y. Difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterology Res. 2018;11(4):264–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baran B, Mert Ozupek N, Yerli Tetik N, Acar E, Bekcioglu O, Baskin Y. Difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterology Res. 2018;11(4):264–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Span M, Moerkerk PT, De Goeij AF, Arends JW. A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRef Span M, Moerkerk PT, De Goeij AF, Arends JW. A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):619–626; discussion 626–7.PubMedCrossRef Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):619–626; discussion 626–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kemeny NE, Chou JF, Capanu M, et al. KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3965–3971.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kemeny NE, Chou JF, Capanu M, et al. KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3965–3971.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2103–2114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2103–2114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90.PubMedCrossRef Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wang Y, Velho S, Vakiani E, et al. Mutant N-RAS protects colorectal cancer cells from stress-induced apoptosis and contributes to cancer development and progression. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(3):294–307.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Velho S, Vakiani E, et al. Mutant N-RAS protects colorectal cancer cells from stress-induced apoptosis and contributes to cancer development and progression. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(3):294–307.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association of RAS Mutation Location and Oncologic Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
Authors
Lily V. Saadat, MD
Thomas Boerner, MD
Debra A. Goldman, MS
Mithat Gonen, PhD
Timothy L. Frankel, MD
Efsevia Vakiani, MD, PhD
T. Peter Kingham, MD
William R. Jarnagin, MD
Alice C. Wei, MD
Kevin C. Soares, MD
David B. Solit, MD
Michael I. D’Angelica, MD
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Metastasis
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08862-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021 Go to the issue