Published in:
01-12-2020 | Surgery | Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
What Drives High Costs of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC: Patient, Provider or Tumor?
Authors:
Patrick B. Schwartz, MD, Christopher C. Stahl, MD, Kara A. Vande Walle, MD, Courtney J. Pokrzywa, MD, Linda M. Cherney Stafford, MPH, Taylor Aiken, MD, James Barrett, MD, Alexandra W. Acher, MD, Glen Leverson, PhD, Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly, MD, Sharon M. Weber, MD, Daniel E. Abbott, MD
Published in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Issue 13/2020
Login to get access
Abstract
Introduction
Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is utilized for peritoneal malignancies and is associated with significant resource use. To address potentially modifiable factors contributing to excessive cost, we sought to determine predictors of high cost of care for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.
Methods
An institutional CRS/HIPEC database was queried for adult patients from 2014 to 2018. Cost was defined as cost for the index hospitalization, and high-cost cases were defined as > 75th percentile for cost. Bivariate analyses for cost were performed, and all significant tumor, patient, and surgeon-specific variables were entered in a linear regression for cost. A separate linear regression was performed for length of stay (LOS).
Results
In total, 59 patients underwent 61 CRS/HIPEC procedures. The median direct variable cost was $20,509 (16,395–25,240). Median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (7–11.5) days and ICU stay was 1 (1–1.5) day. LOS, length of ICU stay and operative time were predictive of cost. Factors associated with increased LOS were Clavien-Dindo grade II complications and ostomy creation. Patient-related factors, including age and BMI, tumor-related factors, such as PCI and CCR, and surgeon were not predictive of cost nor LOS.
Discussion
Our results, the first to identify predictors of high cost of CRS/HIPEC-related care in the US, reveal cost was largely related to length and intensity of care. In turn, these drivers were influenced by complications and operative factors. Future work will focus on identifying an appropriate ERAS protocol following CRS/HIPEC and selection of those patients that may avoid routine ICU admission.